Does Johann Hari actually meet his interviewees?
Hari's use of quotes is beyond a joke and much worse than he has made out
By Guy Walters Published 01 July 2011 13:39
If you look at the text below, you'll find an interview with the activist and former Afghan politician Malalai Joya carried out by Johann Hari for the Independent in July 2009.
The 42 bold passages highlighted by my friend Jeremy Duns can be found -- verbatim or near-verbatim -- in Joya's own book, Raising My Voice, which was co-written by Derrick O'Keefe. Nearly half of the entire piece consists of words that Joya used in the book. And, just to hammer this home - nearly every quote supposedly given to Hari was in fact taken from the book.
Hari has appropriated words written by Joya and O'Keefe and given the entirely false impression that the words were said to him. It would be naive to suppose that all these passages are simply, as Hari said in his apology, substitutions for what "they [his interviewees] have written or said more clearly elsewhere on the same subject for what they said to me". Did she also say the same things in the same way to Hari? I'm doubtful, to put it mildly.
Is this an interview? No. It's a book digest sold as an interview. That's shoddy, very shoddy. I suspect this example is just one of many. Five minutes spent comparing his interview with Ann Leslie to her memoir appears to reveal something similar.
Mr Hari has severely misled his readers. He has given them the impression that he is a star interviewer who is able to obtain amazing responses from those he meets.
The judges of the Martha Gellhorn Prize should examine the three pieces on which they awarded Hari their £5,000 prize. Chris Blackhurst, the new editor of the Independent, should carry out a thorough examination of all his employee's journalism. There is only so long that Hari's castle can stay in the air.
The Bravest Woman in Afghanistan: An Interview With Malalai Joya
By Johann Hari
"I am not sure how many more days I will be alive," Malalai Joya says quietly. The warlords who make up the new "democratic" government in Afghanistan have been sending bullets and bombs to kill this tiny 30-year-old from the refugee camps for years - and they seem to be getting closer with every attempt. Her enemies call her a "dead woman walking". "But I don't fear death, I fear remaining silent in the face of injustice," she says plainly. "I am young and I want to live. But I say to those who would eliminate my voice: 'I am ready, wherever and whenever you might strike. You can cut down the flower, but nothing can stop the coming of the spring.'"
The story of Malalai Joya turns everything we have been told about Afghanistan inside out. In the official rhetoric, she is what we have been fighting for. Here is a young Afghan woman who set up a secret underground school for girls under the Taliban and - when they were toppled - cast off the burka, ran for parliament, and took on the religious fundamentalists.
But she says: "Dust has been thrown into the eyes of the world by your governments. You have not been told the truth. The situation now is as catastrophic as it was under the Taliban for women. Your governments have replaced the fundamentalist rule of the Taliban with another fundamentalist regime of warlords. [That is] what your soldiers are dying for." Instead of being liberated, she is on the brink of being killed.
The story of Joya is the story of another Afghanistan - the one behind the burka, and behind the propaganda.
I "We are our sisters' keepers"
I meet Joya in a London apartment where she is staying with a supporter for a week, to talk about her memoir - but even here, her movements have to be kept secret, as she flits from one safe house to another. I am told not to mention her location to anyone. She is standing in the corridor, small and slim, with her hair flowing freely, and she greets me with a solid handshake. But, when our photographer snaps her, she begins to giggle girlishly: the grief etched on to her sallow face melts away, and she laughs in joyous little squeaks. "I can never get used to this!" she says.
Then, as I sit her down to talk through her life-story, the pain soaks into her face once more. Her body tightens into a tense coil, and her fists close.
Joya was four days old when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan. On that day, her father dropped out of his studies to fight the invading Communist army, and vanished into the mountains. She says: "Since then, all we have known is war."
Her earliest memory is of clinging to her mother's legs while policemen ransacked their house looking for evidence of where her father was hiding. Her illiterate mother tried to keep her family of 10 children alive as best she could. When the police became too aggressive, she took her kids to refugee camps across the border in Iran. In these filthy tent-cities lying on the old Silk Road, Afghans huddled together and were treated as second-class citizens by the Iranian regime. At night, wild animals could wander into the tents and attack children. There, word reached the family that Joya's father had been blown up by a landmine - but he was alive, after losing a leg.
There were no schools in the Iranian camps, and Joya's mother was determined her daughters would receive the education she never had. So they fled again, to camps in western Pakistan. There, Joya began to read - and was transformed. "Tell me what you read and I shall tell you what you are," she says. Starting in her early teens, she inhaled all the literature she could - from Persian poetry to the plays of Bertolt Brecht to the speeches of Martin Luther King. She began to teach her new-found literacy to the older women in the camps, including her own mother.
She soon discovered that she loved to teach - and, when she turned 16, a charity called the Organisation for Promoting Afghan Women's Capabilities (OPAWC) made a bold suggestion: go to Afghanistan, and set up a secret school for girls, under the noses of the Taliban tyranny.
So she gathered her few clothes and books and was smuggled across the border - and "the best days of my life" began. She loathed being forced to wear a burka, being harassed on the streets by the omnipresent "vice and virtue" police, and being under constant threat of being discovered and executed. But she says it was worth it for the little girls. "Every time a new girl joined the class, it was a triumph," she says, beaming. "There is no better feeling."
She only just avoided being caught, again and again. One time she was teaching a class of girls in a family's basement when the mother of the house yelled down suddenly: "Taliban! Taliban!" Joya says: "I told my students to lie down on the floor and stay totally silent. We heard footsteps above us and waited a long time." On many occasions, ordinary men and women - anonymous strangers - helped her out by sending the police charging off in the wrong direction. She adds: "Every day in Afghanistan, even now, hundreds if not thousands of ordinary women act out these small gestures of solidarity with each other. We are our sisters' keepers."
The charity was so impressed with her they appointed her their director. Joya decided to set up a clinic for poor women just before the 9/11 attacks. When the American invasion began, the Taliban fled her province, but the bombs kept falling. "Many lives were needlessly lost, just like during the September 11 tragedy," she says. "The noise was terrifying, and children covered their ears and screamed and cried. Smoke and dust rose and lingered in the air with every bomb dropped."
As soon as the Taliban retreated, they were replaced - by the warlords who had ruled Afghanistan immediately before. Joya says that, at this point, "I realised women's rights had been sold out completely... Most people in the West have been led to believe that the intolerance and brutality towards women in Afghanistan began with the Taliban regime. But this is a lie. Many of the worst atrocities were committed by the fundamentalist mujahedin during the civil war between 1992 and 1996. They introduced the laws oppressing women followed by the Taliban - and now they were marching back to power, backed by the United States. They immediately went back to their old habit of using rape to punish their enemies and reward their fighters."
The warlords "have ruled Afghanistan ever since," she adds. While a "showcase parliament has been created for the benefit of the US in Kabul", the real power "is with these fundamentalists who rule everywhere outside Kabul". As an example, she names the former governor of Herat, Ismail Khan. He set up his own "vice and virtue" squads which terrorised women and smashed up video and music cassettes. He had his own "private militias, private jails". The constitution of Afghanistan is irrelevant in these private fiefdoms.
Joya discovered just what this meant when she started to set up the clinic - and a local warlord announced that it would not be allowed, since she was a woman, and a critic of fundamentalism. She did it anyway, and decided to fight this fundamentalist by running in the election for the Loya jirga ("meeting of the elders") to draw up the new Afghan constitution. There was a great swelling of support for this girl who wanted to build a clinic - and she was elected. "It turned out my mission," she says, "would be to expose the true nature of the jirga from within."
II "I would never again be safe"
As she stepped past the world's television cameras into the Loya jirga, the first thing Joya saw was "a long row with some of the worst abusers of human rights that our country had ever known - warlords and war criminals and fascists".
She could see the men who invited Osama bin Laden into the country, the men who introduced the misogynist laws later followed by the Taliban, the men who had massacred Afghan civilians. Some had got there by intimidating the electorate, others by vote-rigging, and yet more were simply appointed by Hamid Karzai, the former oilman installed by the US army to run the country. She thought of an old Afghan saying: "It's the same donkey, with a new saddle."
For a moment, as these old killers started to give long speeches congratulating themselves on the transition to democracy, Joya felt nervous. But then, she says, "I remembered the oppression we face as women in my country, and my nervousness evaporated, replaced by anger."
When her turn came, she stood, looked around at the blood-soaked warlords on every side, and began to speak. "Why are we allowing criminals to be present here? They are responsible for our situation now... It is they who turned our country into the centre of national and international wars. They are the most anti-women elements in our society who have brought our country to this state and they intend to do the same again... They should instead be prosecuted in the national and international courts."
These warlords - who brag about being hard men - could not cope with a slender young woman speaking the truth. They began to shriek and howl, calling her a "prostitute" and "infidel", and throwing bottles at her. One man tried to punch her in the face. Her microphone was cut off and the jirga descended into a riot.
"From that moment on," Joya says, "I would never again be safe... For fundamentalists, a women is half a human, meant only to fulfil a man's every wish and lust, and to produce children and toil in the home. They could not believe that a young woman was tearing off their masks in front of the eyes of the Afghan people."
A fundamentalist mob turned up a few hours later at her accommodation, announcing they had come to rape and lynch her. She had to be placed under immediate armed guard - but she refused to be protected by American troops, insisting on Afghan officers.
Her speech was broadcast all over the world - and cheered in Afghanistan. She was flooded with support from the people of her country, delighted that somebody had finally spoken out. One dirt-poor village pooled its cash to send a delegate hundreds of miles across the country to explain how pleased they were.
An extremely old woman was brought to her in a rickety wheelbarrow, and she explained she had lost two sons - one to the Soviets, one to the fundamentalists. She told Joya: "I am almost 100 years old, and I am dying. When I heard about you and what you said, I knew that I had to meet you. God must protect you, my dear."
She handed over her gold ring, her only valuable possession, and said: "You must take it! I have suffered so much in my life, and my last wish is that you accept this gift from me."
But the US and Nato occupiers instructed Joya that she must show "politeness and respect" for the other delegates. When Zalmay Khalilzad, the US Ambassador, said this, she replied: "If these criminals raped your mother or your daughter or your grandmother, or killed seven of your sons, let alone destroyed all the moral and material treasure of your country, what words would you use against such criminals that will be inside the framework of politeness and respect?"
She leans forward and quotes Brecht: "He says, 'He who does not know the truth is only a fool. He who knows the truth and calls it a lie is a criminal.'"
The attempts to murder her began then with a sniper - and have not stopped since. But she says plainly, with her fist clenched: "I wanted the warlords to know I was not afraid of them."
So she ran for parliament - and won in a landslide. "I would return again to face those who had ruined my country," she explains, "and I was determined that I would stand straight and never bow again to their threats."
III "In every corner is a killer"
Joya looked out across the new Afghan parliament on her first day and thought: "In every corner is a killer, a puppet, a criminal, a drug lord, a fascist. This is not democracy. I am one of the very few people here who has been genuinely elected." She started her maiden speech by saying: "My condolences to the people of Afghanistan..."
Before she could continue, the warlords began to shout that they would rape and kill her. One warlord, Abdul Sayyaf, yelled a threat at her. Joya looked him straight in the eye and said: "We are not in [the area he rules by force] here, so control yourself."
I ask if she was frightened, and she shakes her head. "I am never frightened when I tell the truth." She is speaking fast now: "I am truly honoured to have been vilified and threatened by the savage men who condemned our country to such misery. I feel proud that even though I have no private army, no money, and no world powers behind me, these brutal despots are afraid of me and scheme to eliminate me."
She says there is no difference for ordinary Afghans between the Taliban and the equally fundamentalist warlords. "Which groups are labelled 'terrorist' or 'fundamentalist' depends on how useful they are to the goals of the US," she says. "You have two sides who terrorise women, but the anti-American side are 'terrorists' and the pro-American side are 'heroes'."
Karzai rules only with the permission of the warlords. He is "a shameless puppet" who will win next month's presidential elections because "he hasn't yet stopped working for his masters, the US and the warlords... At this point in our history, the only people who get to serve as president are those selected by the US government and the mafia that holds power in our country."
Whenever she would despair in parliament, she would meet yet more ordinary Afghan women - and get back in the fight. She tells me about a 16-year-old constituent of hers, Rahella, who ran away to an orphanage Joya had helped to set up in her constituency. "Her uncle had decided to marry her off to his son, who was a drug addict. She was terrified. So of course we took her in, educated her, helped her." One day, her uncle turned up and apologised, saying he had learnt the error of his ways. He asked if she could come home for a weekend to visit her family. Joya agreed - and when she got back to her village, Rahella was forced into marriage and spirited away to another part of Afghanistan. They heard six months later that she had doused herself in petrol and burned herself alive.
There has been an epidemic of self-immolation by women across the "new" Afghanistan in the past five years. "The hundreds of Afghan women who set themselves ablaze are not only committing suicide to escape their misery," she says, "they are crying out for justice."
But she was not allowed to raise these issues in the supposedly democratic parliament. The fundamentalist warlords who couldn't beat Joya at the ballot box or kill her chanced upon a new way to silence her. The more she spoke, the angrier they got. She called for secularism in Afghanistan, saying: "Religion is a private issue, unrelated to political issues and the government... Real Muslims do not require political leaders to guide them to Islam." She condemned the new law that declared an amnesty for all war crimes committed in Afghanistan over the past 30 years, saying "You criminals are simply giving yourselves a get-out-of-jail free card." So the MPs simply voted to kick her out of parliament.
It was illegal and undemocratic - but the President, Hamid Karzai, supported the ban. "Now the warlord criminals are unchallenged in parliament," she says. "Is that democracy?"
We in the West have been fed "a pack of lies" about what Afghanistan looks like today. "The media are 'free' only if they do not try to criticise warlords and officials," she says in her book, Raising My Voice. As an example, she names a specific warlord: "If you write anything about him, the next day you will be tortured or killed by the Northern Alliance warlords." It is "a myth" to say girls can now go to school outside Kabul. "Only five per cent of girls, according to the UN, can follow their education to the 12th grade."
And it is "false" to say Afghan culture is inherently misogynistic. "By the 1950s, there was a growing women's movement in Afghanistan, demonstrating and fighting for their rights," she says. "I have a story here" - she rifles through her notes - "from the New York Times in 1959. Here! The headline is 'Afghanistan's women lift the veil'. We were developing an open culture for women - and then the foreign wars and invasions crushed it all. If we can regain our independence, we can start this struggle again."
Many of her friends urge her to leave the country, before one of her wannabe-assassins gets lucky. But, she says, "I can never leave when all the poor people that I love are living in danger and poverty. I am not going to search for a better and safer place, and leave them in a burning hell." Apologising for her English - which is, in fact, excellent - she quotes Brecht again: "Those who do struggle often fail, but those who do not struggle have already failed."
Today, she fights for democracy outside parliament. But, she says, any Afghan democrat today is "trapped between two enemies. There are the occupation forces from the sky, dropping cluster bombs and depleted uranium, and on the ground there are the fundamentalist warlords and the Taliban, with their own guns." She wants to help the swelling movement of ordinary Afghans in between, who are opposed to both. "With the withdrawal of one enemy, the occupation forces, it [will be] easier to fight against these internal fundamentalist enemies."
If she were president of Afghanistan, she would begin by referring all the country's war criminals to the International Court of Justice at the Hague. "Anybody who has murdered my sisters and brothers should be punished," she says, "from the Taliban, to the warlords, to George W Bush." Then she would ask all foreign troops to leave immediately. She says that it is wrong to say Afghanistan will simply collapse into civil war if that happens. "What about the civil war now? Today, people are being killed - many, many war crimes. The longer the foreign troops stay in Afghanistan doing what they are doing, the worse the eventual civil war will be for the Afghan people."
The Afghan public, she adds, are on her side, pointing to a recent opinion poll showing 60 per cent of Afghans want an immediate Nato withdrawal. Many people in Afghanistan were hopeful, she says, about Barack Obama - "but he is actually intensifying the policy of George Bush... I know his election has great symbolic value in terms of the struggle of African-Americans for equal rights, and this struggle is one I admire and respect. But what is important for the world is not whether the President is black or white, but his actions. You can't eat symbolism."
US policy is driven by geopolitics, she says, not personalities. "Afghanistan is in the heart of Asia, so it's a very important place to have military bases - so they can control trade very easily with other Asian powers such as China, Russia, Iran and so on.
"But it can be changed by Americans," she adds. She is passionate now, her voice rising. "I say to Obama - in my area, 150 people were blown up by US troops in one incident this year. If your family had been there, would you send even more troops and even more bombs? Your government is spending $18m (£11m) to make another Guantanamo jail in Bagram. If your daughter might be detained there, would you be building it? I say to Obama - change course, or otherwise tomorrow people will call you another Bush."
IV "It's hard to be strong all the time"
"It's not good to show my enemies any weakness, [but] it's hard to be strong all the time," Joya says with a sigh, as she runs her hands through her hair. She has been speaking so insistently - with such preternatural courage- that it's easy to forget she was just a girl when she was thrust into fighting fundamentalism. She was never allowed an adolescence. The fierce concentration on her face melts away, and she looks a little lost. "Yes, my mother is proud of me," she says, "but you know how mothers are - they worry. Whenever I speak to her on the phone, the first sentence and the last sentence are always 'Take care'."
Two years ago, she got married in secret. She can't name her husband publicly, because he would be killed. Her wedding flowers had to be checked for bombs. She will only say that they met at a press conference, "and he supports everything I do". She has not seen him "for two months", she says. "We meet in the safe houses of supporters. I cannot sleep in the same house two nights running. It is a different home every evening."
Where does this courage come from? She acts as if the answer is obvious - anyone would do it, she claims. But they don't. Perhaps it comes from her belief that the struggle is long and our individual lives are short, so we can only advance our chosen cause by inches, knowing others will pick up our baton. "When I die, others will come. I am sure of that," she says.
She certainly has a strong sense of belonging to a long history of Afghans who fought for freedom. "My parents chose my first name after Malalai of Maiwand. She was a young woman who, in 1880, went to the front line of the second Anglo-Afghan war to tend the wounded. When the fighters were close to collapse, she picked up the Afghan flag and led the men into battle herself. She was struck down - but the British suffered a landmark defeat, and, in the end, they were driven out."
When she ran for office, she had to choose a surname for herself, to protect her family's identity. "I named myself after Sarwar Joya, the Afghan poet and constitutionalist. He spent 24 years in jails, and was finally killed because he wouldn't compromise his democratic principles... In Afghanistan we have a saying: the truth is like the sun. When it comes up, nobody can block it out or hide it."
Malalai Joya knows she could be killed any day now, in our newly liberated Warlord-istan. She hugs me goodbye and says, "We must keep in touch." But I find myself bleakly wondering if we will ever meet again. Perhaps she senses this, because she suddenly urges me to look again at the last paragraph of her memoir, Raising My Voice. "It really is how I feel," she says. It reads: "If I should die, and you should choose to carry on my work, you are welcome to visit my grave. Pour some water on it and shout three times. I want to hear your voice." I look up into her face, and she is giving me the bravest smile I have ever seen.
'Raising My Voice' by Malalai Joya can be purchased here. All profits will go to supporting the cause of women's rights in Afghanistan.
You can donate directly to her campaigns here.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















42 comments
What Does a Treadmill Do To you Basically, an exercise routine treadmill is applied for basic screening of coronary coronary heart to get out how fantastic its typical is and how it responds to stress or workout. If you stroll on the treadmill, medical professionals collect material like your cardiovascular electrical activity on ECG while monitoring the blood strain. These details could be interpreted later on to obtain out irrespective of regardless if the heart asks for added oxygen as a reaction.
Healthy hair is an indicator of youth and wellness. The texture and colour of hair is also a signal of ethnic ancestry. African adult males and a lot of women have short, curly hair, whereas Asians are inclined to have prolonged straight hair. Even if a person's hair is obviously curly and wavy, or straight, depends on ethnic ancestry, and the inherited genes from mums and dads. Straight hairstyles are a rage now with superstars, and females are susceptible to adopting hairstyles of their most loved celebrities.
Corioliss Tourmaline Pottery Damp in purchase to Waterless Really good hair times head of hair straigntener will come immensely fundamental. That Great hair days hair straigntener right from Corioliss includes You.75" tourmaline discs. Tourmaline plates develop a great number of occasions the sheer variety of harmful ions than do just about every day porcelain ceramic program. Negative ions in the vicinity of commonly the cuticle tier to establish a smooth, clean wild hair exterior alongside with near up during the scalpers us organic seepage. cheap ghd straighteners Corioliss whet towards not damp hair straightening irons also arrive with Earthenware Extremely ghd straightener cheap a lot of Place Warming.
Find Out More: http://www.straightenerbrands.com/
I first noticed there was something up with Hari when he used unreliable statistics to whip up islamophobia in east London. In response to criticisms Hari blocked a bunchof peole on twitter and other liberals rushed to his defence calling everyone he criticised Hari homophobic. These jibes continued when the allegations regarding Hari's misconduct first appeared earlier this week. I hope they will now accept that their defence of this damaging individual masquerading as the 'voice of the left' is out of place. He does not represent us
I must also credit this for initially finding some of the lifted quotes: http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.com/2011/06/more-evidence-of-johann-ha...
Jeremy Duns found a lot more!
Come on, Guy, Hari’s a great journalist. You might not have heard about the interview he did with South African freedom fighter Yusuf Dadu. By sheer chance, Ron Howard, Ronald Reagan and L Ron Hubbard were there too. They quizzed Hari about a British anti-litter campaign they’d heard about. ‘But who’s the guy behind it, this Bryson fellow?’ they asked, as one. ‘What’s his first name, and when did you meet him, Johann?’ ‘I met him on a Monday, Dadu, Ron, Ron, Ron,’ Hari said. ‘Somebody told me that his name was Bill.’ Now that’s what I call journalism.
"I must also credit this for initially finding some of the lifted quotes"
... Right then. So you'll rag on Johann Hari for taking words said by other people and putting them in the mouths of... those same other people. And to do it you'll nab other people's evidence and not remember to credit them until someone comments on the piece.
Guy, whatever the rights and wrongs of criticising Hari, I think you just invalidated your own right to do so with that little display of hypocrisy.
"Nearly half of the entire piece consists of words that Joya used in the book. And, just to hammer this home - nearly every quote supposedly given to Hari was in fact taken from the book."
Except that's not true is it - the bold type does not make up half and there are lots of unbold quotes
It may be exagerating only by 25% or so - but still - it's ironic in a piece that accuses someone else of bending the facts and exagerating
I like Johann Hari but this is plagarism pure and simple. I would expect better.
Pretty damning stuff. I'm sure Private Eye did a feature on Hari that covered similar ground a few years ago.
Oh, and - "Apologising for her English - which is, in fact, excellent" (15th para from the bottom) - sure puts paid to the idea that Hari was merely polishing up his interviewees inarticulacy.
Hello Guy. Good to see you sojourning from the Daily Telegraph who have also unleashed the attack dogs on poor old Hari. Not quite as shrill as here mind.
As a long time subscriber of the DT I think it a touch unsporting of the NS to be recruiting your services - not to mention confusing.
I mean how many subscriptions can I afford?
Cowley's stewardship is perhaps the most bizarre yet for the NS - and after Kampfner that is saying something. It is hard to pin him down politically. A chameleon and courter of controversialism perhaps? A naked rating-chaser? Who knows? And do your new colleagues know who you are [yet]?
How much is the NS subscription out of interest?
@gwenhwyfaer
Huh? It was an oversight, and I issued the correction before anyone even noticed! (Contrary to what you assert.) How can that possibly be hypocritical? Honest mistake!
Actually I found this interview reproduced here, and the woman being interviewed, Malalai Joya, too interesting and exciting to be really exercised about this "plagiarism" thing. I've tried, but don't find it gripping.. And he *does* mention the lady's book, "Raising My Voice", so really the whole thing is an (exciting) book promo.. And I enjoyed his critical article(s) on Ayn Rand; and noone can accuse him of only pretending to interview her, seeing as she's long dead..
Tell you lads what I'm really more exercised about. It's the fact that British journalism is really such a closed shop of the upper middle classes, and one or two of their pets. I was rather annoyed by an article I found on another journo's thread here. Saying that "journalism is just something you fall into". Oh yeah? If you're privileged, maybe. What if you've actually *studied* for this metier, and yet your entry into it is blocked by a variety of blocks - lack of jobs in the last recession, never mind this one, living in a poor..
..area of the country, local newspapers not wanting to hire, or wanting freelance stories for nothing, and being told on good authority (in the 90s) that "broadsheets like the Guardian prefer Oxbridge graduates because they're.. well you know.. just BETTER." This country has a medieval and nepotistic attitude towards employment (did you know that was one of the factors that made people fight for Communism in China decades ago) and the communications industry. It should grow up and employ people on the basis of fair competition and merit. There should be "journalism exams" like civil service exams. Then maybe you wouldn't have to worry about crap like this.. privileged fools. Oh and your tweet button on this page doesn't work!
@firsttimer It's 1,460 words of a 3,991-word piece. That's nearly half. Most of the rest simply paraphrases the book. The remainder is Hari talking about her running her hands through her hair. An article with two sentences plagiarized as baldly as this would be condemned out of hand. This is plagiarism on a massive scale, and it's one of at least seven 'interviews' that show this pattern. Hari has still not admitted he is a plagiarist. I think your concerns are misdirected.
martin writes, 'Guy Walters lecturing Johann Hari on journalistic integrity is the height of hypocrisy. To be expected of such a sleazy cretinous failure of a journalist like Walters sadly.'
Okay then martin, presumably that's two journalists you'd like to see out of work. That is what you're saying, isn't it?
So the self-congratulatory mass circle jerk among the right wing press over this is still going on then I take it?
Most unedifying for everyone.
PS The piece also doesn't accuse Hari of bending facts or exaggerating. It accuses him of plagiarism and offers proof. Again, I think your conern about the idiomatic 'nearly half' of such a shockingly plagiarized article misses the point massively.
"And I enjoyed his critical article(s) on Ayn Rand"
Did he also write a series of essays about shooting fish in barrels?
A monkey with a crayon could pen a devestating critical article on Ayn Rand, to be honest.
Wouldn't it be easier to actually do the interviews, rather than trawl through books looking for appropriate quotes?
Credibility/trust is everything in this sort of journalism; unfortunately Hari's has gone and so should he. Chris Blackhurst in my experience is a seriously professional journalist and I expect will sort this out.
So are you actually IP-blocking me from posting comments to this article, but not to other articles on the site? That's very strange and interesting.
Harry hart - interviewing properly is hard work. Then comes going over the notes or transcribing the tape. Far easier to sit there, make a rough note of the essentials and then pad it out from work already done by someone else.
Leave it out Cordelia Hope, Gwenhwyfaer and Zakalwe. The tide's turned against you on this one.
Look, no matter how you try, Jonathan Hari is no Sidney Falco character from 'The Sweet Smell of Success'. Falco took the crumbs left on the floor by brooding J J Hunsaker: Burt Lancaster in glasses. Beside such a poisonous cookie as Sidney, Jonathan looks as healthy as a glass of milk.
There are so many media culprits better suited to play Falco,
Of course, Emil Meyer's corrupt cop brings matters to a close. Retribution!
Meyer had always wanted 'to chastise, Sidney'
Let's see how things pan out on the street of shame.
Forget hacking! We'll be back to plain old stool-pidgeons. Cherchez-la-femme?
Squealler
What is most noticeable in these "revelations" is the fact that they are being made at all. There is NOTHING at all new to me about this Mr Hari or any other of the same name or of the same political culture that I could list. It is staggering that "journos" are getting ever so excited about Mr Hari's distorted achievements. But they ought to pause and reflect on the contents of Fleet Street over the past two hundred years.
Even Michael Foot [Evening Standard, Daily Express, Tribune] was taken in, as he exhibited in his "debt" of "honour" to Beverbrook. There is in this Hari peddling yet another consciously created conundrum as a cover to justify lying.
The test surely is this: how many peddlers of Big Business lying in the "Feet Street" culture will quit the wrongdoing habit?
An even tougher test is: how many will show true grit and tell on the many other Hari like perpetrators and fakers? How many will break ranks and start reporting what they already know about how banks loot and plunder the public.....
guy_debord writes, 'So the self-congratulatory mass circle jerk among the right wing press over this is still going on then I take it?'
I thought it was known as 'producing further evidence' you naughty old dead Situationist you. By the way, as Hari interviewed you be lifting quotes from 'Society of the Spectacle' yet?
On his website johannhari.com, there is an article about his experience with anti-depressant drugs (http://johannhari.com/2007/03/22/robbie-i-know-how-you-feel-i-ve-been-there). It contains the following quote: "And so it continued for ten years. I glided through University, into journalism, into a great group of friends and through some sweet boyfriends. Then last year I began to realise that ever since I became anti-depressed, some strange characteristics had sunk into my personality. I would rack up huge amounts of debt and not feel any anxiety about it. I would take wild risks - like getting into fights in public - and not feel any sense of fear. On the rare occassions I felt bad, I would just pop an extra pill and it would
disappear. At times, I began to think I was locked in a new human state I called 'anti-depression': manic, resillient, impermeable. I realised I could spot other anti-depressed people at parties or in the office in a matter of minutes. But I had been taking Seroxat all my adult life, so it was hard to tell where the Seroxat ended and I began. Was this just my personality?"
At the time I thought this was a brave and insightful piece of writing, which it still is!, but now one gets tempted to draw some extra conclusions from it.
@Freeman: I'd despair over Debord's spoken language if quotes from Society of the Spectacle were more coherent.
When he does meet his interviewees, it appears he doesn't always check his facts...
http://folio.me.uk/2009/11/chasing-wild-geese/
(not to say that it's not a valuable piece of work, but it is a dense and difficult read)
A close friend of ours used to write reports on football matches he had watched and then hand them over to a senior sports reporter with a byline.
This senior journalist was more than a little squiffy by the time he got the report but everything went well until our friend left the game he was reporting on five minutes early.
Two injuries sustained by the 'certainty' team and then an own goal and a penalty sank them.
The paper's Sports Editior knowing of his reporter's penchant for a tipple assumed he had left a little early for a pick-me-up. All was forgiven.
Our friend was soon looking for another job. He was tagged unreliable.
Luck of the Game
"It was an oversight, and I issued the correction before anyone even noticed!"
And who's to say nobody noticed before you corrected it? Cheap escape route.
Walters' obsession with Hari is beyond a joke and much worse than he realises.
The pals are gathering round:
'eyespymp Eye Spy MP
Friday afternoon, Gatwick train, Baroness Helena Kennedy of Media Standards Trust on mobile reassuring Johann Hari'
Media Standards Trust - 'An independent registered charity fostering high standards in news media on behalf of the public.'
A joke, surely.
Have you people completely ballsed up your whole site - or are you just somehow blocking comments you don't like on particular threads, as someone above said? (And, NS, your site *is* frequently bugridden and your tweets *don't* work!)
Pity, "neurotic" above missed my comment on his nonsense - and he *obviously* has no idea really what a big deal Rand is in America, to the Tea Party and all - so he wouldn't realise how important an expose saying how she was in love with the ideas of a young serial killer might be.
Oh and I read not long ago that plagiarism has become the big deal in US universities: because it's about the only thing you can tell students not to do.. PC has rendered all other criticism/censure meaningless or toothless.. things like history, ideology, they don't matter.. only plagiarism.. yeah right.
I do think that Mr Hari has been taking the mickey a little here. But can anyone prove that he has distorted the outlooks of those whom he interviewed by adding in these bits from other interviews and articles of theirs? Compared to the outright distortions for which some journalists have been responsible, not least a certain one at the Guardian concerning Noam Chomsky -- see
here and here -- his misdemeanours are relatively mild.
The links somehow disappeared from my previous post.
They are:
< http://www.medialens.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=41... >
And
< http://www.medialens.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=42... >
How anyone can excuse such shoddy, lazy and deceitful journalism astounds me. The man's a fraud - if all it takes to win the Orwell Prize for political journalism is to do a hatchet job on other journalists' work; not acknowledge any sources and wazz it up with a few lies then quite clearly the award isn't worth winning.
More examples of Mr Hari's unique journalism are surfacing daily and it would appear he's been doing it undetected for many years.
The silly boy has managed to pull the wool over the eyes of a great many supposedly intelligent people.
So here's an interesting point. Guy Walters actually used my comments in a puff piece for him and his buddy James Delingpole.
At no point did Guy Walters try to contact me to verify these comments or discuss context. Mainly I suspect because for Walters turning on a Laptop is a feat of technically awareness.
Basics for a good journalist are to verify and corroborate. These things matter not to the cultural and technological Luddite that is Walters. A man wallowing in World War 2 obsession because he can't cope with the present.
I'm not just one anecdote in this. Walters consistently relies on the most appalling opinion based rather than fact based writing. He's a disgrace to the trade.
Guy Walters lecturing Johann Hari on journalistic integrity is the height of hypocrisy. To be expected of such a sleazy cretinous failure of a journalist like Walters sadly.
It seems that Walters is a friend of that flake Darenpole or something. James have you noticed it is a bit warm recently? Nevertheless, what Hari did is unforgivable.
'mcquade
01 July 2011 at 20:09
And who's to say nobody noticed before you corrected it? Cheap escape route.'
Awesome for logic and irony. Plus, as a bonus, a further discount.