Mehdi Hasan

Mehdi Hasan’s polemical take on politics, economics and foreign affairs

Syndicate contentRSS

“What happens if we leave Afghanistan?”

Selling a pointless war with horrific images and stories.

One of the top stories this weekend has been the horrible murder of ten aid workers in Afghanistan, including the 36-year-old British doctor Karen Woo, who was due to marry later this month.

There are photos of Dr Woo in pretty much every Sunday newspaper and hers is indeed a heartbreaking story. But I do hope she won't be used by the desperate pro-war brigade to make the case for staying and fighting "to the death" with the dastardly Taliban.

Don't get me wrong: I despise the medieval and barbaric misogynists of the Taliban, but let's not pretend that the brutal, corrupt warlords on our side, on Nato and Hamid Karzai's side, are any better. Ever heard of General Dostum? Nor should we be under any illusion that we're "winning" this pointless and bloody war against insurgents, terrorists and gangsters. And let's not forget either that, whether we like it or not, there can be no end to the conflict without talking to the Taliban. Even the US and UK governments now grudgingly accept this.

On a related note, the Independent on Sunday has a rather interesting article from Andrew Johnson on the row over this recent Time magazine cover, which shows the noseless face of an 18-year-old Afghan woman, mutilated by her husband on the orders of a Taliban commander. Johnson writes:

The image is a shocking example of the abuse of women's rights and the medieval attitude to punishment in Afghanistan. It also, however, threw up a storm of controversy.

This was partly because of the headline with the picture: "What happens if we leave Afghanistan". The headline pointedly had no question mark, and opponents of the war saw it as naked "emotional blackmail" in support of a conflict that continues to claim many American, as well as British, lives. It was also criticised by bloggers as "war porn".

"That is exactly what will happen," said Manizha Naderi, an Afghan American whose group runs the shelter where Aisha stayed. "People need to see this and know what the cost will be of abandoning this country."

Critics -- of whom there were many on the internet -- pointed out that the mutilation had taken place despite the presence of Nato forces and argued that women's rights were being used cynically as a justification for the war. Columnist Tom Scocca, on the Slate website, described the picture as "gut-wrenching" but added that "a correct and accurate caption would be 'What is still happening, even though we are in Afghanistan' ".

Such was the row that Richard Stengel, Time's managing editor, was forced to write an article defending the image. "Aisha posed for the picture and says she wants the world to see the effect a Taliban resurgence would have on the women of Afghanistan. She knows that she will become a symbol of the price Afghan women have had to pay for the repressive ideology of the Taliban."

Aisha herself -- her surname has been withheld to protect her -- was more circumspect. "I don't know if it will help other women. I just want to get my nose back," she was quoted as saying in the New York Times.

45 comments

Des Demona's picture

@ Mehdi Hasan

On one hand you say you despise the barbaric brutal and mysoginistic Taliban.
On the other you say we have to talk to them.

And say what exactly? Please stop being brutal barbaric and mysoginistic?

Somehow I don't think that's going to work.

Perhaps you can come up with what these 'talks' should entail?

alex's picture

a very good example of how to pose a question in the headline and then deliberately avoid it in the article...
Murdoch taught you well Mr Hasan

felix's picture

Defeat,I dont think so.
Withdrawal,yes.
If the US was engaged in all out war with Afghanistan as a country it could bomb it all the way back to the stone age.
The question is is game worth the candle.
Probably not.Civil war seems inevitable.
In fact it would be cheaper in lives and money to engage with which ever bunch of tribes men happens to gain control.
We dont have to be in Afghanistan to beat al-Qa'ida.
Many Afghan tribes will gladly do the job if supported,as they hate al-Qa'ida whom they regard as bunch of interfering Arabs who have brought nothing but trouble and suffering to Afghanistan.

ASK's picture

Good article!! Welldone Mehdi

IF anyone in here thinks that Nato forces are in Afghanisatn to help and bring a positive change for Afghans, Must be the most credulous and naive person, IF you have such a belief then I suggest you should see your GP as soon as possible.

"What happens if we leave Afghanistan"
I think it should say; "What happened since we entered Afghanisatn" and with ? at the end.

I get surprised sometimes how warmonger are some people, they use every ticniques possible to encourage people to support war, a war which has taken more lives than Hiroshima and Nagasaka but over a bit longer period.

Do these warmongers have moral, dignity, conscience, or any humane values?

If Nato cares about womens' right then they should start bombiing: China, Burma, Zimbabwe, Pakistan, India, Russia, Kenya, oh 95% of countries in the world, or more.

When you see warmongers use different propagandas to persuade people to support the war, YOu can clearly see that the war has lost it main purpose, which never really had a true one.

If women in Britain managed to get their rights, such as votig, owning their own assets and so on, without the "help of Nato" Then surely Afghan women can gain theirs without Nato too.

Joe Bone's picture

@ Buckskins

Thanks for reminding the world- the American won the war in Vietnam.

You might like to add, America conqueror of Granada.

writeoff's picture

We can't right the wrongs we have done. That’s the miserable truth of it. But suppose there was the will to stay for 50 years. Look at places where the West has had a relatively free hand in directing other nations and the results are not pretty. Afghans could, with care and nurture, live like Haitians within a generation.

Raymond's picture

Mr. Hasan
As a journalist, you once again have failed to address the real issue. Taliban = ISLAM. They derive their inspiration from Islam, they preach it, and they are yet another example of the true face and reality of Islam ( the other being Islamic republic of Iran, and Sudan, with Pakistan is not too far off ). when will Muslim/Middle Eastern journalist finally wake up and start discussing a serious reform of Islam, abandoning all that is brutal and regressive. If there is somethign left afterwards, great. It may inspire greatness for a while. Otherwise, throw away the whole thing and move on. Close mosques, destroy Madressah's, abandon the Mullah, kill the terrorist !.. a wolrld without Islam would be a much better world : No Taliban, no terrorists, no immunity for cutting woman's nose for leaving a dirt-bag, no stoning, no parasitic life for Mullahs/Imams ( who have no useful purpose on life ! ), and no Arab/Israeli conflict either .... get rid of Islam, and you solve all these issues ( or at least, remove the main instigator ).
Now, as a jounalistm, do you dare to address that ?

Clem the Gem's picture

You can negotiate with those you despise, but only from a position of strength.
Having already signalled our exit, we simply do not have any purchase on events - unless there is a dramatic victory. Which is at best, unlikely.

swatantra's picture

Utter chaos and outbreaks of civil wars. Its back to the old days of tribal warfare.

Clem the Gem's picture

Once again, another promising stream descends into sterile point scoring and name calling over Islam.

What will now happen is that those of you who will always oppose western intervention anywhere will move on and ignore the subjugation of Women, Liberals, Educators etc.
Those of you who see themselves as fighting for the freedoms of the enlightenment will also quickly move on to another battlefeild.

We are not going to quit with honour, and the only people to be affected, save the veterans, will be the poor, benighted Afghans themselves.

India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran and China will continue to treat the whole region as their backyard, and power politics will hold sway.

Any attempt by "the west" to do anything will be decried, and at some point soon, another UK Minister will say something stupid.

Altogether a very sad state of affairs, but chins up! At least youre not a pushtu woman who can read, eh?

felix's picture

ASK 'Then surely Afghan women can gain theirs without Nato too.'
One would hope so,it may be a long time coming mores the pity for the women.
But as you say it should be up to them to reform their society and religion without outside interference unless it is requested.
Just as it our right to protect our country and culture.
If they then proceed attack us or support attacks on us then they will have to bear the consequences.

felix's picture

As we are discussing senseless wars

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/mehdi-hasan/2009/08/muslims-darfur-poi...

where mehdi makes some good points.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/jun/11/darfur-su...

Axmed's picture

Alec: Surely you do not mean what you have said about Mehdis writings? You gotta be kidding. He is a fine writer. Do not envy him. Raymond you re sick man. Islam is cool.

Joe Bone's picture

@ Buckskins

You might like to add further - America is good at massacring innocents people in each of the wars they were and are involved in - No Gun Ri Bridge, My Lai, Iraq and Afghanistan, Pakistan

Axmed's picture

With regards to the question about 'What happens if we leave Afghanistan? God knows. But I know one thing: Afghans people will be better off without these killers.

stylus's picture

This war is not about making the UK safe if anything it has made it unsafe and has now opened up a hornets nest. The military might leave but the west are going to have a hand in Afghanistan for a long time to come. The US have been doing geological surveys for the past several years now and experts estimate Afghanistan's resources could make it the richest mining region on earth, what a coincidence!

treborc's picture

Which killers American UK, the problem is the war is with Pakistan, so why are we not in Pakistan, better still why are we not at home.

If you can call this home anymore.

Hallmark's picture

I feel deeply for the lost lives and suffering of all in this conflict.
The war in Afghanistan is a geurilla and insurgency war deep rooted within the hearts, minds,culture, politics, and land of the Afghan people. It cannot be won by conventional forces using conventional means. Withdraw our forces from Afghanistan and support the Afghan government to assist political and democratic change that will reflect the true state of Afghanistan on the ground.

tbf8321483's picture

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE LEAVE

If by WE you mean the British, it will make no difference whatsoever. You are only there for window dressing and political cover. For ya’al to run from Afghanistan would be nothing new. Your army had plenty of training for it when they ran from Basra Iraq. Of course the British ubiquitous Dunkirkese comment of victory was quick to the lips. No doubt it will accompany your sprint for the airport in Afghanistan.

Des Demona's picture

It is impossible to change centuries of tribalism in a few short years. Perhaps a better idea than invasion would have been to have rained a few hundred cruise missles down on Bil Laden's terrorist training camps.

Too late now, we're stuck with it, and of course that would have meant the disgusting Taliban regime would still be in place.

When we leave. As others have said, civil war.

praha7's picture

@Buckskins.

"WE"would only be following the example you set in Saigon.

thinkov's picture

so are we magnificent enough to save the world?

we can't even save pushtu womem
and as for saving the world we'd be best not bothering

Rob's picture

Raymond

You give an entirely one-dimensional picture of Islam. You ignore the hundreds of millions of decent muslims, concerned mainly with living a decent life. The form of Islam you are speaking of, is largely (directly and indirectly) a product of the West. Wahabbism, or Salfism, the branch of Islam influencing the Taliban and "Al Qaeda" originated in Saudi Arabia (an ally of the USA). Many of the jihadi groups were created or encouraged early on by the CIA. Others - e.g. the Iranian clerics, Hezbollah, Hammas, sprang up in opposition to despotic US-backed regimes.

It is not many years ago that Pakistan had a female leader and was pretty liberal - it is mainly the war in Afghanistan pushing that country to the brink. Islamic terrorism in Britain, is also something that has only arisen since the start of the "War on Terror." However, the key driver behind the politicisation of Islam is the continuing injustice inflicted on the Palestinians, something in which the US and UK governments are both complicit by their uncritical support of the Israeli state.

Clem the Gem's picture

@praha7: Dont play his game mate, he just likes winding the Brits up.
As the timetable is apparently already agreed fdor US and Uk withdrawal of fighting troops, the "us" presumably refers to all NATO/Western forces.

I think that having done the most stupid thing we could do in a war by telling our opponents when we are going, then we have already started the countdown to the Taliban winning the civil war. This means that all the same horrible practices against women and enlightenment will prevail. Hope all those against intervention will be proud of this.

Unite!'s picture

Their crime is to undermine and complain about our personal freedoms. Paradoxically, in order to safeguard not only our freedoms, but also culturally liberal minorities from the reactions of the majority, the muslim has to be dealt with swiftly and harshly.

. Secular societies should not accommodate or make compromises with any faith group.

. All immigrants should be forced to assimilate.

. Two year military service should be introduced for all youths.

. No further planning permission should be given to any place of worship.

. We should only import immigrants from secular non moslem democracies.

. The final aim of society should be to amalgamate us into a one free, equal and culturally homogeneous citizens under a single constitution, where religion is a private shame.

Kristi's picture

Oh my god, Alec, GET A LIFE. I'm a grammar geek and I don't even spend THAT MUCH TIME typing up a gigantic complaint about someone's grammar. If you want to complain, complain about WHAT he says, not HOW he says it.

Lumut's picture

I agree with Unite and in fact I would like to add more:

1. All those muslims extremists, jihadists or whatever killing names they call themselves should do the honourable thing - just pack up and go back to where you come from.

You have got the check to do honour killings, why don't you all have the check and honour to go back to your own country, when you know you are not wanted here?

Lumut's picture

What happen when we leave Afghanistan?

The answer is staring you in the face Mehdi Hassan.

1. The Talibans with the help of Pakistan will return to enforce their sharia law (no one in their right mind call that law)

2. Saudi Arabia and OPEC will finance them.

3. 100,000s jihadists and suicide bombers will roam and burn the world;

4. You, Medhdi Hassan, will rejoice like all Muslims at the killing of all Jews, Christians and non-muslims as PROVIDED for inside your Quoran.

Thats what is going to happen. Period!!

Ex Muslim's picture

Rob,

You have got it all wrong. The so-called Palestinian issue is just an excuse by Muslims to bomb and murder the Kafir.

The REAL cause is the Quoran and Islam. It is provided in the Quoran, 123 verses of it, to kill all the Jews, Christians and non-Muslims. That is the real cause. Rob, I suggest you read the Quoran, then you would appreciate the real cause of all the jihadists' killings.

Indonesia with 97% Muslims and Malaysia 80% Muslims and yet some of the most violent jihadists are from these two countries against the Christians in their own countries. They beheaded the Christians, burn their Churches, harass non-Muslims everyday. They control the Government, they got 100% of all Government contracts, discrimination law enacted to preserve their unfettered rights- yet they still do what they do to non- Muslims. Is that because of Palestinian issue? Any moron will know its not.

In the Philippines and Thailand, 95% of the people are Christians and Buddists respectively, yet the 1% minority caused the most violent acts - beheadings, bombing etc. against their own country men - is that because of Palestine issue? Rob, you make me laugh with your ignorance.

The REAL reason is the Quoran. The REAL reason is Islam. Islam promotes and glorifies violent, murder, killings.

Greg Dyke's picture

We need to get out of Afghanistan and just drop really really, big big bombs, paid for by our own muslim dhimmis, on them from afar!

tiacchyst's picture

Well Joe, I realize you may be a bad example of what passes for the British education system, however that’s not what I said. What I posted was that the United States military has never been defeated in the field to the point of losing a war. Did I go slowly enough for you? The Vietnam War was a political defeat, not a military defeat. Let me know if I used any words that are beyond your limited grasp of the English language.

felix's picture

could read
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE LEAVE
Simple,
A civil war.

We should just leave and let them duke it out as they inevitable and regrettably will.

The mutilation of women for reasons of 'honour' will continue until Afghan culture evolves from within.
That kind of change cannot be imposed.

Alec's picture

Mehdi, you're supposed to be a journalist with high-profile responsibilities on a prestigious publication. Repeatedly opening sentences with "but" is bad form.

>> But I do hope she won't be used by the desperate pro-war brigade to make the case for staying and fighting "to the death" with the dastardly Taliban.

More poor journalism. Opinion and conjecture presented as fact. You link to no-one using her execution as a pretext for anything, so it's reasonable to conclude you ain't seen an example. Except for this article, of course, in which you use her execution as a cudgel to beat unnamed enemies with.

Most, of not all of the British newspapers, are critical of our military presence in Afghanistan. A goodly few are in explicit opposition.

Who's calling for "Death to the Taleban"? You're constructing your own fantasies.

>> Don't get me wrong: I despise the medieval and barbaric misogynists of the Taliban.

There's a but coming. I predict it.

>> But let's not pretend that the brutal and corrupt warlords on our side, on Nato and Hamid Karzai's side, are any better.

Who did?

>> Ever heard of General Dostum?

Yes, he strapped someone to the treads of a tank and drove it around the compound. Horrendous, but what does it have to do with the execution of aid workers who were unconnected to the British military?

Clem the Gem's picture

in that case thinkov, why not just give up on trying to improve the lot of humanity altogether? Maybe you have, I dont know.

We do not have to be "magnificent", we just have to do better, for everyones sake.

Bruce's picture

I think you've just about summed it up. An endless war which lost any focus or purpose it may (?) once have had some years ago. Just one of the lessons of the Iraq catastrophe is that the 'War On Terror' is self-perpetuating. Nato statements still regularly use that phrase even though even old Dubya recanted on it and apologised for it in 2006. The medics are the latest innocent victims. They won't be the last.

felix's picture

Rob thank you for some intelligent input...your first paragraph is somewhat accurate but a little one sided.

"It is not many years ago that Pakistan had a female leader and was pretty liberal -(she was murdered)
it is mainly the war in Afghanistan pushing that country to the brink.
(radical islamist have always been active in Pakistan)
Islamic terrorism in Britain, is also something that has only arisen since the start of the "War on Terror." (is that an excuse)
However, the key driver behind the politicisation of Islam is the continuing injustice inflicted on the Palestinians,(look at how other Arab countries treat the Palestinians,see
http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/mehdi-hasan/2009/08/muslim...

"something in which the US and UK governments are both complicit by their uncritical support of the Israeli state."

Uncritical,give me a break! and do you know who much US and EU aid goes to Palestine? Compared to that given by the oil rich Arab states?

thinkov's picture

Assassinating Innocent charity workers is really the most despicable cheap action imaginable

No one is going to get even till we get out

Joe Bone's picture

What happen when we leave Afghanistan - the Talibans will do what they know best- to enforce Sharia Law, to enforce Islamic values and cultures and to apply Islamic Science.

See the Tafsir by Tabari, The Tarikh by Ishaq, Bukhari, Hisham and Muslim. They provide you a detailed picture of what would happen when we leave Afghanistan...

1. The Talibans will follow what its Phophet had done - murders, rampant and condoned paedophiles, blood thirsty, rudeless terrorists.

2. They will apply the Islamic science that says:

a. The earth is flat;
b. There are seven earths
c. Semen comes from man's back bone and ribs
d. The sun revolves around the earth
e. Man is made from clay
g. Man is made from congealed blood
h. That Solomon employed Jinns (satans) to build his palaces and temples
i. Honey comes from bee's abdomen
j. Meteors are missiles fired by Allah at eavesdropping Satans who seek to listen to the reading of Quoran in heaven.

Ex Muslim's picture

I appeal to the Editor of The New Statesman to serialise the Quoran and the Hadiths.
That way the world will know what Islam stands for. By so doing it would also expose Islam as a phoney and sham religion. It is your moral obligation to save the world from this so-called religion. So by serialising it, you would do a great favour for mankind.

Most of the Quoran material is a distorted versions of the Jewish Oral Traditions, The Talmud in particular and the OT and NT.

The Jewish Oral Traditions dated from 2 AD (CE). The Quoran incorporated most of the folk tales from the Talmud - See Abraham Geijer 1833, Jay Smith, Dr Abraham Katsh (NY U)

See also Talmudic fables - Targum of Jonathan-ben Uzziah, 150 - 200 AD which is copied verbatim by Quoran 5:31

See also Quoran 5:32 which is copied from Jewish Sanhedrin 4:5. This is the very verse that Muslims all over the world like to quote that Islam is a peaceful religion. Little do they know, its 100% copied from the Sanhedrin 4:5.

Quoran 21:51-71 is copied from Midrash Rabbah 2AD, stories regarding Abraham and the fire - its a Jewish folk lore.

Quoran 27:17 is copied from Jewish folk lore II Targum of Esther written 500 years before Mohammad.

Quoran 2:259 - man die a 100 years- story from The Jewish Fable;

Quoran 2:55-6, 67 that Mosses was resurrected-comes from the Talmud;

Quoran 21:51-71, the errant account of Abraham being delivered from Nimrod comes from Midrash Rabbah;

Quoran 17:1 - Mohammad journey by night to the farthest mosque - from The Testament of Abraham, written 200 BC in Egypt;

The devilish encounter in the 2nd Surah is from Chapter 44 of Midrash Yalkut.

MEHDI HASSAN, there are plenty more where it comes from!!

Clara Kabalevsky's picture

@ Buckskins
Contrary to what you said, I think it will matter a great deal what happens when the British AND the Americans leave. They shouldn't have gone in the first place, having so little knowledge of the country they are trying to take over. And the really irking fact is that Obama and Cameron don't really care now. They see that they're never going to be able to leave having achieved whatever it is they set out to achieve and so they want to exit as soon as possible before they get in deeper and kill even more people. A country that has been a war zone for 25+years is going to be left in a mess. It's going to be very difficult to get out of this without comparisons to Vietnam although rest assured the governments will claim victory no matter what. How on earth can any government start a war on terror by using terrorism themselves? It boggles the mind.

Clem the Gem's picture

Q Buckskins:

If you,ve never been defeated in the field, how come we burned WashingtonDC to the ground?
Were you in another field at the time?
:)

Clem the Gem's picture

Oops! responded to the texan Leatherman!
Forgot myself, it was too good not to. Apologies for incoming rant from USA to everyone else...

MAKootage's picture

Aisha was mutilated in 2008. Its not "what happens if we leave?". Its actually "what's happening right now under our noses." So to speak.

That same Time article conceded that already two Afghan provinces have barred women from leaving home unescorted by males. Other are considering following suit.

What difference does staying make? Is there a catharsis for the politicians in losing as many military lives and funds as possible before actually conceding defeat?

triedeinsursE's picture

praha7, American combat troops were gone from Saigon for over 2 years when the North invaded South Vietnam. The United States military has never been beat in the field to the point of losing a war. The American people stopped the war in Vietnam, not the Vietnamese.Ya'al couldn't even get a handle on a bunch of drunken Irishmen. You RAN from Basra. The US Marines and the Iraqis had to to do your fighting for you and rid the place of the insurgents that ran the British army out of town.

triedeinsursE's picture

Clem the Germ,

You CAN’T “play his game” You are intellectually deficient and your education is at best a work in progress.

Latest tweets