The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Romney says 47% of US voters are "dependent" and will never vote for him

Secret video reveals Republican candidate describing 47% of voters as "victims" who will always vote for Obama.

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney.
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said 47% of US voters "believe that they are victims". Photograph: Getty Images.

If you're running for president of the United States, it's advisable not to dismiss 47% of the electorate as scroungers who will never vote for you, especially if you're a multi-millionaire who paid just 13.9% in tax in 2010. But that's exactly what Mitt Romney has done. Mother Jones has just released a secretely recorded video in which the Republican candidate is shown telling a private donor dinner that 47% of US voters are "dependent upon government" and will vote for Obama "no matter what".

Asked by one donor how he could win in November, Romney replied:

There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what…These are people who pay no income tax ... [M]y job is is not to worry about those people. I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives.

It's compassionless conservatism in its purest form.

You might reasonably argue that those offended probably wouldn't vote for Romney anyway (one often hears this sort of rhetoric from the Tea Party) and, therefore, that the tactless Republican had a point. But it's likely that the video will alienate many of the floating voters he needs to win over if he's to catch Obama in the polls, while also motivating disillusioned Democrats to vote. Among those who pay no income tax, for instance, are millions of pensioners (the most likely group to vote), whom one assumes won't take kindly to being described as "victims" and dependents, as well as students and the disabled, none of whom can be described as scroungers. At a time of economic stagnation, it's also unwise to imply that the unemployed, many of whom will have paid tax in the past (often at a higher rate than Romney), simply chose not to work.

With some success, the Democrats have portrayed Romney as a candidate with little concern for anyone but the wealthy - now they have all the proof they require. Worse, the video suggests he is an insincere man who says one thing in public and another behind closed doors, a fatal impression for any politician to create.

Here's how the Obama campaign responded tonight:

It’s shocking that a candidate for President of the United States would go behind closed doors and declare to a group of wealthy donors that half the American people view themselves as ‘victims,’ entitled to handouts, and are unwilling to take ‘personal responsibility’ for their lives. It’s hard to serve as president for all Americans when you’ve disdainfully written off half the nation.

Update: Mother Jones has just released another secret Romney video, this time featuring a series of ill-advised comments from the "former presidential hopeful" on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Asked by one donor how the "Palestinian problem" could be solved, Romney replied that the Palestinians had "no interest whatsoever in establishing peace, and that the pathway to peace is almost unthinkable to accomplish". He added: "I look at the Palestinians not wanting to see peace anyway, for political purposes, committed to the destruction and elimination of Israel, and these thorny issues, and I say there's just no way."

29 comments

Kekpeeste's picture

PhrpLCAE tzlmFCYva xirgpluivp CJSrAjeme zurevj GwtZTRWGrhw BhlrRKAG csdtCDVoo YbffVBVD almrGQHqd

anaentemo's picture

IjcjZHQK mzhrOIXjj fzzgbxjcug UGXrKqodf ssoztp UipLGHWQxro HtqhNZFK etgfUXIug QfzjGLTC xecwZVTtk

syclitoutty's picture

IjgqSEXB eytrGGLxl izcdqgefct NKJoVxhtb aonqum LovNIOAQwfh WkyjYRCO itohYFSek AgwmMCMZ erybJVKjr

signalfire's picture

Actually, the 77K business expense tax deduction Romney's accountants tried to take was disallowed by the IRS.

If all the 47%'ers have to start riding horses because we can't afford cars anymore, I wonder if that will be disallowed also.

Romney is a scam artist and a sociopath; he thinks being a 'businessman' is the same as taking over companies and skimming the money off the top, telling them how many people they have to fire now as a saving-measure, and walking away.

What do you think he'll do to the US government? Skim off a lot of money for himself and his pals (the same ones who gave him HALF A BILLION DOLLARS to win the presidency) and then he'll decamp overseas in some tropical paradise, away from the angry mobs and guillotines.

mandy campbell's picture

Why are American liberals so uninformed. If you are going to vote for Mr Obama again please research what you are actually voting for. I live in the UK and Mr Obamas policies are heading toward out economic model. Believe me this is not working for us and it will not work for you. I believe Mr Obama will drastically increase everyones taxes in his second term to fund the unemployed and social healthcare like in the UK. The prblem with this is unless the MAJORITY of your population is working there will never be enough revenue coming in to pay for your uemplyed and healthcare. Normal working people pay 35% tax and national insurance if you make under £36k and 51% o income over £40k. This is non negotiable and is taken automatically off your wages. This is what will happen in the US. The bigger danger to Americans is that your country is vastly bigger than the UK and the economic crater will develop much quicker than any other socialist country. I believe that if Mr Obama is elected a second time America will be bankrupt by the end of his term. I think there is a big decision to make in the US election this year, re-elect a popluar president who will bankrupt your coutry or put aside your personal feelings for Mr Romney who has the same plan that most British people are shouting for our idiot prime minister to adopt. You just cannot justify killing your coutrys economy and the future of your families over personal jealousy for a man who has been sucessful, I fail to understad this logic. Do you not see that the Obamas are a laughing stock everywhere else in the world or are you just brainwashed by your terribly biased media and left wing rich celebrities that will get a rude awakening when Mr Obama comes after their wealth also in his second term. As for Romneys 47% quote, he is more or less on the money with that one, why is the truth so unpalatable for democrats? I thought most people would prefer a truthful president with itergrity than the current one who will lie at the drop of a hat to remain in power and costs stupid people like you $1.4 BILLION dollars a year for their upkeep. Even our uselss royals cost a fraction of that. Obamas laughing his arse off at you.

jankaas's picture

oh dear. radio silence from 'Mandy' to the simplest of questioning. another sock puppet put in its rightful place then...yawn.

Des Demona's picture

Ohhhh Mandy
When you came in you gave without thinking

Thanks Barry Manilow!

Blimey talk about ill informed. ''I believe'' ''Believe me''
Not much of an argument.

'This is non negotiable and is taken automatically off your wages. This is what will happen in the US''
What? They will have to pay taxes? If you're talking about the quantum then the 2012 income tax rate in the US for earners between $70,000 and $108,000 is 28% add on social security tax at 4.2% and medicare tax at 1.45% and then State taxes ranging from 1 to 16% and you can see that the tax regimes for the working stiff are pretty similar.
It's only the rich who can get away with paying a nut and a bun in taxes on their millions. Funny that.

John Cheese's picture

On the money Mandy... and ignore Jankass, he's an unhappy ignorant euro troll...

jankaas's picture

"I believe that if Mr Obama is elected a second time America will be bankrupt by the end of his term."

is the most stupid of your bizarre fantasies in a long list of bizarre fantasies. go on then Mandy, define the parameters that would constitute a bankrupt USA.

AAMVN's picture

I just watched 'Bob Roberts' again - should be required viewing for all voters in the run up to any US election....Romney is just like the title character - only minus the charisma.

I know the economy is supposed to be what US voters care most about - but really it's quite good compared to when Obama took office and none of the problems can be attributed to his policies. Nada. Zilch. Even Romney knows this, hence the vagueness endemic to his gaffe strewn campaign.

I'm not blind to Obama's faults and failings. Far from it. But Romney would be a total nightmare in comparison. Politics is always a choice between bad and worse. This time it's bad or far far worse.

Depsite all Romney's buffoonary and outright lack of any credible plans for the future this election is still far more in the balance than it should be. Huge - and I mean huge - campaign funds have been amassed by the Romney campaign and are ready to swamp the airwaves in critical swing states with all kinds of lies and negative advertising.

Indu Pendent's picture

What a Wazzock
(George, I mean Romney)

98% of UK people are dependent on the State. Thats why we have one.

The American dream is just that: buying a lifestyle running up enormous $10Tn state debts on borrow and spend (tax cut) fiscal stimulus policies that have ruined their economy (cf China).

The UK's path is to do what we do better then anyone: be creative, innovative and get our heads down, graft for our kids and expect only what we earn.

Colin Sloss  's picture

Incredible! Mitt, they are all up the canal, unfortunately you want them to vote for you.

John Cheese's picture

The "handout" party can't handle the truth. Obama/Dems do cater to the entitlement groups, including welfare queens, EBT thieves & the overpaid unions- look at Chicago & the striking teachers holding tantrums for a 17% pay increase. Avg salary $71,000. Please... 95% of blacks voted for Obama- is that racist? Maybe. Not a story though. Why? Contrast this "hidden sleazy" video to the non-story of Obama's accidental off-mic "I'll have more flexibility after the election" statement to Russia's Medvedev. Crickets. Ho-hum...Where's Obama's college transcripts? Any of them.

Ravinder Nath Dhar's picture

Whatever Mitt Romney has said gives an indication that he is very honest in expressing his views and does not live in an illusion.USA presently needs such practical persons. I think, if Romney becomes president, US will come out of the present economic mess.

mandy campbell's picture

I think you are right on the money. I am embarassed by this "love affair" with the Obamas. If they get a second term America will be bankrupt by the end of it. I beleive the current administration will be shown to be the most corrupt in US history.

Graig Eaton's picture

Does Mutt Rowney include himself in this 47% after all he has pocketed some of the bail out money?

jankaas's picture

this article fails to highlight a most salient point regarding this 47% of the electorate; a large number of them were created by GW Bush when he took many low/middle income families out of income tax.

Bush said in 1999 he would; "completely eliminate taxes for a four-person family earning $35,000."

he did just that, and here we have Romney complaining about those same people. you could not make this shit up......

Hikaru22's picture

In the light of his remarks, I think that Romney needs to revise upwards his figure for the percentage of voters who will "never vote for him".

hugh markey's picture

Oops! The Great Communicator - no way.

Ronnie Reagan
(J**Z*, did I imagine it?)

Lucidus's picture

As one Tweeter put it,

"Mitt Romney's campaign is so dead the Mormons just baptized it."

chris.levin2's picture

God I hope those 47% really all vote for Obama. Then he would win all the southern red states which all have staggering number of those 47% people: seniors, low income people, military personnel.

Mitt is shooting blind now.

AAMVN's picture

It's really hard to see what Mitt the Twit is really trying to do here. It is just bone dumb Bush level stupidity? Does he not really want to be president and is just going through the charade for some unknown reason? Perhaps it's just that incredible arrogance of the wealth made man who thinks because he's been entitled to everything else he ever wanted - her can be president too because of who he knows and how much money he can bring to the table.

Mark, Labour Party Member's picture

@Laura Lee - great post!!

Laura Lee's picture

There was a study I read while I was writing my last non-fiction book, I don't have it in front of me to cite, but it said that the more social advantage a person has, the more likely he is to discount the contributions of others to his success and to view himself as self-made. In other words, if you are born into a wealthy and politically connected family, you take it for granted that this is the way things are, and you focus on what efforts you had to make without really taking into account that you are not starting at the same place as the guy who grows up in a poor neighborhood. When you think about it, if you've never actually had to struggle, you don't have any perspective on how much work it actually is to "pull yourself up by your bootstraps." If you've never had to go hungry, you can't fully understand how that might affect your ability to learn. If you have never had to worry about affording a suit for a job interview, you discount the idea that this would be a barrier. I happen to think that paying teachers and firefighters and police collectively for the benefit of everyone is the most practical way to do it. I also think laying them off is not job creation. Maybe that makes me a lazy victim. I need to read a bit more Ayn Rand.

Barrie J's picture

Succint and to the point.
Well written, can we have some more?

Gareth's picture

Clinton put it well in his speech to the Democratic Convention: "every politician wants you to believe he was born in a log cabin he built himself, but it ain't so."

Herbert's picture

First class post. I wish you were writing some NS pieces.

Deena Larsen's picture

This from someone who won't even tell us about his OWN tax returns???

If you drive on our roads, eat food, drink water, you are depending on the government. Without the infrastructure from the government, we would be like Ethopia, Bangladesh, other poor countries.

So, Mitt, I think you should simply diss 100 percent of Americans as whiners who depend on the government--and count yourself the biggest whiner of them all.

chas holman's picture

"There are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it."

This, from a man who got $70,000 Government tax break last year for his pet horse.

Latest tweets