Why Boris Johnson should step in to save London’s WorldPride parade
The Mayor could make an important gesture to the LGBT community in London by helping with last-minute funding problems.
By Nichi Hodgson Published 03 July 2012 8:52
WorldPride, an event that was meant to showcase London as a leading city for LGBT rights and life, is fast resembling a paltry village fete. Now, it’s up to all those who honour Pride’s core values to call on Boris Johnson to intervene, and to step up and be counted themselves on Saturday, whatever the state of the parade.
If you don’t already know (and it’s been so little reported in the mainstream press you probably don’t), last Thursday WorldPride organisers Pride London revealed that a shortfall in funding, estimated to be around £66,000 by the LGBT VSO coalition Consortium, would mean drastic last-minute changes for this Saturday’s WorldPride parade day. No special events in Soho, a reduced rally in Trafalgar Square, no outdoor drinking and late licensing in Soho and most galling of all, no floats – floats which volunteers and LGBT charities have invested precious hours and pounds in constructing (with a minimum cost of £2,500 just to secure one), and are now out of pocket for having done so. Being unable to pay for the requisite policing means the procession start time has been moved forward by two hours, scuppering thousands of pre-arranged travel plans, and the official Pride magazine, which details the day’s schedule, has been out of date since it dropped off the press. The one million or so expected visitors are currently en route to a glorified march about town, something akin to what Pride London’s bizarre sleight of spin calls "the roots of the original Pride London rallies". But 40 years later, even Peter Tatchell, the founder of that first march, considers the comparison a travesty, not a compliment: “We’re not only letting down LGBT people in Britain, we’re also betraying the trust and confidence of LGBT people world-wide. This is an absolute disaster,” he said.
WorldPride in London should have been a spectacular party which reminded the international community of the ever-pressing need to fight for the rights of LGBT people, wherever they may be. Now, both the party and the political message have been egregiously undermined by the committee’s incompetence and nonsensical hesitancy in admitting it needed funding help. If the event is allowed to fall apart, London’s claim to being a city of tolerance and social liberalism will surely be tarnished.
Meanwhile, the LGBT community and those involved with the event are conflicted about the best way forward. In an open letter to Boris Johnson, a Facebook group called Shame London have asked the Mayor "to provide equivalent funding to the Notting Hill Carnival", which would enable the parade proper to be reinstated. Since the GLA has in fact already donated £100,000 to the event, others disagree that it is Johnson’s duty to step up to the plate. Some have called out for a celebrity donor, or Soho businesses that profit year round from the LGBT community, to put up the cash; others claim to be prepared to fundraise themselves. Pride London is the only official group with the means to distribute gathered funds, but vitriol for them is now so intense that many potential supporters would not pass a penny the committee’s way whatever it could now pull off. Somebody, then, must surely act as both a mediator and a guarantor.
Late last night, Pride London confirmed that it had secured the support of two sponsors, Smirnoff and QSoft in meeting some of the deficit, theoretically enabling the restoration of the floats to the parade and the closure of selected Soho roads, should the GLA agree. A final all-agencies meeting is planned for later today where the restoration of WorldPride now depends on the cooperation of Westminster Council and the Met, or a top-down order from the only man who can demand it: the Mayor himself.
Johnson’s reticence to intervene so far is not exactly reassuring. Would Johnson not have offered help immediately if the Jubilee celebrations had been financially mismanaged? Or the Olympics? Even the most cynical of us can see that the furore presents Johnson with the perfect political opportunity to up the Tories’ liberal cuddle-credentials. So what point has the Mayor made by so far failing to step in and save the day? That you can put a price on protecting and promoting human rights, and it stands at roughly £66K?
In the meantime, besides occupying City Hall, or picketing Boris’ home, what can any of the appalled rest of us do? Well, join the Shame London Facebook campaign and email the Mayor. Or use a similar letter drafted by Consortium to put pressure on the GLA to reinstate the original plans. And – most importantly - plan to attend WorldPride on Saturday, of course, however the event turns out. Even if we can’t party as hard as we were hoping, we can still do what thousands of other individuals still waiting for LGBT acceptance around the world cannot; march with our friends and loved ones and say to the world, it’s ok to be gay. Whatever Pride London or the authorities owed us in honesty or actions, we owe it to all those denied the right to LGBT identity to show that solidarity.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















9 comments
Call me cynical but this sounds like an attempt to try to blame Boris for the inevitable fuster cluck. It is entirely plain that the committee are not fit to run a whelk stall, this is not really London ratepayers' problem especially this late in the day.
This would be a genuinly hard decision to make for most Tories - give £66k odd for what is relatively very cheap good press, but admit that it's not the 1950's any more. Or don't give any money and remain the bigoted regressive person they almost certainly are.
"The Mayor could make an important gesture to the LGBT community in London by helping with last-minute funding problems". By all means celebrate your sexuality but don't expect your personal life style to be paid for out of the rates!
Total waste of public money given the current circumstances. Can't we ban it instead? That's what all the lefties try to do at any demos that they don't like.
Let me see if I understand this article...
This is about a niche issue which only affects a small percentage of the population of the city, the country and the world. Let us be clear: you can be as gay as you want in the UK today, this is not Iran!
And you are asking for £66,000 of public money to be spent on your niche political parade against a backdrop of reduced public services due to slashed public spending?
Just wanted to be sure I understand your worldview as it appears to be rooted in some fantasy parallel universe of free dosh and a naive public who give a stuff about paying for a free gay pride parade.
We don't need parades reminding us of our differences: how does a parade reinforce the fact that you don't need special treatment. Can't we all just be 'people'? Otherwise, where's the straight pride parade?!!
ANOTHER 66,000 - they've already had 100,000!
I am sorry but the idea of Boris Johnson stepping in to save Pride is farcical in the extreme. "World Pride" has been planned for over 5 years and the administration only admits to a serious Financial shortfall two weeks before the event! This last minute affair is too little too late, the promoters have failed miserably in attracting any top UK talent much less World Famous talent to their event, after spreading boastful whispers through the community that Elton John and Shirley Bassey were to appear on the main stage, then to release the startling news that Deborah Cox would be headlining, it is no surprise that they failed to attract the level of sponsorship required for the event. I am not questioning Ms Cox's talent but after Kylie's appearance at Sydney Mardi Gras and Lady Gaga appearing at Rome Pride, I fail to understand how they could not co-opt one of the UK's LGBT superstars to make an appearance!
I feel quite sure that had Pride London been under the guardian ship of the previous chairman Paul Birrel this would not have been the case.
The blame must be laid plainly at the door of Dr Patrick Williams and his team! Majorly scaling down and significantly changing timings of an event that involves around a million people attending two weeks prior to the day then expecting a bailout 5 days before is a bridge too far...
Let us look to 2013, hopefully the current Pride London administration will step aside and let those in the LGBT community both willing and capable of providing and event of sufficient depth and vision that matches it's communities expectations. Details of those interested in the 2013 event can be found on the 'Community Pride for London 2013' page on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/groups/230603710393564/)
It's too late now for floats now anyway. I am a member of a group who planned to have a float. The truck was cancelled as soon as we heard that floats would not happen in the parade and last week-end was spend adapting the decorations so that they can be portable.
I am sorry but the idea of Boris Johnson stepping in to save Pride is farcical in the extreme. "World Pride" has been planned for over 5 years and the administration only admits to a serious Financial shortfall two weeks before the event! This last minute affair is too little too late, the promoters have failed miserably in attracting any top UK talent much less World Famous talent to their event, after spreading boastful whispers through the community that Elton John and Shirley Bassey were to appear on the main stage, then to release the startling news that Deborah Cox would be headlining, it is no surprise that they failed to attract the level of sponsorship required for the event. I am not questioning Ms Cox's talent but after Kylie's appearance at Sydney Mardi Gras and Lady Gaga appearing at Rome Pride, I fail to understand how they could not co-opt one of the UK's LGBT superstars to make an appearance!
I feel quite sure that had Pride London been under the guardian ship of the previous chairman Paul Birrel this would not have been the case.
The blame must be laid plainly at the door of Dr Patrick Williams and his team! Majorly scaling down and significantly changing timings of an event that involves around a million people attending two weeks prior to the day then expecting a bailout 5 days before is a bridge too far...
Let us look to 2013, hopefully the current Pride London administration will step aside and let those in the LGBT community both willing and capable of providing and event of sufficient depth and vision that matches it's communities expectations. Details of those interested in the 2013 event can be found on the 'Community Pride for London 2013' page on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/groups/230603710393564/)