The Chancellor’s an economic sadist – and we love it
There's something about punishment and hierarchy that holds a guilty appeal for the British public.
By Laurie Penny Published 22 October 2010 17:17
This is going to hurt. Perverts and politicians love a bit of dirty talk and for months the coalition government has been intimating exactly what it is going to do to us, oiling us up with simple, seductive moral offensives on the poor and vulnerable in anticipation of the economic violence to come.
This past week it was university funding; before that, it was child benefit. Now, Chancellor George Osborne's cuts have been revealed in all their glory and no government department has been saved from the coalition horsewhip.
Unsure where the first blow would fall, the country seemed to freeze into some kind of rigid inertia, refusing to acknowledge the totality of our barelyelected leaders' assault on social democracy, on the postwar Attlee settlement, on welfare and health care and everything that once made life on this rainy island bearable. The proper term for this approach is not "economic masochism", in the shadow chancellor's phrasing, but fiscal sadism.
Power games
Only politicians and perverts truly understand sadism. Amateurs think that sadism, fiscal or otherwise, is about hurting people. They are mistaken. Sadism is not about pain. It is about power. It is about the power to inflict pain at random, for no reason, with the most cartoonish and fetishistic of implements, just because you can.
Sadism is about having the power to decide when and if and how much to hurt people, because that kind of control makes you feel important, because that's how you get off.
This is precisely the sort of power play we are dealing with, on both a national and a global scale, as the oligarchies of the world react to the public humiliation of the recession with whiplash efficiency. The phenomenon of fiscal sadism is not unique to this government, although the wet-towel-whipping changing rooms of exclusive private schools do perhaps foster a specific fetish for kinky brutality.
The fiscal sadism of these cuts is part of an international war on social democracy whose agenda is mutating into a terrifying form of kamikaze capitalism. However this government wishes to dress up its decisions, whether in the language of economic pretext or a little rubber dress, there is still no pressing reason for these cuts to be made at such colossal speed, in so calculatedly regressive a fashion, besides the ugly Conservative conviction that poverty is a moral failing.
There are patently more efficient ways to make savings than slashing the heart out of the welfare state. For example, the money saved from George Osborne's crackdowns on benefit fraud could be recouped simply by persuading one man -- the government's efficiency tsar, Philip Green, to pay his taxes like the rest of us. This is not about saving money. This is about control. They plan to hurt us because they want to show us that they can.
The truly awful thing, though, is that we like it. There's a guilty appeal to the easy narrative of punishment and hierarchy, especially if it seems -- whisper it -- that only people worse off than us will really be taking the full whack of the Chancellor's changing-room economics. The French, who, as amply demonstrated this month, don't quite have our fetish for grumbling political obeisance, describe bondage and sadomasochism (BDSM)
as "the British perversion"; perhaps there is something in our national character that delights in ritualised deference, especially if it stings a bit.
Make it hurt
It can be grotesquely reassuring to know that someone else is taking charge, even if they're doing so cruelly. Just as sadism is about power, masochism is about the pleasurable surrender of power.
The right-wing press has squealed in gleeful horror every time a new cut was announced, their only real objections being to the relatively minor excisions from the defence budget. Unfortunately, nobody has yet questioned whether there will be anything left worth defending when the Tories have finished slashing the state into submission.
I have many dear friends who enjoy a little private torment, but the proper place for savage power play is not the theatre of politics. Those in power have co-opted us into a dangerous game of kamikaze capitalism and if we want to continue to live in a country with pretensions to freedom, tolerance and justice, we have to risk rearing up against our chains and ruining the game. We have to risk a bolder refusal to submit to this sick assault on social democracy.
We need to throw their filthy talk back in their faces, before it's too late.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















120 comments
@InNegative: A LITTLE optimistic
re : Laurie. Any other kind of sadism you like ? Care to make a twosome ? !
spit it out inNegative,what qualitys do you think i lack not to be a good leader and future prime minister of the uk.
In the long-term, the blank space of uncertainty will probably be much better for you.
I agree that the people should protest against this coalition, but it is a 'coalition' and one of it's party is sinking fast and to continue would mean certain death for them.
I think we need to be making a case to the Lib Dems, that the only way to save themselves and the country, is to jump ship, before the people start suffering and the economy takes a nose-dive, because, come 2015 it will be too late, far too much damage will have been done.
Sack your leader and move on Lib Dems.
Christine Keeler and Mandy Price-Davies brought the Labour government in '64, you could say,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2KDzd7qbNs
Not sure the will to power is entirely their motivation (greed may figure) but at best the cuts reveal a staggering lack of empathy or any fellow feeling for those in a weaker position.
It also shows how much of a lie the notion of nationhood really is. We are not a "big society", neither are we one happy patriotic family: it's naked class warfare waged by the class that lost its sexy status and privileges after the 1945 government and is now clawing it all back.
If they want class warfare, may I suggest we give them class warfare?
"For example, the money saved from George Osborne's crackdowns on benefit fraud could be recouped simply by persuading one man - the government's efficiency tsar, Philip Green, to pay his taxes like the rest of us."
I'm always fascinated by the way this is presented as easy to do - how, exactly could he be persuaded? He does pay tax in the UK. His wife doesn't because she doesn't live here. He managed to structure things so that she owns the busines. How, in accordance with international law, are you going to get that money? Asking him nicely? Giving him a knighthood? (Too late - Labour did that!)
Mr D: Re: The commune idea; you say using ex mod property to establish these. Do you not think that will segregate social divisions even further? Do we not want to move away from the days of grouping social sectors together; it creates bigger divides. This hit on the economy is going to cause massive damage as people have to move away from areas of unaffordable affluence. If you stick one of your communes in amongst those places, it will end up being alienated by those who would look down on those who are grouped together?
@Stuart: I'm not as pessimistic re your ability to lead the country as InNegative. However there is a matter of policy. In other words what exactly would you do? Come on spit it out.
@Michael - so what you are saying, you thought this article was quite stimulating.
Five paragraphs suggests you do.
Would the right honorable gentleman from the antipodal location please refrain from elevating himself to the Premiership which is reserved for Wee Red Laurie. In an effort to maintain unity among the shadow cabinet I propose that the housing minister’s portfolio include Yurts in addition to Wigwams.
"For example, the money saved from George Osborne's crackdowns on benefit fraud could be recouped simply by persuading one man - the government's efficiency tsar, Philip Green, to pay his taxes like the rest of us"
In this context it's probably relevant to expand on Philip Green's role as the head of the Arcadia Group (TopShop, Dot Perkins, Burtons, etc), through which he not only likes to force us into painfully objectifying fashions, but is pretty much the only high street clothing chain not to sign up to the Ethical Trading Initiative, preferring to keep his workforce in their place - the sweatshop.
All of the "dirty talk" even Danny Alexanda's oh so accidental leak was nothing of the sort.It was all done to grind us into submission and acceptance and lesson the impact of their savage cuts.Have the police arrested Dr Fox yet for leaking his own letter ? I don't know why we bother with Parliament we could save some more by selling it off and could conduct PM's Q's through the letters page of the Telegraph.
Excellent clip here from Paul O'Grady aka Lily Savage on his show from the other day, really giving it what for on Giddy Georgie's cuts - very cutting(!) but all 100% sense,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JE88U5CocpM
I'm all for marching on the streets - its one of my favourite pastimes but if we really want change we need a new political party one for the People not old Labour/old Tory/old WhigLib.
Where have the leaders of the left gone?
Mrs Nobody, don't wait for anyone else to impose leaders on us. We need to produce our own leaders!
@Helen.
"helen_back
23 October 2010 at 12:12"
PMSL. 2 Stars.
@Eddy S
23 October 2010 at 10:25
This is a really good post. Full of common sense and no BS.
@Mr D.
Hiya D. I agree with a lot you say, but this commune notion is so 60's. I do concur regards the Royals. She was well off when she was crowned, but she never had the billions she has now. That money came directly from the British taxpayers. You can be sure that money is stashed overseas.
@Stuart
hiya my friend. What is the point of peaceful protest? What else will you do? Beat up a few Cops and destroy some personal property? If you want to be effective and get real change you do it at the ballot box. I guarantee you the very people doing the most whining are the lazy bums that will not take the time to vote. All they want to do is complain.
@Nick
The cardboard will fall apart in the rain. Of course you could have a green transparent garbage bag handy. Why don't you make a bunch of them and charge say...12 Pounds each for the busy protesters? Stuart could score a bundle with The Big Issues in one hand and a bundle of the green garbage bags that he could retail to the soggy protestors as rain coats for say...10 Pounds each? With the appropriate cutouts for arms and head of course. One size fits all.
Buckskins, I'm a whingy backbencher through and though material, whinging abouts arts cuts especially.
But thanks for the compliment of offering me a cabinet post.
Crispy Duck
You are absolutely right about grinding us into submission.
Sadly, we will continue to submit because nobody can see any alternative to cuts....ACTUALLY....that is the belief but not the truth. Ed Balls, Yvette Cooper and their allies can see an alternative. Unfortunately, that twat Ed Milliband hasn`t given them a chance to show their case. Either Ed Balls or Yvette Cooper should have been appointed Shadow Chancellor and that would have provided an excellent debate against George Osbourne 2 days ago. Alan Johnson is a good experienced politician but out of his depth as Shadow Chancellor.
Calm down relax, it only hurts then you resist. And what is wrong with dirty talk. You and your writings are becoming quite hysterical.
While an amusing article, you do not explain why politicians truly understand sadism. I'm not convinced they do.
'The French, who, as amply demonstrated this month, don't quite have our fetish for grumbling political obeisance, describe bondage and sadomasochism (BDSM)
as "the British perversion"; perhaps there is something in our national character that delights in ritualised deference, especially if it stings a bit.'
We're definitely a nation of (sado)masochists and ritual deferrers. But let's not forget the Marquis himself was a French aristo!
Good article, reminds me of the 80s 'sleaze' that characterised the Thatcher bunch.
You're utterly right Arthur Williamson.
Funny isnt it as the horror begins to dawn on us that while Ed Miliband is in charge we're going to be out of power for so long i don't think there will be a Britain as we know left by the time (if indeed we ever do)get back into power.
Poor Ed his brother sat in nowhere land while he dabbles away looking like a fool yet because labour is so ineffectual with him in charge its the poor and the needy as well as the middle classes who'll suffer at the hands of these madmen.
But still the unions got what they wanted didn't they? or did they?
EhtchTee: Laughed me 'ead off at this clip, thanks la!
The final clip was a bit dark.
mr divine.you would be surprised to know,but if you was immigration minister i would make an appointment with you straight away and volunteer to be deported on the first plane to australia,canada or new zealand never to return back to england,i dont think i would miss england or hackney would miss me heh.
@ Buckskins
I invite you to research our electoral system. In the vast majority of our constituencies your vote doesn't count - either it's a safe seat or it's a stitch up between two parties.
But just you wait for the bile the right wing press will heap on the AV (alternative vote system) campaigners.
The idea that we have real democracy in this country is laughable. The media and the politicians have convinced the majority that 'there is no alternative'.
Deeply ironic that the most individualistic people in Europe accept so much control.
my new mates, just found out, online shite connections and all that,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2p2LN4ITho
And also, smack me, beat me, call me names Fergie, because you know I deserve it, you fecking sado- masochistic perve yew,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77tirxSTAWU
Met Gary Barlows misses in above video in Pricillas boyfriends birthday party in about 1991, in Woolwich, London. I made her laugh with a joke that I can't remember now.
hey buckskins bud how are you,sorry buckskins, we have tried the ballot box in this country and as usual it has been thrown firmly back in are faces after we elect these buffoons and parasites who always go back on there election pledges like the creeps they are,most violence at protests are provoked by the police who like to test out there new riot control tactics and toys,as proved in the poll tax riots things can change through mass protest and public anger and i think this is the right time adopt the these tactics,sitting down in front of computers moaning on blogs is not good enough.streets are there for a reason and i say get out there and protest till this goverment backs down and reverses these spending cut,simple as that,no turning back.this is not a left or right issue buckskins,this is a matter of life or death to defend the poor and weak in soceity.
ang - No probs ang, I sometimes post some sensible yewtubb shite, just got to wait that's all....
The final clip was Georgie having 'is 'ed filled in, circa May 1st, 2012.
That last paragrph was fiction, by the way, honest - I made it up...
" if we want to continue to live in a country with pretensions to freedom, tolerance and justice, we have to risk rearing up against our chains and ruining the game. We have to risk a bolder refusal to submit to this sick assault on social democracy."
You say you want a revolution.
You gasp it out of your breathing-breath,
You say you need to change your world around.
You say you need to overthrow your master
and dig the noose out of your neck,
but I cannot see those nails burning away binding fibers.
I see your denial.
There is no way up and so much down,
but when right and left have no street anymore,
and there is no more direction
on your hungry compass,
you have no cause, you're
just a rebel with a joint,
and someone else's free ride
BareTorrent.
I'm sticking with my commune idea. You are getting stuck in the 60s idea of wigwams and peace man. My idea is to have a commune that will have a main focus of increasing savings amongst the members. You have separate individual housing but also communal facilities. The most successful non-government social organisations are religious groups .. the Mormons started from nothing and now command billions of dollars in wealth. I'm not suggesting people should become Mormons but I am saying that they have just used their group status to become very successful.
And what is success? To lead a life that you feel free to. For many people it is to have enough money without having to work 40 hours a week especially in a job that you don't really like. Perhaps a 15 hour week would be most people's ideal working week, coupled with lots of long holidays. My commune idea is an easier way for people to achieve this kind of freedom.
The setting up of communes doesn't have to be on military or crown land but it does promise a clean slate and an opportunity. It'll be a slow brick by brick process that will take over a hundred years but has more chance of success than another protest.
Hilarious and well observed piece. At last, a Littlejohn for pinkos!
Wasn't Gideon the victim of name-calling by his richer school chums at Eton? Now he holds the wip hand he obviously feels it's payback time. Unfortunately the bullies are all untouchable bankers now so he feels he can kick the poor ('oiks' to him) as they have no power at all (except a worthless vote).
Mr D: Yes the wigwam reference was perhaps a bit OTT, a bit of humour. I see what you mean and yes it could work on that kind of scale; save for a reservation over the risk of creating isolated sectors of society; but I see what you mean if it's all inclusive.
Far from knocking your idea, I'm currently working on plans to develop our advice centre by merging with other community organisations, so I'm quite with the whole community spirit, albeit it's more about the deliverance of services rather than housing. There is no government money for a capital investment in these times (to buy an ex government building or going for a new build for instance), so we are looking at ways of raising the funds. So I'm quite interested you see, in fact one of your posts gave me some good ideas the other week.
But I'm still up for a protest!
I bet there's noone on here who can say what date they will be losing their home?
Mines 31st March 2011, I've already had my notice to quit as there will be no jobs left in my area and I was only on £18000per year!
"Deeply ironic that the most individualistic people in Europe accept so much control."
No irony here at all. Individuality is the very centre of that control. If I'm convinced of anything, I'm convinced of that.
mr d
We should allow in 100 million more people into Britain over the next 10 years.
Did you know that brand spanking really good new 4 bedroom houses are for sale in Florida for $100,000?
you are aware that land prices are directly proportional to local population density.
@Nick: Organisations like yourselves might want to try and set up a cooperative. Because you have a number of staff you could try to encourage bulk purchases from a wholesaler. Part of a person's job description could involve taking and placing orders for staff groceries. Bulk purchases of coffee, washing powder and bog roll would mean lower individual expense. You may try to liason with other organisations such as library staff to increase your bulk purchasing power.
Any spare land surrounding your offices should also be looked at for growing stuff. Mint is ideal to grow. Instead of coffee or tea just pick some mint leaves and add hot water. As a non-caffeine drinker I love to drink my fresh mint tea as I sit in front of my wigwam.
"the money saved from George Osborne's crackdowns on benefit fraud could be recouped simply by persuading one man - the government's efficiency tsar, Philip Green, to pay his taxes like the rest of us."
I'm always fascinated by the way this is presented as easy to do - how, exactly could he be persuaded? He does pay tax in the UK. His wife doesn't because she doesn't live here. He managed to structure things so that she owns the busines. How, in accordance with international law, are you going to get that money? Asking him nicely? Giving him a knighthood? (Too late - Labour did that!)
---------
Easy.
Pay what you deserve, or go to jail.
Would it involve retroactive law and a "breach of human rights"? Maybe. But so what! The rich have trampled over the rights of everyone else, and are now responsible for a savagery against the poor that can be reasonably described as genocide (particularly when the little old ladies start freezing to death this winter, or the young ravaged by the recession face massively raised suicide rates). And Philip Green is complicit in this crime against humanity.
Genocide kills (well, duh). And deserves to be punished. Frankly Philip Green, and anyone else who has made more than a million bob or so (beyond the point at which anybody needs money, yet it is money that would clothe and feed and pay the medical bills for the poorest and most vulnerable) is also complicit. They should all be thrown in jail for crimes against humanity and all their assets confiscated. Even the Cameron and Osbourne family estates would be worth a lot of heart operations if they were returned to the people they TRUELY belong to (the British people) and their current owners were sent to prison. In fact Blair has turned into a money-amassing machine too - he can join them, and we'll keep the book proceeds thank you very much.
No mercy can be given to the rich. None. They don't deserve a penny of pity and unless they radically reform and give all their money away to charity, their days are numbered. Once the people have known how strong the forces of darkness are, and how much hatred and disgust the rich hold for them (listen to it in Osbourne's snarly voice, observe it in figures as Sir Philip takes away millions of pounds of potentially life-saving money) then the revolution will come. It is long long overdue. And there are centuries of injustice to avenge...
Many wish he would be a little more sadistic and stop foreign aid altogether.
Mr Divine, why don't we all just run around in loincloths and live in caves!!! but then we will all start moaning about the shortage of animal skins and the lack of suitable caves.
@Luddite; Don't you think that you might be taking my viewpoints to an extreme? Where have I mentioned loin clothes and caves? I don't mind if some people, young females spring to mind, wear only loin clothes but as for sleeping in caves that's taking the bat piss. No I rather rest my head in my top of the range kingsize bed in my six bedroom mansion on my small acreage.... with my lovely wife.
If you want to sleep with the bat urine and the bats then that's your business. They say its pretty smelly in those bat caves but at least you'll have a hoard of loin clothed young females to keep you amused.. although they'd stink as well.
Ladies, get a Labour govenment in again, by any means, Sunday Mirror or if you can con them, New of the World will do.
We are relying on you ladies, to show the Torys up. And this includes pink men as well, of bleeding course, do your part friends.
Dusty, beautiful Dusty,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QR4vE9xL3yk
I agree with Anna Chen - this is class warfare.
The ruling elite are squeezing the poor until their eyes bulge.
There's more of us than them - one day enough people will wake up to that
'Only politicians and perverts truly understand sadism. Amateurs think that sadism, fiscal or otherwise, is about hurting people. They are mistaken. Sadism is not about pain. It is about power'
That's what I don't like about Laurie's endless analogies with S and M on the pages of her blog.
She turns 'perverts' into a separate category of person from 'amateurs'. It is this typology that pathologises people. Most people have some understanding of how 'power' works. It affects all of us.
Making out 'perverts' are a certain, knowing, sexually sophisticated but weird type of person insults us all.
I get the impression as well that nobody edits these blogposts. This is ridiculous in a national publication.
well put your necks on the line,get out on the barricades,the time for small talk has gone on these blogs,the time is coming when you have to make a decision,are you with us, or are you going to watch from the comfort of your your cozy lifestyles the coming battles that will rage all over the nation in opposition to these spending cuts,come on make your minds up,be brave and show some bottle ,get out there and stop this evil now or be dammed into eternal slavery of the con/lib cutters goverment,your country needs you,dont let us down.
We have to live within our means, so why is it so unreasonable to expect our government to do likewise.
No, I tend to agree with Nick; it's more serious than the kind of nonsense described here ie a guilty appeal to the easy narrative of punishment and hierarchy.
I suggest a quick revision of the book of Lamentations, especially Lamentations 3, to get a more original narrative of punishment and the kind of hope that springs eternal. Austerity isn't about populist notions of no pain, no gain ..it is a test of contentment in my view - but even so we need to be able to account for what we happen to be experiencing along the way openly and transparently and in a way that respects all stakeholders equally -preferably with one's elected Parliamentary representative ( M.P.) who on the face of it and in the face of us citizens really needs to function efficiently, properly and independently of party political considerations, in my view.
will you please explain to a mere peasant like me what the hell are you on about mrs. josephine hyde-hartley,very posh name i must say.