“Today I weep for my country”
The late Senator Robert Byrd’s moving 2003 speech, opposing the invasion of Iraq.
By Mehdi Hasan Published 29 June 2010 14:00Speech delivered on the floor of the US Senate
19 March 2003, 3.45pm
I believe in this beautiful country. I have studied its roots and gloried in the wisdom of its magnificent constitution. I have marvelled at the wisdom of its founders and framers. Generation after generation of Americans has understood the lofty ideals that underlie our great Republic. I have been inspired by the story of their sacrifice and their strength.
But, today I weep for my country. I have watched the events of recent months with a heavy, heavy heart. No more is the image of America one of strong, yet benevolent peacekeeper. The image of America has changed. Around the globe, our friends mistrust us, our word is disputed, our intentions are questioned.
Instead of reasoning with those with whom we disagree, we demand obedience or threaten recrimination. Instead of isolating Saddam Hussein, we seem to have isolated ourselves. We proclaim a new doctrine of pre-emption which is understood by few and feared by many. We say that the United States has the right to turn its firepower on any corner of the globe which might be suspect in the war on terrorism. We assert that right without the sanction of any international body. As a result, the world has become a much more dangerous place.
We flaunt our superpower status with arrogance. We treat UN Security Council members like ingrates who offend our princely dignity by lifting their heads from the carpet. Valuable alliances are split.
After war has ended, the United States will have to rebuild much more than the country of Iraq. We will have to rebuild America's image around the globe.
The case this administration tries to make to justify its fixation with war is tainted by charges of falsified documents and circumstantial evidence. We cannot convince the world of the necessity of this war for one simple reason. This is a war of choice.
There is no credible information to connect Saddam Hussein to 9/11. The twin towers fell because a worldwide terrorist group, al-Qaeda, with cells in over 60 nations, struck at our wealth and our influence by turning our own planes into missiles, one of which would likely have slammed into the dome of this beautiful Capitol except for the brave sacrifice of the passengers on board.
The brutality seen on September 11th and in other terrorist attacks we have witnessed around the globe are the violent and desperate efforts by extremists to stop the daily encroachment of western values upon their cultures. That is what we fight. It is a force not confined to borders. It is a shadowy entity with many faces, many names and many addresses.
But, this administration has directed all of the anger, fear and grief which emerged from the ashes of the twin towers and the twisted metal of the Pentagon towards a tangible villain, one we can see and hate and attack. And villain he is. But, he is the wrong villain. And this is the wrong war. If we attack Saddam Hussein, we will probably drive him from power. But the zeal of our friends to assist our global war on terrorism may have already taken flight.
The general unease surrounding this war is not just due to "orange alert". There is a pervasive sense of rush and risk and too many questions unanswered. How long will we be in Iraq? What will be the cost? What is the ultimate mission? How great is the danger at home?
A pall has fallen over the Senate chamber. We avoid our solemn duty to debate the one topic on the minds of all Americans, even while scores of thousands of our sons and daughters faithfully do their duty in Iraq.
What is happening to this country? When did we become a nation which ignores and berates our friends? When did we decide to risk undermining international order by adopting a radical and doctrinaire approach to using our awesome military might? How can we abandon diplomatic efforts when the turmoil in the world cries out for diplomacy?
Why can this president not seem to see that America's true power lies not in its will to intimidate, but in its ability to inspire?
War appears inevitable. But, I continue to hope that the cloud will lift. Perhaps Saddam will yet turn tail and run. Perhaps reason will somehow still prevail. I along with millions of Americans will pray for the safety of our troops, for the innocent civilians in Iraq, and for the security of our homeland. May God continue to bless the United States of America in the troubled days ahead, and may we somehow recapture the vision which for the present eludes us.
Robert Byrd, 20 November 1917 to 28 June 2010
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















14 comments
Mehdi,please, you are wrong to quote this racist bigot - an opponent of even de-segregating the US Army for pities' sake!
His proudest moment other than attempting to filibuster Civil Rights legislation in the 1960s, was impersonating a Confederate officer in the movie "Gods and Generals".
This man may have been against Iraq, but he was also against every progressive measure of the last 50 years.
A little off post but relevant I think concerning the Iraq subject material of the article is the fact that Tony Blair has been awarded the Liberty Medal. According to the consitution center.......
"The Liberty Medal is awarded annually by the National Constitution Center to men and women of courage and conviction who have strived to secure the blessings of liberty to people the world over.....A global initiative of the Constitution Center, the Liberty Medal reflects the values of the U.S. Constitution -- a belief in justice, fairness, self-governance, and a balance between individual rights and communal responsibility; in the power of people to effectuate change; and in resolving issues through deliberation, compromise, and respect for diverse viewpoints"
A man awarded a medal for upholding the above mentioned values when he took us into an illegal war, killed and maimed millions by his decisions, contravened International Law, ignored legal advice about the legality of such a war, ignored the wishes of the people he was supposed to represent, ignored the advice of government inspectors and UN inspectors etc etc - now that really is enough to make you weep.
I regret that people seem to have no appreciation of a good, honest, strong speech, in defense of principle, in this case.
If people did the same for Churchill they'd never quote his "fight them on the beaches" speech, or his "iron curtain" speech. We can still appreciate what good he did in his life, while knowing he had some views which we might generally find nauseating today.
Perhaps people ought not to be such hypocrites.
Oh..naughy Mehdi! You must of known you would spark a little bit of controversy quoting Byrd. Still, its hard not to agree with some of what the old bigot has got to say, despite the fact that his motives are obviously conservative. On another note...Mehdi, when are you going to become the leader of the Labour Party? We need you! Obviously, you'd have to become an MP first though, eh?
Medhi siding with a fan of the Confederacy ( no bad thing I might add ) Anti civil rights, who's favourite tune is Dixie and was a grand imperial wizard in the Ku Klux klan.
Im pisssing myself laughing. How will that square with the readership of the New Statesman which is facist left ?
wow, he may have been a KKK member, and voted against civil rights laws, but he was against the Iraq war so he's OK by Mehdi.
unseen - he has apologised many times for his actions in the former part of the 20th century. regardless, this speech is specifically about the iraq war, and is only referenced by mehdi for that reason.
"Generation after generation of Americans has understood the lofty ideals that underlie our great Republic."
When I first studied the enlightened ideas upon which America was conceived, I too was in awe of that country. Sadly, I see little parallel between infant America and the fat bully he's grown up into.
America, borne out of liberty and equality, grew into a neo-colonial power. Meanwhile, loyalist Canada slowly inched forward, eventually acheiving far greater respectability.
Re.Byrd's former policital views, Michael Tomasky deals with that one here
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2010/jun/28/usa
This is either being brought up out of ignorance or desperation as far as I can make out.
Lol @ unseen
Byrd lives in denial. Sept 11th, although evil of course, was a response to America's aexploitative and murderous international policies and relations over many decades. In any equation, a negative is never a response to positives.
Dylan
Are you named after the drug addled, doped up the eyeballs, laid back, hippy flake, bunny rabbit in The Magic Roundabout ?
Bug eyed Medhi agreeing with a Ku Klux Klan member.
Oh what hypocrisy, you gotta laugh, havent you ?
The Senate is great. He had a high paying job since 1959 with little fear of being unseated.
The Senate is the American version of the House of Lords.
It's full of Millionaires who have been their forever and who have no understanding of the problems of ordinary Americans.