PMQs should be held twice a week
Two rounds of PMQs a week would increase accountability
By George Eaton Published 24 November 2009 14:45
The shadow leader of the Commons, Sir George Young, has suggested that Prime Minister's Questions should be moved to Thursday evenings to allow more people to watch it.
The "bicycling baronet" has a point. How many people, other than political journalists, can take half an hour out of their day to watch PMQs on a Wednesday? It's also a smart way to ensure MPs don't hurry back to their constituencies early on Thursday.
But if MPs really want to increase scrutiny of the executive they should return to having two 15-minute sessions a week rather than the one half-hour session introduced by Tony Blair in 1997.
As my former PoliticsHome colleague Nick Assinder has argued, the move to one weekly session limited accountability by ensuring that anything that happened after Wednesday couldn't be raised in the chamber for a week. Reintroducing the shorter sessions would also allow less time for questions planted by the whips.
Gordon Brown should steal a march on Cameron and introduce this reform before Young's proposals are taken up by the Tory leader.
Sign up to the New Statesman newsletter and receive weekly updates from the team
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















1 comment
No it wouldn't. It would just be an imposition on the Parties to turn up twice to hear questions being answered or not answered. No, the present in depth questioning for half an hour is about right. However, Camerons questions could be cut down to 4 so as to give more time to Backbenchers. What would help is if Backbenchers would not so blatantly publicise their own good work in their own constituencies.