With 14 out of our 48 medals won on two wheels, why is Britain so good at cycling?
Looking behind Team GB's impressive Olympic performance.
By Sarah Ditum Published 08 August 2012 13:57
How did we get so good at cycling? Pick a Team GB medal winner at random, and there’s a good chance they rode to the podium on two wheels. At the time of writing, 14 of Britain’s 48 medals have involved cycling – either track, road or in the triathlon.
Cyclists are our national sweethearts. When Mark Cavendish failed to fulfil hopes of a win in the road race, there were a few rumblings that Bradley Wiggins’s triumphant performance in the Tour de France had bred some British overconfidence, but Wiggo’s time trials gold soon rectified such fears, and made him the only person to have won both the Tour and an Olympic gold in the same year.
Chris Hoy’s golds in the team sprint and keirin have made him Britain’s most successful Olympian; Victoria Pendleton’s heartbreaking disqualification in her last competitive race means she leaves 2012 with one gold and one silver, but also a huge swell of goodwill from those who’ve followed her career. And as current greats peak, new stars have come into view: Lizzie Armitstead kicked off an overdue debate about the standing of women’s sport after winning silver in the cycling, while Laura Trott’s Olympic double gold (in the team pursuit and omnium) seems even more impressive when you realise that she also holds double gold in the World and European championships.
The signs of British cycling dominance were first obvious in 2008 at Beijing, where Team GB’s cyclists hauled 14 of the total medals (with the BMX events still to come at 2012, we may beat that yet this year). But it was a success built on long-term planning, ambition and lots of money. Coaches Peter Keen and David Brailsford saw Chris Boardman’s gold at the 1992 games in Barcelona as the starting point for a sustained and focused campaign by British Cycling (the governing body of cycle sport in the UK), aimed at winning the medals that could attract the funding that could make Britain’s cyclists into the colossi they have become.
Lottery funding and backing from Sport England (to promote grassroots cycling) and UK Sport (to support elite athletes) have all been critical in this process. But the breakthrough – at least in terms of the Tour de France – has been Team Sky, formed in 2009 and currently providing training, support and financial backing to Wiggins, Froome and Cavendish. Team Sky’s priorities have been criticised: although Pendleton features heavily in promotion for Sky-backed cycling events, there is no women’s Team Sky. Hopefully, the undeniable success and popularity of the women’s sport in this Olympics will change that in the next season.
Where Sky has got it right, however, is in promoting cycling as a universal activity and not just an elite sport. The Skyride events (which started when Sky sponsored the London Freewheel in 2009 and have since gone national) turn whole cities into motor-vehicle-free zones, to be enjoyed by thousands of amateurs of all abilities. For some, it’s their first opportunity to enjoy urban cycling without the menace of HGVs, and the start of a breakthrough into regular riding. And one of the qualities helping to fuel Britain’s cycling boom is that there does seem to be a genuine relationship between elite success and amateur enthusiasm.
Wiggins has a very endearing story about himself aged 12: after watching Boardman take gold in Barcelona, he immediately went out on his own bike and pretended he was Boardman, commentating on himself all the way. Without ascending to Wiggo-ish heights, my family picked up some of the same buzz after watched the velodrome events in 2008, hiring bikes the next day and setting off on a wildly over-ambitious trek that was the beginning of a regular riding habit. It’s not just me: British Cycling membership has doubled to 50,000 since 2008, and Halfords reported an 18% increase in sales of bikes and kit following this year’s road cycling victories.
And while Olympic success feeds mass cycling’s popularity, mass cycling in turn helps produce the elite of the future. British Cycling has astutely established scouting projects in various age groups to locate the amateur individuals with potential to be tomorrow’s champions. (Armitstead is one of the fruits of that outreach.)
The controversy that briefly flared after Bradley Wiggins was quoted as saying helmet-wearing should be compulsory for British cyclists shows that there’s still some way to go before Britain truly becomes a nation of cyclists, as do the arrests of the Critical Mass cycling activists during the opening ceremony. But the pressure for the infrastructure changes needed may become irresistible if cycling’s rise continues, and this Olympic showing gives us no reason to expect anything else.
Sarah Ditum is a freelance writer. She tweets: @sarahditum
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















5 comments
Concentrating on cycling hides a wider picture. Add equestrian, rowing, sailing and canoing and it is clear that Brits do best sitting down. Years spent behind our desks flicking paper balls and paper clips at our fellow clerks?
Maybe this post should be retitled how did Britain fall in love with cycling, or something?
Because it isn't really a look at how and why it got so good at Olympic cycling. The grassroots have very little, bordering on nothing to do with that. In fact, the almost complete absence of any meaningful grassroots may well have helped it to flourish.
As Sarah points out, amateur interest is on the up, but it post-dates Beijing, which give or take a medal, was on a par with this year's success. In other words, there was no real virtuous circle in effect for Beijing. Put another way, elite cycling success is certainly driving amateur involvement, but the same can't really be said yet, beyond rabid home support. Involvement isn't so high that the available pool has been vastly increased, and nor is it so developed that people are entering the GB structure with significant 'pre-training'.
The story of GB cycling success is so unusual in British sport and so instructive because it's so 'un-British'. It's incredibly technocratic, coaching-led system. Traditionally British sport has had a deep hostility to coaching: in football you're told to get stuck in, put your boot in, that you lost because the opposition 'wanted it more'; grit and determination are supposed to trump all. By contrast Brailsford and his team obsess over every holistic detail of technology, technique and psychology. The 'aggregation of small details' is his motto: you find 1% improvement in five different areas, and you win by half a metre.
The lack of grassroots, or rather of dads convinced they know how their Laura or Chris should be doing it, possibly helped that different culture get established.
But as I say, the title may not have come from Sarah but the sub, and the increasing level of amateur involvement is a good thing long term....
Because we used to be Roman/Viking/Norman slaves?
Its because we have very round wheels.
Its because we have very round wheels.