The abortions we don’t talk about
Why is there so much implicit judgment about what is never a straightforward moral issue?
By Glosswitch Published 20 July 2012 9:33
When I was pregnant with my children, I told people early on – way before the 12-week mark. It’s a decision I don’t regret, particularly when I recall the aftermath of an early miscarriage. Recently, though, I’ve started thinking that I wouldn’t do the same again. It’s not that I’m pregnant now, although you’ll have to take my word for it. The fact is, if I were pregnant, I’m not sure I’d want anyone to know until after I’d had all “the tests”.
I am on the wrong side of 35. The side upon which, apparently, everything goes horribly, horribly wrong, at least if you’re female. Reproductively you’re running out of time but as if that wasn’t bad enough, like Jackie in Footballer’s Wives, you start getting “rotten eggs”. You might still have a baby, but it might not be as healthy as the babies you could have had earlier (we’re assuming you’ve always had money and been in a stable relationship; if not, well, you just don’t deserve a baby, ever). That said, it’s probably best not to worry about it. After all, who do you think you are? You’re not some Nazi eugenicist, you’re a pregnant woman, and it’s time to start acting like one. The trouble is, I’m not sure I’d be prepared to do that.
Every year, there are women who will have late abortions due to the discovery of some form of foetal impairment. In some cases the foetus or baby would die anyhow, so that’s okay (unless we’re in Ireland, in which case, tough; carry your baby to term and watch it die in the name of “life”). But in some cases the pregnancy would lead to a live birth with the baby going on to have a relatively normal life expectancy, yet requiring constant care. I am not sure, as a mother, that I could make that commitment. Neither am I sure that it would be fair to ask the children I already have to take over after I am gone. And as the sibling of someone who does require ongoing care, I’m under no illusions about what how hard it can be and what lies in wait for me. I wouldn’t be able to face more than I already have to. Does that mean someone like me should just never get pregnant again? I think I am an okay mother; surely I am as deserving of this chance as anyone else?
I will be totally honest: when I read or hear potential parents saying that they “wouldn’t care” whether or not their child was seriously disabled, I am just a little bit furious. Furious at the way in which they belittle the impact that serious disability can have on so many people’s lives, and furious at the implicit judgement of those who do care, people who might have good reason not be so glib. Late-term abortions based on foetal impairment are difficult decisions. I don’t know what the “right” decision for an individual should be but anyone, before they embark on such a challenging path, ought to really, really care.
This week the Telegraph is reporting on IVF pregnancies being terminated when women “learn the child is less than perfect”:
Andrea Williams of the group Christian Concern said: “We have to question the values of a society which focuses so greatly on adult ‘wants’.
“That a woman pursues a baby through fertility treatment and then aborts it because it is not perfect is selfish and harsh.”
Do you know, if it wasn’t for all the help my parents and I get from organisations such as Christian Concern and Life and SPUC, this sort of thing would really annoy me. Oh, hang on – we don’t get any help from these self-satisfied, judgmental bullies. Just spite and meanness and pointless words. How dare anyone speak of someone else’s suffering and loss in this way?
It is impossible to write honestly about how difficult being a carer can be because another person – the person you care for – is involved and their dignity has to be preserved. This is why women such as Andrea Williams can make heartless comments about “wants” and “perfection” without others being able to challenge her with the realities of their own lives. I am not suggesting that this type of abortion is a straightforward moral issue – it’s the only instance where your choice is based on the specifics of the foetus, and not you – but I find the attitudes of groups such as Christian Concern hateful. It must be agonising for someone who wants a baby so badly and who has got so far to have to make this choice. I could never argue against it because it’s a choice I’d probably make myself.
And what’s more I think I could make it and still look the person I have to care for straight in the eye and admit to what I’d done. It’s not that I would not want this person to exist. It’s that I wouldn’t want another person with the same wants and needs in our lives. And actually – I have no doubt of this – neither would he.
This post first appeared here on glosswatch.com. Glosswitch is a feminist mother of two who works in publishing.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















11 comments
I for one am proud of our strict abortion laws in Ireland. Let me say that i am not religious in any real way but i believe that abortion especially late term ones are an outrage and an affront to humanity. In fact some 'modern' countrys are now permitting gender based abortions and this is a scandal and should be equated to a war crime as it is willful and deliberate destruction of life for self-motivated reasons. Yet we in Ireland are being labelled as being barbaric and living in the dark ages simply because we will never allow this outrage to occur in our land. Many Ulster protestants by the way fell exactly the same as i do so it not a catholic thing alone. No society anywhere should have the right to carry out abortion on demand as this is a slow return to the real dark ages . Whats next , getting rid of the elderly or sick . Abortion must be treated for what it is globally , an outrage .
"...in some cases the pregnancy would lead to a live birth with the baby going on to have a relatively normal life expectancy, yet requiring constant care. I am not sure, as a mother, that I could make that commitment."
So what would you, as a mother, be prepared to do exactly? Motherhood is fine for you when they're healthy, but when they're ill, you want out? As Paula pointed out, you never know what will happen to children during their lives. A severe disability does not make their lives any less worthwhile or them any less worthy of your love and devotion.
You say that you do not treat them like commodities. I think you do exactly that, but you prefer to package this desire as something which is reasonable and really quite civilised.
As a society, we have forgotten that the value of a human being does not lie in their physical or mental characteristics but in the fact that they are human! New life is a beautiful thing, why don't we treasure it?
I treasure cows and pigs (and so on) and their lives. They are mammals just as I am. I don't eat them, I don't kill them (ok, I also count birds as mammals and don't eat them). What about you?
Oh, I would have kept a cat without leg, just circumstances were less than perfect, and vet decided not to go with amputation, put the scared and suffering very young animal to sleep. Yeah, I chatted with some kids, who could hear what exactly was in the box (cat), but they couldn't smell the stench of rotting leg. Vet didn't want to pursue the idea of 'finding the home', concluding in front of children 'kitty is going to find great home'. You know, nobody wanted to take care of this animal after op and it would need a passport so I could take it myself. There were lots of people I had to ask opinions would they help in this and just nobody wanted. It was just a cat. I think I'm a bad spinner after all, couldn't convince anyone to help. Why nobody treasured life of this little kitten? All in all it was a life. Same story you will have with children, everybody is keen to advise how to do The Right Thing, but there's nobody to help out with for example constantly screaming child (and I know such family), where mother after several years of torment was forced to give up the kid.
You don't know how it is until you personally are in particular circumstances; there is life of more than one person at stake and mothers heve their own lives too. And they have right to have lives outside of motherhood and constant care of their children. I fully support such decissions.
'As a society, we have forgotten that the value of a human being does not lie in their physical or mental characteristics but in the fact that they are human! New life is a beautiful thing, why don't we treasure it?' - why don't you extend it personally and stop judge others what they should or shouldn't do, or how they should or shouldn't think?
This is why most of the time it has been recommended that one should avoid from getting child when this situation going to happen very soon. You have covered almost every thing and it is very great. I want that can you make the post on topic of how to get your ex back
Thank you for this beautiful article Glosswitch!
Thank you for your comments. Just to be clear: I don't wish to suggest parents should make one choice or another, or that one choice is naive or wrong - I'm sorry if it came across that way. What I wished to express is frustration at those who don't yet know the difference severe disability can make adopting a moral high ground, as though it’s possible to rise above the whole debate. I think it’s damaging to suggest that difference exists only in the eye of the beholder (it doesn't, not when you find yourself an ailing pensioner still caring for someone in their forties – and those of us who are lucky enough not to be in this position sometimes find it all too easy to say we wouldn't mind).
I really don't think this is an easy decision – I just know that, since I would like to have choices, it wouldn't be right for me to condemn the choices of others. I also accept that you can't predict the future and that you will love your child no matter what – I’m under no illusions that a nuchal fold scan at 13 weeks gestation means my sons are now immune from all the other things that can occur.
I wanted to write this because some parents or would-be parents go through an incredibly hard time when a severe disability is detected in a foetus. It's distressing enough even without them having to face public condemnation. To reduce such parents to consumers trying to pick and choose perfect babies (which is what I think the Telegraph article does) seems to me incredibly unfair and dismissive.
"I will be totally honest: when I read or hear potential parents saying that they “wouldn’t care” whether or not their child was seriously disabled, I am just a little bit furious."
That seems very harsh of you, there are some parents who don't care whether their children are disabled or not, and they have just as much right to vent their opinion as you do. Clearly nobody should force you, or any other women to take on a severely disabled child if you feel that you can't cope with it, and nobody should make you feel guilty about that choice, but equally you shouldn't resent parents who do choose to make the choice to have such a child. Their choice is just as valid as yours.
I am pregnant, I am the wrong side of 35, I've told everyone that I was especting from the time the stick came positive and I have refused all testing that could lead doctor pressurizing me to have an abortion. - not that I would comtemplate one anyway. Let's be honest, we don't have control of what it happens to our lives or our children. One of my classmates had a healthy baby who unespectedly died within a week of being born. Others have had their 'healthy' babies diagnosed with autism at 3 years of age. What do you do? You can't kill the child or give up on them. He or she is your child after all in the good times or bad time and at any stage of life, these children / my child needs support to carry him/ her on to natural death, not to be given a push into it which is what abortion really does.
Lately there's been a lot of talk about euthanasia, but when it comes to any type of abortion, and as clearly can be seen in late terms abortions - these is really euthanasia for babies.
Autism is, at worst, a disorder - a collection of abnormal traits. It is not a disease, and in most cases the autistic is perfectly functional, just odd. Autism is genetic material that civilization needs, so don't hyperbolize this.
I am autistic, and no that isn't euthanasia, it's eugenics.
A brilliantly articulated post on an incredibly difficult and emotive issue.