Lessons from the Pope protest
Now the Pope has gone home, the left needs to rediscover the courage of its convictions.
By Laurie Penny Published 24 September 2010 12:24
The atmosphere amongst the liberal left in the aftermath of the Pope's state visit to Britain calls to mind the uncomfortable eye-avoidance that takes place after someone suddenly turns the lights on at an orgy. Yes, we had a lot of fun, and we probably got rather carried away, but we're not overly keen to discuss it the next morning and we might well hesitate before leaping into any more messy entanglements with gay rights, feminism and anti-state activism.
The protest itself was a joyful chorus of self-congratulatory liberal paralysis. As bagfuls of naughty blown-up condoms floated up into an azure Piccadilly sky, central London thundered with the sound of twenty thousand broadly centre-left Britons failing to make up their minds about why they were there. Some of the printed-out slogans bemoaned the extra public expense of lugging the Popemobile around the country; some complained about homophobia, others about the oppression of women, but never too impolitely. There was, in fact, a horrific delicacy about this collective mumble, as if to make any real, overarching complaint about regressive state and religious indoctrination would be, well, a little tasteless.
'It's fantastic that there's a protest," said queer theorist James Butler, who I met in the crowd, "but it's telling that the only thing being chanted with any enthusiasm is 'Pope Go Home!' That sentiment seems less about creating real change than registering a formal objection while retaining the status quo."
Well, the Pope has now gone home, as he was always planning to. Hurrah. Well done us. Unfortunately, homophobia, misogyny, bigotry, intolerance and abuse have not gone home with the Pope.
The impulse towards egalitarianism and collective rationality that nominally brought twenty thousand liberals to Piccadilly last week should not now be permitted to disperse like incense in an empty church. It's vital that the left remembers that for many of us, there was more to this demonstration than the chance to stand around central London wearing pink paper mitres and making unhelpful jokes about men in dresses.
Even more dispiriting than the silly-hat brigade was the peevish fixation, by way of speeches, slogans and placards, on the cost of the Papal visit. Even Peter Tatchell and the Secular Society chose to focus attention on the twelve million pound bill to the state, in this new age of austerity, seemingly in order to rally the disparate strands of popular anti-papism into one miserly chorus of public annoyance.
This type of shoddy reasoning panders entirely to the clunky conservative line on the necessity of public sector cuts, and implies that, in this instance, liberal Britain would have been entirely happy to host the anointed head of an organisation which has covered up institutional child-rape, opposed women's rights and promoted homophobia across the globe if only it hadn't been so jolly expensive.
Packaging our ideology in the language of financial prudence is a dangerous move for the left, not only because it allows the conservative right to set the agenda, but because meaningful social change is rarely part of any state's five-year budget. Consider the declaration this week by Ben Summerskill, head of LGB campaigning group Stonewall, that his organisation plans to abandon its lobby for marriage equality for homosexuals - because it would be too expensive for the government to implement.
Many LGBT activists justly make the case that the right to form family units of which Iain Duncan Smith would approve should not be the primary focus of the queer movement when homophobic attacks and murders are still taking place up and down the country. Nonetheless, equal legal recognition within a flawed system is an important first step for liberation movements, and I for one will march until my feet bleed for the right of gay and bisexual men and women to bugger up their lives just as frivolously as straight couples. Moreover, being the public face of safe, unthreatening homosexuality is Stonewall's job - but nothing in that job description includes the caveat: "we'd like our human rights, but only if you're absolutely sure you can afford to splash out on us."
It's worth remembering the most positive social revolutions in history, large and small, have all come at cost to the state. Britain, after all, couldn't really afford to stop trading in slaves. We couldn't afford votes for women, or universal suffrage. We certainly couldn't afford to institute a welfare state and universal healthcare just after a world war that left our national deficit at several times the level it is today. Those battles were fought and won because a few brave social innovators believed that justice and progress were more important than balancing the books.
Radical, useful social change does not wait around for those in power to decide that they can afford it. It does not shrink from genuine confrontation to stand at the sidelines sniping about funny hats and fancy frocks. Radical, useful social change is always uncomfortable, it's always expensive, and it always involves an element of personal risk for those who take up the banner. The left needs to stop pandering to conservative parochialism and remember the courage of its convictions.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















71 comments
@Mr. Divine:
Cheers mate. The reason why I identify as an "anarchist" is simply because I am fed up with the left waiting for legislation to solve our problems. We need to get out there and make constructive change happen. I also agree with your last point that protesting the Pope is pointless. Imagine if all the energy poured into protesting the Pope had gone into setting up rape victim support centres, or something of that ilk.
Can't wait til HippieWizard learns about the existence of a body called "the United Nations", headed by a dignitary called "the Secretary-General". Given his concerns about (a) covering up child rape, (b) wasting money, and (c) coddling countries with repressive anti-gay laws, I'd say his head will explode.
VERY funny...........
@Hans Castorp
You're an idiot.
For your information, freedom of religion does NOT mean freedom from criticism. We did not undermine freedom of religion by marching peacefully in central London.
Laurie you have sod-all right to complain about the cost. Catholics pay taxes too.
Dave, are you even reading the article? To wit --
'This type of shoddy reasoning panders entirely to the clunky conservative line on the necessity of public sector cuts, and implies that, in this instance, liberal Britain would have been entirely happy to host the anointed head of an organisation which has covered up institutional child-rape, opposed women's rights and promoted homophobia across the globe if only it hadn't been so jolly expensive.'
james,i agree with you 100%,these middle class oiky little left wing bigots who hide under the cloak of false concern for the victims of child sex abuse just wanna make me puke all over my cornflakes,remember this crowd are the same lot who go outside the isreali embassy with there socalist workers partys placards(WE ARE ALL HAMAS NOW !!) and spit and curse and join forces with there islamic extremist mates anjem choudary and co at the troops returning home parades from afghanistan well protected by the police from a beating from the freinds and relatives of these brave lads who serve are country,you left wing troglites and morons need good kick up your scruffy backsides and understand we are sick of your bigotary and hatred towards catholics.
@Hippywizard: You wrote.
'We need to get out there and make constructive change happen.'
Exactly.
ermmm, just a question, need an answer, are the only people that hate the pope all from the middle class. I see that word being chucked around as if outside the middle class everyone is an enlightened catholic who is in love with the pope.
..and Stuart you have issues, why do you bother reading a story written by someone who is quite clearly left wing, what were you expecting from what is a left wing website, you really are a moron mate, may I suggest spectator or the daily mail, or do you just like trolling lefty sites.
Also loving that spiked link, I love that site its the best spoof news site, better Then The Daily Mash. Oh right yeah, its not a spoof site, its for real. Quality story to, it proves there wasn't 10,000 children raped, Infact only just over 1,000 allegations of child rape where made, only 1,000. Phew that’s alright then. Turns out they where just fondling, verbally abusing and exposing themselves to the children, those crazy priests. What will they get up to next.
shut your mouth up you scummy little moronic left wing trashbag,i am sick of youi dirty racist bigoted anti catholics haters.
you middle class poncy arsewipe hippie wizard,ur about as much as a anarchist as i am a nick cleggs politacal advisor,ok you want to rebel against your middle class lifestyle in your boring middle class leafy surburb but waving a protest the pope placard does not exactly make you the new che guevara,i bump into you posh white socalist workers types every day with ur ridculously looking dreadlocks and i tell you what you would not last 5 minutes living in the inner citys areas in london or anywhere else in the uk with ur socalist revolution bullshitt.bet ur daddys a banker ha ha.
well mr divine i think you hit the nail on the head there,cant wait for danieles reply.
Just Passing By-nothing to do with the content of your message per se...but what exactly is trolling? Is it posting on a website where it's likely that most of the contributors will disagree with you? I'm genuinely curious.
In the west of scotland-where I live-the majority of anti-catholic opinion isn't middle class: it's concentrated among knuckledragging rednecks from the Orange Order.
I think there's a lot of middle class antipathy to the pope/RC church because he/it represents a hierarchical, authoritarian (I'm not using that word in a pejorative sense, only in it's purest sense) tradition, and I think that's anathema to a load of smug, spoilt, watered-down socialists.
Without self-congratulatory smugness, where would either the Nonconformist conscience, or its modern offspring the Guardianista Left, be? You're basically FOR the poor, not really OF them. Pretending otherwise is just stupid and pitiful.
How about this for a radical idea-disestablish your state church?
@Stuart
If you are genuinely sick then step away from the keyboard and make a nice cup of tea. I think you need a break!
@Lox
Yup, that's trolling. And it's interesting to see Paisley and Dawkins saying much the same thing.
I went to observe events on the Friday outside Westminster Abbey, and Unionists and Atheists were chanting 'no pope' together. Not good.
Interesting that you think that saving money is inherently un-left; most of the Tea Party nutjobs over in the US agree heartily with you.
But spending more money than you have is, of course, an aristocratic ideal, isn't it? Nothing so very tiresome as actually only spending what you have or can earn.
Thanks for the explanation, Hans. Dawkins and Paisley are equally dogmatic, and equally predictable, and they're both preaching to a small number of the faithful. It's kind of ironic that atheism as practiced by Dawkins is showing such levels of orthodoxy and intolerance-almost a cult...
It's incredible that someone who seems to think that left wing and liberal are synonymous can actually be employed to write about politics within society.
George Stephenson
401 S. Park Ave. #C-3
Aztec, New Mexico 87410
(505) 258-0037
onemale@live.com
To whom it may concern:
I am writing this letter to the Pope and all Catholic priests. I call on you in the name of human decency to go to the nearest police station and volunteer for a lie detector test. Answer the question: Have you ever molested a child? The church holds itself above the rest of us in their imagined moral superiority. Well, here’s a chance to demonstrate it! This is the very LEAST that the Catholic Church could do to restore the trust and faith of billions around the world. Don’t let pride stop you. Show us this righteous humility you’ve lorded over our heads for two millennia. In the name of simple decency I implore you: Go now, or don’t darken our doors with your nonsense ever again. Thank you.
Sincerely,
George Stephenson
Write to the Pope at: benedictxvi@vatican.va
maybe george stephenson you ignorant bastard bigot should of wrote a letter to your great leader barack obama to stop the state execution of the 41 year old grandmother teresa lewis in west virginia who had learning difficuties but took the wrap for a murder she did not commit while the 2 men who done it are in jail living a life of riley,so dont come on here george stephenson with your all high and mighty moral attitude you son of a bitch.
@SamB..so i expect you will be marching against the religion of islam who hangs gays from cranes in iran,force young girls to marry at the age of 11 in pakistan,oppresses women all over the world,yes when is your march against this religion???
Can't wait til HippieWizard learns about the existence of a body called "the United Nations", headed by a dignitary called "the Secretary-General". Given his concerns about (a) covering up child rape, (b) wasting money, and (c) coddling countries with repressive anti-gay laws, I'd say his head will explode.
Lox, what's a Scottish redneck. And how did their necks get that color. Are you sure they were not Orangenecks?
Hi Buckskins, OK-I'll meet you halfway. They're kind of burnt umber necks. It's a shade that contrasts beautifully with a rangers top, usually XXXL size.
Hi Stuart, there is no life of riley in American prisons. I do agree that to have executed her with the trigger pullers watching TV is ridicules. You’re probably against the death penalty. I am not. She was mentally deficient somewhat but what she knew what she was doing. IMO they should have had all 3 doing the rope dance. I guess we can agree to disagree on this one my friend.
Cheers, Matt.
Thanks Lox, I don't want to fight with you cuz yer too smart fer me. I'm just an ole rednecked backwoodsman ma'am. I best quit trying to tease ya huh.
Ahhhh the last few comments. T'internet is indeed a weird and wonderful place.
George Stephenson should probably be locked up for his own good and Stuart and Buckskins could well be the same spotty kid with one hand on his dick and the other playing World of Warcraft.
But back to the point. There was no point to this article other than saying it didn't achieve much. What did you expect?
Actually one hand would be insufficent for the task on hand sir.
Des that was not the point of the article bud.
1. Anti-Catholicism has a new face in Britain: it's white, middle class, and reads the Guardian.
2. Catholicism in Britain is genuinely multicultural: one had only to contrast shots from the prayer vigil in Hyde Park with those of the gathering outside Downing Street.
3. Never trust National Secular Society estimates of numbers. On the day they were saying 8.000, then the next day their website proclaimed 11,000. By Day 3 they were up to 20.000 - only to be rather embarrassed when the police estimate (as reported in The Times) of circa 5,000 came through.
4. "F$%k the Pope" is no longer a slogan confined to Rangers fans and N. Irish sectarians. It's now considered cutting-edge stuff by soi-disant enlightened liberals.
More lessons as they emerge...
Oh, and on the "institutional child-rape" charge - this:
http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/9548/
Congraultations Laurie, you had you Tea Party: shrill, intolerant, dissolute, self-aggrandising, and inimical to the freedoms of expression and religion that make our society one of the most open in the world.
I am glad you've seen the protests for the shambles they were.
Kindly get your facts straight: "up to" 10,000 attended.
Seems to me the Pope apologists are playing the same false predjudice card as Israel apologists do.
I intensely dislike the state of Israel, and the attitude that led to its formation. So do my Jewish friends. To say that Zionism and Judaism are the same thing is racist and ethnocentric.
I intensely dislike the Catholic Church, I dislike the views of the Pope, and I dislike the idea that this sad little man is supposedly infallible. He, by covering up child rape, is as morally reprehensible as the rapists themselves. I have no problem, however, with individual Catholics. I may disagree with them, or think they are indoctrinated, and challenge them when they actively oppress women, LGBT people and ethnic minorities, but I do not dislike them simply for being Catholics, as religious sectarians do.
Other than anything else, Ratzy hardly loves his neighbour as himself. Look at his wealth, when poor people starve. Jesus, being as he was probably a decent sort of chap, would be PISSED.
Hans makes a good point. It's ironic that while the supposedly "progressive" middle-class crowd decried the expenditure of their (doubtless "hard-earned") tax money in true Tea Party fashion, Catholics in Hyde Park were watching presentations on social justice, the living wage, and learning about anti-poverty campaigns run by groups like CAFOD.
hey buckskins bud,i am not against the death penalty far from it,i am in the hang them high brigade for child killers and terrorist murdering scum,but this case involving teresa lewis does bother me a tad and i think life in prison with no parole would of been my option if i was the sentencing judge and the other 2 gits in prison now should of been the ones getting a jolt from old sparky.
Ah, the Big Lie: the Pope covered up child abuse. Only he didn't:
http://tinyurl.com/2001letter
http://tinyurl.com/lawlerjournalists
I guess some people have invested so much faith in that untruth that no amount of evidence will cause them to abandon it.
James, how about finding some opinions of your own?
"Yet where 3,553 of the individuals claimed to have been touched over their clothing and 3,981 to have been touched under their clothing, a smaller number claimed to have been subjected to what is described in the report as ‘penile penetration or attempted penile penetration’, that is rape or attempted rape; 990 boys and 213 girls made this allegation – a total of 1,203 individuals, not 10,000."
Ah well, then that's ok then...
@James. Even if you are right, the Pope still luxuriates in wealth while millions live on less than a dollar a day. He still thinks that the use of condoms increases the chance of the spread of the HIV virus. He still encourages poor families to keep having children, tying them to poverty and oppressing women by forcing them to remain at home either pregnant or caring for yet another child. He still thinks homosexual sex, a harmless expression of one person's love for (or even just attraction to :P) another person is immoral, trapping many faithful gay people in cycles of guilt and self-loathing. The man causes more harm than good.
HippieWizard, that's extremely generous of you to have no problems with individual catholics and I'm sure they're intensely grateful for your indulgence.
The worst thing about the anti-pope protests has been the pure smugness and self-congratulatory nature of a lot of those taking part. There's little philosophical or metaphysical analysis of why the catholic church believes what it does: why does the church believe abortion is wrong? Is there a balance at any point between a woman's reproductive rights and the rights of a foetus to develop? If the former predominate, then is there an implication for society's wider perception fo the sanctity of life? Those are questions worth analysis-but the liberal left hides behind slogans and chants.
And perhaps you can explain how the church oppresses ethnic minorities? Or was that just a very stupid thing to say? As far as oppression of LGBT people is concerned...any gay catholic-and I've known a few-has a choice. Compromise their sexuality, or leave the church. Most have decided to do the latter, and I think I would probably do the same: my point is, HippieWizard, that it's a matter of individual choice and conscience. Something the left seems to have a problem with.
@HippieWizard
"the Pope still luxuriates in wealth while millions live on less than a dollar a day."
Last I heard this wasn't the Pope's fault, or his sole responsibility.
"The man causes more harm than good."
I assume you have evidence by way of a properly researched benefit/burden analysis to back this up. Otherwise you're not exactly in Enlightenment territory.
And are you saying 'man' or 'church'?
I'm glad you've found a bogeyman to blame eveything on, must be comforting.
Those incidents happened on Ratzinger's watch, like it or not.
Why an earth you Furedistas are defending Ratzinger, the guy who declared the Marxist Elements of Lineration Theology as a Heresy and co-operated with right-wing governments in South America in eliminating it, is beyond me.
http://www.christendom-awake.org/pages/ratzinger/liberationtheol.htm
What do you guys actually believe in nowadays apart from a vague form of libertarianism?
@Lox
I agree with what you say in the main, but you'll find there are lots of gay catholics: it's not a 'take it or leave it' (pardon the pun) thing. Andrew Sullivan is a high-profile example.
Hippie Wizard, I luxuriate in wealth while other live on less than a dollar a day. So do you. What are you going to do about it?
The church has a commitment to social justice. A good friend of mine is involved with a Jesuit school in Kenya where the children of Aids orphans are given a high school education equivalent to what they'd get in a developed European country. The school is supported solely by the catholic church: would you like to go ther and explain to the children there that they're being brainwashed?
When was the last time you did something that had that kind of impact on people's lives?
Daniel,
Opinions of my own? I forgot - we Catholics are just Roman-programmed robots, aren't we? Guess you'll struggle to deal with the converts among us... maybe the Jesuits chipped them while they were asleep.
Child abuse is never "ok", and only a particularly obtuse person would think I was claiming as much. However, it's important to be accurate in one's attacks on religious minorities, and the "child-rape by tens of thousands" claim is simply untrue. In fact, the average priest is no more likely to be an abuser than you are:
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/04/07/mean-men.html
HippieWizard,
Catholics don't believe that being gay is immoral; they believe that gay sexual activity - like all sexual activity not open to the possibility of life - is. The Catechism of the Church states that homosexuals "must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity... every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided." You might disagree with the Church's analysis of non-procreative sexual activity, but it's hardly a message of hate.
As for the Pope "luxuriating in wealth"... the papal apartment is extremely modest, if secular news coverage is to be believed. Yes, the Vatican has many cultural riches, and they're on show to the public, part of the West's patrimony. Would you prefer them to be in the hands of international bankers and businessmen? In terms of its actual finances - as opposed to fixed assets - the Vatican has run a deficit these last few years.
watch your big gob des demona.
Daniel, how can an organisation that combines proscription of moral and sexual behaviour with a commitment to charity be described as libertarian? Do you know what the word means?
The truth is that the British people, especially the middle classes, have no idea how to throw a good demonstration. They are just too polite, pussy footing, scared to offend.
For Christ sake, it was a PROTEST! Why didn't they PROTEST properly, with WIT and ANGER?? Not stupid jokes and confusing messages.
For a good protest, I suggest some one goes over to France to see how it is done!
Laurie: Excellent article. Again, I agree with every word.
But too many morons ( or is there just one?)are spoiling the flow of the debate.
Being against the current Pope's various faults & misdemeanours does not make one anti-Catholic. I'm an atheist, but I was brought up in the Catholic church, and until this Pope started opening his mouth & making pronouncements I'd always associated it with people like my Gran & my Mum, have always been fair-minded people who stood up for justice & peace, campaigned for equal rights, against racism & homophobia. I may not agree with the idea that there's a God standing over us all with a Heaven vs Hell carrot & stick, but there was & I hope still is a lot of good in the Catholic church. I object to this Pope dragging it through the mud & dragging it over to the right. I am still hopeful that some day it will reflect the values of its better adherents.
Living in Glasgow it's nice to see that the Orange Order is expanding it's client base.
I've got used to seeing the lumpenproleteriat marching against the pope over the last 50 years, nice to see the Guardianistas doing the same.
@Lox All missionary activity is an oppression of the rights of ethnic minorities to their own culture. All evangelical faiths are guilty of this.
@Hans I don't fucking care. If he was a real follower of Christ he would personally distribute all of the obscene wealth in the Catholic Church in order to help address the problems of poverty in the world. As an "infallible mouthpiece of God" he has the power to do this.
You want something properly researched? Are the figures for the spread of AIDS in the Phillipines not enough? How about a properly researched justification of an organisation that bases its authority on a connection to a Supreme Being that we have to rely on their word to believe in because he sure as damn well doesn't seem to exist anywhere else.
That man has the power to change things, and what is more, he personally is completely representative of the side of the Catholic Church that exists solely to keep power in the hands of a tiny group of straight white men with an idol fixation and a messiah complex.
daniele,apart from being a hatefull bigot.you seem to of forgot the whole point of blogs on the net is for views to be challenged or would you prefer every left wing and right wing blog just to have clones on agreeing with each other in some big love in,now that would be boring and not democratic,so daniele open your mind up to there are others who have different opinions to you,is that to much to ask.