Return to: Home | Blogs | Bright's Blog

PM's speech on liberty

Gordon Brown does "small and intimate well" - he should give up the speeches

Watching the Prime Minister deliver his speech on security and liberty this afternoon, I did begin to wonder why he bothers. As soon as he locks into declamatory mode, it is very difficult for the audience to maintain their concentration.

He rounded off with a less-than convincing defence of the Labour government's record on freedom of expression, which was further undermined by a refusal to take questions from the media.

But in the question and answer session with invited guests afterwards he was really rather good. He answered a series of questions from experts in the audience, including Shami Chakrabarti from Liberty and Jeremy Greenstock, Britain's former ambassador to the UN, in a relaxed and considered manner. He even showed great courtesy to the man from the "NO2ID" anti-ID card campaign.

I remember seeing Brown work these Q&As to his advantage during his leadership hustings. He's at his best during these more informal sessions.

Unfortunately for him, these go largely unreported and it is the set-piece speeches which we remember.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

Guy
19 June 2008 at 17:34

I was surprised to read that the PM 'showed great courtesy to the man from the "NO2ID" anti-ID card campaign,' since we weren't invited to this event at all and didn't find out about it till afterwards.

The only minister to show us the courtesy of engaging with our arguments at all so far has been Andy Burnham, when he was the junior passport minister. I don't know what went on at the closed IPPR session, but nothing that Mr Brown has said publicly indicates any difference from the know-nothing approach of his predecessor.

Guy
19 June 2008 at 17:35

That's Guy Herbert, General Secretary of the NO2ID campaign, BTW

Martin Bright
20 June 2008 at 15:13

So who was the man from the NO2ID campaign at the meeting then? Very mysterious

NO2ID man
20 June 2008 at 18:29

I am that man!

Firstly, I agree with you on speech v Q&A. He was grey, rushed, stumbled as if he hadn't read the text before. Liberty was tacked on the end of security, he should have openned with that even if he didn't say very much more than he did. In Q&A he was livelier, bit more colour, more credible.

In "real life" I have interests in defence and security (which was why I was invited) Noting all those folks from the IPPR panel asking questions, plus MP, I thought I'd jump in as No2ID (where I was but a humble campaigner) He was courteous as you say, but didn't really respond to the substantive points.

If Brown wants to win the election he's going to have to come up with a coherent and compelling narrative rather than the tigger-like approach he currently takes. And he certainly shouldn't start from where he was this week!

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

The horror comes home

22 January 2009 09:58

Ken Clarke's return

19 January 2009 16:10

A New Deal of the mind

15 January 2009 09:31

It's a New New Deal

08 January 2009 09:51

A year of ups and downs

18 December 2008 09:44

Mystic Mart

15 December 2008 13:06

The two-man show

11 December 2008 09:44

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Vote!

Should we build new nuclear power plants?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker