Why we should embrace the horse dancing
Like all sport, dressage promotes hard-work, aspiration, and communal effort.
By India Bourke Published 07 August 2012 10:03
Thanks to the long list of blue-blooded equestrians, from Zara Philips to Mitt Romney’s wife, it is easy to assume that dressage is a sport for the elite. And to joke about it. The jokes I can’t argue with. Ann Romney’s horse really did do a more impressive job than Mitt last week. But the idea that riding is only for the POSH (Privileged Or Super-rich Horse-owners) is not just misleading – it’s totally back to front.
On the eve of Britain’s first ever dressage medal, and a gold one at that, there are some important reasons why every sports hack, politician, and parent – anyone in a position of responsibility or care – should forget the stereotype and take a dressage lesson or two. Never mind the Olympics, it should be on the National Curriculum.
OK, maybe ponies in the PE department isn’t that realistic. And yes, having some talent and a family able to buy a multi million pound animal is one way of reaching the top. But while money might win you a medal, it won’t win you the respect of the sport. A real master of the horse is someone who can produce their own world-beater, not just once, but over and over again.
Let me introduce you to Carl Hester – a man without title or money – whom the media has consequently and unfairly sidelined. Carl was born on the tiny, car-less, Channel Island of Sark. As a schoolboy he earned pocket money by driving carriage horses for tourists, then took his first real job, aged 19, at a riding centre for the disabled. He didn’t own a horse until he was 20 but found work as an apprentice at a top dressage yard. By working until 9.30pm every night, he became the youngest British rider ever to compete in an Olympic games. He now makes a living training riders and producing and selling horses.
2012 is Carl’s fourth Olympics – and he nearly didn’t make it. Like football teams, many top riders rely on wealthy benefactors to lend them their rides; at the beginning of the year Carl had to call on every contact he had to make sure his multi-million pound horse, Uthopia, wasn’t sold to the Swedish team. But sweeter than his own success in this year’s contest (he is currently in fifth place), is the fact that he does own Valegro, the horse ridden by his team-mate and apprentice Charlotte Du Jardin, who has just smashed the Olympic record with a Grand Prix score of 83.66 per cent.
This year Carl is the kingmaker – in the most egalitarian and selfless of senses. His story shows that, more then any other sport, dressage is about producing something. Carl advises young riders to make their own road to success by making their own horses; buying them young and cheap, training them and selling them and buying more until they work their way up to where they want to be. This is tough advice. Seriously tough. It’s a life work – but one that produces much more than top horses and Olympic gold.
In the past the purpose of this "product" was military. When asked why Germany is so dominant in dressage one German trainer told me:
"Because we had to defend ourselves! We had to defend ourselves from the French! From the Poles! From the Austrians!"
A good point, even if it doesn’t quite tally with our version of history. In Britain, pit ponies were a central part of the industrial revolution – and its values of hard-work, aspiration, and communal effort – that Danny Boyle rightly loves to celebrate.
But even more than this, learning how to listen is the real gold mined through working with horses. Watch any test in tomorrow’s team final and you’ll see each horse’s ears quivering back and forth as they strain to understand their rider’s silent commands. Horses aren’t born "difficult" or "headstrong". Like people, they are made that way when they’re misunderstood (an easy thing to do when you don’t share a first language).
If we really want to learn how to listen we should start paying more attention to the four-legged silent ones. They have a lot to tell us about how our own modern "Uthopia" might be achieved. For some this may be producing their own Olympic horse, or living on an island without cars. For others it may be a society in which politicians listen to their public, teachers to their pupils, and parents to their children. I’d settle for feeling the soft breath of a happy horse on the back of my hand. Whatever your utopia, whisper it; ‘"dressage is for everyone".
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















13 comments
I have listened to a number of arguments for and a number of articles against dressage. One thing is for sure - being active is always a good thing. Is dressage an exclusive way for keeping active? Yes it is and I am sure the author deep down knows that herself (though may not be able to admit it out loud). Poor Carl did not get a horse till he was 20. Well, a number of excellent riders will never get a chance to own one.
I don't think this article is doing much good for promoting the sport, I am afraid. The facts are stretched and the argument put forward is ... weak. Which is a shame as I completely agree with the sentiment. Dressage is great. And should be enjoyed by more people.
Those excellent riders you mention could easily own a horse. But horse ownership is sacrifice. No new car, no holidays, no take-away meals, no nights out. A second job, not enough sleep and clothes bought in the sales. It takes more than dedication of time, it takes sacrifice for almost every horse owner.
And thats just to afford it.
Done well its a hobby that can pay for itself, an excellent rider can always get added value put onto a young horse, or a cheap horse, and thus fund their hobby.
This frees up money to compete, and to attract sponsorship, which then means that the fnancial cost decreases.
But only the truely obssessed and dedicated can follow this, as it wont happen in four years, and it may not happen at all.
In horses you need luck, judgement and talent, and the excellent riders that you speak of (if they exist at all) may well be excellent riders, but they lack that burning desire to achieve their dreams, and the acceptance of sacrifice to make that dream come true.
As for the myth that horses are expensive, then I'd advise an excellent rider to pop to their local horse sales, or buy a racehorse coming out of training. £500 would cover it. Though I think the excellent rider is well aware of that fact.
Ohhhh purlease - what hogwash. The dressage winning team -
Carl Hester - brought up on the tax haven of Sark - his dad was a famous actor and his grandfather presented Ski Sunday on the BBC - yep a real chav
Laura Bechtolsheimer , the granddaughter of a German billionaire enjoyed a privileged background and began riding at the age of three.
- Nuff said -
Charlotte Dujardin - she has told how as a schoolgirl she would take turns with her sister to ride their mother’s Shetland ponies in competitions. - yep like we all do.
India Bourke? Straight of a council estate in Woolwich? I doubt it. Well done the dressage team but no need to publish patronising bollox like this.
Des De'moan'a you're right to point out that the sport still has a long way to go before it's as inclusive as it should be. As do most Olympic sports. The point is, however, that Carl and Charlotte prove that it can be done without huge personal finance. I wouldn't say Carl was a 'Chav', but I'd put odds on him being substantially richer now than when he started out - from learning and succeeding in the sport. Meanwhile Charlotte, like the author, went to her local comprehensive school. With many 'privileges' of a supportive family, an encouraging local riding school, and the ability for self-sacrifice, Charlotte and Carl show that the way to the top does not need a limitless bank balance. It is much more open than the above stereotype claims. So lets not perpetuate these ideas - but, as Carl has done, show that you can make your own way. The more people who feel that riding is accessible to them, the more will benefit from the huge amounts about listening, good leadership and even business sense that horses teach. In my experience in Devon, you could hang around your local riding school all weekend for free - if you were prepared to help out with basic tasks. It's great free childcare for parents, and a great social life/education for kids. I only wish there were more opportunities like it around - especially in urban areas.
India
I have no issue with anyone trying to make sport more inclusive. Where I take issue is with your fallacious opening that - ''But the idea that riding is only for the POSH (Privileged Or Super-rich Horse-owners) is not just misleading – it’s totally back to front.''
That is back to front in my opinion. You follow this up above with - ''Meanwhile Charlotte, like the author, went to her local comprehensive school. With many 'privileges' of a supportive family, an encouraging local riding school, and the ability for self-sacrifice, Charlotte and Carl show that the way to the top does not need a limitless bank balance. It is much more open than the above stereotype claims.''
Big difference between a comprehensive in leafy Bedfordshire and SE London, no? I don't know many parents in my neck of the woods who own or could even possibly contemplate owning Shetland ponies, so classifying Charlotte as a 'stable girl' who went to a comp is a little disingenuos. And perhaps Carl wasn't super rich but he was decidely privalleged and started off with the backing of the billionaire Bechtolshemeir family. So though of course hard work and dedication play a large part, in reality a limitless bank balance to kick start the process did come in pretty handy wouldn't you say?
PS - thanks for writing such a lovely article!
ultimately tho, its not money that wins medals. it is ability to listen to your horse and to be in-tune with it.. to get inside its head and to know its anatomy inside out..as well as being able to teach it, in a language it understands, to use itself in a way that is most beneficial to it. You need to be in balance yourself and to extend that balance to your horse..one tiny blip in your own mind or body and its all over. you need to be able to forge a partnership where you communicate almost telepathically, where you know literally what each other is thinking. to get to the top of ANY sport, you need cash..... you need to leave behind your previous life and go somewhere else to train.... and so on and so forth. but horses are about so much more than money. meanwhile , the majority of the horseworld hasnt got any! ;)
owning a horse doesnt have to cost money - non-horsey people have no clue about this. we dont seem to think that having kids means you need to be rich... and horses need a lot less money than children! at 36 i'm lucky enough to have my first horse... and he is teaching me such a lot. There is much humanity can learn from their noble natures and incredible instinctive awareness. they're humbling. it depends what you DO with your horse as to how much cash you need. my horse lives a natural life and needs just the cost of hay and feed and proper care. out of all the money I spend on my own place in a high tech modern society, this is my smallest bill by far... and the biggest boost for my soul!
@Tom P -
From my own experience as an equestrian, the fact that he did not own a horse until he was 20 is actually quite substantial. Many horse riders come from privileged backgrounds and get a horse as soon as they can mount it - probably 5 or 6. As for an Olympic level rider they usually own *multiple* horses.
When you have your own horse, you can pretty much practice whenever you want. So yes, he was at a disadvantage.
What's the point of this?
What's the point of anything, DMYERS?
When I tried to feel the soft breath of a happy horse on the back of my hand it turned round pronto and shat right on my palm. It knew I wasn't cut out to be a dressage rider, see. "Right-you-are-then, surr," I said in my rustic burr, doffing my cap at the noble beast (and how horribly crappy it got in the process!) and stomping off in my hobnail boots to submit my entry for the root-vegetable throwing contest.
"He didn’t own a horse until he was 20."
I see where you're going with this, but I'm not entirely sure this quite sells the idea that his life was one of deprivation and struggle.