David Allen Green

A critical and liberal look at law and policy

Syndicate contentRSS

Atticus Finch is not enough

Why the “great lawyer” theory of justice is misleading.

To Kill A Mockingbird
Atticus Finch and Tom Robinson in court. Photo: Rex Features

President Obama has provided an introduction to a special television showing of To Kill A Mockingbird. In one way, this gesture shows great taste and political savvy: the story of Atticus Finch’s battle against racial injustice is heart-lifting and remains of potent relevance today. 

Yet To Kill A Mockingbird is a story of legal failure on a systemic scale.

Finch’s defence is almost inevitably unsuccessful, and an evidently innocent man is convicted. Nothing – not even someone as attractive and righteous as Finch – can save Tom Robinson: the criminal justice system was so dysfunctional that a courageous and incisive lawyer is effectively bound to fail.

It remains a mystery why this great book and film encourages anyone to be a lawyer, so horrific are the defeatist implications of the tale for the legal system.

But the story continues its hold over popular culture. Many people, when asked who they would select as the greatest lawyer in fiction, would still choose the brave but ultimately ineffectual Finch. The reason for this is simple: Finch is a great man who happens to be is needed for a good justice system than for lawyers and their clients to be nicer people. 

In reality, few cases depend entirely on the performance of a single lawyer: it is how the lawyers on both sides and the court system work together which ensures whether the interests of justice are served.  And in criminal cases there are the wider issues of the role of the police and of the probation and prison services.  Criminal justice is complex, and so just outcomes depend on the efficient interaction of many professionals and on the resources available to them.  Injustice is what happens when this system fails or is improperly resourced.  But few politicians and their voters want to grasp at the problems of the justice system: instead, yet more laws will be passed to be enforced with less money.

And so we have a politician seeking re-election commending Finch on a television special, and everyone will then be inspired by watching a great man lose his case. If only every lawyer was like Finch, the viewers will think, and the world would be such a better place.  And the criminal justice system will carry on failing, just as before.

 

David Allen Green is legal correspondent of the New Statesman

13 comments

olek's picture

prezent na chrzest
Why would one ever buy a newspaper again? Outstanding piece, thank you.

olek's picture

VRy interesting to read it :P :D

prezent na chrzest

Tom Kennedy's picture

Your post has a lot of great information about Obama's policies and I think that TV show was right in giving such title to him. Although it has really helped me with my paper for a class I am taking. Do you have any other posts about this topic? ipad 4 release date Thanks
Tom

anwar45's picture

hii am anouar485
great posting.acne treatment reviews

abd el hakim's picture

hii am hakim
thanks a lot for the articles, very nice ..motorcycle jeans

zarmed's picture

We love Atticus because we can aspire to be like him, Ambition to be like him better than anything. motorcycle jeans

Tom Fairfield's picture

So there you have it, many great benefits of the MBT footwear. I highly recommend taking a look at the Masai Barefoot Technology because I think you will be amazed with what the design and features have to offer.

Silican's picture

How is "less money" the problem when throwing obscene amounts of money at a defence buys you innocence? The US scales of justice are weighed with gold. Money is the problem, not the solution.

hugh markey's picture

Before 'Nam really took off LBJ, that ultimate politician, gave a pep talk to all those Good Ole Boy Southern governors.
The President said he would make damn sure 'colud boys' would be kept well back from the fightin' so's the Confederates could have a clear shot at the Cong. Black civil servants and police officers would also be required to buy off any rebellious US citizens in the cities.
Have a look at some of those photos of US military aircraft and the decorated black pilots who flew them into the hell of North Vietnam.
Boy, oh Boy. Those casualty lists worked wonders. US Law was an also-ran until LBJ got those Southern peckers in his pocket.

GI Joe Louis

Richard Lanigan's picture

I dont know if I would agree with your analysis of "ineffectual" surely the point of the story is for Scout to see her father doing the right thing regardless what others thought, I dont think the old man or the people in the public gallery at the end or Scout saw Atticus as a failure.

old stateswoman's picture

We love Atticus because we can aspire to be like him.

I maybe can't change the world or the legal system, but I can always aspire to be like Atticus.

David will know that Atticus is based upon Harper Lee's father - and that her 80+ year old sister remains in practice in Alabama.

I wonder whose lives they've touched - whose world's they've changed.

Perhaps David should re-examine his own motives before attempting to belittle "hero worship" of doing the right thing.

mbrecker's picture

Now, what Green didn't say.

A President who's an attorney, who's never tried a case in court and who many say violated intl. law is talking about how important justice is.

Is that a contradiciton to anyone?

Matt Flaherty's picture

I like the thought behind this article, but perhaps there's something else that can be said about To Kill a Mocking Bird. There's more to the story. In that famous fictional case we have an unusually sympathetic judge as well. It was the judge who appointed Atticus, not to his liking, as the defence counsel. That gave Tom Robinson the best chance he could have possibly had, as evidenced by the amount of time the jury sat in deliberation. However, it is ultimately the jury that lets us down here. They could not see past their prejudices.

Latest tweets