Registered user login:

RichardHerring

Richard Herring

Comic Richard Herring’s sideways look at politics, people and everyday life

Richard Herring Homepage

How to get a head in advertising

  • Posted by Richard Herring
  • 07 February 2008

Herring's rather radical proposals for dealing with people who work in advertising...

I have been slightly astonished by a new advert that has appeared on the tube in the last week for something called Cargiant (I won't link to their site, for fear that I might encourage anyone to go there). A smug faced man is shown (and in some versions there is a before picture of him looking miserable) and the text reads, "Chris had a long face.

The wife wanted a new family car and this had the potential to blow a huge hole in his finances, not to mention the other plans he had for his money.

A little bird told him to get down to Cargiant where he bought a quality used car that kept the wife more than happy and saved himself a tidy little sum in the process. Just enough for a wicked weekend in Paris…
… with the girlfriend, tweet tweet!"

Now clearly this is an advert which makes light of and actually celebrates marital infidelity. The fact that the punch-bag faced man's wife is looking for a family car suggests that they also have children and yet here he is trumpeting the fact that he has not only managed to shut up his nagging wife, but has also escaped his family home to spend a weekend away with his mistress, who is so light-headed and vapid that she simply tweets like the little bird that she is.

Of course advertisers aren't stupid. They are shallow and morally corrupt and if they had any decency would drown themselves in a vat of their own sorry tears (if only they were capable of emoting).

This advert has been "created" (though to talk of it being created seems like an affront to all art ever produced - to be more accurate it has been farted, and there was some follow through which clung to the underwear and it was then decided to just put those soiled pants up on the Underground walls) because they have worked out that a) it will get up the noses of people like me and thus get written about all over the place, drawing attention to Cargiant and familiarising the public with its previously unknown name and b) that the sentiments and "humour" of the advert will appeal to the target demographic of, I presume, Nuts reading men (I really don't think they're too bothered about any potential female car buyers), trapped in loveless marriages who are actually too wimpy and scared and unattractive and unappealing to have a mistress, so can live their lives vicariously through this stupid and unpleasant cock.

In fact probably the men this would appeal to aren't even married themselves and thus can worship this hero even more because he has gone two better than them and managed to find a pair of women who don't mind his slimy visage gurning above them as they rut like the syphilitic pigs that they are.

If only he looked slightly ashamed in the picture then we might be able to sympathise with him a little bit - ah poor old Chris, perhaps he married young, before he knew who he was or impregnated his girlfriend and tried to do the decent thing, but he's met someone and has fallen for on a deep and spiritual level and cannot help himself, though of course he is heartbroken that this means he is betraying his wife and kids.

I still wouldn't choose such a man to front an advertising campaign, but if he showed just a shred of remorse we could feel sorry for him. But no, the actor (presuming this isn't a true story, that Chris has willingly and arrogantly put his own face to, being too stupid and vain to realise that this means his wife will find out) has been instructed to pull the most self-satisfied face that has ever been pulled outside of Bono’s mansion.

Maybe you think that the actor should not be held culpable in this disgrace: he was only doing his job and perhaps he had no idea how his image was going to be used. But I don't think that this should excuse him. We've heard people saying "I was only following orders" before and those same people claimed to have no idea what ultimate purpose they were working towards.

If you see "Chris" in the street or on the tube (where you will have photographic evidence to confirm his identity), kick him firmly in the (almost certainly shaved) kiwi fruits. He deserves it. Or better still follow him home and then force him at gunpoint into revealing the identities of the advertisers who employed him, then, after kicking him in the kiwi fruits, go round to their converted lofts and film yourself cutting off their heads and then post the video on the internet as a warning to all the other cynical scum advertisers out there that their pathetic attempts to outrage ordinary people won't be countenanced any more.

The only downside of this that I can see is that there would be a Hell of a lot of publicity for Cargiant in the aftermath, which might raise profits for the company and thus make the life of the scum that shat out this campaign somehow worthwhile.

The best policy would, of course have been to ignore the adverts completely, as one would ignore the attention seeking antics of an unpleasant child. But it's too late for that now, as I have fallen into the trap of these grandmotherfluffers and done exactly what they wanted and you now all the name of a company you had probably never heard of before.

So all I can hope to do is create my own advertising campaign then perhaps Cargiant will go out of business and the advertising executives who fronted the campaign will be sacked and, deprived of the income to buy cocaine and wanking machines, will slit their own throats, meaning that we don't have to dirty our hands with their contagious blood.

Of course, advertisers are cleverer than me and better at advertising things and if that campaign were by some chance to become effective, they would just launch a counter campaign in which Cargiant apologised for any offence that they had caused, realising that they had over-stepped the mark, offer a discount to all mothers and get a whole new wave of publicity out of their pretend contriteness. You can't win.

Killing everyone who works in advertising (though merely kicking the genitalia of any of the actors involved as they are stupid, like lambs, rather than evil like the werewolves who employ them) is the only option. If you know anyone in advertising, please put them out of their misery. If you work in advertising then please have a cold, hard look at yourself in the mirror and if you have a shred of humanity left inside the zombie hulk that your job has made you, please head butt the mirror, take a large shard of glass and plunge it into where your heart used to be.

If you feel you are letting your clients down by committing suicide then feel free to give them one last burst of publicity by cutting their name into the lizard skin of your face first. And if you have any sense of justice you might want to slice off your kiwi fruits first (yes, even the women, they will have grown balls after a fortnight in the job) and wear them as earrings, which will at least give the other souls burning in Hell with you something to laugh about.

I am not joking.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

24 comments from readers

TAR ART RAT
07 February 2008 at 16:55

!oh nice!

TAR ART RAT
07 February 2008 at 16:57

ouch.

sammie
07 February 2008 at 23:25

Or better still follow him home and then force him at gunpoint into revealing the identities of the advertisers who employed him, then, after kicking him in the kiwi fruits, go round to their converted lofts and film yourself cutting off their heads and then post the video on the internet

i look forward to seeing this video on You Tube, it sounds like 'five stars' to me

Bingtingling
08 February 2008 at 08:39

A glorious example of how to rip off Bill Hicks.

I think you need to get back on the booze, Herring.

Richard Herring
08 February 2008 at 19:43

Maybe it is a little Bill Hicks right at the end, but I wrote it all in one sitting and the sentiments were heartfelt and the death of the advertisers seems to be the only logical course of action. And it would be awful to think that noone could point out when advertising is evil (ie always) just because Hicks did it first.

There's plenty of original thought in there and I didn't consciously copy Hicks' plea for the suicide of these people - though you're right I think he even says "I'm not joking" or something similar. But like him, I'm not joking.

Robert Powell
09 February 2008 at 11:38

Hmm Bill Hicks. Now he was talented and funny.

xl5
10 February 2008 at 09:27

Is Cargiant the source of the latest penis-enlarger - the extra-loud custom exhaust systems which are shaking the foundations of a neighbourhoold near all of us right now? Previously, you could spot a dickhead's car by the italic script on the number plates. These exhausts are now the audible version.

crowth
12 February 2008 at 11:16

I do love a nice anti-advertising rant. The more heartfelt vitriol in these matters the better. And if by some comedy grace you manage to inadvertently channel the spirit of Bill Hicks (who should be an inspiration to us all) then the never-done-jacks of this world can go fluff themselves.

Robert Powell
12 February 2008 at 12:16

Richard, do you do a lot of the posts under your blog? I just wonder because there is a certain amount of repetition and I really doubt anyone else but yourself would quote you? Rxxx

crowth
12 February 2008 at 13:50

You are quite right Robert, but not so astute. All my numerously repetitive posts are labelled 'by rich'. As I said to a friend recently: "Easy mistake to make. Everyone apart from me makes it".

crowth
12 February 2008 at 14:24

Wait... I think I got the wrong end of the stick there. It kind of makes me look like a pillock. My life is a meaningless, empty vessel of a thing, you see, bereft of significance and recognition, and I seized the first tentative sniff of acknowledgement; even it was in the form of criticism, I thought I should embrace it. My name, you see, is also Richard. And I also have my own blog, of which I'm not the sole contributor. But of course you would have been referring to Richard Herring, the superlative comedian who is best and writes this column for the New Statesman, this very website upon which we are scribbling our comments. Be assured that my apparently bloated ego is suffering self-inflicted slaps to the face at this very moment.

crowth
12 February 2008 at 17:25

I think that explains it. The method has got the best of him and if anyone has a bone to pick with Richard Herring, it's Jesus.

Michaellyncy
13 February 2008 at 09:20

I new a bloke called Robert Powell..he didn't play Jesus though.

Andrew Collins
16 February 2008 at 10:52

I hope the new editor of the New Statesman doesn't scrap all these blogs to save much-needed money. The quality of debate after them is illuminating and throught-provoking.

A reasonable man
20 February 2008 at 05:45

Well, having been away for a while Richard, I come back to the most delightful debate stirred by your advertising angst. I love the fact that it was written in one sitting. It exudes passion and its occasional repetition only enhances this. The advertising industry, like all media, is deeply flawed and irresponsible, and this needs to be pointed out often so that media workers stop believing in themselves and find more useful careers. Well done, Richard, Excellent stuff. PS Bill Hicks - opinions of him are ludicrously hyperbolic. Take no notice of any comparison. It is usually, in my opinion, the person making the comparison who is attempting merely to demonstrate some vicarious comedy cool.

Andrew Collins
20 February 2008 at 08:59

No, Bill Hicks was as brilliant as people say he was. I don't think it is hyperbole. Because he died, his legend has been inflated somewhat (especially by people lucky enough to have actually seen him live, who now feel special and want to broadcast the fact), but let that not blind us to his actual genius. I wish he wasn't dead.

Michaellyncy
21 February 2008 at 22:49

I agree, Hicks was brilliant, legends do get inflated, especially when someone has had such a great impact in such a short life - but is there really anything wrong with that?

It's more of a shame when someone has talent that isn't recognised.

However I must confess that whenever I find out about a lesser known stand-up act or TV show that I find hilarious, should it later achieve commercial success there is a part of me that laments the time when I and only a relatively small audience knew of it's brilliance. I remember when The Office was first shown on TV and no-one else seemed to watch it.

A reasonable man
23 February 2008 at 02:15

Excellent comments Andrew Collins and Michaellyncy. I wonder if I was being a trifle hyperbolic in my reaction to the mention of Bill Hicks. Although, in my defence, his genius is over- worked, as you rightly acknowledge.

Spankabuttux
24 February 2008 at 18:38

Dear Crowth,

My name is not only Richard, but Richard Hfollowed by nearly six letters, so I'm even more like Richard Herring than you. Bad luck, Richard-o!

Spankabuttux
25 February 2008 at 01:24

To Robert Powell

Why? Why are you here? Are you abnormally egocentric? You don't like Richard Herring, we get it. Do you have anything else to contribute?

sammie
25 February 2008 at 14:33

To Swanseliker

I look forward to Mr Powells little comments and his exchanges with Mr Herring. I think nothing ever gets resolved but still I find them very amusing.

Looking forward to Mr Powell comments on Mr Herrings latest blog 'no-one to blame but myself'.

The Wild One
28 February 2008 at 18:11

Could it be possible that Herring and Powell are the same person....? Arguing with one another for the readers' amusement? Other than that I can't see why someone who seemingly detestes Herring as much as he claims could be arsed writing such replies.....

It could be.....

sammie
28 February 2008 at 18:42

To The Wild One

Hmm, not sure about that one. I think it may be someone who knows him.

Hes left a comment on Richards latest blog 'no-one to blame but myself' Its not one of his best comments... but still made me smile. They should form a double act (-;

Paulus82
24 March 2008 at 11:23

Well, I work in advertising and I'm afraid we don't fall for what people tell us to do in writing, we do the dictating to other people, ie. Buy Richard Herrings hillarious new DVD from all good Bargain Bins. There's a certain oxymoron to the article, written by a comedian who's career is built on insulting hecklers [comment deleted by administrator]

Was very funny though and did sent it to my colleagues who have sufficiently thick skin to enjoy it.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Richard Herring

Richard Herring began writing and performing comedy when he was 14. His career since Oxford has included a successful partnership with Stewart Lee and his hit one-man show Talking Cock

Feeds

Recent Posts

Spirit of the Fringe? You must be joking...

  • By Richard Herring
  • 28 August 2008

Dancing in the rain

  • By Richard Herring
  • 14 August 2008

Jumping off the scaffold

  • By Richard Herring
  • 29 July 2008

Herring is getting old

  • By Richard Herring
  • 14 July 2008

Judgemental force of nerds

  • By Richard Herring
  • 30 June 2008

Signing Herring's filth

  • By Richard Herring
  • 17 June 2008

Exposing little Richard

  • By Richard Herring
  • 03 June 2008