Return to: Home | Blogs | Fourth Estate

Would Cameron lose a Lisbon referendum?

Who would win a post-ratification vote?

We all know that David Cameron will renege on his pledge to hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, but what would the result be if one was called?

Over at Comment Central, Daniel Finkelstein suggests the No campaign would be defeated. He writes: "Why would the result of a post-ratification referendum be different to one held before ratification? Simple. People react differently to overturning the established position than they do to changing it [sic]."

I'm unconvinced. Labour and the Lib Dems would present a vote against Lisbon as tantamount to a vote for EU withdrawal (and they'd be right) but that could actually encourage more voters to reject the treaty. Given the anti-establishment mood, it would be remarkable if voters approved the creation of an EU president and foreign minister. A newly elected Conservative government could also claim a mandate to campaign against the treaty.

A September YouGov poll suggested that 43 per cent of voters would rather leave the EU than accept Lisbon without a vote. It'll be worth keeping an eye on Ukip's poll ratings in the days after Cameron's statement tomorrow.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

Philip Lingard
03 November 2009 at 13:52

As a committed European, I would warmly welcome a vote on whatever the new Conservative Government concocts as a question to be put to the electorate.

The arguments in favour of the EU never get a hearing in the UK these days and I am convinced that in a focussed referendum campaign, the pro-EU arguments would win as decisively as they did in Wilson's referendum.

Kris
03 November 2009 at 21:55

I hate the EU, and I'm looking forward to giving my vote to UKIP next year.

Khan
04 November 2009 at 01:17

Cameron has already reneged on it. No surprise there then.

Gospel of Enoch
04 November 2009 at 09:09

Phil: Arguments? What arguments? A few years back Chris Booker offered champagne for the best pro-EU argument; no-one won...

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

What was easyJet thinking?

20 November 2009 16:08

Tories would create 'Berlusconi's Britain'

20 November 2009 15:17

Harman on the ropes

20 November 2009 10:35

Eurosceptics won't like this...

19 November 2009 13:06

Clinton's crush on Miliband

19 November 2009 09:28

Is Archie Norman's appointment bad news for the Tories?

18 November 2009 15:15

Twitter and libertarianism

18 November 2009 10:14

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker