Amy Winehouse never, ever let us down
Winehouse was never interested in the normal rules of female celebrity.
By Laurie Penny Published 28 July 2011 12:32
We live in a hard, spiteful world that gorges on gossip and outrage and tramples on talent. As the tributes pour in for Amy Winehouse, who died on 23 July at the age of 27, we should remember that throughout her short career, the young singer was bullied by the press for the same vulnerability that made her music so powerful.
Winehouse was always more than an amazing voice. Her songs are as remarkable for their emotional authenticity as they are for the raw, precocious power of her singing. Her breakthrough album, Back to Black, is one of the great records of the early 21st century, and it is sublime precisely because it is about suffering: the ugly intimacies of addiction, the untidy angst of being young and lovesick and desperately unhappy, distilled into something rich, bitter and fine.
In a music industry that seems set on a trajectory of icy, impenetrable perfection, of inoffensive singer-songwriters with cookie-cutter good looks making coffee-table records for the curtain-twitchers of Middle England, Winehouse wore her flaws as brazenly as her 13 tattoos. And she was hounded for it to the point of breakdown.
The gossip press loves nothing better than to watch a young woman fall to pieces. The tabloids scented blood long before Winehouse appeared in public with flecks of it spattered on her ballet pumps, and began to hunt her through the streets of London and New York. Her song lyrics were quoted back at her in endless dissections of her obvious distress, mocking her refusal to "go to rehab" when she eventually did just that. In 2009, she had to take out a court order to stop press photographers from camping outside her house.
With the ethics of the tabloid press under scrutiny, it is worth asking why hacks felt the need, as the science writer Martin Robbins observed, "to pursue so aggressively and mercilessly a talented, but vulnerable, young woman". The day before the Sunday Mirror broke the news of her death, its sister paper sneered about Winehouse's appearance at a gig "like the embarrassing auntie you don't want at a family reunion". The same papers that gloated over Winehouse's deteriorating health and published grisly pictures of the car crash that was her personal life now carry solemn tributes to her achievements. The same papers that called Winehouse fat when she arrived as a fresh young talent in 2003, then gloated over her emaciated appearance as she succumbed to the pressures of fame, are saying how worried they always were about her weight.
A recurring motif of the many articles taunting Winehouse as her addictions lurched out of control was her failure to be “a good role model". Photographs of the "troubled singer" were regularly used to illustrate hand-wringing pieces about how young women everywhere were spiralling into a moral soup of loose-knickered, hard-drinking degeneracy.
Part of the joy of Winehouse as a pop phenomenon, however, was that she was never interested in the normal rules of female celebrity. When asked in 2007 why Amy Winehouse meant so much to me, I wrote that she was the only woman singer who you could never imagine releasing her own perfume - and if she did, you wouldn't want it near your pressure points any more than you'd dab yourself with Essence of Keith Richards.
It should not be the job of every female who achieves success through her own talents to be a model of ladylike good behaviour. Pete Doherty, whose substance misuse has likewise furnished the gossip papers with almost a decade of slobbering disapprobation, was never asked to be a role model. Young women need role models, but we also need artists and icons.
Winehouse was consistently iconic, from her trademark scruffy beehive and eyeliner to the raw soul of her voice. It is one of the many ways in which she never, ever let us down.
Much has been made of how her premature passing places her in the macabre coterie of musicians, from Morrison and Hendrix to Joplin and Cobain, who died suddenly at the age of 27. The superstition surrounding the so-called 27 Club is no more than a tasteless attempt to attach meaning and order to the senseless waste of young talent. Yet perhaps the association will allow Winehouse to be remembered not as a frail addict, but as the damn fine music star that she was.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















70 comments
Surely dying let you down?
You're no cooler than the rest of us by criticising the work of a dead woman.
So she wasn't as good as The Doors or Dusty Springfield? Fair enough.
Why do many struggle to appreciate the possibility that she was one of the best since then?
I have had others tell me The Beatles were the definition of iconic, not Amy. Why do so many feel this need to qualify her status rather than appreciate what she was?
One of the best voices of the last twenty years who put her soul into her words.
Quite simply a breath of fresh air to the soul genre who brought it back to the forefront of popular music when it had all but disappeared and an artist who opened the door for female vocalists of the future at a time when the charts were dominated by TV generated acts.
Role model blah blah. All I want is a bit of honesty and some small characteristic I can identify with. I would struggle to find that in the likes of Cheryl Cole.
Personal choice blah blah. As a sober alcholic your initial choices are made yourself but before long and with such physically addictive drugs as heroin, the choices are made for you. It is too simplistic and really just a bit simple to pass judgement with, "Just say no".
Some of her music wasn't to my taste but it doesn't stop me appreciating her talent in the same way it doesn't stop me recognising The Beatles even though, White Album aside, I would listen to The Who all day long.
Wasted talent? At least she made it. She got there. Left her leagacy. How many of us will say the same? How many of us, through circumstance or poor choices will never reach our potential; fading away into the backrgound only to be remembered by our close family?
Amy, thanks for coming to the party, it was a shame you couldn't stay longer, but I'm delighted you came at all.
Only just read this. I assume 'never, ever' has to be pronounced 'nevar, evar'.
"Surely dying let you down?"
Well said!
Winehouse let us down in the sense that she played her intended role pretty much without a single surprise. In this sense, she perhaps created no expectations in me to actually disappoint. When she first started, it was pretty clear she was annointing herself for a relationship with sacrifice and death - which is primarily the essence of 'the iconic' star: to always be placed somewhere near to the limit of death; die for a cause, die for your art, die for your own tortuous emotional life.
The difference, I guess, between Doherty and Winehouse is that Pete appears to be a far less authentic version of this process. Winehouse - at least for a short while - had a soul and heart; Pete is mostly a rockstar simulation, and not a particularly good one. Winehouse was indeed a talent and made a great album. Tis just a shame she couldn't have been as creative with her ideas about iconic living.
And, just so we're clear, The Doors were mostly shit too.
The media knows what sells. A lot of consumers do not care what a rock star or pop star sounds like. The more disastrous the lifestyle the better. It's all about presentation. The Tories know this fact well.
Whether Jimi Hendrix was a great guitarist or not he could not draw a following until he put on a public exhibition of smashing his instrument .
At one of his performances, Alice Cooper, was it, bit the head off a live chicken. Man he really could rock.
British rock bands had to keep throwing television sets out of hotel windows to awe their slack brained fans and keep them buying the product.
Davey Jones had his nose broken mixing it with former heavy-weight champ Sonny LIston. Yea, Sonny was meant to go into the tank - that is according to rock rules. Virtual reality has been around for some time
Who's Artie Shaw?
"Tis just a shame she couldn't have been as creative with her ideas about iconic living."
I should have said 'creative and exciting'.
Amy Winehouse - not my cup of tea to be honest. Bought her first album on the back of some rave reviews but was disappointed - a couple of tracks were ok I thought, but overall nothing to write home about in my opinion. But thats just me.
Icon? Legend? Genius? Hero? Hmmmm ..I dunno about that? These terms get banded about far too easily these days I think.
Waster? - definitely! lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mT7Lo-jd7KE&feature=related
Amy was a brilliant singer and artist. She was also a hugely entertaining personality. If she was let down by the usual hoards of boring, two dimentional, nothingness people and third rate talentless celebs that clung to her for fame, then that is totally understandable. No doubt she had to drink to make people more interesting. She was a refreshing, unfussy person and luckily had enough charisma and talent to outweigh the boring, nobodies that often frequented her life. Hope she has a fab afterlife, befitting her great personality.
Another case of someone dying early and then everying pretending they were better and worthier than they actually were.
Feminist message of the day - "You too can grow up to die early after years of a horrific life at the hands of drink and drugs."
Say what you want about plastic, rubbish girl groups, most of them don't die alone of drug overdoses at 27.
(from Stephen W)
"It wasn't the tabloids that drew her into a life of hard drinking and hard drugs. It wasn't the daily mail that [...] encouraged her to [...] destroy her health, and eventually kill her and utterly waste her talent at a tragically young age."
Hell, yeah! Thanks so much, 'bout time someone put this into the right words.
These means of reproaching media or whatever else of being the culprits are just ridiculous.
It reminds me of an unrelated case over here in Germany: Mr. Guttenberg blamed his family (!) for his awfully copy-pasted thesis, because they were continuously imposing pressure on him: pressure to succeed in accomplishing what he wanted to accomplish.
Yeah right! You'd always blame the others, that's the way to go. Just to distract from your own shortcomings.
Are you Limeys still crying over that drug-addled SKANK??? I haven't heard you all cry for this long since we killed bin Laden! LOL
Amy Winehouse was a great singer and songwriter. Listening to her Back To Black album is an incredibly pleasurable and also painful experience. The honesty about her feelings and relationships made her songs compelling but also exposed her innermost thoughts and feelings for a very wide (sometimes hostile) audience. That took some guts.
www.observer-rich.blogspot.com
What a fantastic voice and delivered with such passion, what a great loss.. Not just to Amy's family, but to all those who love great music.
She's the one reason I don't ever watch that bastard Grahame Norton. He was up there with the worst of the tabloids when it came to cruel comment about Amy Winehouse.
Borderline personality disorder. People with BPD rarely survive till old age. No surprise. I've dealt with hundreds. She was a pop singer. Full stop.
gerry tierney, I agree
I'm not sure how often the "good role model" motif came up, Laurie: if it did, it would only have been at the level of Daily Mail letter writers. Her audience wasn't children. I think we have an incredibly unhealthy celebrity culture that manages to combine adulation and schadenfreude-Amy Winehouse was a victim of that, but she wasn't the first and she won't be the last.
And she did make choices, Iden-perfectly rational ones. People take drugs because they enjoy it, and decide that the short term gain justifies the long term risk. Every decision any sane person makes is on a completely rational basis-every choice meets a need. You might not be able to verbalise-let alone rationalise-the need, but it's still there. If I decide to give up smoking after thirty years on the tabs, is that because I'm programmed to smoke for three decades? Isn't it more likely that it's because I realise that I'm riding my luck, and take a conscious decision that some short term discomfort will be worth it in the long run?
Lox: I think Iden is saying all our choices are predetermined, it's all fate. When we are faced with a choice it is predetermined what are the choice will be! You on the other hand are saying we can choose one path or another. It's impossible to know who is right.
One thing that we can say is that people with the same genetic predisposition have made different choices. Clearly society influences those choices and the circumstances that people find themselves in. If you can't buy drugs because there isn't any around the choice is made for you.
But then you can say that it is your fate to find yourself in these circumstances. The society that you find yourself in is predetermined!
Nice tribute article Laurie. Only just got to it.
I liked Winehouse. She had a rich if heavy voice, and some of her songs are very catchy. Pity no full third album - will anything posthumously be released?
Trofim: what is your profession and how did you meet hundreds of BPDs?
very sad waste of talent and life - hope she's found some peace somewhere else.
amy was my hero,,but what annoys me now is where is pete docherys tribute to amy,,is the likes of him not to blame for the downfall of amy..his silence is deafeaning since amys death...anyway rip amy...she will be in good company in rock and roll heaven ie keith moon,,jimi hendrix..etc etc...
It wasn't the duty of the press to save Winehouse; that was, in the first instance, her duty, and, in close second place, the duty of her family and friends - like you Laurie. And not one of you managed to do an iota of good. Blame-shifting arsehole.
worshipping at the altar of celebrity culture gets us nowhere and serves only to damage political movements, you think the average oppressed woman on the streets in the UK can relate to or even dream of being like Winehouse (or indeed should do so?), of course they cannot, people generally only get media attention when they represent what the media want us to worship, not because of any difference or talent, heck people who make a difference are generally not mainstream or tabloid love children. This is a very dissapointing article, its reactionary to her death, dellusional about her influence and falls prey to the kind of blind adulation for a person that the Right relishes in and the Left would do well to avoid at all costs.
This article is just ridiculous.
It wasn't the tabloids that drew her into a life of hard drinking and hard drugs. It wasn't the daily mail that supplied her and encouraged her to take the harsh chemicals that would take control of her life, destroy her health, and eventually kill her and utterly waste her talent at a tragically young age.
She 'never ever let us down'? She let herself and everyone around her down massively by destroying her life and wasting her talent. And her blood is on the hands of everyone who ever supplied her or encouraged to go down that path. And it certainly wasn't Rupert Murdoch or Paul Dacre.
A talented young woman has had her life torn apart and destroyed by painful and damaging addiction. She made some awful choices and extremely sadly they killed her. Now is a time to weep that it all turned out so badly.
The idea you'd condemn someone for putting their name on a perfume but praise someone who ruined their health and tragically killed themselves with drugs says a lot about your warped personal view of the universe.
If Amy Winehouse was never interested in the normal rules of female celebrity that is because she was too busy destroying herself with Cocaine, Ketamine and Heroin. To not put that clear fact front and centre.
Humans do have free will. And AW exercised hers by doing drugs. I have no respect for someone who abused themselves by choice, and then died as a result.
Nice to see the tory trolls pissing on her grave. They just can't get enough hate can they?
Death of a good, young singer, and then a Laurie piece of writing just about sends the right wing trolls bat shit insane.
motown jazz retead was Ms Winehouse. Your points are well made but a tad revisionist, I understand a woman maligned but what a waster
Moronic brownshirt troll"...but trust L Penny in her feminist 'crusade......."
Well, if you don't like Laurie's writing, why do you read it arse wipe? Just
She was just another drug F***ed person who could sing, I'm sick of hearing Amy Winehouse,
what about the names of all those who died serving in the armed forces no one seems to wory about them..
Having been at that Amy Winehouse gig at Glasto 2008 , she was a proper mess . She was out of tune for a lot of the songs and ranting between. I dont think it really is a good example to use in a article entitled 'Amy Winehouse never let us down'.
At the end of the day it appears she was a young alcoholic, who whilst withdrawing from alcohol , had a fit and died. Sad and unfortunately not an infrequent cause of morbidity or mortality in that demographic.
If modern science permitted one could say she was sometimes possessed. Extraordinary girl. Worth digging around Youtube for sublime clips unavailable elsewhere.
A.W will probably be remembered as a young woman who wasted her life and talent...but trust L Penny in her feminist 'crusade' to tell us in the same paragraphe that A.W 'was never interested in the normal rules of female celebrity' and that the papers 'gloated over her emaciated appearance as she succumbed to the pressures of fame'... One thing I know...when the time comes, Laurie Penny WON'T be remembered, thank God !
not to mention the title 'A.W never let us down' ... no ? Ask the many paying audiences who saw her stagger on stage unable to give the performance they had come & paid for !!! L Pennie should get a grip once in a while, even if , in her distorted view, a woman can do no wrong (or if she does, must somewhere be a man's fault!)
She had excuses-and she chose to use them. The writer of this article chooses to believe that pop music has artistic value. It does, the same way fried Mars bars have nutritional value.
Best since then?
Well, there's been many, many, since then, but just for starters off the top of my head, Sharon Jones is a contender, whose band was borrowed for Back To Black.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ouI5KcyHfE
Someone explain to me why she isn't as widely lauded and known as Amy? She's never let me down, either.
I in no way feel morally judgemental about Amy's lifestyle, she made some poor choices, had some bad guidance, was hounded by the press and tragically paid an awful price for pursuing her art, as many have done. I don't really doubt her integrity, just couldn't stand the way she sang, thought she was a bit over-rated and am tired of the over-eulogising about our princess-soul-singer-of-hearts. Knew it was inevitable though.
She was alright, a bit cliche though.
I had her in my "dead pool" last year actually. Still, can't win 'em all.
I'll listen to "Back to Black" today, it's not a "great" album by any means, but it's a worthy one, and it's an adequate testimony to a great voice.
Your comments on gossip press reminds me of that South Park episodes where they reveal that people need to sacrifice famous young women to grow good corn!
That said, I'm still on my campaign to try to find a pop music article or review which actually mentions *chords* or anything else music-related. That just confirms my belief that there is nothing musical about pop music anymore, and that classical music is today the alternative, revolutionary and anti-system musical expression that rock once was.
(Pop music is still art, of course, but not music per se - something like media art meets performance meets poetry meets dance?)
Back to Black is the definition of a coffee table record. I recall my parents buying it and finding it too boring to perservere with, and that really says something, believe me.
If you think AW's music is powerfull I advise you not to listen to the greats that she has been compared to - stick on LA Woman and your mind will be totally blown.
I was no fan of Winehouse (not my genre at all) however even a snearing, cynical contrarian like me could appreciate the organic brilliance of her voice. Regarding her lifestyle and untimely death, I feel that the holier than thou "I told you so" brigade are even more devoid of taste than those queing up to deliver the usual posthumous platitudes. Plenty of us have used alcohol less than responibly, so we'll have no lectures on sobriety from the nay-sayers thanks very much.
A brilliant obituary Laurie Penny. Your choice of words is superb.
On this occasion I have to disagree with Laurie. Are we seriously arguing that AW is ranked up there with the soul greats such as Marvin Gaye,Otis Redding, Aretha Franklin and Stevie Wonder. I believe that whatever talent AW had was sqaundered in pursuit of a hedonistic lifestyle of drug and alcohol abuse. AW chose this life and it for this reason we should not hold her up as some iconic persona. AW had access to the finest medical care and yet chose the path of self destruction. As for the idea that somehow she came off drink three weeks before her untimely death is all part of the family's refusal to believe their daughter had serious addiction problems. I believe that the proceeds of her estate should go to a drugs charity to save people who otherwise cannot afford expensive medical addiction programmes.
Ignoring the lifestyle and concentrating on the art, the 'coffee table record' description above from JWSXG is a good one.
Let's get real here. Amy Winehouse made good dinner party music. It was nostalgic, derivative and fairly non-challenging. Because of that it was justifiably popular among several different age groups.
But the posthumous 'greatness' being thrust upon Amy Winehouse just doesn't fit.
I'm afraid I agree with maxinemf. It's a sad story of addiction and wasted talent.
No doubt insecurity played a large part in her dependencies (and fame exacerbated that), but we must acknowledge that her lifestyle was in part down to the choices that she herself made. It troubles me that very young girls idiolised her and were inadvertently exposed to her lifestyle (although this is an unfortunate by product of our times).
But the iconic label is problematic for me. Forgive me for saying this, but her look and styling were not her own, although she wore them with panache, and I feel the same about her music, brilliant singer/songwriter that she was. The sad thing for me is to see a talented young women not fullfill her own potential.
I disagree with maxinemf.
The reason is simple, your assertion that she "chose this life" or "chose the path of self destruction" is based on the notion that human beings have free will, and this simply doesn't stand up to the reality of the human condition revealed by neuroscience and genomics. Our consciousness is a simulation of our self produced by our neurology which is in turn a product of our environment and genetics.
Amy Winehouse did not choose to be a troubled woman susceptible to drug and alcohol addiction just as I did not choose to have freckles and a lack of patience with people who use the death of a celebrity as an opportunity to sneer and moralise.
Her death is sad, tragic even, yet we should instead be glad that she lived to make some great music.
I think the points about the media are well observed and fair enough, but I do tend towards the view that we get the media we deserve. Ergo, criticisms of the media also point to more general problems with our society.
At one end of the scale are people who resent success and who are only to happy to indulge in some schadenfreude when successful people fall apart. This is why the red tops that chronicled every one of Amy's lows were, and remain, so successful. People liked reading about it.
But it's not just about the red tops. At the other end of the scale are those who live vicariously through others' excesses, those of us who celebrated and lauded Amy's shambolic lifestyle because it satisfied our idea of how a "proper" rock star should behave, or because she met our need for larger-than-life female icons who defy or subvert gender stereotypes. Too little regard was given to the pernicious effects of living that way.
I suppose the point I'm stuttering towards here is this: both Amy's admirers and detractors had a tendency to see her as an abstraction (an icon, a symbol, a cartoon character?) rather than a living, breathing and fragile human being. Our media merely reflected and reinforced that.
"When asked in 2007 why Amy Winehouse meant so much to me, I wrote that she was the only woman singer who you could never imagine releasing her own perfume"
Out of interest, who asked you?
wel come Online stores
http://www.ebibiz.com
Post new comment