Can Osborne undo the damage done by the charity tax?
With two-thirds of coalition backbenchers opposing the plan, the Chancellor is considering concessio
By Samira Shackle Published 16 April 2012 9:12
When George Osborne announced a cap on tax relief in the Budget last month, the so-called “tycoon tax” was supposed to be a populist measure. Under the plans, previously uncapped tax reliefs – including those on charitable donations – would be capped at £50,000 or 25 per cent of income, if higher. Supposed to be a way of clamping down on legal methods of tax avoidance, it clearly it hasn’t quite worked out as hoped, with the government under a hail of criticism for limiting charitable giving.
It appears that the storm is far from over, with a ComRes poll finding that two-thirds (65 per cent) of government backbenchers believe that tax relief on charitable donations should be exempt from the cap. The survey, commissioned by the Charities Aid Foundation, found that 68 per cent of the Conservative and Liberal Democrat MPs surveyed believed that the government should review its proposal to cap tax relief on charitable donations. It also showed that 93 per cent of coalition backbenchers believed that the government "should do all it can to use the tax system to encourage charitable donations from wealthy donors".
So what next for the policy? The government is still scrambling to regain some political points, with the Treasury releasing figures that reveal the extent of tax avoidance among the super-rich. The figures show that almost a thousand UK taxpayers earning over £1m a year are paying less than 30 per cent of their income in tax, while 12 of the 200 taxpayers earning over £10m are paying less than 10 per cent in tax. The figures are supposed to show how the super-rich are using tax reliefs and legal schemes to reduce the amount of tax they pay.
The numbers are certainly shocking, but at this point, probably not enough for the government to regain control of the message. Indeed, the Financial Times reports that Osborne is considering changes to the proposals, although as yet he is resisting pressure to exempt donations from the cap completely. Two proposals are reportedly under consideration. The first is to create a separate limit on charitable donations of 50 per cent of a person’s income, which would allow charities to claim tens of millions extra in tax relief than the current plan. Such a move would cost £40m, hugely reducing the amount saved by capping charitable donations, to just £20m. The second is to allow donors to roll over any unused tax reliefs into future years if they are used for donations.
Hot on the heels of the furores over pasties, granny tax, jerry cans, and email surveillance, this is yet another example of poor communication and media strategy from the very top of the coalition. With several papers this morning calling for David Cameron to improve his team, this latest incident only serves to cement the impression of a government that acts before it thinks.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















5 comments
Tax relief on charitable donations? But why should other taxpayers eventually pay for someone to be generous?
I remember tax relief on personal pensions back at the beginning of this century - I was told by someone in the job center that anything i put into a personal pension would effectively be matched by the tax relief i should get. It didn't seem to last long either as i remember.
The charity tax is only the beginning. The aim is to abolish Gift Aid, or else drastically to reduce the range of activities eligible for charitable status, if not both. Yet another attack on everything that mainstream Britain holds dear.
Like the legal redefinition of marriage to include same-sex couples (on which Labour is probably going to have a free vote), the cutting of incomes outside London and its environs, the deregulation of Sunday trading, the devastation of rural communities by letting foreign companies or even foreign states buy up our postal service or our roads, and Royal Mail privatisation’s severing of the monarchy’s direct link to every address in this Kingdom.
Yet another reason to vote in 2015 for the only party capable of defeating this Coalition. Yet another reason to ensure that there is a dedicated body of MPs to keep the Miliband Government in line with those values and priorities.
As for the church tax, why not extend the VAT exemption to secular buildings of comparable architectural or communitarian importance? I have never understood why that was not already the case. Ed Miliband, over to you.
Forget pissing about with charitable giving - look at dividends from a 'personal company' and offshore 'image rights', offshore corporation 'HQs' and offshore trust funds. Top tip: jersey would be a good place to start.
I entirely agree with Herbert's posting. Essentially, tax relief on charitable donations serves merely to make taxation voluntary for the wealthy. Why should the rich be able to chose what their taz money is spent on? It is fundamentally undemocratic.
Have I misunderstood this? Why should the rest of us subsidise rich 'philanthropists' by giving them tax relief on what they give to charity? If they genuinely want to give, then let them give out of their post-tax income (as the rest of us do). If they don't, then it's clearly a tax scam, and one that the media seems determined we should continue to subsidise.