The Tory rebellion leaves Cameron as the new John Major
The PM looks like a weak and defeated leader after last night's vote.
By Richard Morris Published 11 July 2012 9:54
Labour’s plan to embarrass Nick Clegg and the Lib Dems over Lords reform has backfired spectacularly. "Why would we want to hand the Lib Dems a victory?" went the logic of Labour’s decision to two-facedly vote for the Bill but against the programme motion that gave it any chance of seeing the light of day. But what chumps they look now. Nick is left looking like the Miss Haversham of British politics, deserted at the altar of constitutional reform while the groom has a fistfight with his family in the car park. And trust me, everyone always ends up feeling sorry for the jilted bride.
But fear not, Labour MPs. Your war gaming may not have played out just as you expected. But there is a small consolation. You have probably just finished the career of David Cameron, ended any hope of this government doing much else of any worth in the foreseeable, and probably won the next general election to boot.
Cameron looks now like a weak and defeated leader – as the always excellent Jonathan Calder puts it, the new John Major of Conservative politics. Unable to control his backbenchers, he must be gloomily contemplating the hand that fate has dealt him. All over Westminster, Conservative rebels have been drinking the bars dry and celebrating showing the "leadership" – if we can still call it that – who’s boss. "Rebellion is the new cool", I saw tweeted tonight, quoting one Tory backbencher. I’m guessing it wasn’t Peter Bone. But they’ve got a taste for it now, and they know that with enough numbers, they can get the PM to back off. How Cameron must already be regretting his decision not to whip this one properly.
And having got a taste for rebellion, the Tory right will want more, more, more. The snooping bill, EU referendum, a British Bill of Rights. They’ll be clamouring for the lot. But they won’t get it. I doubt there’ll be many Lib Dem MPs willing to hold their noses for Tory policy going forward.
So the rebels won’t get anything they want. And they’ll blame Cameron for that. Ostensibly for not putting us in our place – but really because they’re still furious with him for not winning a majority at the last General Election. And so the rancour and the poison will continue.
And where will it end? Well, we have a Prime Minister, unable to deliver on his coalition promises, under the thumb of rebellious backbenchers, but incapable of satisfying their demands, behind in the polls and all the while becalmed in an austerity driven economy.
Major can probably tell Cameron how this ends ...
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















14 comments
Nice article..... interesting.
Goji Goji fructe goji
26 Labour MPs voted against. There were also some interesting abstentions. And the 26 are a remarkable list, Left and Right, Old Labour and New Labour. It reflects the clear feeling all the way across the Parliamentary Labour Party.
The list of 91 Conservatives contained literally no one who could ever have been a Minister in this Government, most of whom must surely have known it. Being a PPS is neither here nor there.
In spite of which, certainly if Labour had voted against Second Reading, and probably if Labour had merely abstained, then there would probably have been fewer than 30 Conservative rebels, and certainly fewer than 40. There were 91 rebels because Ed Miliband gave them permission
There will be nothing like that many at Third Reading, especially if Labour either abstains or, as is far more likely, votes against the final signing off of a Bill such as neither Lewis Carroll nor Monty Python could possibly have conceived.
Sir George Young withdrew the Programme Motion in order to spare his colleagues' exposure as all talk, since as few as 20, if that, would actually have voted with Labour.
The 26, several of whom would not have acted in this way without prior clearance, have expressed the real Labour attitude to this dog's breakfast of a Bill. But denying it Second Reading would have spoiled all the fun. That fun will now begin. Indeed, it has already begun.
http://dv.gd/oej
http://dv.gd/oej
http://dv.gd/oej
http://dv.gd/oej
http://dv.gd/oej
http://dv.gd/oej
http://dv.gd/oej
http://dv.gd/oej
http://dv.gd/oej
http://dv.gd/oej
http://dv.gd/oej
http://dv.gd/oej
http://dv.gd/oej
http://dv.gd/oej
http://dv.gd/oej
http://dv.gd/oej
@ catsmeat....you have to think in colouring book pictures, like a Lib Dem.
"Labour’s plan to embarrass Nick Clegg and the Lib Dems over Lords reform has backfired spectacularly......but there is a small consolation. You have probably just finished the career of David Cameron, ended any hope of this government doing much else of any worth in the foreseeable, and probably won the next general election to boot."
Bring on more spectacular backfiring then.
"Labour’s plan to embarrass Nick Clegg and the Lib Dems over Lords reform has backfired spectacularly......but there is a small consolation. You have probably just finished the career of David Cameron, ended any hope of this government doing much else of any worth in the foreseeable, and probably won the next general election to boot."
Bring on more spectacular backfiring then.
Clegg's finished as leader with any credibilIty. Lib Dems are grasping at straws looking for game changing moments that allow Clegg and their party to turn the tide. His name is now in the public consciousness as a symbol for dishonest politicians.
The public now no longer believe a word that comes out his mouth.
It's a price he's paying for all that eutopian rhetoric that gave him a spike in popularity pre election and then doing a deal with a Tory party bitter, twisted and in vindictive mood for being kept out power for so long.
That pity for the jilted bride in full...
And could I look upon her without compassion, seeing her punishment in the ruin she was, in her profound unfitness for this earth on which she was placed, in the vanity of sorrow which had become a master mania, like the vanity of penitence, the vanity of remorse, the vanity of unworthiness, and other monstrous vanities that have been curses in this world?
I feel a splinter Cabinet coming - cushion Ms Currie?
I'm afraid I don't see how this is supposed to benefit Clegg.
It's more that while it's a blow in terms of delivering a key manifesto agreement that we genuinely care about, politically Clegg doesn't come out of particularly damaged - he looks like a strong leader who previously got his MPs to vote for a lot of stuff they didn't like, whereas Cameron comes out looking like a weak leader, not in control of his party. There have now been 2 major rebellions in this Parliament - both Tory, both anti Cameron. Overall, 120 backbenchers either voted against the government or abstained on Lords Reform and EU. That's considerably more than 50%. In a leadership election a la Thatcher vs Hesteltine, I would have thought it is doubtful after last night that Cameron would does as well as Thatcher in the first ballot.
Quite a thought
There is only one reason Nick Clegg does not looked damaged by this, and that is because he is too far discredited already. To continue the Miss Haversham analogy - which is quite fun - he is essentially wandering round a crumbling house (LibDem central office), clinging to a forgotten memory (Power) wearing a yellowing wedding dress (political credibility). Also, though Pip (now on workfare) thought he was his benefactor, it turns out it was really an escaped convict.
Clegg has achieved a lot. But all negative, driving millions into poverty. And enabling Osborne to mismanage our economy. And his "sincerity" really, really sticks in my throat.
Richard, you are a zealot. Or a member of a cult. Or just live in la-la land.
One thing Major had over Cameron - politics aside, at least he gave the impression of being a decent human being.