The Queen and her despotic friends
Why is the king of Bahrain coming to the royal wedding?
By Mehdi Hasan Published 17 March 2011 12:58Last month, in my column in the magazine, I wrote:
Have you been invited to Kate's and Wills's wedding at Westminster Abbey on 29 April? No? I didn't think so. Nor have I.
But Hamad Bin Isa al-Khalifa has. He happens to be the king of Bahrain, where thousands of people have been peacefully protesting against his unelected royal regime since 14 February. His Majesty's response? On 16 February, shortly before dawn, he ordered his security forces to storm Pearl Square in the heart of Bahrain's capital, Manama, where the protesters -- emulating those who had gathered in Cairo's Liberation Square -- were camping out. The police fired rubber bullets and tear gas at the king's sleeping subjects, killing at least four, including a two-year-old girl, and injuring hundreds of others. The next day, they switched to live ammunition.
Nonetheless, the king of Bahrain has received his gilded invitation from Buckingham Palace, embossed with the Queen's EIIR royal cypher.
As far as I'm aware, the Bahraini monarch's invite still stands -- even though his country's security forces have spent the past couple of days firing live ammunition and tear gas at pro-democracy protesters in the heart of the capital, Manama, as well as denying the wounded access to hospitals and health centres. At least five people have been killed and hundreds have been injured. In the early hours of this morning, Bahraini security forces -- aided by their Saudi army allies, who arrived in the kingdom on Monday -- arrested and detained six opposition activists and political leaders after breaking into their homes, "brandishing automatic weaponry". The crackdown continues.
Yesterday, Graham Smith, head of the anti-monarchy campaign group Republic, wrote a letter to Kate Middleton and Prince William, calling on them to remove the King of Bahrain and other "vile men" from their wedding invitation list:
I am sure you were as appalled and disgusted as I was at the news that the king of Bahrain has crushed a peaceful pro-democracy rally with tanks and live ammunition, killing a number of protesters. So I have no doubt that you must have serious misgivings about the inclusion of the king on the invitation list for your wedding on 29 April.
You will be aware that there are millions of people around the world who suffer oppression and tyranny on a daily basis. Many of these people look to countries such as Britain for inspiration and support in their struggle for freedom and democracy. As such, surely we have a duty to support the oppressed and the democrats over the despots and oppressors. Clearly, then, it would send an appalling message to the world were any dictators of the Middle East -- royal or otherwise -- seen enjoying the hospitality of your family and rubbing shoulders with Hollywood stars and politicians at your wedding.
I cannot imagine it would reflect well on you, your family or the monarchy were those vile men to remain on your guest list. More importantly, it would seriously damage the reputation and image of Britain and would do harm to the wider cause of democracy and freedom. I am therefore asking you to ensure that the invitation to the king of Bahrain and to any other Middle Eastern despot be withdrawn immediately.
Will the royal couple respond? If not to Republic (why would they?) then perhaps to a friendly reporter (ITN's Tom Bradby, say)? They risk having their much-awaited, much-discussed wedding being overshadowed by the inevitable protests against their VIP guests from the Middle East -- the kings of Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the rest. What is Wills's and Kate's defence? How does the Queen justify her invitation to an unelected tyrant with fresh blood on his hands?
Meanwhile, the British and American governments -- which have supplied the Bahraini autocracy with tear gas, small arms ammunition, stun grenades and smoke canisters -- continue to look the other way and instead agitate for military action against Libya.
But as Seumas Milne writes in his column in today's Guardian:
Considering that both Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, home to the United States fifth fleet, depend on American support, the crushing of the Bahraini democracy movement or the underground Saudi opposition should be a good deal easier for the west to fix than the Libyan maelstrom.
But neither the US nor its intervention-hungry allies show the slightest sign of using their leverage to help the people of either country decide their own future. Instead, as Bahrain's security forces tear-gassed and terrorised protesters, the White House merely repeated the mealy-mouthed call it made in the first weeks of the Egyptian revolution for "restraint on all sides".
Perhaps the fact that Bahrain is home to the US navy's fifth fleet, while the Shia protesters on the streets of Manama have the support of Iran, has something to do with the west's glaring double-standards with regard to Libya and Bahrain. Or am I being cynical?
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















119 comments
@ James Gibson, Your losing your rag, shows you’re not in control of yourself or your mind. I’m not old, I had a shower this morning and I am married to an ethnic minority. Why is it as soon as anyone criticise the most Intolerant ideology the world has ever know you get the suicidal lefties who decide to silence those who are trying to expose the real issues. I mean stop with all the psycho babble James, of course History is open ended Whats your point? Facts are facts and many great nations and peoples have conquered and invaded many different countries over the years. You just love feeling guilty and cant form an argument for the here and now. Lets face it, without the west the Arab nations certainly wouldn’t have discovered Oil and have reaped the rewards from it. And get your facts rights; It was Nazism (master race fascist party) that was responsible for the holocaust not Christianity – and don’t worry the Islamists where there backing up the Nazi’s to kill the Jews off.
James your an Idiot, “extremist attacks against our governments is because our governments are the ones that have kept these dictators in power for so long” what a load of horse sh*t.
You’re completely of target and wrong again James, extremists attacks have nothing to do with us...its all laid down in the Koran, I mean more Muslims are killing and launching Jihadi style attacks all over the world...its all out fault, eh??? Are they not responsible for their own actions?? Funny how they are all Misunderstanding the religion of peace??? Its all to do with Iraq you’ll say next, do me favour.
The intolerance of Islamic supremacists and the lack of freedom with Islam and oppressiveness of an minorities (women, infidels, gays etc) within Islam is what has held the nations of Islam back, nothing to do with us, mate. Extremists find there justification for their actions and support from others straight out of the Koran, nothing to do with us, mate. Extremists like the Taliban, Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hizbollah, Islamic Jihad, etc etc etc are all driven to hate us by the Koran, nothing to do with us keeping them in power, mate, your making this stuff up. The Arab governments could have implemented Democracy at any time of there choosing, but it doesn’t fit with Islam to be free, happy and enlightened. Do you think Islamic theocracies like Iran will be an improvement??? Islamists and lefty apologists are so full of misinformation, self guilt and self loathing you can never speak the truth about stuff that really happens for fear of being labelled politically incorrect
What a lot of abusive posts! Why can't we disagree politely?
By the way, we had a civil war here; we tried having a republic a few hundred years ago; it didn't work and we restored the monarchy. In 1765 George the Third gave to the UK government his income from the Crown Estate in return for an annual grant in perpetuity. Last year, this amounted to £226.5 million - far in excess of the £35.1 million which the Royal family "cost" us. No Presidential family would ever work so hard nor so far beyond the age of retirement as our Queen and Prince Philip. The years and years of selfless work that the British Royal Family members have done for us is incredible. I do not begrudge them any luxury. Long live the Queen! No doubt they were told by some government official to invite the king of Bahrain to the wedding and perhaps he won't come?
@ Sakina "is baffled by Julia Harris - I wonder where all this Islam-bashing is coming from. I'm sure the article simply discussed the political situation"
Its coming because of Mehdi’s insinuation that the queens aligns herself with these terrible people...we have to make it clear the differences and what drives them and us. Once we understand this, the political world makes its own rules up, lots of unpalatable things go on. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain shake hands with Adolf Hitler on Sept. 30, 1938, does that make him a Nazi? Does that make him guilty for the actions? Does it make him a bad person? NO, it is Hitler who was the bad man, shaking hands, sharing a drink, being invited to a wedding doesn’t make you culpable for the actions and deeds of all your guests.
Alex you disgusting bigoted racist. Well do you Mehdi, still believe non-muslims still live their lives like aminals.
Only one question, Medhi: What do you expect?
You talk about "unelected" people.What do you think she is? do you honestly think she and her revolting family care a hoot about Democracy? Like the Queen mother and her charming son who were openly great admirers of Hitler? You know the one with his even more charming wife, Mrs Simpson, who was ready to betray his own country to the Nazis if he hadn't been stopped by the CIA?
Why do you even bother with the Royal wedding and who is invited to this obscene display of wealth and decadence at OUR expense?
Of course they will be inviting every bloody little despot in the world, do you expect them to invite the chavs from the council estates?
I am surprised you just don't dismiss the whole thing as a disgusting farce and start arguing for a proper republic and a proper democracy instead.
The Royal family must go.It is long overdue.They are as about as relevant as Julia Harris' comments.Their very existence at the top of the British government is offensive.
Luddite, what the hell are you on about?
You stupid little man.
I have to agree with Mehdi Hasan when he said that all non-muslims are animals lacking in intelligence. Even though I have only been a muslim for a short while in 1993 I regard myself as being partly muslim. But despite being partly a muslim I realise I must be an animal for I do all the things that animals do.. eat, drink, breathe live and die. What else am I?
And I certainly lack intelligence for I constantly do stupid things and I have no idea how nuclear power plants works or how to do brain surgery or fit an air conditioner into a multi-storey building. But what muslim person can do all these things?
So not only are all non-muslims animals and lacking in intelligence but so are all muslims.
This is who I am:
http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/tbr/tbr026.htm
@ Joe, I am not a bigot, I have made my views clearly previously that it is Islam, Islamism and all the terrible social and political issues that surround it that we should focus on and not be taken off on a tangent about the Royal wedding, its missing the point.
ISLAM, not the west has created these terrible leaders and the subsequent social and political issues - remove Islam from the equation and Muslims might have a chance to be free and truly happy. No one hates Muslims because they are different or dark skinned or speak in an accent.
Medhi is a defender of his Islamic faith and prefers to talk around the root cause, deflecting our attention....it’s talking of the inviting of say Hitler, Goebbels and Himmler - but never mention they are all subscribers to Nazism.
Why Prince's invite Kings? It's just one of those things one must expect from Birds of that feather, old boy.
I suppose you have not grasped the notion that she 'represents' the country?
Luddite is referring to the views of Medhi regarding those 'animals' he considers all non-muslims to be, you may consider his strange double standards?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APAPqT3QdFU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4hpfqFt-0Q&feature=related
At least none of them shag 9 year olds.
I dont think it's any of your buisness who attends this boy's wedding.He might be a royal prince but remember this, himself and his brother fight for THEIR country and their a credit to us as was their mother.There's no screaming and screeching from them like we see from YOUR crowd.
Invite all to the way of your Lord
with wisdom and beautiful preaching.
And argue with them
in ways that are best and most gracious...
And if you punish,
let your punishment be proportional
to the wrong that has been done to you.
But if you show patience, that is indeed the best course.
Be patient, for your patience is from God.
And do not grieve over them,
or distress yourself because of their plots.
For God is with those who restrain themselves,
and those who do good.
Qur'an 16:125-128
@ Bedd Gelert
I think you've misunderstood the situation in Bahrain mate. Its not a bunch of people causing trouble on the streets of the city. People in London have rights, and we can protest and get treated like humans. Over there people do not have rights... 75% of the population are Shia, and they are not allowed into the army or police force, and they are refused jobs and treated un-equally.
The sunni government in Bahrain prefers to import Sunni's from Pakistan, Syria etc and give them citizenship while providing them with jobs in the police and army.
So in summary you have 25% of the population ruling the country autocratically, with a police force and army made up of foreigners who will obey their commands. As we have seen the 75% of the country are fighting for their human rights, and us as one of the first real democracies in the world should support them rather than turn a blind eye and carry on shaking hands with the tyrants.
And just a note, too many racists on here. Don't forget that our Queen and her family are German a few generations back, so hold back on the deportation talk...
peace
Of course Medhi never seems to address his own 'fellow travellers' such as Palestinians who cut the throats of small children whilst they sleep.
Strange that silence we have seen. I really do laugh at this buffoon lecturing others on morality.
Oh and little Alex. Yes he's self evidently a fool.
@ Muddy
I don't believe all muslims believe we are animals... but i'm afraid your wrong because quite a lot of people in the west and UK actually do shag 9 year olds, and take pictures and share them with their mates around the world. Over 100 of them got caught yesterday... idiot :)
Western governments were slow to speak out against North African monarchs, condemning Gaddafi and company only after public opinion was decidedly pro-revolution.
But Bahrain's government hasn't been subjected to even token chastisement, possibly because the insurrection is Iran-esque.
A summary of Western principles:
1. Anti-Iran
2. "Stability"
3. Democracy
@ Julia- while i agree with you that there are serious problems in the middle east and with some Muslim groups, you say you are no bigot but you have said here that 1.5 billion people are all mad! That is a very unfair and an un just blanket condemnation. Amongst those 1.5, there are many who want and are committed to a pluralist democratic fair political system and a tolerant open Islam. Look at Indonesia where different cultures and religions operate freely, it is not all Saudi or Iran.
Islam is not responsible for Saddam just as Christianity is not for Hitler or Judaism for lieberman.
Chill yea? Umad?
Stuart Eels; I don't belong to any one country. I have a deep affection for England because I was brought up there but when I look at the place from afar I see discontent, dissatisfaction, and disunity. I see people thinking they are more intelligent than other people because of their academic qualifications or 'greater' because of their financial wealth. At least here people value what you can do and how you are with them regardless. And when I go the parties I met people from a range of backgrounds, it's so refreshing.
Britain's idea of one's worth stems I think from having a 'top dog' family .. everyone else can feel like they are on the rungs of a ladder leading up to the top family. And that's where the discontent and snobbery finds its source. We get rid of the top and then we are all equal, of equal value and status.
So thats nothing about human rights, womens rights and gay rights. Freedom of speech?
The above only applies if you repent. No thanks although I do note you missed the bit out about Jews. Strange that.
Quran 16 The Bee.
....unelected tyrant?...
...blood on the hands?...
why should this bother a queen who's title
has been handed down by- not all that infrequently throughout history- by unelected tyrants?!!!!
“Buckshite and all the other trolls here, you sad jobless bigots. You come on Medhi's blog and spew your vile hatred. You spoil this blog so yes please feel free to sod off with your hatred. Zionist hasbara agents no doubt...”
Shalom Dr Alex-lax.
As you refuse to discuss your fascination with incest and your constant accusing Julia and I of being participants, I was wondering. Is it because I have drawn attention to your slaverings, or in fact is incest a Muslim practice. How do you feel about your prophet Mohammed or whatever his name is. Is Pedophilia also part of your religion Dr Alex-lax? If not why was your prophet raping 9 year olds and why did he rape Maria the Coptic? This must be some religion you have. No one in this blog has a filthy mouth like yourself...Dr. You should have no trouble telling one and all about the wonders of Islam.
@ Oliver Bajuz '...UK actually do shag 9 year olds, and take pictures and share them with their mates around the world. Over 100 of them got caught yesterday... idiot :)
Oliver, I'm not sure if you're being purposefully obtuse, but clearly Muddy is referring to a larger cultural acceptance of paedophilia within Islamic communities and its moral reconciliation through interpretations of the Koran. Of course paedophiles, such as the underground ring you refer to, can be found anywhere, but our laws outlaw it and in our culture it is considered morally reprehensible. Not so in Islamic countries such as Afghanistan.
I think most are well aware of the German lineage of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and the how our monarchy skews the righteous ideals of a classless society but she's hardly a despot. And to be honest with the steady erosion of all things British I'm starting to almost defend the institution.
All in all another pathetic piece.
Why don't the anti-Muslim bigots deal with the question at hand rather than posting those YouTube videos for the umptenth time?
You also have to love how those great democrats have disabled comments on those videos but yet you can freely attack Mehdi Hasan here as much as you like. That says a lot.
To clarify: last year the income the government derived from the Crown Estate was £226.5 million whereas the total costs of all the Royal Family amounted to £35.1 million. So we are effectively subsidised by the Crown Estate, thanks to George the Third. On top of that, the Royals work, work, work for us.
Alex. CLICK-ON to Muddy's link's, you may gain a greater understanding.
Paul Mannion, there's no greater bigot then a Muhammadan bigot.
Oliver Bajuz, your comment is right, the difference is, we don't hold them-up as a example to follow.
Julia; I am a leftie, but please don't lump me with with the fanatical religionists (muslim or christian) after all isn't "religion the opium of the people"?
Julia Harris makes me laugh and feel sad at the same time. Strange feeling. Strange lady.
Julia Harris- you are my heroine your righteous anger is magnificent!!!!!!
Mehdi Hasan views don't make him a political colossus, his gurning on shows like Question Time, his ranting doesn't make him a democrat, most sane people see him for what he is! Some of the comments from his sycophants toward you show just where they coming from and its not a pleasant place.
I can't wait for the proposed purchase of the NS by Andrew Neill to see how long he lasts!
Nothing to add. Most of us seem to dislike "Her German Hanover Majesty". The males of the House of Windsor seem to get tired of marriage at seven years or so. Shall they invite the King of Bahrain to the divorce?
neB
In this country you have the right to offend, but you have obviously led a sheltered life. You should try living in the cou ntries run by "dark skinned" devils and then you would have real reason to complain. Thank your lucky stars you do not live in South Africa with a teenage daughter and Mr. Mandela!You play the racist card as a joker?
Granny: The royal family derive income from land that technically does not belong to them. It belongs to the state. Some of the residences (e.g. Buckingham Palace) that are used by the royal family belong to the state yet the royal family uses it at no expense. I'm sure someone will give you the exact figures but let me assure you they take much more than they give. But it isn't just about money.
How can a country feel united if this one family has so many privileges? If we're all in this together then why can Prince Andrew become a trade representative, jet off to New York, stay in a luxury hotel for longer than the conference, treating it like an extended holiday, and have all his expenses paid for? If it was someone else he would be done for defrauding the government. Yet he keeps his 'job'! How can you have a united country when this happens? And many people think like I do. If we're all in this together why are these bods getting all the goodies for no other reason that are born as a royal? It's a cause of division in our society and a barrier to unity.
And the waste of this family makes me want to puke.
Its time we gave them the boot, they STINK.
Buckshite - you give Jews a bad name and I am sure they have no wish to have an imbecile such as yourself speak for them. You are becoming boring now, and I wish NS would just block your and that other troll julia insane rantings so that the rest of us can enjoy reading this blog.
Raheel, I always hear Medhi use that as a defense of his position....i.e that because there are 1.5billion Muslims that any criticizim of it doesn't hang, of course I dont think they should all be straight jacketed.
I never seem to see the moderates...Islam is Islam...there cannot be any dilution of it...?
As for Indonesia, there seems to be an increase of the intolerance of the Jihadi’s and Supremacists.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5ii-xfxEdieX...
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/03/16/bomb-yapto-disguised-book-...
2011.02.08, Indonesia, Temanggung
7 Injured A Muslim mob viciously beats a priest trying unsuccessfully to keep them from burning three churches and an orphanage.
2011.02.06, Indonesia, Banten - 3Killed 6Injured, Three members of the Ahmadiyah minority sect are dragged out of their homes and beaten to death by a Sunni mob chanting 'Allah Akbar'.
DISTURBING video has emerged of a bloody religious mob attack in Indonesia that killed three members of a minority Muslim sect, showing extremists beating and stoning their victims to death.
http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/footage-of-deadly-mob-a...
Indonesia: New ban imposed on Ahmadiyah Islamic sect
http://www.adnkronos.com/IGN/Aki/English/Religion/Indonesia-...
Religious tensions tarnish Indonesia's moderate image
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/indonesia/100818/religiou...
And they say: Be Jews or Christians, then ye will be rightly guided. Say unto them, O Muhammad: Nay, but we follow the religion of Abraham, the upright, and he was not of the idolaters. Say O Muslims: We believe in Allah and that which is revealed unto Us and that which was revealed unto Abraham, and Ishmael, and Isaac, and Jacob. and the tribes, and that which Moses and Jesus received, add that which the prophets received from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and unto Him we have surrendered.
Quran, 2:135-136
Say: "O people of the Book! come to common terms as between us and you: that we worship none but Allah; that we associate no partners with Him; that we erect not from among ourselves Lords and patrons other than Allah." If then they turn back say: "Bear witness that we (at least) are Muslims (bowing to Allah's will)."
Quran 3:64-71
God forbids you not, with regard to those who fight you not for (your) Faith nor drive you out of your homes, from dealing kindly and justly with them: for God
loves those who are just.
God only forbids you, with regard to those who fight you for (your) Faith,
and drive you out of your homes, and support (others) in driving you out,
from turning to them (for friendship and protection). It is such as turn to them (in these circumstances), that do wrong.
Quran 60, 8-9
We sell the various autocrats in the Middle East weapons, train their security forces, offer diplomatic cover for repression so we might as well bring them over to hob nob with the only people in the UK they'd have anything in common with...fellow reactionary monarchs.
Dr Alex-lax.
Thank you for that answer to my question re your fascination with incest and childish name calling. Can't you at least tell me if it's a Muslim thing or simply a Dr Alex *Smirk'n* thing?
Allah (Arabic: الله Allāh, IPA: [ʔalˤːɑːh] ( listen)) is the
And straight from Wikipedia...
"Allah is the standard Arabic word for God. The term is best known in the West for its use by Muslims as a reference to God in the context of Islam. It is also used by Arabic speakers of all Abrahamic faiths, including Mizrahi Jews, Bahá'ís, Eastern Orthodox Christians and Eastern Catholic Christians, in reference to God.
The term Allāh is derived from a contraction of the Arabic definite article al- "the" and ʼilāh "deity, god" to al-lāh meaning "the [sole] deity, God" (ho theos monos). Cognates of the name "Allāh" exist in other Semitic languages, including Hebrew and Aramaic. Biblical Hebrew mostly uses the plural form (but functional singular) Elohim. The corresponding Aramaic form is ʼĔlāhā in Biblical Aramaic and ʼAlâhâ in Syriac."
...feel free to cross-check.
Thank you Buck, Gerry and Stuart.
I didn't realize about the Andrew Neill take over...maybe I can take over Mehdi's spot??
@Julia: so you haven't actually read the Koran but you criticise it. I asked what text of the Koran you were opposed to, and you said you weren't a Koran scholar. You posted youtube documentaries instead... secondary material. Why couldn't you just find the text you object to? Why, because you haven't even read the book!
Like I said to before, it's people's interpretation of the Koran that maters. Look what Adam has posted,
'we follow the religion of Abraham'
Remember that Mohammed was a prophet and a prophecy is a vision of the future. All the atheists that dismiss 'God' don't understand this whole dimension of prophecy. It's like a form of collective consciousness that states what is needed now and what will come to be in the future.
Mohammed was the last prophet but in the old and new testaments it foretold that there are other people that will come. There are seven seals, and I am the first seal.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/tbr/tbr026.htm
They've tapped my mouth, no more criticism of Islam, its not allowed.
You may think I am crazy or having a laugh but I am serious in what I say. Think of it terms of a seal that combines consciousnesses: taking strands and tying them together.
So Julia, you need to be able to quote the Koran to support your opinion otherwise your opinion gets lost in the ether. If we are to break down the people who are misusing/misinterpreting the Koran we need to know their exact words that they are using to justify their violent actions. Once we have them we can turn them. We use their words and turn them into a peaceful direction. We reinterpret their interpretations.
Like what I did with Medhi who said, 'all non-muslims are animals and lack in intelligence'. I pointed out that everyone including Muslims are animals and that we all lack in intelligence.
If we are to remove arrogance and violence and achieve peace then we ourselves must interpret what the Koran is saying.
If we believe in the Christian or Judea's 'God' then are we not in effect also Muslim because it is the same God? All Muslims are believers in the Christian God, and therefore they are Christians and Jews.
Diplomacy is a strange game. I'm not going to criticise the queen for being tactful and not rocking the boat. We have a constitutional monarchy here, not an absolute one. We could get rid of the monarchy and have a presidential style 'Blair' government. The queen is meant to be impartial and non political. She is here for checks and balances. I'm sure if Ahmadinejad wanted to come to the wedding, he would have been invited and no doubt a few years ago, Mugabe would have come too. Unlike Blair, the would no doubt have avoided war in Iraq.
It's not for the monarchy to overturn leaders. I appreciate that at times we are hypocritical in our love of leaders with plenty of oil, but it is not up to the queen to make a political stance. Just like I don't blame British Muslims for not being political martyrs in Iran when they stone, hang and abuse muslims.
Buckshite and all the other trolls here, you sad jobless bigots. You come on Medhi's blog and spew your vile hatred. You spoil this blog so yes please feel free to sod off with your hatred. Zionist hasbara agents no doubt...
Great piece Mehdi, and a nudge towards reality. It's funny how some media organisations, and certainly our government, pick and choose what causes to highlight. Bahrain was one of the most peaceful of the protests in the Middle East and they are suffering immensely, and arguably, silently. I guess prejudice in the West comes in different forms!
Mr Divine,
You asked for a source in the Koran regarding Julia’s comments on Islam and death to unbelievers.
http://www.wvinter.net/~haught/Koran.html
P.S. I don’t agree with 99% of what she says but I agree that some Mullahs use text from the Koran to justify their actions.
C Baker:
How English of you, to think the queen is just a nice old lady who does what she is told by "her" government. How having these tyrants at your son's wedding in any way "impartial and apolitical"? Surely she has a say on the guest list.If not who is telling her to invite these tyrants? the government? How is that making it more excusable? why is there no one to inquire about who is actually responsible for the guest list? why are we speculating? why is it there are no journalist in the land with the bollocks to question what the Monarchy is up to, and who is responsible for their actions?
And again, what on Earth is wrong with having an elected president who is at least responsible for his actions and not hiding behind the cover of diplomacy or his government?
@ Julia-it certainly did seem a blanket statement against the Muslim world.
I'd like to see a definition of moderate, which we normally don't get. There may be more 'moderates' than you think though.
I heard about those attacks in Indonesia; while sad and terrible, they remain an exception in the country. The dominant strand of Islam there is tolerant and open.
The reason we see extremist attacks against our governments is because our governments are the ones that have kept these dictators in power for so long. We could save ourself a left of headache by not supporting the bad guys... for once. http://www.howtoinstalllaminateflooring.org/
C Baker - "We could get rid of the monarchy"
How? Stop voting for them? Impose an economic boycott on Duchy Originals?