Registered user login:

Bright'sBlog

Bright's Blog

Politics uncovered by Martin Bright, New Statesman political editor

Bright's Blog Homepage

A Cabinet of all the Talents?

  • Posted by Martin Bright
  • 18 September 2008

Bernard Donoughue's essay comparing the present political atmosphere to that under Jim Callaghan is a must read

It's been a good week for the New Statesman, with loads of pick-up of the interview with James Purnell and some good coverage of the Prescott/Campbell campaign for a fourth term for Labour. We were also delighted to carry the Progress article by Alan Miburn.

But the most interesting piece by far, was by Bernard Donaghue, the former adviser to Harold Wilson and James Callaghan. It's called Jim's Lessons and you can read it here.

Asked to compare the Labour government of the late 1970s to Brown's today, Donoughue (now a Labour pweer) makes some fascinating observations. But he also offers some advice:

Brown could learn from that earlier experience. His own cabinet - with some commendable young exceptions - seems lightweight compared to Callaghan's and especially relative to the challenges that face it. Some of the biggest current Labour beasts are sadly (and, in my view, unnecessarily) outside the cabinet and if included would add weight and experience. John Reid, Charles Clarke, Alan Milburn and David Blunkett should, if they could be persuaded, be inside in senior positions.

We understand the Prime Minister taken a close interest in the piece. Could Gordon Brown be preparing to take Donoughue's advice?

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

3 comments from readers

Simon
18 September 2008 at 14:40

Aren't we supposed to have a GOAT at the moment?

Surely that should have included a COAT.

I really don't see that bringing back reminders of the past will help Gordon now.

When the mood of the country is for change - bringing back old hacks is the wrong tactic.

Chas
18 September 2008 at 14:53

Poor bosses always hire poor underlings because they are insecure and do not want to be eclipsed. In addition, Brown is well known as a control freak so he certainly does not want anyone with a mind of their own, let alone a spine, in his cabinet.

If, for some odd reason he acts quite out of character and appoints some heavyweights (who are they anyway; Clarke, Reid, Blunkett - you name them - are all completely discredited, having made an appalling job of running their respective departments in the past), they will fight like ferrets in a sack and resign / get fired in no time. And Brown never acts out of character, so it is unlikely that he will fire the current bunch of supine pygmies and hire people he knows will be trouble.

Newmania
20 September 2008 at 00:01

I have read the New Statesman today and it was hard to discern anything you could call "What Labour Stand For" . Purnell seems to be following Conservative ideas which is clearly electorally doomed as selling them, sells the opposition . The various stabs at this sort of thing I have seen are so weak. I thought Miliband`s for example could have been written by a school girl ending up with”…the truth lie somewhere in between…”

Not one person had anything to say about the issues that really count . Immigration , tax and crime ,. This article was a good read but the Callaghan period was one of literal darkness and Palaeozoic government that in retrospect is hard to believe .

One thing that the collective Labour skull is peculiarly resistant to is the admission that no-one believes Gordon Brown’s own estimation that he us genius on the basis of his ability to bore us with pointless stats we all know can be persuaded to prove just about anything . His great idea tax credits was a Clowns show of pantomime incompetence and vanity .His luck has run out and now he is a tragic figure who embarrasses everyone by lurking around at the Party when the hosts are trying to go to bed.

Realistically Labour cannot hope to do more than remain the other of the two main Parties at the next election and almost anyone would be better than Brown….except perhaps Harriet Harman…or Milliopede …or Straw. Go for Johnson , nice chap , proper Labour keep the cheap seats and reinvent in opposition . It is the only way.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Martin Bright

Martin Bright began his journalistic career writing in very simple English for a magazine aimed at French school children. This experience has informed his style ever since. He worked for the BBC World Service, and The Guardian before joining the Observer as Education Correspondent. He went on to become Home Affairs Editor before becoming the New Statesman's political editor in 2005.

Recent Posts

Sunday comment round-up -- 16 November 2008

  • By Martin Bright
  • 16 November 2008

Recession blues

  • By Martin Bright
  • 13 November 2008

Two elections a world apart

  • By Martin Bright
  • 08 November 2008

Leaders-in-waiting

  • By Martin Bright
  • 06 November 2008

Why I'm on the outside

  • By Martin Bright
  • 30 October 2008

George and Mandy Go Wild on Corfu

  • By Martin Bright
  • 23 October 2008

Here we go again

  • By Martin Bright
  • 22 October 2008