The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

The pressure builds on Gove to act over the GCSE scandal

Exam regulator Ofqual ordered exam board Edexcel to move GCSE English grade boundaries.

Education Secretary Michael Gove. Photograph: Getty Images.
Education Secretary Michael Gove arrives at the Leveson inquiry earlier this year. Photograph: Getty Images.

The revelation that the exam regulator Ofqual, contrary to its previous insistences, ordered exam board Edexcel to alter its GCSE English grades boundaries just two weeks before results were published has intensified the controversy around the papers. Until now, Ofqual has maintained that exam boards set June's grade boundaries (which were harsher than those used in January) "using their best professional judgement". But, thanks to the leaked letters obtained by the Times Educational Supplement, we now know that it ordered at least one to adopt new boundaries in order to bring down the number of C grades awarded. Glenys Stacey, Ofqual's chief regulator, will answer questions from MPs on the education select committee at 9:30am this morning, with Michael Gove due to appear tomorrow.

And it's Gove that Labour is concentrating its fire on this morning, urging him to order an independent inquiry into the affair. The unspoken suspicion is that the Education Secretary leant on Ofqual to intervene. In a letter to Gove before the results were published, the regulator warned that a crackdown on "grade inflation" would make it "harder for any genuine increases in the performance of students to be fully reflected in the results."

Meanwhile, the decision of Welsh education minister Leighton Andrews to order Welsh pupils' papers to be regraded has made Gove's refusal to act all the more conspicuous. Gove has previously argued that the fiasco simply reinforces "the case for reform" - modules and units should be scrapped and GCSEs replaced with new O-level style exams. But that will be of little to comfort to those English pupils who saw their papers marked more harshly than those sat in January. Until the Education Secretary acts to correct this injustice, he will rightly be accused of complacency.

4 comments

john woods's picture

When are the NS hacks gonna get it through their thick skulls that the only scandal here is the way the educational establishment has tried to cover up it's failure for two decades by a process of grade inflation and dumbing down the curric? Gove is right to blow the whistle - finally.

Charles grubmeyer's picture

It is?

Dominic Rae's picture

Should we not be worrying about a man devaluing the current grading system who is also looking to push through education reforms of his own?

It would be a lot easier to prove a new system more effective if you're comparing to an old system that you've made to fail.

Gareth's picture

Yes. There's a similar concern behind the retrospective introduction of the EBac qualification. In its "first year" only 22% of pupils had chosen a combination of qualifications from which they could gain an EBac, with 16% ultimately achieving one. It's not difficult to see that as schools narrow the choice of subjects offered to pupils, the proportion of students attaining an EBac will increase dramatically, without necessarily any corresponding change in teaching quality.

But then, a government which appears so adverse to genuine evidence-based policy making needs to find its justifications from somewhere.

Latest tweets