Mehdi Hasan

Mehdi Hasan’s polemical take on politics, economics and foreign affairs

Syndicate contentRSS

Is the state of Israel its own worst enemy?

Some brief thoughts on this morning’s breaking story in the Middle East.

The late Israeli foreign minister Abba Eban famously remarked that "the Arabs never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity". But it is the Israelis who never miss an opportunity to score own goals, to be their own worst enemy.

Why on earth, during a period of relative quiet in the Middle East "process" (let's be honest: it is not a "peace process"), would the Jewish state send armed Israeli commandos to attack a convoy of ships carrying aid to the blockaded Gaza Strip, and those, too, ships linked to the Turkish government, perhaps Israel's only stalwart ally in the Muslim world? (Sky News is now reporting that Israel has warned its citizens not to travel to Turkey. The end of a beautiful friendship?)

I can imagine pro-Israel lobbyists holding their heads in the hands this morning as they watch the news, wondering how they can spin their way out of this latest atrocity. Claiming, as Israel has done, that its soldiers were attacked with knives and axes will not do. Nor will unleashing the silver-tongued Mark Regev on to the airwaves as the Israelis did this morning on the Today programme, help them either. Regev has been exposed, time and again, as being economical with the truth. (On an amusing side note, if you play "Google predicts" with Regev's name, the only option that comes up in the Google search box is "Mark Regev liar".)

By the way, check out this page on the BBC website. Notice anyone's name missing from the list of international figures reacting to the Israeli attack? Yep, our new Foreign Secretary, William Hague. There seems to be radio silence from the Foreign Office. Meanwhile, according to al-Jazeera, "Turkey, Spain, Greece, Denmark and Sweden have all summoned the Israeli ambassadors in their respective countries to protest against the deadly assault."

As the Tory-supporting columnist Peter Oborne noted in his controversial Dispatches TV documentary on Britain's pro-Israel lobby, the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) group has a great deal of influence inside the party, and Hague himself has been subjected to pressure from it in the past. So perhaps, as the well-connected Tory blogger Iain Dale pointed out in a recent discussion show on al-Jazeera that he and I participated in, our Foreign Secretary intends to be "much more pro-Israel than his predecessor David Miliband".

Let's see . . .

UPDATE: Here is William Hague's official statement (via the Foreign and Commonwealth Office website):

I deplore the loss of life during the interception of the Gaza Flotilla. Our Embassy is in urgent contact with the Israeli Government. We are asking for more information and urgent access to any UK nationals involved.

We have consistently advised against attempting to access Gaza in this way, because of the risks involved. But at the same time, there is a clear need for Israel to act with restraint and in line with international obligations. It will be important to establish the facts about this incident, and especially whether enough was done to prevent deaths and injuries.

This news underlines the need to lift the restrictions on access to Gaza, in line with UNSCR 1860. The closure is unacceptable and counterproductive. There can be no better response from the international community to this tragedy than to achieve urgently a durable resolution to the Gaza crisis.

I call on the Government of Israel to open the crossings to allow unfettered access for aid to Gaza, and address the serious concerns about the deterioration in the humanitarian and economic situation and about the effect on a generation of young Palestinians.

I like the line about "the loss of life", as if the people on those ships died in a natural disaster, or from heart attacks, rather than from Israeli gunfire. Notice also that Hague's first criticism is, implicitly, of the people who were killed ("We have consistently advised against attempting to access Gaza in this way...") Pathetic.

UPDATE 2: The US blogger Glenn Greenwald gives his take on the attack here. He writes:

It hardly seemed possible for Israel -- after its brutal devastation of Gaza and its ongoing blockade -- to engage in more heinous and repugnant crimes. But by attacking a flotilla in international waters carrying humanitarian aid, and slaughtering at least ten people, Israel has managed to do exactly that. If Israel's goal were to provoke as much disgust and contempt for it as possible, it's hard to imagine how it could be doing a better job.

He adds:

The one silver lining from these incidents is that the real face of Israel becomes increasingly revealed and undeniable. Not even the most intense propaganda systems can prettify a lethal military attack on ships carrying civilians and humanitarian aid to people living in some of the most wretched and tragic conditions anywhere in the world. It is crystal clear to anyone who looks what Israel has become, and the only question left is how will the rest of the world -- beginning with their American patrons -- will react.

I wouldn't have used the phrase "silver lining" but, nonetheless, he has a point.

86 comments

David Wearing1's picture

Even if this doesn't prove a tipping point for Israel, it is likely to at least hasten the point where that moment comes. Both Apartheid and the occupation of East Timor ended, at least in part, because US support became unsustainable in the face of international condemnation. Clearly the US would support its ally resolutely, and irrespective of any atrocities the latter committed, if there were no political costs attached. But Washington will come under increasing pressure now from other regional allies like Turkey, from the EU, and from international public opinion, to step in and tell Israel that enough is enough.

Israel cares passionately about its public image. This is a grave PR disaster for them, additionally so because it will remind the world once again of their sadistic blockade of Gaza. I can't believe that any of this is sustainable either for Israel or for its patron in Washington.

Sue_H.'s picture

The question on my mind is regarding this ONE SHIP being targeted and not the others. After having researched a little, it has come to light, that this was the ship that had all the communications equipment, and was the control ship for the others. In other words, it was the 'strategic steer' as they normally refer to it in 'a fleet of ships'.
It has also been said that the other ships were not even boarded. If that is the case, then how much can we believe of what Mr. Regev says, and what he briefs the correspondants of the different media outlets.

Jim's picture

You remain silent on atrocities in Sudan, Iran, Syria and numerous other Muslim countries - I notice you made no mention of taliban massacring nearly 90 Ahmadis the other day - but one country can get you to speak out.

You are a typical Islamist hypocrite, Mehdi.

thinkov's picture

the impunity of the zionists is incredible,it seems no matter how barbaric their actions they don't give a monkeys about international opinion

David_thompson's picture

Its clear from the interviews of those people that have come back/been released, especially the first person from Glasgow, that their ship was never boarded/checked. This means that Regev has been caught out spreading false propaganda and lies once again, He claimed in all his interviews that all the ships were boarded ! Hence, his argument, that ''this was a police-kind of an operation, in which we were just making a safety check'' is totally absurd and a pack of lies.
Secondly, this ship was targeted because it had some very influencial people in it.
A bungled operation, which they never expected to go so bad.

vanrisszcu's picture

Jim - you're wrong. See my Twitter feed and you will see me mention the massacre of the Ahmadis. I've also criticised, in previous blogposts, the tendency of Muslims to condemn only Israel's atrocities and not those of Muslim states.

Of course, the key point here is that the terrorists in Pakistan do not claim to be a democratic, law-abiding nation-state, nor do they have the support and sponsorship of the west's leading governments, including our own.

Also - are you saying the BBC are "Islamist hypocrites" too, for daring to report this attack as their top story? And CNN too?

Kate - thanks for your comment and good point about the CMEC but please see Peter Oborne's Guardian piece, which I link to above, for further details about the CFI and Hague shifting his views between Lebanon in 2006 and Gaza in 2009.

thinkov's picture

let's not forget their nuclear arrangement with apartheid south Africa

Chris's picture

Good points in this article.

Another sad day, another senseless violent act in the history of this region. Attacking an aid convoy in international waters shows how paranoid and intolerant this country is. And contemptuous of international law and international opinion. (Regev is already doing his best to justify what happened - he's sounding increasingly unconvincing and desperate.) Will this now finally force our governments - including the all-important US government - to act? (I predict that it won't...)

swatantra's picture

Who would have thought that the Zionists would have turned into the Facists of the Middle East. The Israelis have turned Gaza into a concentration camp.
The sad fact is that Labour has kept quiet all these years and watched a tragedy in the making.

Lou's picture

It's the worlds largest military prison as I posted earlier but for some reason it wasn't put on the comment board.
Consecutive Governments since Balfour's day have failed to address the damage that the British Govt wreaked on the people of Palestine and their country. Successive Governments of the West have not acted to enforce UN resolutions of which there are hundreds against Israel.
Our foreign policy is shameful as is our ability to turn our eyes away from some violators of international law yet punish excessively smaller breaches by other countries.
Nothing will change, the usual platitudes will be issued, maybe even a UN resolution or two, but the status quo will remain.

ibgbt226m9p9's picture

Not content with a weekend of homophobia over David Laws, the Waffen SS branch of the New Statesman pull on their jack boots to spew out a bit of anti semitism, it must be their lucky day, eh ?

Nice work lads, Adolf and Nick Griffin is proud of you.

maxinemf's picture

William Hague needs to spell out clearly an unequivically where he stands in relation to the Palestinian question. The idea that a small group within the Cons. Party can dictate party policy is immoral and undemocratic.

Daniele1's picture

Great comments Medhi.
This action by Israel is a total outrage. But what is worse is the mild reaction of the American and British government who talk of "regrets" and "loss of lives" instead of using words such as "condemn" and "murder" as they would have if any other country had carried out such a murderous act.
After what they did and continue to do to Gaza, nothing will surprise me. It is obvious that they know they have "carte blanche" to do as they please.
I am now hoping that the EU, the UN and some individual countries will find the courage to denounce, condemn and challenge Israel.
It is now clear that the UN must demand the end of the blockade of Gaza and force Israel to obey the countless resolutions against them they have ignored for so long.
Enough is enough. The International community must act decisively to put an end to the bullying of Israel.
Jim:
Like Medhi says, should we then compare the actions of terrorists to that of Israel? Using your own logic, Israel is then a terrorist state, which is exactly what it is today.
Come on, who will be first to tell me and anyone who dares condemn Israel that we are all anti-semite scumbags?

Daniele1's picture

Once again, my anti-Israeli comment has not been published. Same happened with Sholto's article. Am I being paranoid?
Abdul: Shut up!

Lou's picture

There's gremlins in the machine Daniele, I queried mine not appearing.

MatthewBlott's picture

@ Abdul Amir Hassan

Gosh, Abdul, how did you manage to get that posted? Virtually everything I've ever posted at the bottom of one of Mehdi Hasan's pieces has been pulled.

Tanino's picture

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p1CJwTNC9M

maxinemf's picture

Is there some censorship going on with comments?

ibgbt226m9p9's picture

Tanino

palistinian rap rhymes with crap, kid.

ibgbt226m9p9's picture

Matt asks ''Gosh, Abdul, how did you manage to get that posted?''

Im very glad you asked me that Matt, because my comments are genius, pure and simple, thats why they get posted.

Tanino's picture

@Abdul;

I'm unacquainted with Palestinian rap, the author of the song I posted is an Englishman of Iraqi origin.

Abdul Amir Hassan's picture

Also I think they indulge me here on the NS website because I am such a fool and my comments are so mentally unbalanced that no one here really takes them seriously. Do they?

ibgbt226m9p9's picture

The donut posting at 19.55pm is not me, its probably Nick, its kinda sad, isnt it ?

ibgbt226m9p9's picture

Meanwhile back on planet Earth.

Medhi squeels in fake indignation, this is a non story bit like '' dog bites man shock ,'' move along, nothing to see.

Daniele1's picture

I am wondering: is there any point posting on this website when "Abdul buffoon in chief" gets 6 postings published in a row and none of the serious comments seem to get through?? what is going on at NS tonight?
This is very disappointing.

Lou's picture

Daniele,

I don't know but I've made three other postings that haven't made it. All good points to air for debate, such a shame that the real debaters can't get on and yet the gremlins in the machine are letting diatribe to be dispensed freely.

Abdul Amir Hassan's picture

I'm just off to kill myself.

I can't take these awful people attacking my "friend" David Laws. Boo Hoo.

Shafeeq's picture

By the way, does ANYONE think that "Abdul (look-at-me-posing-as-if-I-am-a-Muslim) A. Hassan" is his real name? As a relative newcomer to this site, for me he has runied a perfectly good debate.

Lou's picture

What's the point of putting a subject up for discussion? Winges about not getting through make it and drivel from certain quarters but no one with anything of substance on the subject to say can air it.

jeremiah's picture

The response to this convoy was totally disproportionate.

If they were really worried about the ships contents they could have legally requested the ships stop and searched the holds.

No they had to go bananas with gun totting thugs and shooting innocent people.

The answer to the question is yes. The country who cannot be named is it's own worst enemy.

Gaza is basically a big prison and this incident underlines the disgraceful policy that that state currently employs on peaceful activists.

jeremiah's picture

Note-

If you want your comment posted don't use the "I" word!

Mrs Nobody's picture

It's because they're bullies and bullies always assume that the weak will yield to their agression.

All praise to the aid flotilla for standing up to them. I understand there's another ship still en route due in tomorrow, let's see what happens to that one.

Lou's picture

An ambassador to Ireland said his countryment were the ones under attack and had to defend themselves. Surely it was the people on the aid convoy that were under attack when assaulted from air and sea in international waters?
Hague says restraint should be exercised. Like they're going to listen to him. Could he define exactly what he means by restraint? Where is a statement from Cameron or Clegg on this matter?

jeremiah's picture

The bottom line is that this incident would never have happened to a ship that was armed or under protection from a naval vessel.

Had they tried to board such a vessel they would have been fired on and rightly so.

International waters means just that. The response was disgraceful and they will pay.

Da man's picture

Why u always onto nick? It's a bit sad picking mostly on him so why don't u get a life abdul

kilokilo's picture

I don't really see how anyone can defend what happened last night / this morning, so it makes me wonder whether there is more to this story than meets the eye.

As for Hauge casually calling on the country to comply with a UN resolution - which it is in clear violation of, and which we are unlikely to do anything about... doesn't this make a mockery of invading Iraq for failing to comply with a UN resolution, all be it a resolution about imaginary WMDs rather than a very real illegal blockade which has already resulted in a untold number of deaths and left approximately half a million people in poverty.

paularuy's picture

Abdul Amir Hassan 31 May 2010 at 20:52

This is not me, he's an imposter.

paularuy's picture

Shafeek luv

If you hate the country soo much,then bug off.

M Bloom's picture

The next time i see someone wielding an iron bar i'll know what ascription to use: peace activist.

kilokilo's picture

M Bloom,

using that logic what would you ascribe a special forces attack on a ship in international waters, which resulted in 10 deaths? crowd control? police action? piracy? or the most henious crime a state can commit - aggression?

kilokilo's picture

From a legal point is this any different to the seizure of ships by Somali pirates off the East African coast?

paularuy's picture

They shouldnt have boarded the ship, nah.

They should have torpeoded the boat load of shit stirrers.

Dylan's picture

Shafeeq - A dim-witted white guy adopts an ethnic persona in an attempt to discuss world affairs with his intellectual superiors.  His hilariously stereotypical view of the world is often tolerated by those he debates with out of misplaced political correctness.  On the occassions where he is challenged, he usually objects that his (fictional) ethnicity is the basis for the attack.

Even though that observation will sound strangely familiar to regular readers of this site, I was actually describing Sacha Baron Cohen's comic creation, Ali G.

Looks like we've all been had.  Well done on resurrecting a satirical fictional character from the past decade Abdul.  I take it back - you do have a sense of humour after all.

Abdul Amir Hassan's picture

I am Spartacus!

Abdul Amir Hassan's picture

No, I am Spartacus!

Abdul Amir Hassan's picture

Well I'm just a dickhead, wot wiv me bein the real AAH luv mate etc.

Al4's picture

@Abdul Amir Hassan

I'm not sure you're welcome here any more. If the NS has any sense you won't be permitted to post again on anything.

Nick9's picture

Blimey Abdul, you really have got a split peronality!, one minute you're full of honest self admissions; the next you're back to your ol bad self! You gotta see a doctor mate! And stop accusing me of using your 'name' (not that it's yours anyway); I've got better things to do with my time, tis the first time I've looked on this site today, and much to my surprise your still going strong!

Lou's picture

I feel the response was disproportionate. The initial assault was contrary to international law.
The activists defence will no doubt be that under international law it was an act of piracy and they had a right to bear arms.
If more aid was allowed in, the blockade lifted then this direct action would stop but the situation within the siege is evermore desperate.
Apart from the aid these convoys/flotillas deliver, the political and world attention it draws to the plight of the besieged is essential. On the whole, they remain a forgotten people, namely by the governments of the world and particularly the West who issue platitudes and piecemeal condemnations but don't attempt to affect any real change towards a peaceful resolution for both sides.

Daniele1's picture

Jeremiah: you may be right. It is the I word which stops the postings.
Shall we call this country "God's chosen people country" and see what happens.
After all that's probably why they get away with murder. They've got a direct connection with the Allmighty.
Seriously, this is frustrating.

Latest tweets