Are we on the verge of a blue-yellow coalition?

Senior Lib Dems are optimistic about doing a deal with Cameron.

Memo to fellow progressives: this might not be our "moment". Sorry to be the bearer of bad news on the day that hundreds of people are gathering in central London to call for electoral reform, but I'm here to inform you that the Lib Dems might be about to do the unthinkable and join up with the Tories.

One senior Lib Dem frontbencher told me this morning that the Tories will "offer us a referendum on electoral reform. I have no doubt about it. They are desperate." He added: "My ideal outcome is unachievable. Personally, I would like to have done a deal with Labour."

So, are we on the verge of a blue-yellow coalition government, with Lib Dem ministers taking seats in a Cameron-led cabinet? Perhaps -- but almost everything about this election and the campaign that preceded it has been unpredictable. There's no reason why these post-election negotiations won't turn out to be just as volatile or as erratic.

Personally, I hope and pray that Nick Clegg does not fall for the Tory proposals that are put in front of him in the coming days. He has to remember that Cameron and co can't be trusted on electoral reform; the Conservatives are -- and always will be -- the party of the status quo.

But I've prepared myself to be disappointed. A Cameron-Clegg administration is no longer inconceivable. The Lib Dem leader's ludicrous decision to refer to the party with the most seats and votes as having a "mandate" boxed him in and forced him to negotiate with the Tories first. I asked my Lib Dem source why he had done so. His reply: "There is no point in saying we're going to play by rules that don't exist. We've got to play by the rules as they are."

Clegg and co may regret that decision at the next election.

Mehdi Hasan is a contributing writer for the New Statesman and the co-author of Ed: The Milibands and the Making of a Labour Leader. He was the New Statesman's senior editor (politics) from 2009-12.

Getty Images.
Show Hide image

Voters are turning against Brexit but the Lib Dems aren't benefiting

Labour's pro-Brexit stance is not preventing it from winning the support of Remainers. Will that change?

More than a year after the UK voted for Brexit, there has been little sign of buyer's remorse. The public, including around a third of Remainers, are largely of the view that the government should "get on with it".

But as real wages are squeezed (owing to the Brexit-linked inflationary spike) there are tentative signs that the mood is changing. In the event of a second referendum, an Opinium/Observer poll found, 47 per cent would vote Remain, compared to 44 per cent for Leave. Support for a repeat vote is also increasing. Forty one per cent of the public now favour a second referendum (with 48 per cent opposed), compared to 33 per cent last December. 

The Liberal Democrats have made halting Brexit their raison d'être. But as public opinion turns, there is no sign they are benefiting. Since the election, Vince Cable's party has yet to exceed single figures in the polls, scoring a lowly 6 per cent in the Opinium survey (down from 7.4 per cent at the election). 

What accounts for this disparity? After their near-extinction in 2015, the Lib Dems remain either toxic or irrelevant to many voters. Labour, by contrast, despite its pro-Brexit stance, has hoovered up Remainers (55 per cent back Jeremy Corbyn's party). 

In some cases, this reflects voters' other priorities. Remainers are prepared to support Labour on account of the party's stances on austerity, housing and education. Corbyn, meanwhile, is a eurosceptic whose internationalism and pro-migration reputation endear him to EU supporters. Other Remainers rewarded Labour MPs who voted against Article 50, rebelling against the leadership's stance. 

But the trend also partly reflects ignorance. By saying little on the subject of Brexit, Corbyn and Labour allowed Remainers to assume the best. Though there is little evidence that voters will abandon Corbyn over his EU stance, the potential exists.

For this reason, the proposal of a new party will continue to recur. By challenging Labour over Brexit, without the toxicity of Lib Dems, it would sharpen the choice before voters. Though it would not win an election, a new party could force Corbyn to soften his stance on Brexit or to offer a second referendum (mirroring Ukip's effect on the Conservatives).

The greatest problem for the project is that it lacks support where it counts: among MPs. For reasons of tribalism and strategy, there is no emergent "Gang of Four" ready to helm a new party. In the absence of a new convulsion, the UK may turn against Brexit without the anti-Brexiteers benefiting. 

George Eaton is political editor of the New Statesman.