Be a light consumer of animals
Why not try becoming veggie for a week to reduce your carbon footprint
By Sian Berry Published 21 May 2007 9:58For someone who has put a lot of effort into confounding the stereotype that Green Party members are all beardy, sandal-wearing, lentil-eating (etc. etc., insert your own favourites – the best one directed at me so far is ‘bunny-hugging’ from a caller on Radio 2), it may seem a bit odd that I have decided to give a big plug to National Vegetarian Week.
But no, not odd at all. The theme of this year’s event, run by the Vegetarian Society from this Monday to next Sunday, is how going veggie is good for the planet. And the fact is they are completely and utterly right.
Farmed cows and sheep are responsible for nearly two fifths of the total quantity of methane generated by human activity. As a greenhouse gas, methane trumps carbon dioxide many times over, so the contribution of animal farming to climate change is actually more than our entire transport system. This makes a lot of sense if you think about it. All of us eat things and most of us aren’t vegetarian, but not everyone has a car or a mini-break obsession (in fact only a tiny proportion of us globally have either).
Rearing animals also uses far more water than growing vegetarian food – thousands of litres go into making a kilogram of beef – and it uses up vast amounts of land, providing crops for food for animals for food for us. A madly inefficient way of managing the world’s resources.
What appeals to me most about the environmental argument for cutting down on meat is that it’s not an all or nothing thing. Reducing your carnivorousness is as easy as adding just a couple of new vegetable-based dishes to your repertoire, and every meal without meat helps to cut your carbon footprint. Simply bearing this in mind while you look over a menu is far less daunting than taking a pledge not to ever have a bacon sandwich again.
Nevertheless, I am going to take up the Vegetarian Society’s challenge and be completely veggie for the next week. To be honest, I’ve been a very light consumer of animals for ages – for precisely the environmental reasons listed above – and I already steer well clear of battery eggs and intensively farmed, frightened meat of all kinds.
Recently, I have unintentionally become even more virtuous, since discovering I prefer garlicky tofu to chicken in stir fries and developing a taste for a delicious recipe involving big green lentils mixed up with cabbage and drenched in vinaigrette. This latter fetish has amused my local shopkeeper, who knows all about my political work and chuckles, “Green Party, green lentils” when I go to stock up.
For myself then, with most days going by without meat touching my plate, and with the only flesh I can find in my fridge today a chunk of East European sausage, giving it up completely for a week shouldn’t be too hard. But I’d urge everyone to give it a go. Starting with a week of real vegetarianism is a great excuse to try some new things and start eating a bit more healthily – for yourself and for the planet.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















7 comments
OK, so the perfect scenario is this: meat consumption down, methane gas down, health increases and a better planet... now what of the farmers who've lost their livelihoods?
I'm not talking about the agribusinesses where they can diversify and fall back onto another section of their vast portfolios and use huge EU subsidies to invest heavily in other areas, but the farmers at the bottom of the ladder who receive so very little in the first place? Surely there needs to be a safety net to protect our genuine rural protectors and keep real salt of the earth farmers in business?
All that said I completely endorse this Vegetarian Week and look forward to the impact it may have.
Hi Paul, most of the meat I do eat (when not being 'properly veggie' as I am this week) comes from precisely those kinds of farmers. They are the ones I'd want to keep going, not the agri-corporate-animal-frighteners, anyway.
Bearing in mind the horrors of the flesh industry,i think it morally indefensible to eat it,especially in the Western world.
If flesh-eaters were made to work in a slaughterhouse,at the killing,butchery end,I wonder how many would be put off, for life?
But the same could be said for any group who has benefitted from our unsustainable economy: yes it's a shame that livelihoods will be lost, but if they had the brains and the morals, they would have got into more sustainable farming methods a long time ago.
Are we also meant to shed tears for car drivers when road charging is introduced? No. Are we meant to shed tears for holiday junkies when VAT on aviation fuel kicks in? Again, no. So sorry bad lad farmers, you're not getting my sympathy for poisoning the food chain, producing crap food, voting UKIP and mistreating nature's assets.
You are right enough about methane having a far higher greenhouse effect than CO2, but only in the short term. Methane has only a short residence time in the atmosphere (when compared to CO2) of around 20 years, since it is broken down by UV light. Consequently, any warming effects caused by methane are thought to be relatively short term 'blips' , whereas CO2 as a molecule is considerable longer-lived and is much more of a concern over longer timescales.
I have been a vegetarian for over 15 years, and I agree that it is a sensible way of reducing our carbon footprints as well as being closer to a sustainable means of sustenance than carnivorousness. Thnak you, House of Quorn!
I wonder if everyone going veggie in the west would help keep food prices down generally?
If animals reared for meat compete for land and grain, this presumably raises prices, eventually being transferred along the supply chain to grain and vegetable prices.
This probably impacts on poor people already, in the same way as bio-fuels are doing. If this is combined with the likely impact of climate change on global food prices, then eating large amounts of meat might increasingly be akin to a form of indirect cannibalism.