Return to: Home | Blogs | Sian Berry

Nails in Labour's coffin

Ruth Kelly has revealed another backroom farce surrounding the introduction of Home Information Packs

As the government tries again to drag us back into the bad old days of nuclear power, this isn’t the only nail in the coffin of Labour’s environmental credentials.

There have been several recently, with almost every department lining up to demonstrate its incompetence at organising and running effective green policies. The ongoing debacle of the DTI’s chronically under-funded, currently suspended, and what seems like deliberately badly planned, Low Carbon Buildings Programme (which is supposed to help householders generate their own green electricity) is now a classic example of this tendency.

On Tuesday, Communities and Local Government Secretary Ruth Kelly revealed another backroom farce surrounding the introduction of Home Information Packs. These have been delayed now from June until August – and will only then apply to houses with four or more bedrooms.

The scheme has been managed in the worst way possible. Revealing the waste of a golden opportunity to create a new, skilled, green workforce, Kelly confessed that less than a quarter of the necessary inspectors had been trained to complete energy surveys for the packs. Those that have qualified were gearing up to start work in a few days time but now face unemployment until August, and even then an uncertain workload as no new timetable has been set for expanding the scope of HIPs.

There is no excuse for this kind of mismanagement. The HIP isn’t something the government thought up last year and decided to rush through. The energy component of the packs is an essential part of compliance with the EU’s Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, and they have had plenty of notice of this. With no firm plans for compliance now in existence, it looks like this will be another environmental Directive to add to the list of those the UK has failed to implement properly, including those on waste and air quality, among others.

When Labour came into power ten years ago, they promised to ‘make every department a green department’. Instead we have seen green policies jettisoned, left on the shelf or just plain undermined by almost every minister who gets the chance. Part of the reason that so-called Environment Secretary David Miliband is so ineffective must be that he and his ministry have little influence on – or even knowledge of – the chaos being wreaked by other departments in areas that should be within his remit.

As we watch our carbon emissions rising every year, the DTI demolishing our hopes for a green energy future, and the CLG department ditching policies to reduce the footprint of our homes, Defra seems largely confined to funding ‘communications initiatives’ around climate change and encouraging councils to spy on our wheelie bins. I suspect that only when we get an Environment department with real teeth – or better still, real Greens in government – will we see any improvement.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

mariella
29 May 2007 at 11:05

Surprise surprise, the Government has wimped out on HIPs. When will they show some real bottle? It seems local authorities are doing a better job of showing the environmental impact of housing - Haringey in London has a website which shows the amount of heat being lost from every house in the borough.

Simon Birkett
29 May 2007 at 22:03

Dear Sian

You are right to highlight the importance of compliance as part of any credible legislative framework to protect the environment.

The Campaign for Clean Air in London wrote recently to Commissioner Dimas urging that the European Commission ask the European Court of Justice to commence enforcement action against the countries that breached European Union (EU) legal limits for air quality in 2005 including the UK. In fact, the UK breached EU legal limits for particulate matter (so called PM10) in 2005, 2006 and has already done so in respect of 2007. No derogations are allowed.

In our letter to Commissioner Dimas, we ended by saying “Respectfully, if the European Commission does not act in the way we are requesting it will raise serious questions about the likelihood of any EU enforcement related to air pollution whether for air quality, for carbon dioxide (CO2) emission targets for cars or in respect of climate change. Please set an example now in respect of air quality that will reassure European citizens about their future.”

Separately, we wrote to Mr Miliband with our response to the consultation on the draft Climate Change Bill. We support fully the need to have Climate Change legislation that sets binding legal limits for CO2 within a robust, consistent and ambitious framework broadly in the form of the draft Climate Change Bill (though with Annual Budgets for CO2).

However, in the letter to Mr Miliband, we said “Does the UK want to be the first and only country to have a Climate Change Act and the only one that fails to treat air pollution holistically? Or will it adopt a very simple mechanism to include appropriate measures for air quality in the legislation, full details of which are contained in this letter, to ensure that air pollution is addressed holistically? The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recommended such an approach recently."

The Campaign for Clean Air in London urged Mr Miliband please to accept the need for enforcement action by the European Court of Justice in respect of breaches of EU legal limits for air quality and to make the minor changes we are recommending for the Climate Change Bill in order to set an example truly for the world.

Finally, we wish to acknowledge your personal commitment to "green issues" as the first of over 20 leading politicians to give their support to the Campaign for Clean Air in London. Please will you make the Mayoral race in London interesting by pledging, if you win, to deliver sustainably at least World Health Organisation recommended standards of air quality throughout the whole of London by no later than than the London 2012 Summer Olympics? In practice, these are the same as the EU legal limits that have been missed so badly in recent years with limits for nitrogen dioxide due from January 2010.

Yours sincerely

Simon Birkett

Principal Contact

Campaign for Clean Air in London

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

Berry last blog

14 July 2008 11:18

Oops we broke EU rules

19 June 2008 14:37

Boris's large fiscal hole

10 June 2008 17:03

Farewell Ken

09 May 2008 16:03

I may not actually win...

07 April 2008 10:01

The truth about Brian Paddick

28 March 2008 10:51

Vote Berry... and Livingstone!

19 March 2008 14:54

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will the next election produce a hung parliament?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker