UK 10 April 2012 The civil liberties fight isn't over The Lib Dem grassroots haven't accepted that there's nothing to worry about. Sign up for our weekly email * Print HTML OK. I’ve signed the activist’s letter on the "snooping bill". I’ve taken advantage of the conference call with SpAds to express my disgust. I’ve told Nick to pull his finger out. I’ve cheered as Lib Dem backbenchers make their feelings plain. And I’m delighted that when asked about these plans our President, Tim Farron promised, "we are prepared to kill them – I mean to be absolutely clear about that – if it comes down to it". So I should be happy that things have been stopped in their tracks. But I’m not. I’m still livid. And what’s made me, and the rest of the party so angry – other than the proposals themselves - is the fact that no one in the centre "saw this coming". That it’s "taken everyone by surprise". What, really? As one (terrific) Lib Dem blogger put it, Civil liberties are at the heart of what it means to be a Liberal Democrat. Our support for them is almost what defines our party: the reason why many talented people joined us rather than seek an easier path to public office through Labour or the Conservatives. And he’s right. It’s why there has been an almost visceral reaction from every single member up and down the land to the news that these proposals were even being discussed. It’s why we were so flabbergasted to hear that we should "wait and see" what these proposals were, while David Davis was out waving the flag for civil rights. While I’m thrilled that the plans have seemingly been halted, I’m now very wary of phrases like "watered down", "compromise" or the rather, ahem, tautological "support for any new security measures dependent upon us getting more privacy not less". To carry on the vogue for Big Brother themes just now, it seems to me that there is a lot of scope for Doublespeak in all this. I’d rather we just stuck to the coalition agreement: We will implement a full programme of measures to reverse the substantial erosion of civil liberties and roll back state intrusion. No quid pro quo’s there, no compromises, no "watering down" of proposals, certainly no "if it comes to it". We’ve promised to roll back state intrusion. Not letting MI5 track what everyone’s doing on their X-box. So, let’s be clear. While we’re thrilled to hear that (to quote Tim again)… If we think this is a threat to a free and liberal society then there would be no question of unpicking them or compromising, this just simply must not happen. …the grassroots haven’t accepted that there’s nothing to worry about. We’re just standing here, with our arms crossed, waiting to see what happens next. And it had better be legislation that makes the country a more liberal place to live, not less. Richard Morris blogs at A View From Ham Common, which was named Best New Blog at the 2011 Lib Dem Conference. › Are religious people really more left-wing? Liberal Democrat party president Tim Farron has threatened to "kill" the "snooping bill". Photograph: Getty Images. Richard Morris blogs at A View From Ham Common, which was named Best New Blog at the 2011 Lib Dem Conference Subscribe from just £1 per issue More Related articles Let's talk about Daniel Hannan, Donald Trump and Adolf Hitler To the Commonwealth, "Global Britain" sounds like nostalgia for something else Is defeat in Stoke the beginning of the end for Paul Nuttall?