Return to: Home | Blogs | Oliver Postgate

The last dilemma

The Clangers creator highlights humankind's crucial choice

The fervent Channel 4 programme "The Great Global Warming Swindle", produced by the 'denyers', and its slating and rejection by the 'disaster crusaders', has taken the debate about the likely future of the world out of science, which is necessarily inconclusive, and into the realm of pseudo-religion.

Now you either 'believe in' one future or you 'believe in' another. Both attitudes are rich with indicative examples but apparently without sufficiently conclusive proof to silence the opposing unbelievers.

Underlying it all is a simple dilemma, one which concerns us all, now.

It is this:-

If we choose to believe the ‘doomsters’, and take the necessary steps to replace global warming with global cooling, civilization will have to revise its priorities and we shall, for a time, be mightily inconvenienced – and if at some later date, it might conceivably be proved to have been unnecessary – then we and our grandchildren will be alive and life on earth will continue.

If we choose to believe the ‘denyers’, decide that there is nothing to worry about and go on as usual, we shall be very comfortable, thank you – and if it should then become clear that the so-called ‘tipping point’ has passed and it is obvious that global warming has become runaway and irreversible – then we and our grandchildren will be dead and life on earth will cease.

This is not a choice which can be left to politicians. It is our life

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

3 comments from readers

Bob
17 March 2007 at 16:53

Please examine the facts. You will find that it is more than an "inconvenience" for African and third world nations not to be allowed by the industrialized world to evolve in the name of irrational fear. Children are reduced to squalor, poverty, disease in the name of your "maybe" scenario. Do the science (real science). Do the math. Don't react because of the politics of fear. Here are a few questions.....

Why are there flora and fauna remains under the ice of the poles, showing times of great warmth before man?

Why was it warmer elsewhere in previous periods of history than now long before man inhabited the earth in numbers?

Use your head. Use logic

Steven Douglas
19 March 2007 at 14:36

Absolutely, to both the previous comments. The so-called "Precautionary Principle" is one of the most selfish, and unimaginably thoughtless concepts; a sure death knell to the many hundreds of millions who aren't at liberty to sit at a comfortable keyboard, in air conditioned evirons, and pontificate about the virtues of being "mightily inconvenienced". For them, DEATH is at their door already, and our mighty inconvenience equals death to them. The truly unthinking "denyers" are those who would deny them their chance at simply living beyond their terrible, and terribly dangerous and unhealthy, poverty.

Oliver
22 March 2007 at 10:53

The “real” science that “Bob” refers to is the observable fact that the snow-cover, which is the source of water and life even in the tropics is melting and that if it continues the desertification and consequent starvation of Africa will continue apace. and spread across the world. (They call it global warming) .

The “math” (first-year physics) is that once under way the melting becomes self-inducing because the reflectivity of the earth is reduced and the sun-heat intake increased (they call it global warming). Once under way no human intervention can halt the process, which would render the earth uninhabitable .

The “logic” is that if the human race doesn’t do what is necessary to put a stop to the process before it is too late, there will eventually be very few of its members left undead.

That is the dilemma. What Bob and Steven decide to do about it is up to them

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

FIFTY YEARS OF WHAT?

20 February 2008 09:48

DIVINE LAW

18 February 2008 11:10

WHERE HAS ALL THE MONEYGONE?

11 February 2008 11:17

Politicians cannot save the world

16 February 2007 17:23

Three cheers for the New Statesman

29 January 2007 12:01

The economics of conquest

02 January 2007 16:50

Oliver's Christmas message

19 December 2006 10:31

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Blogroll

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker