Return to: Home | Blogs | Fair Isle

Independence thinking...

Malachy explains some the subtleties of Shetland's relationship to Scotland amid talk of independence

As last week’s New Statesman special feature demonstrated, for those of us living north of the border, independence is truly the topic of the day.

But here in Shetland the issue is not just a simple matter of 'yes' or 'no'. These islands have a complex and strange relationship with Scotland. And it is a relationship which, ultimately, could have an impact far beyond these shores.

For most islanders, identity lies at home: we are Shetlanders, whatever that may mean. And while Shetlanders today are usually willing to describe themselves as Scottish, this has not always been the case. Until not very long ago, to be Scottish in Shetland was a more heinous crime even than being English!

Culturally, historically and, of course, geographically, Shetland is different from Scotland. And it has never voted SNP.

Shetland, along with Orkney, only became part of Scotland in 1469, when they were pawned to the Scottish crown as part of a dowry payment from the king of Norway and Denmark to James III of Scotland. The agreement made was that once the full dowry was paid the islands would be returned to Denmark, and until that time Norse laws would remain in place. But Scotland reneged on the deal.

Denmark appealed to the crown several times over the ensuing centuries, but to no avail. Norse law was eventually ended in 1611, though Denmark has, in theory, never renounced its claim to the isles. Following the Act of Union between Scotland and England in 1707, at a time when many islanders still spoke the native Norn as their first language, the vast majority of Shetlanders were forced into serfdom. The people were cruelly exploited by their new Scottish landlords until the end of the 19th century.

This tainted history explains not only the antipathy towards Scotland, which continued well into the 20th century, but also the persistent nostalgia for a romanticised, Nordic past, which is most apparent in the Viking festivals of Up Helly Aa, held around the isles each winter.

But the uniqueness of Shetland identity would hold little interest beyond the pubs and homes of the islands were it not for one, significant factor: oil.

Throughout the 1970s and 80s, while the Scottish nationalists were shouting from the rooftops about “our oil”, there was a faint but significant murmur from the Northern Isles that, actually, it’s ours.

When the North Sea was first being explored for oil, Shetland was quick to see the possibilities. The Zetland County Council Act was passed by parliament in 1974, giving the local council full control over all developments around the isles, and also allowing them to build up a massive oil fund over the following years. It has made Shetland into one of the wealthiest parts of the UK. The oil terminal at Sullom Voe became the largest in Europe, handling, at its peak, 1.4 million barrels a day, and although production has decreased since that time, the terminal is expected to last until at least 2020.

It is no surprise then that an independence movement developed within Shetland. It saw as its models the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, as well as our closest neighbour, Faroe, an autonomous dependency of Denmark.

Interestingly, the SNP has never rejected the right of the isles to autonomy, and the party did not stand against the coalition candidate of the Orkney and Shetland Movements in the 1987 election. The SNP has promised that, should Scotland move towards independence, Shetland will be free to choose its own path. But what that path will be is not at all clear.

The oil boom, which potentially made Shetland independence financially viable, also, ironically, made it less likely. The population of the islands was boosted dramatically during the ‘70s and ‘80s by Scottish and English oil workers and their families, many of whom have chosen to stay. Culturally and demographically Shetland now looks more like the rest of the UK than ever. But a radical and cohesive independence movement is certainly not out of the question, and, who knows, Denmark might even take the opportunity to try to regain its old territory!

As if in penance for the environmental damage caused by the oil industry, from which the isles have benefited so much, Shetland Islands Council is now developing another hugely ambitious energy project. The largest community-owned windfarm in the world is planned for Shetland – 200 giant mills covering much of the central mainland. It is a project that could potentially supply as much as 25 per cent of Scotland’s power, and it would also see another significant cash-boost for the isles. Our importance as an energy provider to the rest of the country is not set to be diminished anytime soon.

Politicians, both in Westminster and the Scottish central belt, are quick to forget about the little islands in the north, but Shetland holds some interesting cards in its hand, and at the moment it remains anyone’s guess as to how it will choose to play them.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

GusA
04 April 2007 at 11:58

I see Scottish independence as part of a deeper movement of self-determintion, so would welcome more devolution / local rule to Shetland.

But surely not all the oil around Scotland belongs to Shetland?

malachy
04 April 2007 at 16:58

Well the issue of ownership would obviously be a complex one - and an autonomous rather than independent Shetland might not be given rights to any of the oil if the Scottish government chose to be difficult. But in more general terms, no, a lot of Scotland's oil is in the vicinity of Shetland, but some of it is elsewhere. This link gives a good idea of the location of the UK's oil fields: http://www.energyinst.org.uk/education/natural/images/fields...

Bobby
27 July 2008 at 00:23

I've been to Faroe as well as Orkney and Shetland and I find the similarities in attitude are striking. I would say about 50% of Faeroese are pro-independence. They say that if they had oil like Sheltand then there would be a significant majority in favour of independence. As MT points out, the cultural references in O & S are self-consiously towards the North not to Scotland in the South. The Orcadians have an Icelandic saga named after them and St Magnus Cathedral is not named after a native Scot! When vistors arrive in Shetland by plane then the first site they come across when driving up to Lerwick is Jarlshof.

Actually what is the situation of Shetland in international law? Do the Danes have a legally valid claim to the islands or has Denmark officiially recognized the islands as part of Scotland?

JimSilvey
17 February 2009 at 12:07

"Shetland, along with Orkney, only became part of Scotland in 1469"... "ONLY"? If Shetlander's really want to be part of Denmark, pay £8 a pint and speak Danish then that is a matter for them of course... didn't see any evidence of them wanting to do that when I was living there for 16 years though! What I found that the people proposing this were usually Brit nationalists, as reflected in the comment about it being a more "henious" crime being Scottish than English. Shetland and Orkney have been part of Scotland for 540 years, much longer than they were ruled by the men in funny hats... I am sure that will remain the case for the next 540 years.

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

Farewell from Fair Isle

28 January 2008 10:01

Shetland's proud musical tradition

21 January 2008 13:12

Turning 100

14 January 2008 09:51

New Year in disguise

07 January 2008 11:48

Seeing the light

17 December 2007 11:46

Preparing for winter

10 December 2007 11:24

Guilty pleasures

03 December 2007 09:59

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will the Iraq inquiry be a 'whitewash'?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker