The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

PMQs should be held twice a week

Two rounds of PMQs a week would increase accountability

The shadow leader of the Commons, Sir George Young, has suggested that Prime Minister's Questions should be moved to Thursday evenings to allow more people to watch it.

The "bicycling baronet" has a point. How many people, other than political journalists, can take half an hour out of their day to watch PMQs on a Wednesday? It's also a smart way to ensure MPs don't hurry back to their constituencies early on Thursday.

But if MPs really want to increase scrutiny of the executive they should return to having two 15-minute sessions a week rather than the one half-hour session introduced by Tony Blair in 1997.

As my former PoliticsHome colleague Nick Assinder has argued, the move to one weekly session limited accountability by ensuring that anything that happened after Wednesday couldn't be raised in the chamber for a week. Reintroducing the shorter sessions would also allow less time for questions planted by the whips.

Gordon Brown should steal a march on Cameron and introduce this reform before Young's proposals are taken up by the Tory leader.

 

Sign up to the New Statesman newsletter and receive weekly updates from the team

1 comment

swatantra's picture

No it wouldn't. It would just be an imposition on the Parties to turn up twice to hear questions being answered or not answered. No, the present in depth questioning for half an hour is about right. However, Camerons questions could be cut down to 4 so as to give more time to Backbenchers. What would help is if Backbenchers would not so blatantly publicise their own good work in their own constituencies.

Latest tweets