Tuition fees make students obsess about "value for money" from their education
As a second-time student who now pays the fees, Steven Baxter has noticed a change in his attitude to learning.
By Steven Baxter Published 15 October 2012 9:46
The year was 1998. I left university much as I’d joined it – with a sense of vague dread, albeit with a degree in my back pocket – and embarked upon a career in journalism. Having voted in New Labour in a euphoric haze of D:Ream, Britain Deserves Better and Robin Cook’s awkward dad-dancing, I felt a little guilty that my party of choice had surprisingly introduced tuition fees for all those students unlucky enough to be younger than me.
“Ah well,” I shrugged, “But I’ll never go back to university, so it won’t affect me.”
The lesson we learn from this is twofold: firstly, don’t trust politicians. Secondly, don’t trust yourself. Because, all these years later, I have ended up going back to university, and I find myself lumbered with a £9,000 bill for the privilege.
At this point I should politely prepare to hold back the bleating pedants and Liberal Democrats (now there’s a Venn diagram with a big bit in the middle). I am not lumbered with a £9,000 bill, they’ll say; and actually it’s all a lot fairer thanks to them, and the problem is I don’t really understand how much fairer it all is, and it’s only if I’m spectacularly lucky enough to be earning more than the average that I should pay back anything at all.
Yes yes, I hear all of that. It’s not that I don’t understand, because I do. And I repeat: I effectively have a £9,000 bill. If you want to portray it as some kind of hokey-cokey tuition fees which are only active when I reach that magical sum of wealth and opulence known as an ordinary wage, that’s fine. But I know the reality. Should I not have to pay it, lucky me, I’ll be badly off. Should I have to pay it, lucky me, I’ll still be quite badly off. It’s more likely than not that I’ll be paying it off.
But I am here to tell you this: since I am in a position to compare a university experience without tuition fees at all, and one with a likely £9,000 bill at the end of it, I’ve noticed several differences. Back then, of course, I was a long-haired teenager, bright-eyed and innocent, who was definitely going to be the best journalist ever; now I am a bald 37-year-old ex-hack who is definitely going to be the best primary school teacher ever. (I still have the same level of ambition, you’ll notice).
The memory plays tricks, but I can recall my undergraduate life being one in which I didn’t mind about the quality of the lectures, or even what they were about: I memorably picked the entirety of my second-year modules based on their being in the afternoon (and therefore more likely that I would actually turn up). Now, if there’s a session that isn’t up to much cop I can see the bundles of £5 notes being chucked into the furnace with every passing minute.
Back then, when you had a duff lecture, when the overhead projector didn’t work, when you didn’t get anything out of a two-hour session, you’d think no more of it and wander off to the SU bar. What did it matter? It wasn’t like I was paying anything. Now, it does matter because I am paying. And I think it totally changes the relationship between you and your course.
For better or worse, you start seeing lectures, seminars and so on as being "value for money" or not. You begin to treat your education like any other service: you’re in the position of a consumer, rather than a student, and you feel like asking for your money back on those occasions when things don’t quite go according to plan.
It’s not the way I want it to be, or the way I think it should be. I can’t help feeling for the lecturers who are experiencing this world of change, where students who once didn’t care too much about what happened when are now ever mindful of the price they’re paying for what the success – or otherwise – of their course. It’s easy to see why resentment can build on both sides, who can become a little more distanced than perhaps they used to be.
Back in that New Labour honeymoon, I never thought for a second that I would have gone back to university, let alone had to pay a fortune for it. But here I am and here it is: education reduced to a spreadsheet, to a series of products on a conveyor belt, with me, the student/consumer, desperately trying not to see it that way.
This could only be the beginning. How would voucher schools change parents’ relationship with education providers, and teachers? That remains to be seen. But what I do know is this: my generation didn’t fight hard enough to keep higher education free, and now we’re reaping what we have sown.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















7 comments
This was true when fees were already double the developed-world average at 3.3k
What's happening now is that teaching and research have been compromised by the cuts, you're actually getting less for your 9k than students previously did for 3.3k.
"How would voucher schools change parents’ relationship with education providers, and teachers?"
You mean when the vouchers are phased out?
DR OKAKAGBE- welcome you all to my world My name is Dr okakagbe and I am a Professional Traditional Spells Healer, specializing in the fields of Love, Money, Power, Success, Luck and Witch Craft. I can help you with any problem or wish that you might have. I have more than 25 years experience in the field of Spell Casting Spiritual Healing. Over the years I have worked for thousands of clients in more than 50 countries all over the world. My services are hugely in demand which is proof of the success I am achieving on a day to day basis. Do you have love problems / issues that you need sorted out? We have a variety of love spells that will change your life forever. Have you lost a loved one? Are you in love with someone who doesn’t seem to care about you? Is your loved one in love with someone else? contact me NOW and I will summon all my powers to make your dreams come true. Are you battling to make ends meet? Are you experiencing a financial crisis and you cannot pay all your bills? I know what it feels like. Let me help you by casting one of my much sought after Money Spells. I can help you increase your income, land that job you are after, help you achieve success in many fields, improve your luck, and much more… Are you living in constant fear? Do you need a Protection Spell? Contact me on (ACOGBESPELLTEMPLE@GMAIL.COM )NOW and I will cast a very powerful Protection Spell that will protect you and your loved ones from evil. Don’t wait until it is too late. Contact us NOW. I specialize in various fields of Spell Casting. I can help you with any problem that you might be facing. email me now
ACOGBESPELLTEMPLE@GMAIL.COM.
having worked in higher education from the days of "free" education to the present i have been watching with interest how students have reacted as fees were introduced and then increased. i think that the idea that a more mature person may consider a waste of money what a less mature person may consider to be another lecture ticked off without any excess thought is probably about right and was easily demonstrated by no great upsurge in complaints about course from students. each time we were told that students have become consumers (while pretending they hadnt) and each time behaviour has changed little for most students. this time...whio knows but i would look to the office of the independent adjudicator for the figures to show that consumerism and value for money are king.
having worked in higher education from the days of "free" education to the present i have been watching with interest how students have reacted as fees were introduced and then increased. i think that the idea that a more mature person may consider a waste of money what a less mature person may consider to be another lecture ticked off without any excess thought is probably about right and was easily demonstrated by no great upsurge in complaints about course from students. each time we were told that students have become consumers (while pretending they hadnt) and each time behaviour has changed little for most students. this time...whio knows but i would look to the office of the independent adjudicator for the figures to show that consumersim and value for money are king.
Having done a 'Free' undergrad with student loans for living costs, a PGCE with a bursary of £6,660 and some more student debt and then a Masters in the paid world for £7,500 I think that I'm equally qualified to talk about this.
I think that the tendency to view individual bad lectures as a waste of money or poor value is something that I appreciate more as an adult, more than because I'm a paying customer. Doing a part time masters means that work has to be done as well as studies, and 2 hours of pointless drivel could have been more valuably used than the theoretical £40 I just threw away.
I agree that it makes you think more critically about course choices and whether the final qualification is good value for money, but that was a goal of e tuition fees. I've paid all mine back - even from the Masters which only finished 12 months ago as I have one of the above average jobs.
The Uni I went to were very conscious of the changing environment and assessed everything to an almost obsessive degree with lectures that scored poorly being dropped from the following years course. As many were visiting lecturers from healthcare this meant that only the good lecturers came back.
So true, yet amazingly standards haven't risen with the addition of consumer values to higher education.
I went to university in my late 20s a couple of years ago but dropped out after 18 months. For the skills I needed there were much more cost efficient ways to get them.
During the late 1990s and initial years of this new century we read oh so many books on globalisation.
Although - most thankfully - we are now out of any kind of labour market, we were induced to change careers at various mile-stones along the way. But this was a individual decision - unforced by the market. It was in no way mandatory.
Most of us are eternally grateful for the Open University and congratulations to its founder Harold Wilson. And let's not forget the Barrage! Without this flood barrier riverside London could not have blossomed in a skyline of luxury accommodations and sybaritic services. Even Canary Wharf shelters behind this utilitarian structure.
But globalization demands that workers change their skills every so often.
Nothing is fixed -exept the salaries and perks of the financial elite.
No wonder Non-Doms are flocking to the capitol of UKPLC.
Sympathy