Voices

Views from elsewhere

Syndicate contentRSS

"Poverty of aspiration" – a phrase that should have gone out with Victorian frock coats

Three short words that try to apportion blame.

Photograph: Getty Images
If we take action on equality social mobility is a lot more likely to be loosened up. Photograph: Getty Images

There’s a lot that annoys me about the Labour Party – well I’m a Green, so that mightn’t be very surprising – but one phrase that is a particular favourite of Labour education spokespeople and more than the odd backbencher is guaranteed to raise my blood pressure to rage levels: "poverty of aspiration".

It is a phrase that in three short words seeks to blame the victims of austerity, those left stranded by the abandonment of the British manufacturing industry, trapped in over-crowded poor social housing or impossibly expensive private rental dumps and at under-resourced schools, people who through medical accident or unfortunate fate need the support of decent benefit payments being told to "buck up", "lift your sights", "try harder". (Or sometimes it just tries to blame their children’s teachers for all of the problems of society.)

It would seem to fit better in the mouth of a frock-coated Victorian industrialist, urging the child chimney sweeps to climb faster, rather than a be-suited 21st-century MP, yet somehow Labour just keeps saying it. We've certainly got "poverty of opportunity" that is knocking down our young people (in particular) at every turn. With youth unemployment up 246% in the past year, many well qualified young people – with degrees, work experiences, internships, languages, the lot – are struggling to find work, and when they find it the pay levels are frequently desultory for their skills, with short-term contracts the norm. Labour might like to focus on the NEETs, but even if all of those young people greatly up their skills and training, where are the jobs?

We've got "poverty wages". Why after 13 years of a Labour government was the minimum wage not a living wage, and why were increasing numbers of mature people with work experience finding themselves employed as "apprentices" on a desultory £2.60/hour?

And we've got an awful lot of awful grinding, simple poverty - pretty well everyone on out-of-work benefits to start off with, which meet less than half of the needs ordinary Britons identify as essential to a decent life.

But in my professional, volunteering and personal life, I keep encountering people trying to overcome tremendous disadvantages to build a decent life for themselves - often well-qualified, hardworking people who’ll do practically anything to try to secure a stable, secure, decent life for themselves. What more can they do? What more does Labour want them to do?

There’s another phrase that Labour politicians often use – “social mobility”. And certainly, it’s terribly important that there’s an equal opportunity for a daughter of a binman to become PM as for an upper-class boy educated at Eton (we wish!), but a focus on the chance to move up the ladder ignores the critical problem of how steeply the ladder is slanted and how far apart are its rungs.

When the price of success can be so high, and the cost of failure so great, parents who enjoy advantages in life are getting keener and keener to push their offspring to heights of CV-enhancing achievement in every field, making it harder and harder for children whose parents can’t provide violin lessons on Monday and equestrianism on Tuesday.

And being left behind at age 18, or 16, or 11, or 5, or 3, has higher and higher life penalties. If we take action on equality – raise the tax rate for incomes of over £100K to 50p, crack down on tax evasion and avoidance, work to rein in soaring executive pay and bonuses, make the minimum wage a living wage and ensure benefits provide a basic decent standard of living – then that social mobility is a lot more likely to be loosened up. That’s what we should be focusing on – not simply on trying to provide a route out of poverty for a few individuals who can climb that steep ladder despite the odds.

And it wouldn’t just be social mobility that would be loosened – all of life could be, to the benefit of all. Given we now have the unhappiest children in the developed world, a condition attributed to long working hours, materialism and failure to provide facilities/activities for poorer children - reducing inequality, putting less focus on money and materialism, and more on to a better quality of life for all – would be a huge step forward. And given our high rates of mental ill health and stress among adults, a loosening up of life for all of us would be an excellent idea. So let’s start talking about the need to end poverty (and not just child poverty – all poverty hurts our society), let’s start talking about greatly reducing inequality in our society. Let’s speak not just for the squeezed middle, but also for the squashed, stressed, much-slandered bottom.

 

24 comments

Robert Taggart's picture

This scrounger be more than satisfied with our lot in life - just keep the benefits coming !
Not all of us can bothered to work our arses off just to consume more material things - a simpler, quieter life in comfort be enough.
Aspiration requires perspiration = no thank you !

plain john smith's picture

Allah Akbar!!!!

Andrew Parker, The Sun (London), August 9, 2012
Two evil brothers face long jail terms after they were yesterday convicted of grooming schoolgirls for sex and selling them as prostitutes.

Ahdel Ali, 24, groomed a 13-year-old girl from the day he met her and later raped her.

He also had sex with two other 15-year-old girls who he later pimped out with his brother Murbarek Ali, 29.

A court heard the teenagers were driven to the rear of a shop and forced to climb through a window “because they were white girls”. Murbarek got one of them to have sex with two restaurant workers when she was four months pregnant.

The brothers’ links with Asian restaurants and fast food shops provided them with a network of punters who paid £20 to £50 for sex, Stafford Crown Court heard. The girls, from Telford, Shropshire, regularly failed to attend school or went missing from home and were “easy prey” for the brothers, who are both married.

The pair controlled their victims by offering them lifts and mobile phone top-ups, urging them to drink vodka and smoke cannabis and giving them fags and food.

The brothers, also from Telford, who denied a total of 26 charges involving sexual abuse and sexual exploitation, will be sentenced in October.

Original Article

McMac's picture

Didums. Mummy not give you enough hugs? To busy I guess, those lorry drivers weren't going to shag themselves.

Holton's picture

During the queens jubilee and the furore of the volunteer workers being bussed into London and then told to shelter under London bridge, It was only John Prescott to his credit who raised the issue. Deafening silence from Nu labour who don't give a toss about the working class, unless there's votes in it of course.

Mrs.Josephine Hyde-Hartley 's picture

Yes it was awful to hear about these volunteers, standing under the bridge in the rain. Similarly it was shameful and probably just as potentially demoralising I thought, to see all the empty seats at various venues during the first couple of days of the Olympics.

And the excuses made for both disappointing situations boiled down to " the usual frustrations", which to my mind as a Christian and ordinary member of the public, are best explained even two thousand years later by Jesus who the bible tells us directly told Judas ( the one who sold him ) " YOU will always have the poor with you".

Jesus didn't say , " we will always have the poor with us" - as if to make some perpetual prophecy.

The point I'm trying to make is that the devilishly complicated ways and means we use to deal with people ( as assets) ie effectively buying and selling wholesale, the work/life balance of human beings - even in the form of some public service (erroneously in my view) invented as if to serve the public interest - will always lead to the usual frustrations that are spoiling too many lives with their concomitant burdens.

Red Rain's picture

So when did the green’s start caring about British industry? How many affordable homes did Labour build? No one can ever accuse Labour of underfunding education. Labour spent spent and spent again only to see standards fall. “We’ve got "poverty wages". Why after 13 years of a Labour government was the minimum wage not a living wage” Isn’t that a question a Labour minister needs to answer? What we had under the previous Labour government was an explosion of employment agencies and short term contracting combine this with Labour’s ill-conceived open door immigration policy; what we witnessed was a crash in real wages with many outside the public sector not receiving a pay rise of any kind for years… This all came about under a caring Labour government not a nasty party’s government. “Let’s speak not just for the squeezed middle, but also for the squashed, stressed, much-slandered bottom”. So when did Labour start caring about the British working class?

hugh markey's picture

In the fifties and the sixties hesitant youth was not that keen on voting - just in case. A lot were dead-end kids but never knew it. Until they reached their thirties and hadn't made it.
The Tories managed to divide the young from the old and middl-aged and thus conquered the world of politics. In spite of the awful performance of the Conservatives in power, even the Harold Wilson governments had narrow majorities most of the time. And that was before the internet, social media, cable tv and television reality programmes.
For the moment we can't see how Labour or the left-wing can compete. Absolute disaster may come to the rescue. But we're not hoping

MUtton Heads

hugh markey's picture

In the fifties and the sixties hesitant youth was not that keen on voting - just in case. A lot were dead-end kids but never knew it. Until they reached their thirties and hadn't made it.
The Tories managed to divide the young from the old and middl-aged and thus conquered the world of politics. In spite of the awful performance of the Conservatives in power, even the Harold Wilson governments had narrow majorities most of the time. And that was before the internet, social media, cable tv and television reality programmes.
For the moment we can't see how Labour or the left-wing can compete. Absolute disaster may come to the rescue. But we're not hoping

MUtton Heads

JacquesOuze's picture

I strongly suspect Ms Bennett's volunteering hasn't taken her into many non-metropolitan working class enclaves across the UK. As McMac and Archie Dempster claim, poverty of aspiration is a real and pervasive force in some parts of these communities. Unfortunately, because it's an inherent part of the culture of some parts of the working class, it's unlikely to respond to a bit of tinkering with the tax system or adjustments to the minimum wage. This is a long-term culture change project.

In my experience, it's not so much a case of having 'you've no chance' drummed into you - it's not as dynamic as that - more a case of a deeply rooted belief absorbed from the surroundings that many opportunities and jobs are 'not for the likes of me'. For me, that was in spite of having supportive parents who valued education and told us repeatedly that we should aspire to do anything we wanted to.

But as the son of a factory worker and a typist, the possibility of a professional career seemed to have roughly the same level of reality as becoming a Zulu warrior, even though I came through my low achieving comprehensive with good O levels. That's partly because we didn't know people who did professional jobs, so they didn't seem real. Everybody's parents worked in factories or shops or down the mine, or drove a truck or whatever, and the only 'professionals' we came across were the teachers at school or the GP, and the GPs were all ancient and posh, so not like us.

So in order to make a more constructive and informed contribution on the issue, perhaps Ms Bennett should consider 'doing an Orwell' and actually mixing with some working class types. Better still, she could 'do a Baggini' (see Welcome to Everytown - Granta 2007) and actually try living amongst some ordinary, unfashionable, provincial working people for a while to see what's really going on.

plain john smith's picture

The Somalis seem to combine all the worst characeristics of black gang culture along with Islamic religious craziness.

McMac's picture

Have you ever been in a social situation where there's a room full of adults conversing, and in the corners there's a young kid trying to draw attention to himself by making silly noises. Well sorry to break this to you mate, but you're not one of the grown-ups

Red Rain's picture

Sorry to break this to you mate but it's the Labour party who's making the silly noises.

Herbert's picture

A lovely putdown MCMAC, and one Plain John Smith has been asking for for some time.

McMac's picture

I agree with much of this article, but fundamentally disagree with much to.

Not only does it seek to absolve people in financial problems or social disadvantage of any responsibility to dig themselves out, it goes on to blame the people who do have aspirations and work hard to achieve them. Blaming a surfeit of aspirations for society’s ills is the first step on the road to the clocks striking 13.

Poverty of aspiration is and always has been a real issue. I was brought up and schooled in an environment where not going to prison was seen as a good result, and a job any job was a success story. There where kids, who in other lives would be getting Oxbridge firsts, going into unskilled jobs straight from school. It never crossed our minds to aspire to something else.

10 years after leaving school I went to university and could see the kids who didn’t have restricted horizons, 18 years old and ready to grab the world by the scruff of the neck. That’s what we want isn’t it? Rather than a generation told that they should be happy with their lot, nothing is their responsibility, it’s all the fault of the educated middle classes and thier violin lessons.

Archie Dempster's picture

What a dissapointment this article is: Throws in all sorts of attacks on the Labour Govt (and i'm not labour anymore) but says absolutely nothing about poverty of aspiration pers se. A clear FAIL i'm affraid.
you only had to look atthe BBC 2 programme onthe two Oxbridge tories last night to se the counter point. A class who feel a supreme and unchallengable sense of entitlement to high office, top jobs, and what they perceive as social status. Thw two insurgets soon found out how anyone who attepts to "get intio the magic circle" gets treated. Smeared, gerrymandered out, snubbed and patrobised. We need hundreds of thousands of working class young people to grab the f*****ing high tables (in every sense) of this country and to know that they had the right and indeed duty to do so. as the High Master of Eaton says to his pupils "Why not you?" Too many working class kids instead get "you've got no chance" drummed into them from the earliest age by family, teachers, peers, the nedia et al. This article showed a wilfull failure to understand this pervading culture

James  Wild's picture

I agree with much of this. However we shouldn't only focus on the youth unemployment we should look at ALL unemployment. Some job schemes are only available to the young when a middle aged unemployed person will have as much if not more trouble finding work. The older unemployed have to deal with ageism plus the problems of joblessness.

Hu Ru's picture

Plain John Smith said:....... wouldn't be anything to do with the fact that NuLab let four million people into the country?
He's Tory and believes in the "trickle down fairy".....but he's right, and they're still piling in, Dear Coalition.
When is that fact going to be recognised?
BTL = "impossibly expensive private rental dumps "......there's you 'legacy' Blair - that and a poxy war.

Gerry Tierney's picture

The current "apprenticeship" scheme is an absolute joke.

It's nothing more than an excuse for Asda to pay you £2.60 an hour while calling you a "customer service apprentice".

This country is absolutely f**ked. Seriously, there is no going back.

I am getting out as fast as I can. I'm only 27 and have had more than enough of it.

Hu Ru's picture

That's good thinking son - don't look back. I'd head for Argentina if I was your age.
Good luck kid.

ActuarialChris's picture

Seriously, Argentina? Of all the countries you could have picked you pick them? The same country who's inflation rate is over 25% and the government is running out of money and nationalising its industries to compensate? Why on earth would you go to Argentina?

plain john snith's picture

Er, the massive levels of youth unemployment wouldn't be anything to do with the fact that NuLab let four million people into the country? No, how could one commit such a thought crime?

"If we take action on equality – raise the tax rate for incomes of over £100K to 50p, crack down on tax evasion and avoidance, work to rein in soaring executive pay and bonuses, make the minimum wage a living wage and ensure benefits provide a basic decent standard of living – then that social mobility is a lot more likely to be loosened up. "

Er, how does doing any of these things have any impact on social mobility? I would have thought they would have had the opposite effect, as higher taxes will simply deter people from working harder, seeking promotions, or starting their own businesses.

What exactly should the minimum wage be? If you put the minimum wage up to (say) £10 per hour,so the factory cleaner is making that sum, the production line worker will want his wage put up to £12 ph, so in turn the toolmaker will want his put up to £15, which means the foreman will want £18, which means the manager etc etc etc: all minimun wage legislation does is create an inflatioany spiral in which everyone's wage is ultimately devalued. Anyone remember the Seventies?

Gareth's picture

"Er, the massive levels of youth unemployment wouldn't be anything to do with the fact that NuLab let four million people into the country?"

No, because those four million people all buy food, clothing and so on. In doing so, they create as many extra jobs as they 'take up'. Why on earth would you think there is a fixed number of jobs in this country? Yours is not a thought crime, just bad economics.

plain john smith's picture

"No, because those four million people all buy food, clothing and so on. In doing so, they create as many extra jobs as they 'take up'. Why on earth would you think there is a fixed number of jobs in this country?"

Yes, but certain of these immigrants: the Somalis spring to mind - find the money to buy food clothing etc primarily from dole fraud, crime, multiple marriage and breeding lots of little Somalis and getting child benefit. They contriubte zilch to the economy, but are rather a massive economic drag. The problems associated with mass unrestricted immigration are enormous, but the left just ignore em.

Gareth's picture

True, I just question the degree to which the group that you describe is typical of the total immigrant population. Do you have evidence that significant numbers are fraudulently claiming benefits or committing crime?

Migration Watch (who I would expect to be able to make a strong case if one existed) admit that immigration has an "essentially negligible" impact on GDP per head. Where it does attempt to offer evidence that immigration has a negative effect on the employment of UK-born workers, it admits that it can only manage "tentative" anecdotal evidence. Their approach has been criticised by the Institute for Public Policy Research. It might not be that 'we on the left' are ignoring the problem but that the case for its severity has yet to be fully made.

By the way, I apologise if the way my last comment was written seemed rude. Reading back, it was more abrupt than I'd intended. Perhaps 1am was not the ideal time to be posting!

Latest tweets