http://www.roseshoesoutlet2012.com

how could some one like murdoch still even care about money . rupert there is an old proverb it goes like this , what does it prophet a man to gain the whole world but to loose his soul .

WHen will that odious Toby Young be out of a job. Cannot come soon enough!!!

Contrary to the views expressed in Guardian and NSM, with a very tiny bit of reach and readership, the country gives a toss about such minor issues. The lefty media has started believing its own hype. Already people have started asking "Milly Dowler", who? (This is not a comment on morals or otherwise). In 3 years the impact will be big fat zero.

Move on. The juice gone down the drain. News International would be there; making too much enemy out of it is not going to help Labour. Sounding all pompous and self-righteous when in reality you are no saint is bad bad bad policy.

The fat man should not have claimed £4800 in food bills; if he were to have a moral position; ever; on anything.

News Corp. has been meeting privately with Conservative members of the Parliament Committee investigating the Company.‏‏

Rupert Murdoch’s Fishy M.P. Meetings
The mogul says that News Corp. has been meeting privately with members of the Parliament Committee investigating his empire.

The Daily Beast. Peter Jukes Apr 28, 2012
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/04/28/rupert-murdoch-s-fishy-...

These Tory types have an unusual idea of morality as in "if it makes money its ok"..also that did you notice that the Committee went beyond its remit in Judging Murdoch as not being fit to run company but Leveson is the appropriate place to Judge if Hunt has broken the Ministerial code.....funny that !!!!

So fat Tom Watson (how much did he fiddle on expenses, pray remind me) says that Murdoch is not a fit person to run a business. Should we care? What power has said Watson? None I trust. What does he know about business, or indeed about anything except climbing the greasy pole of politic?. Would I rather spend an evening with Rupert or with Tom? Would I rather the countrywas run by Rupert or by Tom? No contest, really. And what will this committee DO? Sweet Fanny Adams, don't you think?

Does this Committee have any legal authority? If not, what does Murdoch care? I seriously doubt that News Corp. shareholders will revolt and kick him out.

It is interesting to note that the article by Michael Wolf is not open to comment by the general public. Is the Guardian still running scared on the Murdochs!!!!!!

It doesn't stop. Won't stop. Can't stop. Rupert Murdoch is going to be run out of Britain.

His is a worst-case scenario: a powerful political opposition moving against him, and a chain of evidence moving toward him.

I find myself feeling deeply and helplessly sorry for the man: he's cornered. He is not only "not fit" to run his company, but he's been "wilfully blind" about the company's crimes. He made a conscious and calculated decision to look the other way. Enron's former chief, Jeffrey Skilling, is in jail for innumerable years exactly for that reason.

No doubt, as I write (at 8am in New York), News Corporation is preparing a statement saying that Tuesday's damning parliamentary report is a partisan show, which, dividing 6-5, it is. And in a broader sense, too: Murdoch is as good a Labour party issue as it gets.

But that's merely identifying the problem – one of the problems. The reality is that the cost, real and psychic, of operating in the UK far outweighs the rewards. On top of that, the constant paralyzing media and legal distractions, make it virtually impossible for the company to function in the UK. Management can't manage.

michael wolff Guardian

I am most reliably informed that the staff at Sky News would love to be rid of Papa and Baby 'Doch so that their channel could be taken fully seriously. It entirely deserves to be. Sky News is not half bad at all. Its revenue could be used to keep going The Times and the Sunday Times for saving which Murdoch undeniably deserves credit, with the Independent National Directors of all three elected by and from among Sky subscribers. Or perhaps, in the event of public ownership, by and from among the electorate at large. Though, in either events, strictly from among politically independent candidates.

The sport could go back to the BBC and ITV. The high quality American television could go back to the BBC and Channel 4. The low quality American television could go back to ITV and 5. The films could go back to whichever of those happened to buy them. And The Sun could go to the wall, thereby, as much as anything else, forcing the Mirror Group titles back to their roots as serious popular newspapers. After all, Maurice Glasman, never did take up that column on the Sunday edition, so let it go and take Toby Young with it.

There was a pre-Murdoch Sun, and even Auberon Waugh wrote for it. Before even that, it was the Daily Herald, which was at one time edited by George Lansbury, and for which both Chesterton and Belloc were known to write. It awarded the Order of Industrial Heroism, the medal of which was designed by Eric Gill of the Distributist League and of the Westminster Cathedral Stations of the Cross, and featured Saint Christopher carrying the Christ Child. That at a time when the awarding newspaper was the official organ of the TUC, recalling all those Biblical scenes and characters on many a trade union banner. Maurice Glasman, indeed. Rod Liddle, as now. Neil Clark. Tim Collard. Martin Meenagh. Oh, yes, there would be no shortage of people to write for it. With no more competition from the gutter or the sewer.

Just as Jeremy Hunt has been forced to disclose all emails and phone calls relating to the Murdoch empire, this same maxim should be applied to Louise Mensch , John Wittingdale and other Tory MPs' who sit on the select committee. LABOUR SHOULD BE CALLING FOR FULL DISCLOSURE AS THERE SEEMS TO BE ANOTHER COVER UP UNDER WAY DESIGNED TO PROTECT CAMERON.

SURELY DAVID CAMERON SHOULD NOW BE FORCED TO DISCLOSE ALL FROMS OF EMAIL AND TELEPHONE CONTACT WITH RUPERT MURDOCH, JAMES MURDOCH AND REBECCAH BROOKS.

WE SHOULD NOT LOSE SIGHT OF TOM WATSON'S SALIENT POINT NAMELY THAT THE MURDOCH BRAND WAS BEHIND THE CORRUPTION OF WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN OUR MOST VALUES INSTITUTIONS, THE POLICE, POLITICS AND THE PRESS!!!