Return to: Home | Blogs | Human Writes

The real thing?

The truth about working conditions inside Coca-Cola's "Happiness Factory": wage cuts, 12-hour shifts and strikes

Coca-Cola’s current TV ad features life inside a Coke vending machine where hundreds of weird cartoon creatures individually make a bottle of Coke.

Small fluffy white balls bounce onto the bottle to cover it with kisses and penguin scientists frost the bottle with the flakes of freshly shredded snowmen.

The bottle is sent to the delivery chute accompanied by a full marching band, cheerleaders and fireworks displays. It is essentially the cast-offs from Lord of the Rings on acid with a work ethic.

It is cute, clever and if I was a child watching it I would have the uneasy feeling that I was being “groomed” by Coke. Tellingly the commercial is called “Inside the Happiness Factory”, though in fairness it is an advert for the company, so it is hardly likely to be called “Making the bastard workers do some PR”.

In an extended version, things go a little bit Aardman animation -- “real Coca-Cola employees [in America] were interviewed and their responses used by the animated factory workers.”

Describing life inside the “Happiness Factory”, a talking potato with rotor blades on its head says, “It’s a relaxed atmosphere. It’s not like some jobs, where you’re tense when you get here. It’s a good working environment.”

So great is the life of a Coke employee that a cartoon cheerleader (possibly a pear or a parsnip), tells us that she “could not imagine leaving”. And in the piece de resistance, a female tuba player with an Hispanic accent asks the camera, “What have I given to Coca-Cola? My loyalty and my love, I give that.” then she pauses and demurely chokes “Don’t make me cry.”

So there we have it, working for Coca-Cola is brilliant! How do we know? A flying potato vouched for the company.

There are no plans to produce a similar video using the comments of Coke workers operating the canning production lines at Milton Keynes or the bottling plant at Wakefield.

Which is just as well for the company. For the first time in 30 years the workers have gone on strike; they are less than impressed with life in the “Happiness Factory”.

Perhaps in the Milton Keynes version a penguin has just finished a 12-hour shift in hot and humid conditions. “This used to be a good job once, but over the years it has changed.”

A fluffy white ball on a picket waving a union banner adds, “We have exchanged our benefits for wage increases over the years, so we have paid for our own wage increases.”

Before a tuba player says, “They are offering us below inflation pay rise, so it’s actually a pay cut.”

On the Northfield industrial estate in Milton Keynes the pickets sit in front of the plant, shut for the day, on picnic chairs. GMB and Unite placards dot the grass verge.

At the Wakefield plant, which came out earlier, banners were brandished declaring “Strike, it’s the real thing.” The strikers list the slow erosion of their benefits: substitute team leader pay cuts, average holiday pay cancelled, the 15-minute handover at the end of a shift to explain to the next team the problems and events of the production line is no longer paid time. And now a wage deal that is again below inflation.

There has been no evidence of the company treating their more famous employees in this way. No one has reported a team of WAGS heading into Wayne Rooney’s pit cottage, shouting “Colleen, cum quick lass, there’s trouble at advertising agency.”

No one has yet seen her in desperation as Wayne howls, “An advertisin’ man needs a fair day’s pay fer a fair day’s work. A million’s all I ask, it’s nowt t’ th’company but bread an’ butter to an advertisin’ man.”

And so far there have been no solidarity meetings at Labour clubs up and down the country, where speakers glance at dignified but downtrodden Colleen and the WAGS, and in anger cry out “ Sum o’ these women 'ave not ‘ad a new pair o’ shoes in hours.”

The company could be in for a difficult time, summer is the peak demand time and if the sun finally shines they could find themselves running short, if the dispute continues.

But these are ‘ifs”, the only thing for certain is that all is not well in the “Happiness Factory”.

And the company with a brand logo that is possibly more recognised around the world than the crucifix, takes another blow to it's rapidly tarnished image.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

7 comments from readers

bayofpigs
02 August 2007 at 12:59

Better watch out Coca-cola has a reputation for 'sorting out' union leaders elsewhere in the world ...

http://killercoke.org/

ClaireProvost
11 August 2007 at 13:53

It would be comical, if it wasn’t so terrifying and offensive, how companies like Coca-Cola are desperately scrambling to cover their asses and pre-empt further uproar about their involvement (both direct and indirect) in workers’ rights abuses and the growing gap between the rich and the poor in America and around the world.

Mark Thomas’s comments about the “Happiness Factory” reminded me of last month’s issue of Vanity Fair, the “Africa Issue,” in which companies from around the world rallied together to present themselves as benevolent forces working with compassion and humanity towards a healthier, happier Africa. The current theme of corporate advertising is hypocritical to the point of (painful) laughter, as Vanity Fair’s issue squeezed articles about HIV/AIDS in Africa between two-page advertisements for Armani, Rolex, Hummer, BMW, Chanel, and Cadillac. Most egregiously were the advertisements for Shell and ExxonMobil.

Shell is not a popular country in Africa, particularly in West Africa, where I am right now, and where its oil has polluted and impoverished the Niger Delta, where anti-Shell activist Ken Saro-Wiwa’s death is still mourned, and where instability in Nigeria is oft-traced back to Shell and the dirty politics of oil. The gall to publish an advertisement for a company like Shell in a magazine issue dedicated to “Africa” is supreme and makes it extremely clear that the magazine’s audience is not the “global village” but rather the wealthy middle-aged high society woman and her pocket-book.

Companies around the world are embarking on their most ambitious advertising campaigns, not only to guise their crimes and human rights violations, but also to launch a pre-emptive, defensive, counter-attack on the increasing skepticism and critiques of big business and its involvement in suppressing and exploiting the world’s poor.

Stephen
12 August 2007 at 16:25

Don't drink Coca cola.

Helen
12 November 2007 at 15:40

Mark, perhaps you should call your next book 'as used on the anti-coca-cola trade unionists in Colombia'. Anything to stop people drinking this sugary sweet filth...

Freeme
07 January 2008 at 11:38

Slavery, genocide, exploitation, fear, lies, pain, conflict, greed and power. All for some sugary brown water. Be smart, don't drink coke!

Little Richardjohn
15 April 2008 at 19:24

Why is it that those worried about 'British Sovereignty' never complain about the freedom of international corporations from the obligations of the laws of the countries they operate within?

boru
03 May 2008 at 15:28

if you are union member at a plant with CC vending machines then tell the management to throw them out!

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

Willing to break the law?

09 July 2007 17:35

'Tony Blair is a cult'

25 April 2007 12:01

Join the day of 1,184 protests

11 April 2007 10:10

British humbug

29 March 2007 15:29

Free Ocalan ... or should that be Borat?

26 February 2007 11:48

We need a 'Bribery Tsar' for the 21st century

05 January 2007 11:06

Roll up, roll up! Peerages for a £1

18 November 2006 16:47

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Blogroll

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker