Alexander struggles to charm as he signs up for more welfare cuts
The man "more right-wing" than George Osborne received a muted response from Lib Dem delegates.
By George Eaton Published 25 September 2012 13:50
After Vince Cable's deft performance yesterday, Danny Alexander's speech to the Liberal Democrat conference fell rather flat. "Fellow plebs," he began, offering an inferior version of the most memorable line from the Business Secretary's address.
Having been described by one of his party's activists as "more right-wing" than George Osborne, Alexander was on a mission to prove that "it is not impossible to be a Liberal Democrat in the Treasury". So he hailed the progress the coalition had made towards an income tax threshold of £10,000 (adding that the Lib Dems would seek to raise it to £12,500 after the next election), trumpeted the increase in capital gains tax, and, sounding like the world's least terrifying super hero, warned tax dodgers: "we are coming to get you and you will pay your fair share". All of this was politely and even enthusiastically received, but it couldn't compensate for the jarring notes elsewhere.
While he vowed to continue to push for some form of wealth tax, he also signalled that the Lib Dems would have to sign up to further welfare cuts in 2015-16. "At £220bn, welfare is one third of all public spending - and despite our painful reforms it is still rising. We will have to look at it," he said.
Elsewhere, he unwisely mocked Ed Miliband's theme of "predistribution", an idea of considerable appeal to Lib Dem activists. "Apparently it means spending money you don’t have, without knowing where that money is going to come from in the future," he inaccurately surmised. Predictably, it failed to raise so much as a smile from the conference floor.
Offering an even more robust endorsement of George Osborne's strategy than Cable, Alexander erroneously suggested that Britain's record low borrowing rates were the result of the coalition's deficit reduction programme. Yet, as he must surely know, they owe more to the Bank of England's quantitative easing programme (which has seen it buy up hundreds of billions of UK gilts) and our non-membership of the euro (the US, in spite of the loss of its AAA rating, has seen its interest rates fall for the same reason).
Alexander declared that this hard-won "credibility" meant the UK could now afford to guarantee a series of grand projets, offering the example of Crossrail. But with the country already mired in a double-dip recession and unemployment forecast to rise next year, delegates will ask why it took the coalition so long to adopt anything resembling a growth strategy.
One political point worth noting is how little Alexander did to reach out to Labour. He referred twice to "the mess" the party left and joked hopefully that Cable won't have received a "congratulatory text message from Ed Miliband" after his speech (ironically, it was Cable who texted Miliband after the Labour leader's speech last year). The abiding impression was that, in contrast to Cable, he is far more comfortable working with the Tories than Labour. It's one reason why the party faithful struggled to warm to him today.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















13 comments
I know this is unkind but Harriet Harman got it absolutely right when she described Alexander as "the ginger rodent". The man is loathsome. He lacks not just any charisma but competence. He really ought to go back to managing PR for Cairngorm's national park - if they would have him.
Tories needed this imposed hardship on us so that they could clean us out. Lib Dems provided that to a non elected party. In my book it makes them worse than Tories.
Agree with Kenelmist. Many people in low paid part time work didn't earn enough to pay tax in the first place and increasing the threshold did nothing for them. And the same Lib Dems claiming to be friends of the poor were happy to let their Tory pals push through a big real tax cut for their wealthy friends. Lesson learned: I'll never trust a Lib Dem politician again. I know many people who voted for them tactically in 2010 to keep a Tory out and ended up with a Tory government anyway. I hope that Labour make it a priority at the next election to have Alexander removed from his seat. It would be a very symbolic target ala Portillo or Neil Hamilton.
Didn't Vince tell him to lose the specs?
Swot
Oh George... leave Danny alone!
The Lib Dems are - in essence - fully signed up to the Thatcherite agenda of the coalition, and have no doubt: the bulk of the cuts will fall on the poorest and the lower-middle class, as always...
George...where have you been the last 2 years? The Lib Dems are now a fully liberal, Thatcherite party..they are not, and never were, a party of the left of even left-of centre: all that was just positioning to dupe silly students and others into voting for them in 2010, and once they were in power they revealed themselves to be a natural fit for Cameron and Osborne: indeed Alexander, Laws, Clegg and Huhne would be considered slightly to the right in today's Tory party, only their Euro-philia separates them from most other Thatcherites..
So get with the programme, George..Danny Alexander is the true face of Liberalism in 2012...
Oh George... leave Danny alone!
The Lib Dems are - in essence - fully signed up to the Thatcherite agenda of the coalition, and have no doubt: the bulk of the cuts will fall on the poorest and the lower-middle class, as always...
George...where have you been the last 2 years? The Lib Dems are now a fully liberal, Thatcherite party..they are not, and never were, a party of the left of even left-of centre: all that was just positioning to dupe silly students and others into voting for them in 2010, and once they were in power they revealed themselves to be a natural fit for Cameron and Osborne: indeed Alexander, Laws, Clegg and Huhne would be considered slightly to the right in today's Tory party, only their Euro-philia separates them from most other Thatcherites..
So get with the programme, George..Danny Alexander is the true face of Liberalism in 2012...
Beaker is vying for the approval of his Tory masters. He isn't a pleb- he's an arse!!
Isn't it just time for some of these Lib Dems to defect to the Tories?
Pleb? W*nk*r more like.
Raising tax threshold does most for the rich, as Polly Townbee points out today in the Guardian. He will be struggling to get re-elected. 13% voted Tory in his constituency. They will be happy with him. But the other 87% will make sure he is out on his ear.
Try telling the various friends and colleagues I know earning £14-20k who've seen decent increases in their net monthly pay packet that it 'does most for the rich'.
Toynbee is way off the mark on this one. Loathe though I am to praise much of LibDem policy, the rise in personal allowance is of great help to struggling hardworkers on lower salaries.
Increasing VAT from 17.5% to 20%, freezing child benefit, reducing access to tax credits, gutting school building programme, I could go on, as Miss Marple said, "They do it with mirrors".
As you know it does nothing for those too poor to pay tax, and all of those with high incomes gain from it. Meanwhile many lower paid are losing housing benefit, child benefit, tax credits - and services too. Toynbee's point is well made.