Is the banking inquiry now a "total joke"?
Inquiry criticised after outspoken MPs are left off its membership.
By George Eaton Published 13 July 2012 11:36
The parliamentary inquiry into banking hasn't even begun but it's already being dismissed as a "whitewash". The reason? The two most combative MPs on the Treasury select committee, Labour MP John Mann and Conservative MP Andrea Leadsom, have been left off its membership.
Mann has already responded on Twitter, angrily denouncing the commission as a "total joke" and vowing to set up his own inquiry into the rate-rigging scandal. Here's his statement:
Both Andrea and I were available for the Inquiry and because we are too outspoken we have been blocked
This exposes the Inquiry as a total whitewash with Andrew Tyrie reaching his conclusions in advance of the meetings.
We need to get to the bottom of this scandal and I’m therefore setting up my own inquiry into this dreadful mess.
It was Mann who said of Bob Diamond at last week's hearing: "Either you were complicit in what was going on, or you were grossly negligent, or you were grossly incompetent. That is the only conclusion".
We haven't heard from Leadsom yet, but her 25-year career in the banking sector, including 10 years at Barclays, was widely thought to have made her the most effective inquisitor. In addition, she demonstrated her independent-mindedness earlier this week with her call for George Osborne to apologise to Ed Balls for suggesting that he had "questions to answer" over the Libor scandal. (A fact that some are suggesting may lie behind her absence.)
Those who have made the cut, other than inquiry chair Andrew Tyrie, are Conservative MP Mark Garnier, Labour MPs Pat McFadden and Andy Love, and Lib Dem MP John Thurso, all of whom were reportedly selected on the advice of their parties. They may yet prove an effective line-up (and QCs will question witnesses on the inquiry's behalf) but given their "useless" performance against Diamond (in the words of Leadsom) they begin from a position of weakness. The hand of those who argue that only a judge-led inquiry will do has been considerably strengthened by the exclusion of Leadsom and Mann.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















14 comments
Nice article..... interesting.
Goji Goji fructe goji
Another Labour mess on their watch. Knight Sir Fred, cocktail parties with Labour supporting Sir Victor who help destroy Lloyds tsb.
Brown and the bankers
"Another Tory carve-up." Another piece of rubbish left by Labour.
The working man's Party led by Tony Blair and anti EEC Lord Kinnock and family plc (Brussels) and that anti-establishment tiger Lord Prescott, not forgetting Rotchild's pal Lord Mandelson of Foy.
The left live in a fool's paradise about those who have led them all these years, including Miliband in his millionaires house.
This is absolutely crazy.
Web Design Kent.
Who EXACTLY compiles the list for an inquiry into the banking shenanigans? People in the pay of big bankers - that is, "we'll pay you handsomely to get this quashed" type of pay? That would be very, very illegal, wouldn't it, and our government wouldn't stoop to such low scullduggery, because they would be worse than any low-lives they so obviously detest for lack of moral backbone.
Yes it is. Several banks in the States have paid megamillion dollar fines. Yet, they don't have to admit to any guilt. No top people will ever go to prison. Why?
Because it's more convenient to score pre-election political points for Obama. See, we're cracking down on these people. We're on the case.
No he's not. But that doesn't matter. Millions will still vote for him.
It is very difficult to find an individual these days that isn't a ceo or ex politician or lord or banker or ex quango or civil servant, advisory group or lord and justice at the same time, that isn't interconnected through wealth, companies, board of directors, government contracts, employing relatives, not a member of an interest group, independent person that isn't in the self interested goverment, ceo, banker, fsa, lobbyist food change of money and greed.
Your everyday constituency mp doesn't stand a chance against all these vested interests.
=== http://www.top4biz.com
=== http://www.top4biz.com
=== http://www.top4biz.com
=== http://www.top4biz.com
=== http://www.top4biz.com
=== http://www.top4biz.com
=== http://www.top4biz.com
=== http://www.top4biz.com
=== http://www.top4biz.com
=== http://www.top4biz.com
=== http://www.top4biz.com
=== http://www.top4biz.com
http://bit.ly/4Owjag
http://bit.ly/4Owjag
http://bit.ly/4Owjag
http://bit.ly/4Owjag
http://bit.ly/4Owjag
http://bit.ly/4Owjag
http://bit.ly/4Owjag
http://bit.ly/4Owjag
http://bit.ly/4Owjag
http://bit.ly/4Owjag
http://bit.ly/4Owjag
All the more reason why we need a judicial inquiry into the banks NOW.
Another tory carve up.
What did you expect from this Govt?
This is what the banking sector pays its lobbyists for.
Is the banking inquiry now a total joke?
What do you mean 'now'?
the banking sector cripples its way forward.