Mehdi Hasan

Mehdi Hasan’s polemical take on politics, economics and foreign affairs

Syndicate contentRSS

In praise of Peter Oborne

Why can’t we have more conservative columnists like him?

I've been enjoying my good friend Peter Oborne's columns and blogs in the Telegraph in recent weeks. He joined the paper from the Daily Mail back in September, and has brought some much-needed sanity and balance to the Torygraph's comment pages.

Oborne is a supporter of David Cameron, but fronted a Channel 4 Dispatches investigation into Andy Coulson and the phone-hacking scandal last month. He has also been a long-standing opponent of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and an outspoken critic of Islamophobia and anti-Muslim sentiment (perhaps he should have a word with the Telegraph's blogs editor, Damian Thompson). Why can't we have more conservative columnists like him?

Writing today on his blog, Oborne castigates the Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, for using fraudulent figures about the extent of benefit fraud.

Oborne, who is a supporter of the coalition's welfare "reforms", adds:

There was an unnecessarily snide tone to Osborne's Spending Review. [He] failed to emphasise the powerful Christian vision of moral redemption and the value of work which lies at the heart of David Cameron and Iain Duncan Smith's Big Society. Indeed, his false figures on benefit fraud helped to build up the impression that the poor are mean-minded and cheating.

. . . of course there are benefit cheats, and they do need to be dealt with. But there are also many people who do their best to raise a family and make ends meet in incredibly difficult circumstances. That is why it is important that Osborne will do the right thing and issue a correction concerning his false figures about the scale of benefit fraud in Britain today.

Hear, hear!

10 comments

9xzulug's picture

commonsense maybe prevailing.it's not what you say it's how you say it.it's about time ideologies were set aside and working for the majority of uk citizens should be the essence of a truthful solution to our country's finacial woes

Neil's picture

I totally agree Medhi. Oborne is one of the few Torygraph columnists I regularly read and agree with. He is more analytical and has a greater sense of morals than his fellow columnists. Bo Jo, Tebbit, Jeff Randall, Daniel Hannan, Christopher Booker and Heffer all have more than a screw loose.

It appears to be that whereas the left tend to argue from the basis of fact and reasoned argument, the right prefers hysteria, generalisation and anectdotal evidence to put their case.
This is also be seen in the USA midterms where the Tea Party and Democrats have completely different styles.

Unfortunately the right-wing, Daily Mail-style of political rhetoric is dominant currently. Stories, however fictional, trump bare facts and Labour needs to find a new (fact-based) compelling narrative.

RK's picture

@neil

soviet union collapsed. fact.

RK's picture

okay i have more than 100 relatives in US. I will write to each one of them to vote Obama next time around, provided he breaks up investment bank and the retail ones.

Let us see how honest are leftists.

michaelpetek's picture

Peter Oborne also refers to "the Chancellor’s vindictive approach to the very poor and his apparently more relaxed attitude towards tax evasion by the rich."

Easy, really. These rich people went to Eton with him. The faw-faw in their accent gives them a certain cachet too. Makes them sound like very important people who mustn't be disrespected, coz it's their money after all.

frances smith's picture

yes. though it is absurd to imagine that it is osborne alone who is responsible for telling lies about benefit fraud. benedict brogan, and other telegraph columnists, are, after all, always telling us how close they are. I suspect oborne's long term attachment to the conservative party means that he would prefer to blame osborne rather than the party leader, though this is nonsense.

though clearly oborne finds the attacks on people on benefits just a bit too nasty, which is exactly what they are, and a few other tories who find it equally distasteful might start feeling uncomfortable too. though to single out osborne and pretend cameron is not responsible is rubbish. after all putting two nasty rightwingers like duncan smith and grayling in the dwp tells us all we need to know about cameron and his view of people on benefits.

crabstix's picture

It is all the same old... blame the benefit cheats and feckless workshy? Well, just reform the benefits system. Hang on, it seems that 2/3rds of the reforms will hit the low to middle income workers hardest? Why is that? Of course, hidden taxing of the working class to avoid tax rises for the rich! Simples, hey Georgie?

Lou's picture

I was pleased to see Peter Oborne's article today, at last someone presenting real figures - which incidentally I posted on 18th October under James Macintyre's 'Do the media lead the anti benefit's screaming' post.

It's disheartening that on the whole, journalists across the media spectrum fail to delve just a little into statisitcs put out by Ministers and highlight the inaccuracies.

Well done Mr Oborne for breaking that particular mould.

RK's picture

Birds of a feather flock together.....all are ganging against Rupert dear.

...Islamophobia and anti-Muslim sentiments...

There you have it. Mehdi, singular reason why you call yourself left. Yeah?

Classic Deception.

Little Richardjohn's picture

When the Telegraph calls a tory chancellor a liar, it's time to reach for a politically-scintillating phrase. Where to get one, that's the problem.
But if only it was a matter of standard-issue lying (politicians for the use of). There does seem to be a schizophrenia about this era of politics. They seem to believe their own lies.

Latest tweets