“Thatcherism gilded with piety”
David Hare’s description of Cameronism.
By Mehdi Hasan Published 18 August 2010 15:57Writing for the Guardian, the playwright David Hare hits the nail on the head:
At the end of this decade, we hit a perfect storm. A financial crisis, precipitated by banking malpractice, coincided with the moment at which New Labour had diluted the principles of social democracy to a point where its founding ideals ceased to be recognisable. When organised finance and the public interest came into direct conflict, the left had neither an analysis nor a coherent plan beyond firefighting. Into this vacuum stepped David Cameron.
In one sense, he's a traditional blame-the-victim Thatcherite. But his special gift is to gild Thatcherism with piety: not just "do this", but "do this, it's good for you". Margaret Thatcher at least had the courage to despise the poor. Cameron befriends them by sticking hymn sheets in their hands while rifling their pockets. She adored the rhetoric of class war; he indulges the blokey pleasures of exhortation. He is a man who because he cannot imagine chooses instead to preach. Internationally, he is null.
Michael Forsyth was asked on Question Time whether the economic crisis wasn't providing visceral Thatcherites with the perfect cover to fulfil their dream of destroying the welfare state. "No, no," he said, "this is economics, not ideology." Cameron was asked whether, when the crisis was over, he planned to restore the familiar provisions of public service. He said not. Somewhere between the hypocrisy and the realism of these two irreconcilable positions lies the future of Cameronism.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















15 comments
Adam Lent from part 2 of the Guardian articles:
"The truth is that Cameron was the man with a plan to win power. But it is George Osborne who is the man with the plan to use that power. The chancellor is determined to reinvent the UK economy through his massive reduction in public spending and doesn't seem too concerned for anything that might get in his way. That almost certainly includes comfy Cameronism as much as anything else."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/aug/18/what-is-cameronism-p...
Unfortunately Cameron is a New Labour created problem. He has spent many years watching and learning from NL mistakes and more than occasional gaffes in public, social and economical policy. The recent Milkgate scandal is a perfect example of Cameron trying through sound-bite journalism take the initiative and try to make his party seem as far removed from Thatchers party as possible.
The coalition is well aware that due to Labours archaic election procedures they have a clear run until the autumn to take the initiative and win the argument regarding the need and speed of cuts. Recent polls will suggest that they are winning this argument with those most important 'swing' voters. No recent election has been won by just getting a party's core vote out. The 3-4 million swing voters are who need to be targeted. Tony Blair was well aware of this and won 3 elections. GB completely lost the plot and ignored these voters and paid a heavy price as Labour lost seat after seat. I find myself discussing the impending cuts with highly intelligent and astute friends and Cameron has convinced them already that the road they are on is the the correct one. Every government member who speaks lays the blame for these cuts at the door of the Labour party. What shocks me is that at no point in the last 100 days nobody from the shadow cabinet has come forward and gone on the offensive and said this is what we would have done to tackle the deficit, and making people aware how and why this deficit came about. The fact that this hasn't happened and was completely missing in the election campaign is a travesty. I am totally convinced the Tory agenda is being driven by ideology but you can not blame them for this. What worries me is that all the Labour candidates seem very eager to but a lid on the last 13 years and try to rebrand the Party. If it moves to much to the left it will be unelectable for a generation. It needs to refocus and forge a identity for the Labour party that is relevant today, and not be too quick to breakaway from the most successful Labour government this country has ever seen.
Qamar, 'Every government member who speaks lays the blame for these cuts at the door of the Labour party.'
Pardon?!? Didn't known that that multi-multi-multi-billion US firm Lehman Brothers went bust due to the actions of the British Labour Party.
Many thanks for informing me.
HT, Qamar is correct. The Con-Dems are creating the impression that the cause of the crisis was Labour maxing out on the credit cards.
History according to Nick Clegg and David Cameron ignores little things such as Northern Rock, Royal Bank of Scotland, HBOS, Lloyds TSB and the other British banks. And they ignore the financial crises in other countries such as the USA (Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, AIG, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac).
It is one of Labour's failings that Cameron pinned the blame onto Labour so easily before, during, and after the election.
What worries me is that none of the leadership candidates has said or done anything of any note to attack this head on. They are another crop of vapid dissemblers without a idea between them or fire in their bellies.
Dave C, bit like adolf blaming the jews.
Attempts of reinventing history is a very old idea, and foolish, especially these days.
Bearing in mind that Hare,Pinter et al were so effective at ending the Premierships of Major and Thatcher, should anyone care about what they say outside of the Theatre?
I doubt that anyone in Westminster is quaking...
Cameron is not that pious, just fairly careful as to his image, and getting an easy run from his mates in the media.
anyone know how high was the deficit when Cameron switched from a committment to matching Labour's spending. Surely the 'Labour' deficit is only what accumulated subsequent to then, ..... and most of that was the Keynsiam approach to getting through a worldwide recession where unemployment was not a price worth paying.
@ET your point is perfect justification as to why Labour have failed to explain the causes of the economic crisis. I do not blame Labour, but as Dave C states Labour have done nothing to explain how the country has managed to run up such a large deficit. Camereon and Clegg have played on this and blame the Labour Party for the ills of the universe.
George Bush - aided by a supine media - was able to convince the gullible that Iraq was responsible for 9/11. In the same fashion, the coalition have successfully blamed the deficit on Labour's apparent profligacy. I don't recall the tory opposition telling Gordon Brown to let the banking system collapse, so for them to criticise the bailouts now is dishonest.
The media's Cameron-Clegg arse-kissing is getting too much and must be challenged. So far it is the usual suspects, NS, C4 News, Guardian and Newsnight who are putting up any challenge to their arrogance.
It seems modern politicians need an enemy (Cold War, unions, terrorism, budget deficit) to justify their actions and the coalition is no different. The left's evidence-based stance is losing out to the right's anecdotal bullshit.
Labour must regroup, challenge taboos (inequality, tax avoidance, criminal finance sector) and make the government the enemy. They need to be brave as history shows us that once services are dismantled or privatised they are gone forever.
Does Carol Thatcher read 'The New Thtatthman', by any chance?
Buy more to send. On this site __ http://www.pointingtrade.com
The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike,jordan,
prada, also including the jeans,shirts,bags,hat and the decorations.All the
products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can
accept the paypal payment.,after the payment, can ship within short time.
_________________________$$$$$$$__________
________________________$$$$$$$$$$________
________________________$$$$$$$$$$$_______
_________________________$$$$$$$$$$$______
_________________________$$$$$$$$$$$_____
_ ____________________________$$$$$$$$$____
__ _________________________$$$$$$$$$$_____
http://www.pointingtrade.com $$$$$$$$$$$$$____
___ _____________$$$______$$$$$$$$$$$$$$___
__ ____________$$$$$$$$_____$$$$$$__$$$$$__
_ __ __________$$$$$$$$$$_____$$$$____$$$$$_
_ __ ________$$$$$$_$$$$$$$$__$$$$______$$$$
_ ___ ______$$$$$_____$$$$$$$$_$$$$_______$$$
_ __ _ ____$$$$$_________$$$$$$$$$$$$_______$$$
_ __ ____ $$$_____________$$$$$$$$$$$________$$$
_ __ __$$$__ ______________$$$$$$$$$$________$$$$$$
http://www.pointingtrade.com
In a year's time, as recession is formally recognised in we will see the end of this coalition. Hang tight, they won't last long.
Some people said that in 1980 Livers, and look how helpful that was. We need to convince ourselves of the fight ahead, and convince people that there is an alternative to this bunch.
If Maggie cannot return... how about Carol ? !