The V Spot

Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett and Holly Baxter of the Vagenda Magazine

Syndicate contentRSS

The only ones shocked by Tulisa's sex tapes are the adults

The way to guarantee teenagers access porn is to ban it outright.

Tulisa leaving the Royal Courts of Justice in London
Tulisa leaving the Royal Courts of Justice in London. Photograph: Getty Images

Technological advancement has always complicated sex, and the internet has been throwing a mixed bag of Freudian issues at us since before we even worked out the webcam. It's no secret that today's teenagers have almost certainly seen more pairs of breasts sodden in variations of bodily fluids than they've had hot dinners - and suddenly, everyone's concerned again. In the same breath that middle aged parents thanked their local vendor for a (horrendously unsexy) copy of Fifty Shades of Grey, they began a tirade of complaints about sex scenes and triple-X websites last week. And as the traumatised few got vocal with their protestations that Black Swan "should have just been a movie about ballet", N-Dubz vocalist and famed X Factor judge Tulisa walked out of court and onto the front pages of a number of national publications, proclaiming that the ex-boyfriend who tried to sell her blow-job technique to the world had "messed with the wrong woman".

The way in which we handle sex, in a world where one hour on ChatRoulette can tell you more about the human libido than Kinsey ever dreamed of, is therefore a continuing conundrum. The record number of complaints about lesbian sex scenes in Black Swan - a number that vastly overtook other films' official complaints about deadly violence - speaks volumes about the way in which we have moved towards American attitudes (violence and guns are OK; willies and nipples are not) about the beast with two backs. After all, Black Swan went to cinemas with a rating of 15, meaning that the youngest viewer (presuming all guidelines were met) was only one year under the legal age of consent. There's no denying that the subject matter was psychologically challenging - but as for masturbation and a cheeky bit of third base in the bedroom, which apparently prompted more uproar than the protagonist's mental breakdown, it seems like we're all collectively kidding ourselves about the innocence of teenagers. Nobody wants to see a five-year-old prancing around in "sexy and I know it" branded bikinis, but whether we like it or not, schoolyard knowledge of websites like XTube and YouPorn amongst their older siblings is widespread and well-known.

This knowledge will soon be stamped out, David Cameron has informed us, by more stringent controls on ISPs and presumably a big dose of fairy dust.
The new "opt in" policy that it is currently fighting its way to officialdom is a system where all content judged to be "too adult" is automatically blocked from view unless you specifically request to see it.

In other words, it's a system that will shame you into openly declaring the real reasons why you opted for Virgin Media fibre optic like the pervert that you are, and no children at all will be able to view sex on the internet ever again. Just like when they banned the Pirate Bay, immediately and decisively solving the problem of illegal file-sharing forever. Phew - there was a danger that we might actually have to address a wealth of social perceptions there, but luckily we've sidestepped all that with the long arm of the law.

As we've previously said until we're blue in the face, the provision of porn on triple-X sites across the globe remains startlingly unsatisfactory relative to its breadth and availability. The only way to guarantee teenagers definitely access it, as well as to shut down any mature dialogue we might have had with them about it, is to ban it outright. And since "sexting" recently made its way onto the PSHE curriculum, there's surely more of an argument to widen our scope of discussion with children who will be hit with a tidal wave of sexual imagery throughout their youngest years whether we attempt to control it or not (hello, Herbal Essences commercials), rather than creating even more wildly exciting taboos for us all to enjoy flouting.

Perhaps if we focused on the real person behind the baby-oiled butt cheeks on predictable, sex-by-numbers wank fodder made for men only, we might begin to educate about sex and technology more effectively. Rather than rushing to turn off the computer screen, we might expose it through serious conversation as the very thin veil that it often is between an ambivalent viewer and the joyless life of physically demanding toil on the part of an actor who doesn't really want to be there. We could invite debate about empowerment and personhood - hell, we could forge a veritable utopia of sex and technology for the generations to come. By the time we have children ourselves, they could have healthy attitudes about hand jobs and not even want to download the latest Hot Girls XXX app on their souped-up iPhone 600s. They might - oh, happy day - wonder who the hot girls are, and why they got there, instead.

One colossal failure of sex marketing on the internet, of course, was demonstrated by Tulisa's ex boyfriend MC Ultra. Following his humiliation in court, it was reported that he and some acquaintances had somewhat optimistically hoped to make about £6m each by selling some grainy video phone footage of what Tulisa euphemistically but rightly referred to as "an intimate moment". It was a commercial flop, making the group about £30 in the day after its launch, but more significantly, it brought down its distributor with it. The young pop star Tulisa, who used to gyrate next to a bad rapper called Dappy and graduated into arguments with Simon Cowell on prime time telly, reacted with incredible dignity and humanity in the face of extreme public humiliation. A self-produced YouTube video showed her proclaiming that there was nothing shameful about being sexual on camera with a person that you trust; rather, that the person breaching that trust should be ashamed. Encouragingly, a major chunk of the British press agreed.

Whole new levels of shaming our peers are available at the poised fingers of each internet user nowadays. With the click of a button, lives can literally be altered forever - and allowing a move back into conservative attitudes about sex will only make these threats even seedier and more likely. The only way to tackle a sexual environment made threatening by the terrifying freedom of the world wide web and the control afforded to each user is education (on fellation, ho ho.) We all know in our hearts that censorship by default doesn't lead us down a road we'd wish to tread - and it's a very sad day when what we know in our hearts is overridden by what stirs in our pants.

 

27 comments

godzacon's picture

Hypocrisy, thy name is Woman. Dignity, my ass; if you value your 'dignity' DON'T make sex tapes!

godzacon's picture

Hypocrisy, thy name is Woman. Dignity, my ass; if you value your 'dignity' DON'T make sex tapes!

Fordy1968's picture

It may come as a surprise, but most adults are probably not interested in how the singer from N-Dubz gives a blow-job. Most adults have more pressing concerns. Indeed, if I were to spend any amount of time taking an in interest in that horrendous band, I'd sooner spend it having a good chuckle at the wally who wears the silly hats.

Pavlova's picture

I think that one of the problems here is the euphemistic, "adult entertainment". It isn't, it's predominantly male entertainment, perhaps predominantly pre-adult male entertainment. Let's call it what it is.

Rather than trying to slice the censor's knife across the porn genre horizontally on some bogus notion of age rating as if once we turn 18 anything goes, it would be better to slice it vertically between what is benign and what is malign.

And I think we already have a template for making that decision in the anti-hate propaganda legislation that protects various designated vulnerable groups.

The reason we are so confused about the acceptability of pornography and it's effects on women is because gender is currently excluded from that legislation. The reason there is no mainstream entertainment genre that caters for racists, homophobes, freak-show conocuers is no coincidence, do people imagine there is no market for such things, or wouldn't be with the right encouragement? If gender were included, public opinion would quickly catch up as it did on marital rape. Test court cases would begin to unpick what is free expression and what is gender-based incitement to hatred or violence

Just because pornography deals in the male organism, I see no reason why it should be immune from social and legal norms applied to other areas of the mass media, on the fair treatment of its employees, it's consumers and its subject matter.

monicaohmonica's picture

Monicaaaa peleaseeee, roam the stereets with coin bucket, ask for signatures, but peleassseeee not here.

Monica Shelley's picture

What is the difference these days between porn and "sex education" ? Only that the government pays for the latter.
http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/36003

The Terrence Higgins Trust gets £10 million per year from the UK
government to distribute "health advice". It is encouraged to target
this advice at young people in the age group 14-19 but instead of
health advice, it offers sickness advice. The sort of material and
information it provides on websites such as "The Hard Cell", "Below
the Belt" and "The Bottom Line" are more suitable for a hard-core porn
site. They are physically and morally harmful.[They include
copr*phagia, "r1mming", "f*lching", b*ndage, auto-erotic asphyxiation,
self-insertion of catheters, injecting substances into the
gen1talia, and much much more.] We call upon the UK government to stop
funding perversion and to withdraw THT's charitable status.

wsrfkmm's picture

2012 comes, in order to thank everyone, characteristic, novel style, varieties, low price and good quality, and the low sale price.accept paypal. Thank everyone .

Welcome to === www.3shopping.us ===

iphone 4/4s X-Doria Cases $9

iphone 4/4s ARK Speakers $18

iphone 4/4s Leopard Cases $16

iphone 4/4s Apart Metal Cases $26

ipad2/ipad3 Thin Book Case $60

ipad 2/3 Cute Smart Cover $28

=== www.3shopping.us ===

=== www.3shopping.us ===

woodcrutch's picture

Farmerjack, a sense of being not good enough is antecedent to any possible brush-off. Humiliation is antecedent to being not good enough. What was on the beginning of your anecdotal post?

Something doesn't add up in Clark's 'without picturing them naked' though. Ah, I see, it's not Clark, it's Gabble! Now I get it right.

gabble gabble's picture

Farmerjack you are certainly a gentleman but you're not fooling anyone. Porn is just a fleeting escapism fantasy. Not talking about extreme stuff just general porn where men and women are just having fun, all equal in love and war...I dont need the money shot , or to be honest a hairy butt crack. Happily married and I am able to fully converse with members of the opposite sex without picturing them naked. You on the other hand are a typical 'bloke' you make all the right noises but probably are the single guy you deride in your nonsense blog. Chill out and enjoy a one handed joy ride and don't feel guilty at the end...

Ziggy's picture

And that says something because I am no f@cking oil painting!! ;-)

Ziggy's picture

She is a chav pig and I wouldn't shag her with a stolen cock.

YIGGZ's picture

Be honest with yourself - she's so far above your league that she wouldn't shag you with a stolen vagina. She probably wouldn't even look at you with stolen eyes.

11isty's picture

This explains who Tulisa is I suppose.

11isty's picture

Could somebody explain to me pls what is this article about?

McMac's picture

All the stupid grown ups are fuddy duddys who don't understand sex and stuff, not like the Vagenda girls, who invented it at sixth form college during free period.

11isty's picture

Could somebody explain to me pls what MCMAC is saying?

CAMCM's picture

MCMAC is venting his bile, bile that's built up from years of insecurity, bitterness and resentment over young women being sexy and not interested in him.

11isty's picture

All true. Well, almost. He isn't THAT old after all. Yet.

Des Demona's picture

storm in a d cup?

connoisseur's picture

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1279197/How-cleavage-boosting-...

jankaas's picture

credit where credit is due, i thought that was by far your most coherent article in the series. indeed education is the key rather than the delusion that is censorship.

but as ever there's a 'floater' in the mix;
"Perhaps if we focused on the real person behind the baby-oiled butt cheeks on predictable, sex-by-numbers wank fodder made for men only, we might begin to educate about sex and technology more effectively."

as explained to the 2 of you on another thread; porn is rooted in fantasy where the consumer is not actually interested in the real mundane daily activities of the person performing. and, there is plenty of porn made by and specifically for women.

capice?

FarmerJack's picture

Rhiannon and Holly suggest that teenage boys would do better to think about the person behind the pornstar than just to jerk off mindlessly--and they would; they'd do better in every sense, morally, educationally, and no doubt in their relationships with the girls who are increasingly their academic superiors.

The problem is that pornography is often where men go when they want to reassert a sense of the old male prerogative of mastery, of looking and feeling powerful just because they're male. Porn is partly the way it is because real relationships with women or girls are too hard; there's too much to remember, to be sensitive to, to be aware of; and the feedback boys get from these relationships (or usually brush-offs) is predominantly one of humiliation, a sense they're just not good enough.

Talking about porn isn't going to work if all it does is reinforce among boys this sense that their native culture is sorry and they should move away from it. The wider issue lies not with sex education but with the socialisation of boys, especially among themselves, and especially now that the qualities society values are more associated with the socialisation of the historically subordinate sex, women.

McMac's picture

Girls! You do realise that your mummies and daddies have, and probably still are, having sex?

hi888's picture

I don't know about daddy for sure, but mom surely doesn't do things like ... that. Something tells me that daddy doesn't do it as well, he's pretty persistent with other women playing Don Juan with his sexualized small talk, which is rather embarrassing for some parties involved, I mean for those who are forced to observe.

hugh markey's picture

Y'know people will do anything to get on television and the interweb. As Anthony Newley opined in more innocent times -"She'd sell her own bowel-movement!'
We're on to cannibalism, dear. Get with the programme, girl!
Even the Royal Courts of Justice are just a 'stage' set for a publicity shoot.

Walking Dead

hugh markey's picture

Y'know people will do anything to get on television and the interweb. As Anthony Newley opined in more innocent times -"She'd sell her own bowel-movement!'
We're on to cannibalism, dear. Get with the programme, girl!
Even the Royal Courts of Justice are just a 'stage' set for a publicity shoot.

Walking Dead

Latest tweets