The banking scandal is too important not to have an independent inquiry
The idea that an inquiry would "shut down" banks is nonsense.
By Richard Morris Published 05 July 2012 16:47
One of the delights of Twitter is that you get to ask the great and the good what the hell they are talking about – and they occasionally answer. So when I asked Bernard Jenkin MP (C, Harwich and North Essex and according to Wikipedia, Parliament’s most famous nudist) why he thought it would be "absolutely bonkers" to hold a Leveson-style inquiry into the banks, he was good enough to reply. Here’s what he said:
@richardmorrisuk @spectator_ch @jgforsyth Because it would paralyse the banks at the very time when we need them to support recovery.
— Bernard Jenkin MP (@bernardjenkin) June 30, 2012
Now I don’t want to have a go at Mr Jenkin, who was good enough to bother to reply and anyway it’s hard to get a nuanced argument over in 140 characters. But honestly… The idea that these Masters of the Universe are not so much "too big to fail" but rather "too important to bother" seems a bizarre one to me.
It’s also worth pointing out that newspapers appear to have been able to continue publishing comfortably throughout the Leveson inquiry, despite its all-seeing eye into the murkier depths of the world of journalism. The notion that financial companies generating billions of pounds in annual profits will grind to a halt for the period of an independent inquiry is ludicrous. Perhaps MPs are imagining dealing rooms around the City shutting up shop for the afternoon so they can enjoy the nuanced testimony of the third deputy assistant Governor of the Bank of England. If so, I can assure them that they are quite wrong on this score…
Nor does it seem to me that the "this is urgent, we need answers now" argument is going to fly. We’ve had a quarter of a century since "big bang" (God, they like their space orientated nicknames in the City don’t they?) to try and get our heads around what the hell is going on. The notion that a select group of parliamentarians will get it all sorted in a couple of months given the chance seems again, plain wrong…
Anyway, there’s a quicker way of conducting a parliamentary inquiry. Just ask this man. He seems to have got the answers right most times. He’s even got a plan. He’s just a phone call away…
But to answer Mr Jenkin’s main point - it is precisely because the banks are so important, because so much of our economy hangs on the success of the financial sector, that we need to have absolute faith in it.
The Libor scandal may or may not have been the financial sector’s “Milly Dowler’ moment (which occurred one year ago today) – but that moment is still going to happen, sometime soon. And just as the real point of the Leveson inquiry is to restore faith in the press, the point of any inquiry into the financial sector is to restore faith in that.
Parliament may well resist the calls for a judicial inquiry this afternoon. But – and here’s an anology that both the space-obsessed City and Britain’s favourite parliamentary nudist can enjoy – they are howling at the moon.
They’d do better to just get on with it.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















10 comments
Nice article..... interesting.
Goji Goji fructe goji
Based on the performance of the Treasury Committee with MPs questioning Bob Diamond last week, Like Richard Morris I have limited confidence that further parliamentary enquiry will have sufficient power to unravel the LIBOR rate fixing.
Suggest that Vince Cable should refer the matter to the European Commission for Competition and Cartels for investigation. They have the powers, and ability to force large Companies to reveal the electronic trail which should reveal what has been going on since 2005. Big Companies quake when they investigate.....
The truth is out there:
http://tinyurl.com/bvf99b8
http://tinyurl.com/c7eprw9
Some of those caught rioting recently were given prison sentences of 6 months for stealng bottled water worth £3.00. It will be interesting to see if the same is applied to our bankers given that theft is theft.
Arrest the bankers. We wrote about their crimes many times at www.stocklegends.com
Any real nudists here ? I would like to recommend you to the world's best and largest nudist dating site for world wide nudists , naturists and naked people to share nude photos and experiences and chat with real nudists Lots of fun on nudistconnect.com
Yes, but, i have been blogging about it, u can check it here: http://gierki.ostrowiec.pl
Richard - Despite your support for the Lib Dems, can we then take it from this article that you are highly critical of Clegg's decision to back a parliamentary inquiry of limited scope?
You will not be alone. In a recent YouGov poll, 2/3 of Lib Dem supporters wanted a judge-led independent inquiry, not one by parliament.
I do think the Parliamentary party in The Commons made the wrong call on this one. And you're right, there is widespread support in the party
http://www.libdemvoice.org/bob-diamond-lib-dems-barclays-bank-judge-led-...
Like the one we had on the IRAQ WAR?