Clegg's dishonesty on tuition fees continues
"I didn't win the election" is not an excuse for breaking the pledge.
By George Eaton Published 18 April 2012 10:47
One of the main reasons why it is Labour, not the Conservatives, that has the best chance of winning a majority at the next election is the scale of the Lib Dem defection to Ed Miliband's party. Unlike in the 1980s, when the left vote was split between Labour and the SDP, the left is now largely united around Labour. One in five of those who voted Lib Dem in 2010 transferred their support to Labour in the months following the formation of coalition and there is no sign of them returning. The latest YouGov poll puts Labour on 41 per cent, the Tories on 32 per cent and the Lib Dems on just 8 per cent.
It was the decision to support the tuition fees increase that was Clegg's Iraq moment, a profound breach of trust for which his party will pay dearly. Challenged on the subject on this morning's Today programme, Clegg replied that since the Lib Dems didn't win the election ["I lead a party with eight per cent of MPs"] he was unable to keep his promise to vote against any increase. "If you want the Liberal Democrat manifesto in full, vote for Liberal Democrats in larger numbers. It didn't happen," he said.
This is disingenuous. Clegg's pledge was not conditional on his party forming a government, rather it was a commitment that all Lib Dem MPs returned by the electorate would vote against any fees increase. The NUS pledge, signed by every Liberal Democrat MP, read:
I pledge to vote against any increase in fees in the next parliament and to pressure the government to introduce a fairer alternative.
So long as Clegg continues to obscure this point, there is little prospect of him winning back the lost Lib Dems.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















17 comments
It's good that you don't always need twice as much storage capacity to cart about the things that two children need compared to what you would need if you were on the lookout for normal (i.e. single) Disney stroller rentals. However, you do need plenty of storage space, as you will need to carry drinks, snacks and spare clothing (etc!) for both children, as well as things that can be shared by both,
57 MP going against the will of the majority. But perhaps Eaton likes this and then he is not democratic anyway. اخر اخبار مصر
Nick says he didn't win the election so he couldn't deliver on fees. Surely he never expected to win. We were all amazed they got this far. Does this mean that everything the libs say in their next manifesto can be ignored, because they are clearly not going to win next time either.
Pledge. It's only furniture polish after all.
Finally the Lib Dems have got proportional representation --8% of the MPs and now according to the latest opinion poll 8% of the votes
Poor old Clegg, he thinks he can argue his way out of anything. Am I the only one who's noticed that he's taken the art of answering his own preferred question (rather than the one he was actually asked) to a new level.
I hope he hangs on until the election, his presence guarantees Lib-Dem collapse.
If you're asking me whether you, like many people who are feeling the squeeze in these unprecedented times, brought about by the irresponsibility of the previous government...think we made the right choice...
If you're asking me whether I think the choice to be responsible and lead the country to a new way of doing politics...was the thing that's right to do...
If you're asking me, or anyone else, whether the choice that we need is the right thing to make; a choice that will secure the right future, the change that this country so desperately needs...
Then I ask you, the people who work hard every day, up and down the country...
etc. ad infinitum
Nick Clegg is using the Liberal Democrats to achieve his own place in history. It is why he so rapidly compromised on tuition fees, civil liberties, benefits and pushed his privatisation agenda. It is why he is so keen to make Lords reform happen. He wants to be remembered by history as a reformer. He will do anything to achieve these ambitions. He isn't interested in democracy or representing Liberal values. He doesn't care if he leaves tens of thousands of voters disenfranchised and turned-off politics. It is all about Nick. His actions have enabled the largest right-wing reforms of this country without a democratic mandate. He doesn't care if he drags the liberal democrat party down so long as he achieves his place in the history books.
He fraudulently misrepresented his party to achieve his own ambitions. Nick Clegg should face criminal charges.
Labour and the Conservatives want these tuition fees. If Clegg would have blocked it, George Eaton would have been the first to call this undemocratic, 57 MP going against the will of the majority. But perhaps Eaton likes this and then he is not democratic anyway.
'I pledge to vote against any increase in tuition fees and to pressure government to introduce a fairer alternative'. He's a liar , it's that simple. Talk of not winning the election is nonsense. They've been caught out. Attempts at muddying the waters says everything about them.
Hum! i can smell a rat miles away.
The new politic, eh! sign a pledge and found the excuse that you did not win the election.
Clegg, you are politically finished in Britain, go to your chateau in south west of France and think for new adventures.
As Nick said this morning, mea culpa on the first part of the pledge, as a minority part of a coalition the Lib Dems were not able to keep that part as the Tories were not willing to agree to it (nor would Labour for that matter for all their crocodile tears now). Howerevr on the second part of the pledge, the Lib Dems have delivered so student starting this September will pay back up to £540 less than under the Labour scheme (also introduced after a manifesto pledge not to) and know that the loan is time limited to 30 years regardless of any career breaks or periods when the graduate is earning less than £21,000.
As for the left uniting around Labour, that is a pipe dream until the so-called party of the workers starts 'fessing up to all the mistakes it made in office where it oversaw the biggest rise in the gap between the rich & the poor since the war, introduced privatisation in to the NHS,and any number of other authoritarian right wing measures.
Commentators seem to forget that "Liberals" are not left of center.
Clegg and most of his inner circle are dinosaurs who follow 19th century laissez-faire on economics and libertarian freedom for individuals as a whole.
The marriage with the SDP was a con job as both parties were destined for oblivion.
The old adage that vote Liberal get a Tory is as true as it ever was.
You don't need to remind people about that broken Libdem pledge. It's permanently etched on our minds.
The Libdems are finished.
Mm. When challenged at a post-election public meeting, Clegg's excuse was "We knew we had no chance of getting our tuition fees policy accepted in any coalition with either side". Which raises the question of why he stood for election on a policy he knew he was going to have to abandon whatever happened.
http://wingsland.podgamer.com/lies-and-the-lying-liars-who-tell-them/
He planned to ditch the pledge before the election. There is clear evidence of this. And the policy is bad in every way. Universities, students, families, society in general, and last - the government, who are paying out more money.
The only good thing is that Clegg was revealed as a fraud - and nobody will ever believe him again.
Ah, hubris. If the Lib Dems want any sort of electoral success then the best thing they can do is ditch Clegg, and then he can join the Tories. He has managed to toxify (Torify?) the party, and they're going to vanish off into obscurity again within the next five years unless they do something. 'Differentiation' won't work. They had a golden opportunity to actually do some good in government and they wasted it in less than a year.
Interestingly you only talk about how many Lib Dem voters have shifted to Labour. In Scotland they have haemorrhaged support to the SNP and the Tories might overtake them again soon. Any idea on what's happening to them in Wales?