The insipid rebellion of the new "rock royalty"
The bloodless brats of pop have nothing to rebel against - sadly they are the role models for a new generation of teenagers.
By Laurie Penny Published 23 November 2010 12:00
What does it say about modern culture when so many of our pop icons are famous primarily for being someone's son or daughter? Following the late 20th century, when musicians, models and artists from every sort of background briefly replaced society belles and high-born dandies in the gossip pages, the children of those artists and musicians have become the new aristocracy, wealthy young debutantes whose arrival on the party scene is breathlessly anticipated in every weekly glossy. Coco Sumner, the pouty progeny of Sting and Trudie Styler, has just announced her arrival in the rigid ranks of pop primogeniture by releasing a debut album with her band, I Blame Coco. I don't know about you, but I can hardly contain my ennui.
"Rock Royalty" is the term that the fashion press uses to describe these phlegmatic youngsters and it couldn't be more apt. As social mobility implodes, we have once again become a society that openly fetishises heredity, aristocracy and class. The real royal wedding is shuffling towards us like the terrifying reanimated corpse of deferential 1980s austerity culture, but in fact we've been comfortably obsessed with the couplings of high-society debutantes for years.
Forget The X Factor. If you really want to make it in show business and can't find a footballer to marry, you'd better have a famous father, like the Jagger daughters, or the Geldof girls, or the Richardses, the Allens, the Osbornes, the Winstones, the Lowes, the Ritchies, the Ronsons and the Hiltons.
The expensively groomed good looks of these young people offset the erstwhile dishevelled, grungy glamour of their parents, but we live in a different world now: one where money and connections are far more important than talent, in the creative industries and everywhere else. Contestants on reality singathons sacrifice every scrap of dignity for a shot at profitable D-list celebrity, but it was barely whispered that Young Mistress Sting was thinking of making a record before every weekend supplement was wetting itself to get an interview.
The album itself, The Constant, is nothing to write home about. Bloated with watery ballads about the symbolic colour schemes of bourgeois young love, it's the sort of unthreatening shopping muzak that plays in every Urban Outfitters in the northern hemisphere. Coco has a huskily acceptable singing voice, and producers who know how to spin out a bridge section -- but Sting she ain't.
This is precisely the album that any listless adolescent might produce if she just happened to have grown up surrounded by top-of-the range recording equipment and most of the wealthiest people in the music industry. It's not dreadful, but you could pick any suburban street in the country and find a teenager making better pop songs in their bedroom.
Pop, of course, is about far more than the music. It's about the making and breaking of cultural icons. Just as there was more to the Beatles than the first jarring chord of Hard Day's Night, and more to Bowie than the off-beat drumline of Rebel Rebel, there is far more to Coco Sumner than vaguely rubbish call-waiting tunes. She is part of the new cultural orthodoxy of rock royalty: a pampered princess in a musical world that has come to worship wealth and heredity every bit as much as the establishment it once rock-and-rolled against.
Many of these dull, rich young people seem genuinely convinced that they are in some way subversive artists, and the press is only too happy to facilitate this delusion. A gushing interview with young Ms Sumner in the Independent recently noted that "although she owns a house in Victoria and has just bought a cottage in Wiltshire, she has refreshingly dirty nails". The dirty nails probably contributed less to the record deal than the millionaire rock-star father, but for the purposes of her personal branding, Coco is definitely a tearaway, a young lady who claims to have found her "rebel" spirit when her nanny played her Blockheads records while driving her to prep school.
Publicists expect a bit of stage-managed rebellion from today's debutantes -- just a soupcon of the sort of bad behaviour that boosts album sales without actually challenge anything, like turning up to Bungalow 8 in a really low-cut designer dress. Iconoclasm, though, is not something that one just inherits along with the family pile. Truly subversive creativity often emanates from personal struggle, and that doesn't tend to feature highly in childhoods where people rush to tell you how wonderful you are every time you fart out a couple of chords.
Whatever she claims, Coco is not to blame. Her tedious songs, however, are the writing on the wall -- precisely the sort of music that French anarchists The Tarnac 9 were referring to when they wrote:
It's enough to listen to the songs of the times -- the asinine "alt-folk" where the petty bourgeoisie dissects the state of its soul, next to declarations of war from [rap artists] -- to know that a certain coexistence will end soon, that a decision is near.
The young people of Britain have grown up being asked to honour the uneasy coexistence of the super-rich and the so-called underclass -- but if this week's planned protests are anything to go by, that coexistence may well be at an end. Real rebellion isn't just a fashion accessory. It's a last-ditch response to social conditions that have become intolerable.
With a few exceptions, pop culture today is more about dynasty than dynamism. The ageing rock stars of the 1960s and 1970s may have sold out, shuffling cheerfully into endorsement deals for butter and car insurance, but those who grew up with their music and iconography still took away the message that with enough raw energy, ordinary people could change the world. For my generation, with only their bloodless brats for role models, it's back to the old rules: look good, do as you're told and make sure your daddy is rich and famous. There's only so long you can follow those rules before something snaps.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















87 comments
Good music can hardly be called the prerogative of any class, but to be fair what has any of us got to sing about, seeing as "we've never had it so good"
I'm afraid you can't win all the time. Although tedious, there is plenty of good stuff out there to listen to, and you can't escape the fact that in any trade/profession it is very common to follow in parent's footsteps, be that because of training, mentality, knowledge or contacts. Problem is arse licking loser 'critics' peddling shit.
@Neuroskeptic
It was actually Black Sabbath's guitarist Tony Iommi who created metal. After losing the tips of his fingers on his right hand (he's a left handed player), he tuned his strings down to make playing more comfortable and that's how the metal sound came about. Combine that with Geezer butler's dark lyrics, Bill Ward's ominous drumming and Ozzy's wails and you have the first ever metal band.
I want to adopt you :)
You are the perfect antidote to those you are writing about, and long may you stay so.
From my post, you could gather that I am a dynasty hater. Particularly because I think India was badly served by Gandi family.
However, what do we do of Norah Jones. Should we be sad that she is successful even though she had nothing but genes from her father. Or be angry with her father for abandoning the child?
Or maybe just celebrate? Like like that. Like that or not like that.
Not an easy question to answer.
At 24 Laura Penny is not exactly like my daughter. But I would not mind a rebel daughter as long as she smiles. Or finds a reason to smile.
I agree with Lloyd. Talent (and that's an understatement at best) is mostly manufactured in America. I get excited with anticipation when I hear a spawn from Rocker Royalty on the scene. Bob Dylan and John Lennon's (sean) prodigies are good examples of hard working kids who don't use their parents fame as an excuse not to practice their craft. I am really looking forward to see what Bruce Springsteen and Bono's off spring have to offer.
O for an hour of Sid Vicious and perhaps a song about these chanterati.
buckskins, ehtch tee is a wee cardiff boyo who loves tom jones,medhi hassan is just becoming at pantomine act and in fact he should get a part cinderella,that man is so biter and twisted and paranoid,as for laurie penny,do you know what buckskins,she only 24 and a young lady finding her way in life, and i would be amazed when she settles down and gets married if she is still writing a blog in the new statesman,in fact 15 years on i could see her writing a column for the daily mail alongside the excellent melanie philips,everybody can change,just look at nick clegg,hows that !!!
Pop stars of celebrity parents are just doing a job to justify their existence and pretend that they are getting off their gilded Arses and going out to work like the rest of us have to do in order to survive. Who actually listens to their musical dross anyway??? The real heartfelt music is made by people who are frustrated, pissed off, cynical at modern day society and play in autonomous centres or small back rooms in pubs where both band and audience are inches away from each other, and who do benefit gigs for worthy organisations and encourage a sense of unity. Rock/pop stars are just in it for the money, surrounded by body guards and security and believe that a bursting ego and good looks are enough to seal the deal with impressionable follow fashion monkeys who lap up everything the corporations throw at them.
"how long will they feed, how long will you swallow?
How long will they lead, how long will you follow?" (His Hero Is Gone)
Include me in, on bass. But only on condition I have my own dressing room.
Sciamachy, thanks for the tip. Love The Adenoids.
well buckskins,behind all laurie pennys feminist angst and fury, i reckon lies a bit of a raver who likes to go to a good party at the weekends and indulges in a bit of drinking and weed smoking listening to old led zeppelin records surrounded by josh sticks,i might be wrong, but then again when i was 24 i certainly spent my younger years getting drunk and stoned and iam 32 now and i cant remember much now about what i done in my 20s i was that stoned.but as they say life is supposed to be a pleasure and not a misery,there you go!!
phew what a day.i made £126 today selling the big issue not as good as the last student demo last month but i cant complain,but it got a bit scary when i got caught in betreen police lines and some piilock with a socalist workers party placard nearly took my head off hurling it at the police and then the police pushed me over trying to arrest the pillock who threw the placard at there lines,anyway,i hope nick when you have your demo there a bit more well behaved and it is not as violent..
You should have a listen to Luton's "The Adenoids" & their side project "Granny's C*nt". Often very humourous punk songs, completely BPI-free, by real people, not plastic trustafarians.
well buckskins,its a busy day for me today,another students demo going on in london, so i will be out selling my big issue to them lads and lasses nice and early today,lets hope i can make a few quid today just before the christmas break.hope there is a good turnout today from the students union,thats very good.
A career in a "creative" industry for someone without the imagination to find her own path in life... like goldy or bronzey, but made of iron.
More seriously, Left Is Forward nails it.
Laurie- I like your writing usually but this strikes me as really hypocritical... You've said on numerous occasions that you're are fed up with people bringing up your relatively prosperous upbringing, private school education etc, and that this shouldn't undermine our appreciation of your writing, but now you beat Coco Sumner with the same stick your critics use against you... !
The Internet revolution has fundamentally reshaped modern music .Arcade Fire have a dynamism and musical brilliance which draws parallels with the great bands of the late 1960's .however they are not known to the wider public despite being number 1 across the road.record companies can't invest in music if people don't buy it .that's why the horrific music that pollutes the airwaves is extremely poor.there are only 200 records shops left in the uk .the younger generation will be queueing up for FIfa 11 or CAll of Duty rather than going to the record shop to buy a latest albums which the young people did in the 1970's .the game had changed for music
Inherited positions in popular music.
Inherited positions in media (films, TV) - think of the acting dynasties, or even the Dimblebies.
Inherited positions in politics (even the Benn family, bless 'em)
Is there any real chance for social mobility in this country when it is run so nepotically?
Coco Who?
"so many of our pop icons are famous primarily for being someone's son or daughter?"
So many? There's Coco and...er...who?
If by "pop" you mean "pop culture" not "pop music" then yes, of course, a lot of celebs are only famous for being related to someone famous but that's because people are interested in the families of famous people.
Ozzy Osborne is deservedly famous as the founder of metal; for some reason he and his family decided to turn their lives into a crap TV show but the rest of them owe their fame to Ozzy. You can hardly blame people for being interested in the other Osbornes, and given their background, a career in showbiz was inevitable anyway so...
Stuart: A load of advice workers, solictors and people from the legal sector?.....it'll be a veritable riot!
Surely Coco is not the one to blame, but the glossies that herald the arrival of her and her ilk? Also, rather than denigrating this young woman, would it not be more productive to propose a more viable and, dare I say it, worthy holder of the title of 'icon'?
If the youth of today are only spoonfed their role models by the press then, as a member of the industry with a voice, why not offer an alternative?
I don't mean to be overly argumenative, I completely agree with your sentiment. I just feel that there's a final step to be taken.
You bastard sciamachy.. I wanted to be first.
====== http://www.tinyurl.com/23wkoeq ====
====== http://www.tinyurl.com/23wkoeq ====
====== http://www.tinyurl.com/23wkoeq ====
====== http://www.tinyurl.com/23wkoeq ====
====== http://www.tinyurl.com/23wkoeq ====
====== http://www.tinyurl.com/23wkoeq ====
====== http://www.tinyurl.com/23wkoeq ====
Popular music does not play a major role in popular culture anymore.the Internet and video games have attracted young people away from rock and roll.the rise of X factor wouldn't have happened without the Internet revolution.there is not the millions to be made out of record sales which subsequently means record companies won't invest in genuine musical artists who write there own music an play their own instruments.the poor quality boy bands and girl bands are designed for those who aren't music lovers who shop in supermarkets.the great artists of this generation are playing to small venues across the world.the music is there but only to a small audience .what needs to change to stimulate the music business is the banning of downloaded music .this would encourage the rise of small labels to sign dynamic new artists who could sell their product .this would enable music to be relevant to a mass audience and facilitate the radio to start playing cutting edge music
Mr D; Ha ha, now we all know that would defeat the object! My poster will be appropriately worded and aimed at the disgraceful actions of this coalition over their plans to withdraw Legal Aid to people who positively need it to challenge unjust & over bureaucratic decisions made by the DWP, HMRC and LA's.
Hi Stuart & Buckskins. Good luck on selling the BI's! I believe I'm coming up to the Big City in January for a big march on the 'Access to Justice' front, even the legal profession are up in arms now! What gets me is how many of the laws being passed at the moment are being passed by 'statutory instrument', without any proper debtate, it's never right.
"...but Sting, she ain't."
Well, that's one thing she's got going for her...
"She is part of the new cultural orthodoxy of rock royalty: a pampered princess in a musical world that has come to worship wealth and heredity every bit as much as the establishment it once rock-and-rolled against."
Rebellion was always a pose anyway. What was the first thing the big stars of the Sixties did when they became rich and famous? They bought themselves stately homes and hired butlers. Some of them even married into the aristocracy.
Meanwhile the real aristos, in a struggle to keep up, went on the stage or the fashion industry. But then you go back in history and find that one of David Cameron's ancestors, Dora Jordan, was an actress who spent twenty years as the mistress of a future king.
Plus, as they say, ca change.
my hall of fame for musical legends and icons has to be dolly parton xxx and slash ex of guns&roses the best guitarist in the world since jimi hendrix.
hope you have a good time nick when you come down to the smoke in january. and dont forget to buy a copy of the big issue.
Blimey even "Rebellion" has been approved and is now corporate!
How long do you reckon you have to do an unpaid internship at the New Statesman before they'd consider paying you for your opinions, and how helpful is it to know someone already employed there?
this is partly our fault, thats all of us collectively, whoever we may be.
the pop music industry is like a giant chameleon, it will change its skin to suit whatever is popular at the time, so if something is successful then loads of copycat artists will appear, so we have one successful rock royalty star, like kelly osbourne (though i hate to use the word successful here, but in thier terms i suppose she was) and they will then throw more at us til we die of boredom.
the only real solution is to start buying music not on the basis of the persona of the artist but on what the damn thing sounds like, if people were to rebel and buy only good music, regardless of what the person looked like or the image they chose, then where would that leave them? they'd have to try and copy and provide us with some music worth buying, unlikely though it seems.
we'd be back in the 1960's, sort of!
Another wonderfully perceptive post from our Laurie.
'Left is forward' - some excellent contributions too!
It is very sad and frustrating about the lack of mobility in this country.
For instance, I used to wonder why so and so was on television (news presenters, actors etc.) and then I looked on wikipedia and usually found they went to an expensive public school! Mystery solved.
@frances smith
It's interesting - it is partly our fault, in a sense, as consumers, but it's also misleading to see consumers as having a real choice.
Music sales are very strongly correlated with publicity. There are plenty of "nobodies" who are perfectly good songsmiths and musicians, and who make their music available for download or even physical purchase, but can only afford to do it as a sideline because they don't make enough money. Nobody has ever heard of them, so people don't buy their stuff.
The son or daughter of a famous person knows all the right people to start with. How to find a label. How to pull the strings. How to get press coverage. How to get airtime. Moreover, celebrity is a valuable and to some extent inheritable asset - it's possible to get coverage as the son or daughter of someone famous to start with, before developing your own career later. Had she become a painter rather than a songstress, she'd still have sold a few paintings on the back of her name and connections.
So blaming society is only partly the answer. We have a large profit-driven music industry (if they think they can use her parents' names to make a success out of her rather rather than another singer of exactly equal talent but less auspicious background, they rationally will do so), we have legal nepotism (the comment above about New Statesman internships is telling!), we also have an insatiable media appetite for "celebrity" (partly driven by readership/viewing figures - but that in turn only matters because they are profit-driven industries; if all media was state-owned like the BBC we COULD compel a less fawning or shallow attitude).
There are solutions. And it's not enough to blame society or consumers. But unfortunately the only solutions I can think of are genuinely radical - it's difficult to shift the advantage that having famous parents bestows, without very restrictive legal changes and big alterations to media ownership and obligations.
Well at least Bowie's son goes by his father's given name. Although it's generally well-known that Duncan Jones is Bowie's son (unfortunately named Zowie Bowie at birth), he's not using the name to get anywhere but doing it on his own talent. But then again, if your mum or dad is in the business you want to get into then if you do follow them, you're always going to be accused of using nepotism, no matter how talented.
http://www.midheaven.com/
awesome anti mainstream ,avant experimental weirdness with not a single pander to stardom desire
Brilliant article, Laurie. Thanks for writing it!
its not what you know, its who you know. always been there, always will be.
this story is small fry. imagine being in hollywood where nearly everyone is a friend of a friend or family
nick, as long as the rioters buy a copy of the big issue before they fight with the police thats fine with me,but bloody hell, i hope they are not burning my copys of the big issue when they light them fires,i hope they have good sense to read the non politacal big issue which is neither left or right before they put them on the bonfire,anyway early night for me tonight,its been a long and cold day out there at the demo,finish me beer off and smoke a quick joint and iam off to bed..
nice thinking buckskins,i might just do that.
@Nick: Could you hold up a sign, "I'm an Anti-Protestor"
"It's interesting - it is partly our fault, in a sense, as consumers, but it's also misleading to see consumers as having a real choice.
Music sales are very strongly correlated with publicity. There are plenty of "nobodies" who are perfectly good songsmiths and musicians, and who make their music available for download or even physical purchase, but can only afford to do it as a sideline because they don't make enough money. Nobody has ever heard of them, so people don't buy their stuff."
Eh? Of course consumers have a choice. For one thing, we have a choice as to whether or not to buy music as opposed to torrenting it (let's be honest) so what sells is irrelevant.
It's true that in order to be a full time professional musician you need to sell. But there are thousands and thousands of local bands, many of them excellent, that do it part time.
if you like them, buy their stuff. if you like them but not enough to buy them, you are a hypocrite, but go and torrent their stuff and listen to it.
it's your choice.
Real or Simulacra? You decide:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Igt-jW4e8ts
Thank you Laurie, but we have it far worse in America where the corporate bosses have manufacture talentless glamouraty pop dribble for years now. With robot radio stations owned by right wing master minds real grassroots music is ground out under the jack booted heal of cultural fascism.
Great article Laurie
Love ya tons
Best regards for you all,
Looking forward to your visiting.
http://www.1shopping.us/
====== http://www.tinyurl.com/23wkoeq ====
====== http://www.tinyurl.com/23wkoeq ====
====== http://www.tinyurl.com/23wkoeq ====
====== http://www.tinyurl.com/23wkoeq ====
====== http://www.tinyurl.com/23wkoeq ====
====== http://www.tinyurl.com/23wkoeq ====
====== http://www.tinyurl.com/23wkoeq ====
Disposable music packaged as raw and rebellious talent, its like everything else when the corporate hand takes control. Real music rebellion happened before when the massive arena concerts got out of hand, and you're right there are probably hundreds if not thousands of young gifted people making new and original music right now in their rooms. They have different ideas of success, its not measured in the number of appearances one finds themselves in glossy mags either.
Kinda makes you feel sick that this music may not see the light of day while spoilt brats of the mega rich get a free ride to the top and most people are glad to be brainwashed and suckered in.
Post new comment