Quality posts is the main to be a focus for the viewers to pay a visit the web site, that’s what this website is providing.

Would you be fascinated about exchanging links?

Every weekend i used to pay a quick visit this web site, for the reason that i wish for enjoyment, as this this website conations really pleasant funny material too.

This website online is mostly a walk-through for all of the info you needed about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse right here, and you’ll definitely discover it.

on question time vince cable said "we are in real finacial difficulties and worse" what does the worse mean

If you've got a problem, perhaps you should change your name. Try "Titus" on for size.

@Daragh McDowell

"You were on QT last night? Well guess that's one hour struck off my iPlayer list..."

Shucks. That must've been devastating. Irreparable damage to MH'S heart! Jeez.

medhi hassan is the nick griffin of the muslim world,your attack on the pope on question time just confirms to me why muslims have no place in british soceity with this hatred and extremism that has cursed this country since 1997 when new labour opened the floodgates of mass immigration to the uk of muslims from terrorist states like pakistan,iraq and afghanistan,you medhi hassan showed your true colours on question time and if your supposed to be a moderate muslim well god help us what your exremists brothers of yours thinks of the west and the uk,

@James (26 September 2010 at 06:23)

But the question is surely whether the rate of paedophilia/cover-ups in the Catholic church is higher than in other comparable institutions (i.e. other religious groups, state schools, secular youth groups etc)? From what (limited) systematic comparatative studies there have been the RC percentage rate seems to be if anything slightly lower than in Protestant denominations and MUCH lower than in the secular school system. Can two reports (which deal with allegations, not legal convictions) from small nations about an institution which has over a billion members be counted as authorative? So at what ratio of paedophiles to non-paedophiles is one justified to make the blanket judgement that paedophilia is "part and parcel" of an organisation?

Mr Hasan

I did not know who you were before Friday. Watching you on QT I was very, very impressed - I was in agreement with most all you said. I enjoyed your passion and that you came accross as not 'one of the gang'. Now there's a young man who is no politician I cheered. He says it as it is.

On Saturday I came to this website to find out more. I spent hours reading your articles and the associated comments. And I must admit I was a little troubled by what I found. In particular I found no explanation from you for your words concerning non-believers and animals. And yes, I read your article addressing this question but found obfuscation therein. But ok, I thought, you are a man of faith. Perhaps you were just quoting the Koran and perhaps your words were easily misread out of context.

After watching Ed Miliband on Andrew Marr's show I noticed you were on the following programme and decided to watch. I thought you were clearly uncomfortable in the discussion about sex workers and unprepared to listen to the more informed such as the sex workers union representative. Ho hum, I thought, well this is a subject that calls beyond intellect and we can all find ourselves confused in such matters without fully understanding why.

But then came the conversation regarding homosexualility. In your one comment during this piece you conspicuously failed to take the opportunity to defend a persons right to a non-heterosexual sexuality. Instead you chose to attack "aggressive secularism". Oh dear, you took the politicians choice to avoid the question. Do you not see that your inability to defend a persecuted minority of which you do not belong diminishes your defence of a persecuted minority to which you do belong? Are you not asking yourself how you found yourself in agreement with an obvious loathsome bigot?

It is hard to recognize and escape the bigotry into which we are born. I am an aging fella who has struggled for tolerance and wealth distribution all my adult life, but I grew up in a time and a working class where racism was rife. I had to learn that my community, my mum and dad, my uncles and aunts, my friends were wrong. It wasn't easy and at the time caused much pain. But it was the right thing to do.

I do not want to believe you are a homophobe or a religious bigot. You may well be struggling with these matters but unfortunately your increasing profile as a "progressive" commentator will allow you to prevaricate no longer. Your position demands you make choices, and clearly state your choices, nomatter how difficult for you and your kin.

I do not care that you believe ancient texts are the word of a god. I do care if you take such things seriously enough to harbour prejudice against other people.

Regards

Mr J Martin, London

It may hlpone to vent one's feelings to write in this column but I doubt if the gentleman in question has read and taken any notice of everyone's comments

So is it worthwhile writing except to exercise one' wrists - a rather Onanistic exercise in the circumstances

I found Medhi Hasan's comments on Question time on the whole interesting and thought provoking, until his remark about there being 'Tens of Thousands of Paedophile Catholic Priests.'

This is really an outrageous statement in view of the facts, that in the UK there are likely to be no more than 5,000 priests, in total, and that research has shown only 0.4% have been accused of offences against children, not all of whom have been convicted. Even those 20 or so offenders is necessarily far too many.

One would expect a serious journalist who should be familiar with the social sciences and the nature of statistics, to provide the most substantial evidence before making such a claim.

One of the reasons for the Holy Father's visit was to apologize most sincerely to the citizens of the UK for the serious sins committed against children by an incredibly small minority of Catholic priests,
and for that apology to have been graciously accepted.

Is Medhi Hasan so holy that he can cast not just a stone against the catholic priesthood but the whole of the Himalayas?

This kind of irrational outburst does not serve the truth. Neither does it build bridges of hope between sincere people of faith and sincere non-believers. Rather it would entrench already hardened ill informed attitudes.

It was an extremely inflammatory remark to have made and not one worthy of a morally sound and fair-minded journalist.

David Dimbleby also failed gravely in his duty as Chairperson in not reprimanding Hasan for this breach of the etique of debate.

For his and everyone else's information, 'this not the kind of
behaviour one would expect from an educated English Gentleman.'

You`re arrogant and up your own backside; you perform like so many better men before you - Bernard Levin being the acme, but you lack the charm. Your attack on the Pope was reprehensible. How do we know that child abuse isn`t rife in islam - all those long, roomy "frocks" imams wear (lots of scope for gropes, fumbles and more), and the authoritarian rule. You wouldn`t, of course, know because muslims are so scared of their own religious leaders. Islam is religion by tyranny. At least Roman Catholics now have a voice.
As for your jibes about Cameron, wealth and co, you sound like you have benefited from privilege too. Hypocrite!

." How is it that eight-year-old Antonio Clegg has a greater grasp of economic theory, and of the lessons of economic history, than you, Clegg or Danny Alexander?

lol

Somehow Idon't think he will answer these questions. Vince Cable sold out his principles for power. Plain and simple!

Mehdi you gave a virtuoso performance at Question Time today. Searing and insightful: We're not worthy, we're not worthy :)

Fine performance Mehdi. On the timing of VC's conversion to deficit hawk, LFF did a good piece this week on Clegg's conversion (which includes a link showing that there was not a sudden "firestorm" from Greece; it had in fact been rumbling along for some time). http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/09/cleggs-justification-for-deficit-...
Quizzed on the same matter this week by Andrew Neil, Huhne used the same argument. He referred to a Bloomberg table (which I have yet to find)showing there was a spike in interest rates during the days of coalition negotiations. Keep up the good work.

You did well last night Mehdi, but need to let others finish - they can damn themselves on their own. Hislop looked particularly grumpy - i hope you gave him a hug...
Cable is caught in a bind, and I dont see his experience of this coalition being a happy one...

if they do invite the far left medhi hassan on question time again i hope he issues an apology to all catholics in the uk who he insulted with his racist and bigoted comments he made about that religion, but i guess the bbc kinda like the nutty muslim on with extreme views and his eyes popping out of there sockets and medhi hassan certainly fits that profile,i would of prefered maajid nawaz from the quilliam foundation on question time because at least he knows what he is talking about and is a good role model for muslims,that i cant say for medhi hassan.

Mehdi, we need more like you to shine a harsh light on the flip flopping Lib Dems and their questionable coalition.

You were immense on QT last night.

Vince seems to get an immensely hard time for what I see as no reason whatsoever. Of course there are contradictions with a few of his views, but the only way Cable can really motivate any real change is through being in Government.

You can't expect a member of a coalition government to be outspoken against the cuts when the winning party marketed themselves on cutting the deficit.

I actually think, had Vince stepped back and refused to be a part of this coalition, the Lib Dems would have been beaten and bruised and the coalition destroyed before it had even began. Also, had the Lib Dems decided on a "progressive" coalition with Labour and other parties to secure a majority, that coalition would have been much more unstable as this present one.

Although Vince is a politician and should be called to account on his contradictions, Mehdi showed himself to be nothing other than a horrid, arrogant bully. This "open letter" to Vince also expresses an element of cowardice as, why would Mehdi not ask these questions on the panel as the 60 minutes would have presented plenty of time to do just that.

I thought you were a little too keen to please the crowd. Also you all ganged up on poor Vince Cable. It felt like bullying at school

Mehdi

What a confident and eloquent performance both a QT and Sunday Morning. You clearly unsettled both politicians and the chap from christian voice. Keep it up!

Rgds
Numan

Mehdi, if you were talking to Vince before the programme, why didn't you ask him some of these questions then? Just a thought...

Publishing an 'open letter' (quite the most self-fellating way of making all the points you weren't skilled enough to make last night) just continues to cement your place in my mind as the sixth-form bully, desperate to carve out a TV niche for themselves as an attack dog who barks out selective quotations made by your opponent, often out of context, and then shouts them down whilst they try and answer.

I'm amazed you manage to drag yourself away from the mirror in the morning in order to get into work.

You're pretty good at this QT thing, Mehdi...would love to see you in frontline politics.

No point being shy and letting Tory bullies walk all over you, doing the "talking bollocks with an authoritative voice" thing.

CF looked out of her depth.

Overall a crap show though, last night....the show is not what it was.