Steven Baxter

Patrolling the murkier waters of the mainstream media

Syndicate contentRSS

No, I will not "grow a pair"

Men need to admit their vulnerability.

New Statesman
"Adam's leaf" underpants, invented in 2004, are supposed to keep the testicles ventilated and increase sexual potency. Photograph: Getty Images

If there's one phrase I'd love to get rid of, it's "grow a pair". You hear it a lot nowadays, not just said by men to other men they wish would grow up, but even from men to women, or women to other women. "Grow a pair", they say, or "strap on a pair", as if a couple of testicles will solve all problems, like a pair of dangly amulets.

As most men know, growing a pair of balls, or having them drop, doesn't really change much at all. You remain pretty much the person you used to be, albeit with a slightly deeper voice. But still, in our culture and language, "balls" and "ballsy" mean courage or courageous; we talk of "cojones" or "having big balls" to mean audacity or power.

It's irritating nonsense, for several reasons. Courage isn't inherently a masculine quality, of course, but there's more to it than that. People often use the phrase "grow a pair" or "strap on a pair" as a way of belittling someone who has shown weakness, or vulnerability - someone who didn't show the requisite assertiveness that apparently lives in the testes.

As well as that, it reinforces the very worst stereotypes of the "man's man": the rush to confrontation, rather than negotiation; a certain headstrong or even bloody-minded quality; the idea of maleness as something that is aggressive, rather than collaborative.

For those of us men who are more team players than the all-conquering alphas we're supposed to aspire to be, it's a tiresome thing. Not all of us are meant to shout and bellow and fight our way to success; some of us prefer other ways of doing things. It's not through a lack of balls, but through a lack of unfeeling uber-competitiveness.

Must we still, in this new century, be talking of men as people who should be nasty, assertive, pushy, unpleasant, in order to be proper men? We're not all Gordon Ramsay (who has a fondness bordering on obsession for talk of "big bollocks" when upbraiding some poor cookery sap on television).

But there's something else, too. The real quality that testicles have is staring us in the face. Human males, unlike many other mammals, have external testicles, dangling merrily away from their undercarriage like a couple of lychees in an old leather purse.

This evolutionary quirk exposes the adult male to extremes of pain and suffering at a stroke. A well aimed kick from an attacker, or punch from a young child (children happen to be at the perfect height to connect with full force), and even the toughest man will be reduced to a quivering foetal position of helplessness. There are no words for the pain, which I am pretty sure is definitely entirely worse than childbirth (THIS IS A JOKE).

How humans could ever have believed that a benign (and in many cultures apparently male) creator decided to place a couple of pain grenades hanging invitingly down as they do is a question for anthropologists. What it means, though, is that men's testicles, far from being a centre of our strength, are our most visible sign of weakness.

Every year, dozens of men die because they decided to "strap on a pair" rather than admit their own weakness. Whether it's shrugging off a niggling illness or feeling unable to talk about mental health problems (young men are at far greater risk from suicide than women, for example), the things we've been told about what it is to be a man can be our own worst enemy. It's not weakness to admit you can't cope; it's strength.

If we can't get rid of the odious phrase "strap on a pair" perhaps it's time it should take on a new meaning. Because it is courageous to strap on a pair - to hang your vulnerability so obviously, to invite a kick in the balls. It's an aspect of masculinity that often gets overlooked, the quality of honesty, vulnerability, and gaining strength through admitting your weaknesses rather than glossing over them with displays of machismo.

So if someone asks me to strap on a pair, I'll take their advice: be more aware of shortcomings; realise how vulnerable we all are; remember that a fall from hubris is just a well-aimed punch in the nuts away. That's real courage, I think.

43 comments

Erik's picture

Some men do need to grow a pair. They've been coddled since they were babies and never really did grow up. I have some female friends who have married (and divorced) this type of "modern" man and, what do you know, go straight back to mommy when things don't work out.

I hate to say it, but my generation (35-55) is a bunch of wimps. When I try and hire someone for a sales position, they want the world. They want to work 11-3pm (with an hour for lunch) and live at the coffee shop. Then they whine about traffic here in Washington Mo ! What's the deal? Make 1 sale a week and they are happy about it!

My generation really does need to grow a pair of something.... Pride would help....

Erik's picture

Some men do need to grow a pair. They've been coddled since they were babies and never really did grow up. I have some female friends who have married (and divorced) this type of "modern" man and, what do you know, go straight back to mommy when things don't work out.

I hate to say it, but my generation (35-55) is a bunch of wimps. When I try and hire someone for a sales position, they want the world. They want to work 11-3pm (with an hour for lunch) and live at the coffee shop. Then they whine about traffic here in Washington Mo ! What's the deal? Make 1 sale a week and they are happy about it!

My generation really does need to grow a pair of something.... Pride would help....

mzaryta's picture

anim3snipe
sadt3ars
animeonlye
nsf7
3solat
mnoms
magicians4all
animexyt
mexyt
delegnet

hesham15's picture

anim3snipe
sadt3ars
animeonlye
nsf7
3sola
mnoms
magicians4all
animexyt
mexyt
delegnet

Keewa's picture

Oh god, you've drawn out the MRA, Steve, run for your life (and sanity).

Keewa's picture

Oh god, you've drawn out the MRA, Steve, run for your life (and sanity).

Caissg's picture

Good article. And too ironic for our situation. As a young, male, spouse caregiver no one believes the pain and trauma a man is going through and his sensitivity. And since we are caregivers of intersex patients who look female but have male testes and are genetically male, it makes for an interesting discussion in the context of this article. Breaking stereotypes is progress.

Caissg's picture

Good article. And too ironic for our situation. As a young, male, spouse caregiver no one believes the pain and trauma a man is going through and his sensitivity. And since we are caregivers of intersex patients who look female but have male testes and are genetically male, it makes for an interesting discussion in the context of this article. Breaking stereotypes is progress.

Tesco Shelf Stacker's picture

Oh, Mr. Baxter - ya big girl's blouse! lol ;-)

World War 2's most famous ditty - mocking Nazi leaders with reference to their testicles.

"Hitler, has only got one ball, Goering, has two but very small, Himmler is very similar, but poor old Goebbels had no balls at all."

You can whistle the rest ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CB8F8g1-4Uw

Clown Asylum's picture

Great article, and agreed - I think all these gendered expressions are harmful. However, I was somewhat alarmed by reading

"The real quality that testicles have is staring us in the face."

... Which would be (alarming) news to me...

RedHead's picture

I love this post.
Grow a pair...don't be a pussy...both phrases need to be killed with fire. Physical features have no bearing on what makes you a man (or a woman.)

Leinadro's picture

"You hear it a lot nowadays, not just said by men to other men they wish would grow up, but even from men to women, or women to other women. "
So we're going to start off an article about vulnerability by pretending that women don't say this stuff to men? Or is it a given that you didn't say it?

"How humans could ever have believed that a benign (and in many cultures apparently male) creator decided to place a couple of pain grenades hanging invitingly down as they do is a question for anthropologists. What it means, though, is that men's testicles, far from being a centre of our strength, are our most visible sign of weakness."
The problem is the fact that testicles are fragile is the source of the illusion of invulnerability. Behind the facade of "grow a pair" is that since the testicles are frail being able to take damage to them without flinching is a marck of strength.

Jeff Fecke's picture

I despise this phrase for one simple reason: as a survivor of testicular cancer, I no loger have a pair. I have a singleton; I got rid of the other one, as it was trying to kill me.

Strangely, I haven't noticed any change in my level of masculinity, whatever "masculinity" is supposed to be. It's almost as if testicles have no bearing on who a person is.

McMac's picture

Too right, three testicle wouldn't make any sense at all.

Though it's worth remembering that on average men have less than two testicles, which by some strange twist gives an insight to how certain groups produce thier the 'pay gap' figures. EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED MAN!

Dude2012's picture

Let's face it. We're all trying to pass on our genes. That is our basic struggle, whatever the sex.

So as a (heterosexual) man, I don't give a f*** if another man tells me to grow a pair.

But I do care about the fact that a lot of women seem to want both the super-macho man, and the touchy-feely man, but at JUST the right time. If you get it wrong, you're history.

And all the women are competing for the same select pool of alpha males (who see the women as disposable), leaving those of us who aren't alpha male with little female contact.

Women, meanwhile, have suitors and sex whenever they feel like it.

Take a look at your circle of friends. Chances are there'll be more lost, single men there than women.

That, to me, is the problem, not some phony crap about people putting each other down with mere words.

ElenaHart's picture

"Take a look at your circle of friends. Chances are there'll be more lost, single men there than women."

Let's take the States as an example. Inside the heterosexual population in any given country, it would probably be that approximately equally many men and women date. Why? Because a heterosexual couple is formed of a man and a woman.

What might cause this discrepancy in your circle of friends, I don't know. Perhaps you have more friends that are men, perhaps the people in your circle of friends are still quite young (the average age for men marrying is higher than for women) of perhaps you know many lesbians that date each other.

Whatever the case, your anecdote is not universal and mine actually contradicts it. I personally know more single women than "lost, single men".

joannaaaaa's picture

or perhaps one good-catch man takes on four or five of the women?

McMac's picture

Mmmm. I've heard this 'woman want macho alpha males and that's why I'm single' nonsense before.

It's bllcks. Some women do like to have a human rottweiler on their arm, some woman like blokes for other reasons. Women are all different, and have pretty much the same wants, fears and insecurities as we do.
Once you are able to recognise women for the individuals they are, and give yourself to that person, not the caricature you think she represents, you'll get all the muff you want.

STEVE LOCKETT's picture

Thank God for some sense - the phrase I want to get rid of is "Men in general".

jankaas's picture

p*ssed myself laughing when i read that last bit. top stuff!

McMac's picture

Ah! I'm glad someone noticed, I had a little chuckle as I was typing.

Des Demona's picture

See.... I think the above is more about what it's like to be a man! Beautifully encapsulated. Can I just add my definition of the difference between a female and a feminist? A female knows she runs the show, a feminist wants it to be openly acknowledged.

Evil Pundit's picture

Well, at least this article isn't sneering, misrepresenting, and mocking the men's rights movement.

It does, however, fall into the feminist trap of assuming that men's problems can be fixed if they just become more like women. And it avoids the really serious issues of discrimination against men which are at the core of the movement.

Still not impressed. But then, with the demonstrated attitude of the editor in charge of the week's theme, I don't expect to be.

Evil Pundit's picture

P.S. Come to think of it, this article doesn't address the men's rights movement *at all*. No wonder it's so inoffensive - it's almost irrelevant!

MRA Watch's picture

The MRM is largely irrelevant to most men's lives. This is because of the composition of the MRM (MRAs).

Louise McCudden's picture

I loved this piece. That is all.

John Cheese's picture

In the US, the telly only shows acts of violence against men- that's all that is acceptable & PC in this day and age. Much of it is woman on man. Not sure if it is the titilation factor, or anger & rage from women producers for the now perceived "glass ceiling" or just trial & error results from the censors. But it reinforces the theme of this article...

sianushka's picture

great post.

Glen Poole's picture

It's interesting how WE are at admitting men's weaknesses:

"Every year, dozens of men die because they decided to "strap on a pair".....young men are at far greater risk from suicide than women, for example"

The true figure of men's mental fragility in the UK is that a dozen men will commit suicide today - 12 men every day of the week kill themselves - that's more than 4,000 a year

And I agree with the author that "grow a pair" is killer phrase that it'd be great to get rid of - and at the same time we need to stop saying things like "men don't talk", "men need to admit their weaknesses"

Gay people are more likely to commit suicide than straight people - do we say "gay people don't talk" "gay people need to admit their weaknesses"......?

No we say "what are the barriers that gay people face to accessing support services and how can we address those barriers to help them get equal access to those services.....hey, maybe we should fund a special service targeting gay people so we can tailor services in a way that responds to our needs"

In 2009 the CEO of Mind said "It is a major health inequality that a mental health strategy exists for women but not men" - and that remains

Rather than tellign men what they "need" to do and "should" do it's time we treated men and boys like every other equality group and starting asking ourselves what can WE do to address the fact that 12 men will kill themselves today - how can WE change the way we deliver support services to men and boys, understand the barriers men and boys face to accessing services and help them overcome those barriers

Perhaps the public sector could "grow a pair" and start taking responsibility for the inequalities that men and boys face, starting with the lack of mental health strategy for men and boys in UK

Glen Poole
The Men's Network

Silican's picture

Possibly relatedly, vis-a-vis growing pairs, men use more violent means to kill themselves.

AllyF's picture

Cracking comment Glen.

It's not just mental health and suicide issue either. The 'grow a pair' culture is largely what drove about 10 million young men (and a fair few boys) to volunteer to be slaughtered in WW1 and, on a lesser scale, contributes to huge numbers of deaths and serious injuries in the workplace to this day.

In a more mundane sense, I do agree with Stephen though that the most insidious aspect to "grow a pair" (like "man the fuck up" and so many others) is that it genders human traits like courage and stoicism in a way that is harmful to both men and women.

Feministsmakethingsup's picture

[deleted double post]

Feministsmakethingsup's picture

Hi Stephen

I think you have scratched the surface of the man/up grow a pair topic here, the feminist analysis of it tends to be a very superficial one and usually comes down to something along the lines of "grow a pair and show your vulnerability".

"That's real courage, I think."

Do you see the irony of your putting a shaming device in the form of a charge of cowardice in there?

"Every year, dozens of men die because they decided to "strap on a pair" rather than admit their own weakness. "

I wonder if you have a source for this figure you've given us? ;)

If you are interested in looking at data, you are welcome to drop by /r/mensrightslinks

Louise McCudden's picture

Except this mentality is not coming from feminists. It has existed way before feminism ffs!

Silican's picture

Absolutely. Testicular size and mating success has been demonstrated in flies, birds and some primates. Only in the latter is the relationship thought to be direct, as opposed to mediated via testicular hormone levels. The equation though is confounded by the relationship between testicular hormone levels and aggression. Oh, sorry, ffs!

Feministsmakethingsup's picture

@LOUISE MCCUDDEN

I didn't say that this mentality came from modern feminists Louise, I said the feminist analysis of it tends to be superficial and usually involves calling men cowards for not admitting weakness, which is only a repetition of "grow a pair" expressed in a different way, as you can confirm by reading what I wrote.

That said I wouldn't underplay early feminism's contributions to it, handing out the white feathers to shame men that were not gone to war for example, and you can see the sentiment expressed in feminism and by feminists in various ways often - the feminist response to the mens movement has for a long time now has centered around mocking and shaming the men and the movement for talking about their problems.

Des Demona's picture

Mmmmmmm so far in this series we have a man-bashing feminist rant and a stating the bleeding obvious self-help mantra.

Lulz's picture

A bloo bloo bloo :(

Jon Smalldon's picture

"remember that a fall from hubris is just a well-aimed punch in the nuts away."

Brilliant line. I will steal it and claim it as my own at a later date.

MCMAC above is correct as well. Given this is a themed week, something on why men do not go to the doctor and therefore die earlier as a result would be good.

McMac's picture

There’s another version of ‘grow a pair”, that unwritten rule that men are not allowed to be ill …“man-flu”.

By every measure men take less time off work than woman and use NHS resources much less, but in every office a man returning back from illness will be greeted with the sneering “man-flu was it?”. The message is clear, real men don’t get ill and take time off work. Adverts portray the sex that takes the most time off sick as “just getting on with it” and male malingers swinging the lead.

So in a two for one offer, blokes stop saying "grow a pair" and sisters lay off the “man-flu” comments please, it’s a culture that kills.

anon3's picture

That's a decent point, not sure where you were going with that at first.

DMyers's picture

The people I know who get the worst 'man 'flu' are women. Not a generalisation - merely a behavioural observation ;-)

McMac's picture

"Dozens..." that seems a tad conservative?

Latest tweets