Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

Exclusive: Douglas Alexander makes direct call for Lib Dems to lend their vote to Labour

Labour’s campaign co-ordinator joins Andrew Adonis in warning that a split in progressive ranks would usher the Tories into No.10.

Labour's national election co-ordinator, Douglas Alexander, has made a direct call for Liberal Democrats to lend their votes to Labour in marginal seats being fought over by Labour and the Conservatives.

Echoing the appeal at the beginning of the campaign by Andrew Adonis in the Independent, Alexander warns "progressive" voters who are disillusioned with the government that they would be "horrified if they woke up on 7 May and realised that their vote for the Lib Dems contributed to Cameron standing on the steps of Downing Street".

This contest "is a moment of great peril and great possibility for progressives", Alexander says. Re-electing Labour "would lead to a fundamental crisis of the Conservative Party and on the right of British politics. It would herald a new dawn for Labour and progressive politics."

But he adds, in an interview with the New Statesman: "If, however, the centre-left vote was to be split in seat after seat, we would be looking at the very real possibility of a majority Conservative government on 7 May. That is why I am determined in the final days of the campaign that we send a clear and unequivocal message that this election will be determined in large part by what happens in about a hundred Labour-Conservative marginal seats. My direct appeal to voters in constituencies across the country would be to vote for the party that can open up politics and advance an agenda for fairness. And that party is the Labour Party."

In a direct appeal to liberal-minded voters, he says: "I know that there are voters, New Statesman readers, some of them my friends, who are angry about Iraq, anxious on Afghanistan and concerned about civil liberties. But I also know that they would be horrified if they woke up on 7 May and realised that their vote for the Lib Dems contributed to Cameron standing on the steps of Downing Street."

Alexander goes on: "I believe that to maximise Labour's vote in this election and to maximise Labour's seats after this election is the surest way to defeat the Conservative Party and to herald a new dawn for Labour and progressive politics. But the risks are real and our message is clear: If you vote Clegg, you could end up with Cameron in any Labour seat on 6 May.

"It has been clear from his public comments the hostility that Nick Clegg feels towards Labour and our leader . . . so we must send a clear and unequivocal signal that the risk is real for those voters who may have doubts or concerns about Labour but are determined to avoid a Conservative government, that if they vote Liberal Democrat in those seats, they will end up with the very real risk of having delivered the keys to Downing Street to David Cameron.

"There are many who have voted Labour in the past, who face an important decision on 6 May. My clear appeal to them would be to deny the keys of Downing Street to David Cameron and to vote Labour to ensure a progressive future for Britain."

Alexander takes a further swipe at Nick Clegg, who, Labour's campaign co-ordinator claims, has "an apparent sense of entitlement" about becoming prime minister. The International Development Secretary says: "Clegg's made a big error of judgement in spending so much time in recent days talking about his own job prospects and so little time talking about the job prospects of millions of employees, workers and voters across the country.

"The economy is central to this election, and I think people are more concerned with what happens to their family and to their future than to Nick Clegg's apparent sense of entitlement."

These are excerpts from a wide-ranging interview. More extracts, on different subjects, including the TV debates and the media, will be posted on this blog. A piece on the interview appears in the next issue of the New Statesman magazine, out on Thursday.

Trancription by Ian Smith.

Tags: Election 2010

10 comments

onlyjasper's picture

As a Labour campaigner in the Southampton seats Cameron has now decided are easy targets, I agree strongly with Laura Evans. As Polly Toynbee stressed in last Saturday's Guardian, the key issue for progressives is to vote for the most likely candidate against the Tory. (and let's hope that they're all supporting the Greens in Brighton Pavilion!)
I'm encouraging Lib-Dem supporters here to vote Labour (even if it goes against the grain) but to give whatever time they can to campaign for the Lib-Dems in neighbouring Romsey and Eastleigh, where Sandra Gidley and Chris Huhne have slim majorities. Whatever Labour's failures, no progressives will benefit from giving Cameron a working maority.
It's a pity that Douglas Alexander feels incapable of taking the sane, tactical line.

onlyjasper's picture

As a Labour campaigner in the Southampton seats which Cameron has now decided are easy targets, I agree strongly with Laura Evans.
Polly Toynbee's article in last Saturday's Guardian made the case for all progressives to support the most likely anti-Tory candidate (and I hope they will all rally to the Greens in Brighton Pavilion!)
Here, with two left-wing Labour MPS, I'm urging people inlined to the Lib-Dem cause to vote Labour, even if it goes against the grain, but to use their energies campaigning for Sandra Gidley and Chris Huhne in neighbouring Romsey and Eastleigh, both with tiny majorities. If I lived in the areas of this city covered by their constituencies, I would not only be voting Lib-Dem, I'd also be out there campaigning for them.
It's a pity that Douglas Alexander can't find the nerve to encourage the anti-Tory vote, under whatever colours.

liverpool's picture

A good call by Douglas Alexander to push the Labour message...

Somewhat confused by onlyjasper advocating a vote for the two Labour MPs in Southampton 'because they're left-wing' but not supporting Nancy Platts in Brighton who is far more progressive than either Denham or Whitehead.

And remember on the 'tactical voting', Clegg and even the Lib Dems left-wing are willing to consider a deal with the Tories, throwing their own progressive credentials into doubt.

But those who want a Lib-Lab coalition, remember Clegg's unwillingness to deal with Labour if it comes third. This just confirms Labour voters everywhere need to vote Labour to give the party the highest possible vote and make the deal with the LibDems more likely.

Mrs Laura Evans's picture

Why should we use our vote to prop up Labour?
Shouldn't labour voters be persuaded to vote Lob Dem to keep the Conservatives out?
As far as I can tell, Nick Clegg has said very little, if nothing at all about his Prime Ministerial prospects.
What utter nonsense!

Bill Kristol-Balls's picture

Oi, Alexander. Nooooooo

You've had 13 years to bring in even the most basic change to the electoral system of AV which would have prevented you from having to make this grovelling appeal.

You didn't do it.

Play fair Dougie. If you're calling on Lib Dems to back Labour in Lab / Tory marginals then tell your supporters to vote Lib Dem in their Tory marginals.

It's a matter of sheer bloody common sense that if Brown leads Labour to your worst result since 1918 he shouldn't carry on. Don't stress though, I'm sure Prime Minister Clegg will find a job for you.

Robert's picture

Well, Bill, Mr Clegg hasn't started rowing back on his intention to automatically side with Cameron if the Labour vote collapses, has he?

Even if it's happened because we are voting LD tactically?

Mr Clegg seems to be kissing goodbye to gaining Cambridgeshire South East with that attitude.

Bill Kristol-Balls's picture

Clegg's going to lead a coalition of the willing whilst the other 2 parties tear themselves apart.

I hear Lord Ashcroft has ordered his private jet to be fueled and ready to take Cameron to an undisclosed location, far away from the baying Tory mob if he doesn't get a working majority on May 7th.

AliPea's picture

Clegg is not going to win. The current system (and a reality check) make this a foregone conclusion.

Instead, those swept away with Cleggmania who vote with their heart rather than their head on May 6th increase the chances of Smug-eron and his dubious pals getting their greasy mitts in the door.

Hello massive levels of inequality! And goodbye any chance of electoral reform that prevents us ever being in this position again.

Keep the Tories out.

Boudicca's picture

This is the LibDems best opportunity in 80 years to replace Labour as the alternative Party of Government. On current polling, Labour is going to come third in the number of votes cast.

Now why on earth would LibDems support Labour and lose a once in 3 generations opportunity like this. I could understand it (almost) if the Tories had another Thatcher who they thought must be beaten at any price - but the Tories haven't. They've got nice, liberal (with a small l) one-nation Cameron.

Or there's grumpy, dithering, bullying Brown - and a new supply of Nokias. Hmmmmmmmmm!

joetheplumber's picture

Cameron might be a rabid reactionary whose true blue family values are those of a Bullingdon stalwart. But to project Labour as a progressive party, as Adonis does, is utterly cynical and dishonest. Like democracy, progressive politics died with Blair ten years ago.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets