In the background for now at least, the long and important Labour leadership battle rages on
David Miliband launches campaign against VAT rise +++ Ed Balls benefits from Question Time bounce ++
By James Macintyre Published 28 June 2010 16:33Amid the controversy surrounding the government's benefit cuts that are serving as small print for discussion following the Budget, the long-drawn-out Labour leadership contest continues to run, the other, less-noticed story in British politics today. So, time for a quick update on the three main players:
** David Miliband has launched a campaign against the increase in VAT from 17.5 per cent to 20 per cent, which the Lib Dems themselves had opposed and which even the independent Institute for Fiscal Studies has labelled "regressive". He is writing to each Lib Dem MP setting out why they should vote against the move in the Budget. Miliband has also criticised the record on schooling of successive governments -- including Labour administrations -- and called for the removal of the "obstacle course" of constant exams for students from the age of 14 onward.
** In Westminster, Ed Balls is considered to have done his campaign no harm with his feisty performance on BBC1's Question Time last week, during which he tore into the "stooge" Vince Cable over the Budget and over the reversal of critical Lib Dem policy lines -- including the position on VAT -- that had provided cover for the party. Yesterday, Balls made the running on Iain Duncan Smith's plans for reallocating the jobless, likening it to Norman Tebbit's call for the unemployed to get "on your bike".
** And Ed Miliband sets out his case for "values" over "management" in politics in a ten-minute interview for the BBC's Daily Politics. In it, he says that he is a politician of the "centre ground" but that he is in politics to "shape that centre ground from the left". Miliband notes that it wasn't just people "on the left" who were outraged at the banking crisis, for example, and claims that he could reach out beyond Labour's core vote. Incidentally, he admits to having a "geekish" background, but defends his career, which has been largely in politics. He also confirms that he and his brother, David, told each other that it would be "quite wrong" to stand in one another's way when both men decided to stand for the leadership.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















4 comments
We used to have a leader that was just as good at the clunking fist stuff that Ed Balls was doing on Question Time. His name was Gordon Brown. Look where that got us.
Enough already with the macho politics. Most people will have squirmed at the sight of Ed beating up on a frail old pensioner like Vince Cable
James Macintyre.
Did you actually read what the IFS said about the plans?
They said that the VAT rise was "slightly progressive" but that it was the cuts to benefits (which accumulate indefinitely because of the switch to a lower rate of CPI uprating) that make it regressive and that when spending cuts are included it is going to be even more regressive.
They DID NOT say VAT itself was regressive. IFS are on record many times saying exactly the opposite. I suggest you do some research.
The problem we now have, and it is a very real one for Labour, is that we have no effective team to counterpose Tory arguments until after conference.
With the best will in tghe world, our frontbench are all caretakers of their current jobs, and it shows.
Yes this is the honeymoon period, but for christs sake up the energy levels! People are already being hurt by this bunch of gits.
OK defeat did hurt. But the Party, and contenders, are getting over it.
Great to see the Coaltion attempting to come to terms with their new briefs. Caught a bit of Home Office questions on Parliament TV and saw the New Ministers making the same old fudge as the previous Labour Ministers. Plus ca change. Perhaps the Coalition will learn the responsibilities of practical Govt and not be so arrogant in future.