Harman blames economic crisis for failure to oust Brown
"Leadership crisis" in middle of "economic crisis" would have been wrong
By James Macintyre Published 22 September 2010 18:38Gordon Brown could not be forced out of office during the "coup" attempt in January because of the "grave economic situation" and his determination to stay in power, Harriet Harman has said.
In an interview to be published in tomorrow's New Statesman, Harman, the acting Labour leader, is asked why she did not tell Brown to go during a one to one meeting with him during the "coup that never was", which was led by Geoff Hoon, Patricia Hewitt and Charles Clarke and exclusively revealed first by this blog. Harman replies:
There are three overriding things there. First is that the country was still in the middle of a grave economic situation and to have a leadership crisis in the middle of government, in the middle of people worrying about whether their jobs are going to go . . .So, there's a huge economic crisis. The second thing was that, because of that, there was no general view in the party that Gordon needed to be pushed out of office. And third, Gordon was very determined to take his responsibilities as prime minister seriously and see the country through the recession.
For the full version of the wide ranging interview, see the magazine out tomorrow or Newstatesman.com in due course.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















6 comments
Excuses. There never is an ideal opportunity. Just do it.
Surely the headline begs many questions in this (admittedly short) piece, and to me seems quite misleading. And Harriet's comments hardly mount up to an explanation of events and of Brown's continuation in power. One major factor must have been the credibility (or lack of) of people like Pat Hewitt and Hoon.
Should not the logic be that you sack the man responsible for the crisis?
Ed Balls I mean ...
@TrevorH wrote, "Should not the logic be that you sack the man responsible for the crisis?"
Adam Applegarth, Sir Fred Goodwin and their like had already been ousted.
Well well well, so the Labour Party, deep in the do do decides to obfuscate the truth , hide it from the general public, how very galant!
In the real world, it's no good pretending it is not raining when it is. All the workers I know just wern't that daft, if it rains , you get wet. Brown was never any good, from his over hot housed education.The biggest political failure in a coouple of decades.
I disagree with Harman, if Gordon Brown found his political feet two weeks earlier in the 2010 election, he would had a better chance to win the election!
For two weeks during the election campaign, Brown went from 'one safe house to another'!
It appeared he forgot about the rest of the voters and went to Labour Voters!
That why Brown lost the 2010 election!
Post new comment