Should a campaign revolve around a leader?

Parties' home pages make interesting viewing.

A quick click on the three main parties' websites, during what is still in effect the calm before the storm, makes for a noteworthy contrast.

The Conservatives go for one major "story" next to a big picture of a determined-looking David Cameron.

The Lib Dems go for an even bigger picture of Nick Clegg.

But Labour's site is an altogether more mixed affair, with more text than pictures, and images of anyone who has "posted" in recent hours, from Jack Straw to Douglas Alexander to Peter Mandelson. It also has Tony Blair's Trimdon speech prominently displayed on the home page.

Some would say that the party is trying to "hide" Gordon Brown, who appeared with the cabinet outside Downing Street to call the election yesterday. But it could also be said that, by relying on their young leaders so heavily instead of presenting a full team, the Tories and the Lib Dems are taking a risk.

5 comments

coops's picture

i guess it depends whether your leader is an unpopular weirdo or not?

beak's picture

The more Browns face appears anywhere the more people dislike him. With a face/personality like that Labour are left with little choice.

Desperate's picture

This has to be the single most mundane point I've read over the course of the last 48 hours. Normally I think your writing is poorly constructed and ill thought out however I must confess that this registers worse. It's simply boring.

James4's picture

Thanks for your comments "Desperate", whoever you are. Do feel free not to read me. James

Primus Inter Pares's picture

The office of the prime minister is supposed to be "first amongst equals" so Labour are doing it by the book in this celebrity obsessed nation.

The reason that David Cameron is going solo is that he is the only one that is releatively "normal" in a hotchpotch bunch of weirdos!Even George Osborne is more hated than Broon and thats no mean feat.

Lib Dems cos they dont have that many MPs

Latest tweets