Cameron is the biggest political loser of the Olympics
Booed by the crowds and overshadowed by Boris, the PM has not had a good Games.
By George Eaton Published 10 August 2012 9:12
It's not hard to identify the political winners of the Olympics. Boris Johnson, who never missed an opportunity to make a populist intervention, and whose named was chanted by thousands during that extraordinary speech in Hyde Park, is now spoken of as a potential prime minister by both the left and the right, and is increasingly viewed as a threat by Labour.
Beginning with the Queen's skit with James Bond (the highlight of the Olympics ceremony for voters, according to polling by YouGov), the royal family has seemed more at ease with itself than for decades. The BBC's coverage has reminded us of the virtues of public broadcasting, whilst the armed forces, filling the void left by G4S, have renewed their bond with the public.
But who are the losers? Tory MP Aidan Burley's curt dismissal of Danny Boyle's ceremony as "leftie multi-cultural crap" did little for his career prospects, and with a slim-ish majority of 3,195 in Cannock Chase, a seat that Labour held from 1997-2010, he is unlikely to be returned at the next election. Mitt Romney's suggestion that the UK was unprepared for the Olympics, inaccurate as it turned out, damaged his reputation at home and abroad, with Boris openly mocking a supposed ideological ally ("There's a guy called Mitt Romney who wants to know whether we're ready"), David Cameron quipping that it's easy to run an Olympics in "the middle of nowhere" (a reference to Romney's management of the 2002 Salt Lake City Winter Games), and Carl Lewis concluding that "some Americans just shouldn't leave the country".
The biggest loser, however, is the current occupant of 10 Downing Street. Rather than enhancing Cameron's reputation, as some Tories hoped, the Olympics have diminished it. The cringemaking photo posted by the No 10 Twitter feed of the PM watching the boxing at home while wearing a Team GB polo shirt looked like what it was: a desperate final attempt to reap some political benefit from the Games. Rather than serving as the proud leader of a successful nation, Cameron has spent more time fending off criticism of the government's school sports policies and dismissing fears that the Olympics have reduced economic activity. As Prime Minister and the leader of a party that won just 36 per cent of the vote at the last election, Cameron was never likely to survive the Games unscathed. But what makes the negative press coverage even more galling is the adoration for the prince across the Thames - Boris. While the crowds cheer for Boris, they boo for Cameron. For the first time since he became Prime Minister, conservative commentators are asking how long he can continue. After two weeks in which Britain has rarely seemed happier, few could have imagined a less happy end to the Games for Cameron.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















28 comments
I have just spent two weeks in hospital where I received world class treatment. Legacy of Labour Governments. Lets hope we can resist Tory changes long enough to return a government that will return the NHS to the top position it held in 2010.
steve, labour policy is to spend less on NHS than the tories, not sure if your aware of the fact.
the tories have ring-fenced the NHS so that they don't appear 'uncaring' which means further cuts for other areas. Labour have said they would cut more from NHS thereby protecting other areas.
I have just spent two weeks in hospital where I received world class treatment. Legacy of Labour Governments. Lets hope we can resist Tory changes long enough to return a government that will return the NHS to the top position it held in 2010.
Cameron is just the biggest political loser! Shallow, sneering, pompous. The very epitome of a bigoted 19C beadle.
Why did the BBC give him prime space this am for his final final sad attempt to gain political glory from the Olympics? Could they not have talked to Daley, a young person about to suffer Cameron's assault excluding the young from the economy, or Farah, a black man who could have spoken of the difficulties facing immigrant families?
In the long-term the article is wrong because Johnson is popular as Mayor of London larking about. However he is in danger of over-egging the pudding and needs to calm down
Politically the current pro-Boris push to replace Cameron by the Tory right will be exposed as wishful thinking.
These people used to hope the same for David Davis. Poor fools.
George
What did you think about the purile grovelling of Miliband to Hollande just before the Olympics? What concessions do you think Miliband went offering?
Do you think the pictures of Miliband and Mitt was in poor taste? Do you know the collective noun for 'wassock'.
@Indu
You would probably just add an 's' to form the plural.
But George has been kind in a way because he was asking about political losers, during the Olympics. If we took a wider view we might see Cameron's 'visionary'' idea of the big society, and his chancellor's marvelous success....well, let's face it, there is plenty more could be said.
Thanks but I suspect the collective might be a "bandwagon of wassocks".
Think the best descision cameron made was to double the money spent on opening and closing ceremonies after checking out the story boards. Forget everything else that was money well spent!
The NHS still remains inefficient though, however much Danny Boyle may like to dress it up. My family and I have been let down by it on numerous occassions, but, being poor, we have no choice but to use it. I'd rather a more effective health service was at my disposal.
"Cameron is the biggest political loser of the Olympics" I don't think any politician gained any political authorty or standing but did Ed Milliband even bother turning up?
Boris Johnson - Britain's blonde Berlusconi?
After Boris' U.S. book tour this summer, several people I know saw the parallels with Rudy Guiliani. Mayor of the largest city, he can be amusing (especially to people who don't live under his administration), and if he attempts to move up to a national position, will no doubt be more amusing as he crashes and burns.
But whether or not all of you want him running the country, he did pump up enthusiasm for London (the city, not just the Olympics) on his visit.
This article really does read like a load of subjective partisan left wing bollocks. I am no fan of Cameron but i didn't think his photo was cringeworthy and I don't think he has come out of the olympics badly. You are clearly so biased thats what you want to see. I don't see it like that at all and I can't stand the tories.
Nice to see that like most men Cameron also grabs his nuts while watching the Telly.
Makes a change - it's usually Clegg's that he's got a firm grip on...
The idea that all the Tory Party has to offer in place of Cameron is Boris, underscores the paucity of talent in the party. Ken in his younger days was very charismatic but could not transfer that popularity to the national stage. Boris is said to be energetic, charismatic etc etc because the press tells us so. Frankly I do not believe a word of it. The idea that a national politician can appear apolitical is a contradiction in terms. Let us not foget too his comments about Liverpool, his unshamed apologias on behalf of the bankers. The man is a freak!!
The comments above assume applied logic on behalf of the electorate.......the same electorate that voted for Thatcher and Blair three times each.
I'm with Tricky Dickie - 'Never overestimate the intelligence of the voters'.....might just be enough to turn it (failing another war with the Argentines).
An interesting definition of intelligence. Your logic seems to be that people are defined as intelligent if they agree with you. It smacks of self-righteousness and the re-education programmes practised by Stalin. It is a vile definition of intelligence, in addition to being an incorrect one.
I imagine that Nixon, as a practitioner, may have known a bit more than most of us about political intelligence. I think I'd go with his opinion rather than yours.
I think I'll stick with mine, thank you. Nixon is not a man I would trust. My mother always taught me that a liar is worse than a thief.
Cameron has never been fit for purpose. What does one expect when he was voted to lead the Tory Party on the back of a speech?
Is that any worse than being voted leader of a party on the back of the union block vote? In truth, neither Cameron nor Miliband are great statesmen.
I think there is a worse ending looming on the horizon for Cameron, he is not delivering.
He is a very poor Prime Minister. Even Tories are thinking that now. He changes policy according to the whims of public opinion. He listens too much to Lord Ashcroft, who is obsessed with focus groups and opinion polls. Cameron doesn't seem to govern on principle. Has he any? If so, what are they, other than a vague commitment to muscular liberalism, liberal conservatism, etc? He's not delivering at all, as you say, and will be punished. His only hope is when the spotlight falls on the finer details of Miliband's economic strategies.
Unbelievable piece of inaccurate opinion. Lord Ashcroft owns the conservativehome website that rarely has good word to say about David Cameron and are at present trumpeting the leadership qualities of Boris Johnson.
When his own party is questioning his actions, you just know his future is in doubt.
The #candidcameron category is worth looking at on Twitter.
I think this is the best one: twitpic.com/aheh0z