Human cost of welfare reform
The scandal is that no one is prepared to make a moral case for welfare provision.
By Laurie Penny Published 03 June 2011 19:00
Who will stand up for the welfare state? Not the Conservative Party, whose mantra - "Making work pay" - has turned out to be a cruel euphemism for slashing already meagre welfare payments and steering the long-term sick into the magical land of jobs. Not Labour, which declined a second reading of the Welfare Reform Bill; after all, its attacks on disability and sickness benefits when in power laid the groundwork for the coalition's planned destruction of the Attlee settlement. And it won't be the press.
With most official statistics indicating that gutting welfare on the brink of a second recession will leave millions in penury, the government has resorted to stoking tabloid hysteria, feeding the weekend papers a ready-boxed scare story tied with a thick ribbon of prejudice. Details of the most ersatz claims used by fraudulent welfare claimants have been distributed to build the growing consensus that the poor are simply not worth looking after. This is a consensus that nobody in opposition seems to have the guts to challenge.
In reality, benefit fraud rates remain stubbornly low, at 1 per cent. For every person who claims that a fear of ladders prevents them from cleaning windows, there are 99 others for whom incapacity or unemployment benefits are a vital lifeline. So vital that staff at jobcentres have been issued
a six-point plan for how to deal with rejected claimants at risk of suicide. The government appears relaxed about the human cost of welfare reform.
The headline figure is that benefit fraud costs taxpayers £1.6bn each year. That figure is a fabrication. According to statistics from the Department for Work and Pensions, this includes over £600m in "official" and customer errors. Factoring out pension scams, the figure is just £250m. To put that number in its proper context, the most conservative estimates hold that corporate tax avoidance costs the Treasury £25bn per year: 100 times the cost of benefit fraud.
Moral case
Threatening the workless with destitution may make good headlines but it is no way to increase employment when there are no jobs to go to.
Unemployment in Britain stands at 2.5 million, including almost a million under-25s. The employment minister, Chris Grayling, wants us to believe that the private sector will provide jobs for these people, as well as another million public-sector workers and welfare recipients who will soon be joining the dole queue. Unfortunately, private-sector employment has flatlined, there are six dole claimants for every vacancy and Father Christmas is just your dad faffing about in a nylon suit.
There used to be a liberal consensus that it was the government's responsibility to provide employment and ensure that those unable to work were entitled to a minimum standard of living. As the Welfare Reform Bill oozes unchallenged through the Commons, the real scandal is not that the government is lying through its teeth in order to justify its evisceration of the welfare state. The scandal is that no one in Westminster is prepared to make a moral case for welfare provision as the honest heart of social democracy.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















252 comments
oh, and re the pensioner schoosing between heating or eating.What scaremongering nonsense. Single Pensioners on low incomes are entitled to approx £450-500 a month in Pension credit not to mention getting their council tax and housing benefit paid. In many cases this is MORE than the people who administrate the benefits get in take home pay. Pensioners have never had it so good.
Karen, I do know what it is like to be in different states of 'pain' some over very quickly, others slow and horrible. It is not the point I am making. Genuine cases of people not being able to work should access to welfare.
Karen, is your sister still writing this for you?
Nick, look at that Daily Mail article again. Look at the picture carefully especially at the boyfriend's face. Then think about why the parents might not tell the truth.
Welfare to work details out today. From the BBC....'So it's full steam ahead with seven-year contracts which could be worth three to five billion pounds. Companies have been falling over each other for a slice of the action and big winners include familiar private sector employment firms like A4E and Ingus as well as outsourcing giants G4S and Serco'.
Arrangements include an agreement that the Govt will not interfere and it will be a payment by results arrangement so these private companies only get paid for getting someone into work.
'The contracts are run not only on a payment-by-results basis but also on what's called the black box approach. This means government won't tell suppliers what kind of support they need to give, promising not to interfere in the running of schemes'.
The BBC goes on to state that the Works & Pensions Committee noted that 88% of the prime contracts have gone to profit making companies.
you've proved nothing. answer my question - would you employ these spongers with back ache and depression?
yes she is i have to have someone stay with me overnight as i have tried to kill myself on several occassions, i cant sleep cos of the constant pain and wish my family would just let me end it
Nick have you got a insult tag team after me! This one is definitely someone else's personna.
Emerline, what are you doing up at 5 o clock in the morning in pommie land? Are you going for a walk on the top of the moors or perhaps you're sticking some spuds in the ground? Maybe you're trying to get your name on the silver screen, Emerline, Emerline. You should have your own New Statesman blog.
'profoundly misguided view' 'ideologically confused' .. sounds ... kind of ... familiar. Maybe everyone in England has the same black adder insulting lexicon nowadays and syntactic arrangement.
How long have you been carefully reading my comments for Emeline? And why haven't you written under this name before?
PISS OFF YOU DICKHEAD
Can't you just take more painkillers?
no i cant im already taking 3 different painkillers and in the next couple of weeks i will be a guinea pig again to try a new drug to try to ease the pain even so that it is tolerable because ive been told by my pain management consultant that i will now always be in pain for the rest of my life
Sorry about that Emerline, I was talking to myself. It wasn't meant for you. It was directed at my own misguided intellect. It is I that should apologise to you for making veiled sexist threats. As if!
employers got sick of waiting for lazy brits to take the jobs. Here in East anglia - some firms actually ADVERTISE IN POLAND because they can't get staff here. If there are no jobs, then move to somewhere that does - instead of waiting for a labour government to build low - wage factories. You are the Troll who likes keeping the poor poor !!! why? because it keeps you in a government job (until, ironically, you are cut!!) and also because the poor vote for labour - the benefits partie (paid for by the hard workers).
Monk, you are the ignorant communist troll!
Why can't we fuck our way to freedom?
What I meant by 'as if' wasn't what you were thinking. You see when someone like you comes on here, like many have done in the past, and starts insulting me, well they remind me of people from the past. So I think, maybe this is so and so from the past under a different name. Your name has never appeared before but the way you write things has.
Because I don't know you from any comments under your own name I assume you are someone else. Does that make sense? You see with Nick, we go back a long way and occasionally we flare up but generally speaking we have a dialogue that isn't full of insults... we exchange points of view. With you I haven't even exchanged a point of view under your name and you've just started laying into me! Its very funny.
What have you got to say apart from taking the piss out of me? You wanna be a pom in Australia; you get the piss taken out of you all the time.
Anyway I'm off to a bonfire tonight at mate's place. It's long weekend celebrating the Queen's birthday! What are you doing Spud?
TTFN, got a dinner party to attend in a luxury country home. enjoy your evenings, all.
What sort of pain is it? And where is it? Sounds like you can't do any work.
I have prolapsed discs in my neck.
If I come off anti-inflams I can't move my arms above my head and sleep properly.
I have had other stuff as well.
I'm in the Riverina NSW. Where are you living approx?
And what does a pain management consultant know about the future medical developments?
I live in scotland i have a condition called diabetic neuropathy look it up. its where high blood sugar damages the nerves of the body and there is no cure
I've looked it up. It's obviously connected to circulation. I suppose it depends how bad it is. Sounds like you have got it pretty bad.
Do you take a lot of hot baths? Have you got a massage chair? And what do you do during the day?
Today I'm in the my garden again. I have a few acres and I propagate plants so there's always something for me to do outside. It's winter here so I lit fires.
when i go for a bath the pain intensifies even more also there times when i wont get out of bed for a long long time and my family are constantly encouraging me to get out of bed, to wash or even get out of my pj's i get hot flushes from the meds as well as my conditions i feel as though ive nothing to live for. tell me why should i want to live this is hell
Most of the day you'll be recovering from your hangover.
@Martin L ha, yeah yeah, back under the bridge, and listen out for the next signs of passing life...
Mr D: I see I was right, Emeline did return, told you she would!
Now as for this government's crazy welfare reforms, I'd call it it the 'lunacy bill'. There idea to tackle welfare is to provide welfare to work providers with end result payment ranging from £4,000 to £14,000 PER PERSON. The scope for fiddling the figures is huge, they'll be making up jobs which just don't exist, or sending people off on mad 'self-employed' schemes just to get the much needed tick in the box; - thus ensuring their government sourced payments. They are so wildly out with their projections, they can't say whether their daft plans will cost £3 or £5 billion! What kind of forecasting is that, shows they're just making it up as they go along!
When they say that unification of the system is the solution, every one in welfare cracks up. It's only six or seven benefits they are merging (they don't seem to know whether it's 6 or 7!) - it's a total recipe for disaster. Bungle after bungle awaits. They should scrap the stupid contracts to these wasteful welfare to work providers and use the billions to properly equip the DWP/HMRC with the right tools to do the job before even thinking about migrating claims from one benefit over to another.
To give you an example. In 2003 Government pledged to transfer all Income Support child claims over to Child Tax Credit on a 'case by case' basis, well 8 years later they've still not completed the process. If they can't even do this, transfering millions of other claims on to a benefit which doesn't yet exists, strikes me as simply unachievable. Mark my words it'll take light years. They've got less than 4 years to fulfill their daft promise; - 15 is far more realistic.
These reforms will cost far more than they save. What they're not being entirely honest about is that once unification has gelled (don't hold your breath) they'll be axing a load more jobs in the DWP; - thus creating another wave in the Tsunami of problems this lot has the knack of creating.
Thankfully by then Cameron and Clegg will be long gone and more shamed than Gordon Brown ever was for wasting so much public money!
Oh come on Martin, cut people some slack. Like the woman I dealt with not so long ago. 'Bad back' comment was what went on the ATOS report, the reality was she'd had two 18" titanium rods precariously shifting either side of her spine after spending a year in and out of hospital, 6 months of which were in a plaster cast around her torso. Before she could recover, she went back to work. Work she loved, as a care assistant, it's years of heavy lifting which caused it. She took to drink because the pain killers wouldn't touch it. Two appeals upheld, each time the Tribunal saying they couldn't fathom out why on earth she was before them. Whilst waiting for her appeals, she couldn't afford to feed her meter and had to go without electric; - hardly good for someone in her condition. Oh and she's one year off being a pensioner, she's also had years of abuse at the hands of a very violent partner.
The ATOS examiner didn't even ask my client to take her coat off and said she hadn't got time to look at the x-rays she'd taken along.
By the way, her Tory MP says she's one of the most deserving cases he's ever seen, he also thinks the system is 'absurd'.
All true, not fiction.
Sorry about the delay.. had to sort out one of me kids.
I have felt suicidal at times because I'm bi-polar 1 so I understand to some extent your state of mind. And I know that no matter what anyone says it doesn't really work.
What I have found is that being in nature for hours at a time, somewhere very quiet with nobody there, helps me. I try to spend most of my time outside in nature. Can't you get up to some of those moors in Scotland or beaches? Comedy is also helpful .. do you watch Seinfeld?
I'm not sure if it'll work for you but you can either die in that hell or you can move. Moving very slowly is very interesting. You watch people and see that most are in a rush. If you move really slowly at say quarter speed when you do something you'll feel that the time moves quicker than when you rush it.
Go outside now and see the sunrise, the clouds are breaking apart.
Thank you for this. This affects my family personally. Very few in the UK give a damn about this, it seems. It is an issue that will shame us.
Most appalling of all is the cowardice of the Labour and Lib Dem parties in their support of these actions. No wonder we have achieved a state where some care home workers considered their charges to be nothing but toys to be beaten and abused at whim.
This is not reform: it is social brutality.
I find some of the stats from Lauries article difficult to swallow, 'benefit fraud rates remain stubbornly low, at 1 per cent' yet we hear headlines saying two thirds of incapacity benefit recipients could work?, i worked previously with a charity & with rented housing & would say from personal experience it must be higher than 1% .
Laurie, you are 100% right. But why, for God's sake, did Labour abstain on the second reading? This party was created to defend the poor and the vulnerable. Yes, Purnell was a disgrace, but Ed M must now show that Labour was wrong, not only on civil liberty, and Iraq, but also on welfare. If it seems unpopular to defend the poor, than frankly Ed is living in the same toxic la-la land as the Daily Mail. If we do need a leader, and I doubt, let's seem him leading for a change.
I need money Laurie.
Can you please give me some right away?
Thanks in advance.
there is a simple fact that the number of people claiming disability allowance has increased significantly over the last decade.
if the disability allowance paid the same as unemployment benefit i don't think we would have seen such an increase.
There's a section of society that needs dealt with, its not working class people, or poor, but the antisocial behaviour & refusal to work attitude of a % that blights our society. Everyone is sick of them, Laurie will have an impossible time defending that group.
Give them a council house house, they trash it & give their working neighbours a mental breakdown, not acceptable. Its gone too far.
You're up early Nick. Quick to your office in Tottnes to make sure that nobody has registered on your taxpayer's funded website. Maybe they've complained about you taking the piss out of a mentally ill person on the New Statesman website. Imagine if your superiors found out! I suppose a lot would depend on how contrite you are today and whether the victim of your nasty innuedos and practical jokes is willing to forgive you.
Part of the problem is that both in the U.K. and the States there's a "weakness isn't tolerated" idea. You pull yourself up by your ______ and get on with it. The sillier view of this is the old Python sketch. Back in my day we used to walk 5 miles to school. Then on the way back home we had to clean the street as well before dinner, and so on.
The other part of this is mass hypocracy. I know lots of people hate the EU and the UN. However, until further notice both the U.K. and the States are members of the U.N. The U.N. Declaration of Human Rights says that all people are entitled to live a decent life without fear and to be able to express their opinions.
Unfortunately, the Tories and Obama have made it clear that maintaining global power comes first at the expense of their citizens. Apparently they could care less.
Also, for everyone who loves to have a go at anyone on benefits and assumes they're all the same lazy, greedy bunch of _____, keep this in mind. If the worst happened and YOU had to go on benefits, how would you feel if it felt like the world was treating you like crap? Because of something that's not your fault that caused you to have to go on benefits?
Disability Living Allowance (DLA) is exactly what it says Eddy; - an allowance for having a disability. It's intended to meet the costs associated with living with a disability and entitlement, in most cases, is confirmed by a doctor.
It's not a replacement for Jobseeker's Allowance. DLA is paid at different rates to people according to the severity of their condition for their care and or mobility needs. It can be paid whether you are in or out of work.
Indeed informed research by Disability Alliance shows that many people are helped back into work by an award of DLA. It can help with their mobility; - making it possible to get to and from work. It also passports people to entitlement to mobility aids and blue badges. Without it, many won't be able to get to work!
A lot of people cry out for tax reduction as an incentive to help people back to work. Okay DLA isn't a tax break, but it is linked to other allowances such as tax credits which make it more viable to return to work. In short DLA is not purely an 'out of work' benefit. One of the reasons why benefit claims increased over the last decade is because of the number of work related enhancements.
As a result the 2010 IFS/DWP figures for unemployment related benefits show they accounted for just 2.6% of the total benefit bill.
People need to understand the system before quoting 'simple facts'.
Ah, Privet, you repeat the stats without reference to their meaning. If you change the definition of "fit for work" to include people with a terminal prognosis, end stage organ failures, etc. then you get 2/3 of claimants stamped "Fit for work" - they aren't healthy people! A friend of mine was unable to attend a medical as she is in hospital where she's been for months, but this was not enough to score her any ESA points, so I reckon she'll be finding herself Fit for Work very soon. Is that what we mean by fraud, that people are being stamped fit when they are dying? No, fraud is when you are actively lying, not when you qualified under a previous regime and are now to be knocked back becuase they don't think chemo is debilitating enough to stop you getting to your full-time job.
Wellfare should be seen as a very flawed form of wealth redistribution. Labeling people who collect it as "scroungers" is a cowardly back biting. It is directing hatred towards the econmically disadvantaged. Its hatred directed towards the weak.
Where do you think this nations wealth comes from? It comes from the third world. It was taken by force, that is a form of spunging that is far more large scales than a benifit collecters.
Also people must be insane to want to go down the American road. Do you see the levels of poverty in that country?
Agree with Alex Brown. The levels of poverty in America make me sick. We should adopt the cuban or old soviet union economic and social policies immediately and invade any third world country that is going down the american route of poverty, want and deprivation.
The Tories are doing what they have always done - it's called divide and rule. Look back at the 19th century and see how the poor were treated then. There were the poor and the 'undeserving poor.' Aren't we just talking about the same thing now? It's all propaganda designed to divide the masses who are the 'natural' opposition to the rich ruling elite.
We are as a nation sliding back to the dim dark days of Victorian England.
@ Nick - I agree entirely about ESA.
@ Karen - you probably could work................
@ danielle - Thanks babe!
@ peter - family comes first and i have wonderful relationships thank you, but money helps, and I've EARNED it. I am proud of my hard work - not my problem if others are lazy - why should I have to pay???
the best comment to date is Nicks regarding ESA.
The most hilarious is from karen - wantimh Ashcroft to pay for her benefits - would you want to pay millions to our welfare dependency? fAIR PLAY TO HIM.
perhaps you should aspire to his success instead of expecting everyone to pay for you..............
A society should be judged according to the way it treats the young, the sick, the old and the disabled.If a rich society cannot provide for its vulnerable members then this society has the wrong values and needs to be reformed, through a revolution if need be.
The wolves in the wild take care of the injured or sick animals in the pack,kill for them and bring them food. Why are they people here who thinks it is all right for this society to abandon vulnerable people and make them pay for the banks' monumental fuck up?
Some people are wondering why there seems to be more disabled people than ever when "we live longer and healthier lives". Actually yes precisely we are living longer BUT NOT healthier lives.Some conditions which may have killed the victims a few decades ago, are now survivable but the people affected may remain disabled or not well for years, some times for the rest of their lives.It is quite easy to explain but the press prefers to claim that most disabled claimants are fake because it fits their political agenda.
Switch on the light then.
The other statistic that's worth mentioning is the benefits that have been budgeted for and go unclaimed each year, which(according to Citizen's Advice who have absolutely THE best data on this) in 2010 reached £16billion! That's a MASSIVE saving that the gov't never mentions. If the poor are so hell-bent on scamming the system, how does one account for that HUGE amount of unclaimed money?
As for the lack of any moral objection to the gutting of the Welfare State, the reason for that is quite simply an increasingly selfish society. All too many people believe the myth of the "self-made man": that you have to pull yourself up by your bootstraps. But the truth, as many studies have shown (see Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers) is that none of us operate in a vacuum and much of what any of us achieve is due to the people and (more broadly) the society around us. A decent Welfare State benefits us all.
Good to see Laurie on top form as usual-A Cant Spouting, Trustafarian Hypocrite.
I am one of the "work shy scroungers" vilified in the press on an almost daily basis. I havent worked for 5 years nor am I going to be able to for the next five years. the past 12 months I have been spat at and abused in the street, been called a faker by strangers.
and why? because I served for 13 years in the armed forces until I was caught in an IED which left me completely blind, reliant on oxygen, take 52 tablets a day to keep my organs working and only able to stand for 5 minutes until my spine gives out.
according to the proposed cuts I will have to leave the small 2 bedroom house i have which means loosing an overnight carer when I am ill and my guide dog. Today I had a letter from Lord Freud who just said we all have to accept what is happening and gave the worst case scenario of benefit fraud and inflated rent prices (£2000 a week - mine is 133 a fortnight - big difference !!!)as a blanket excuse. my local MP is aware that if the reform goes through as planned I will have to choose to either move to another area loosing all contact with friends and be in complete isolation or make up the short fall in my benefits to pay the rent which will be paid using my meals on wheels money allowing me to have a meal just once every other day.
My situation is not unique but this is what thousands of others are facing. but i thought in this day and age i would never have to choose between if i want human contact each day or a meal each day. This is not what I fought for my country for. and i wish those who want to tar us all with the scrounger brush to have a think before you speak. we have feelings dignity and pride even if we dont have a meal everyday. I am ashamed to be British if this is how we will treat the disabled and sick in this country from now on
p.s neither Lord Freud nor my local MP (conservative) seemed that bothered and dismissed my problems with "we are all having to make cuts so is there anything else you wish to talk about on another subject?" kind of says how much contempt they hold for people like me
Fraziel: In which case you're regularly wrong, it's a waste of time pointing you in the right direction.
Although you might like to try...
http://www.dwp.gov.uk/publications/specialist-guides/decision-makers-gui... it should be familiar.
There are many more reference points; You may just learn something.
You remind me of a DM at a Tribunal only very recently, there she was reading away quoting chapter and verse. I looked and over and felt compelled to ask her what particular version she was refering to when quoting the law. '2010 she says - it's up to date'. Mmmm, I remind her it's an overpayment case and what we're actually looking at is the law as it was in 2003. The Judge looked skywards at her incompetence.
I'll not bother telling you the outcome.
They will try, but, they will fail...
us scroungers have nowhere else to go, so we will always claim for something.
Oneself be currently engaged in a 'battle of wills' with them - having failed the work capability assessment (again) one chose to appeal - earning us c.six months 'grace' ! It also helps to tie them up in a bureaucratic nightmare - of their own making !!
@Privet you sound like a daily mail reader, nobody here is defending anyone who sets out to abuse the system.
In today's Guardian there was a man, who had two brain tumours and died of cancer just after being found fit for work by government 'doctors' at ATOS. This is not unique, i have read loads of similar cases.
in a recent survey over a third of disabled people said they'd been abused. the government is actively nurturing a spirit of resentment against the vulnerable. an easy, helpless target.
it's not a figment of anyone's imagination, it's happening.
Post new comment