We're a small tea shop in Brighton - read about our recent experience of Nick Griffin and whether we think he should be on Question Time: www.metrodeco.wordpress.com

HO!! no he's NOT!! you know....

Enoch Powell was ahead of his time.

Nick made them all look like the anti-white lefty/Communists they are.

Go back to those halcyon days before Windrush.All the spuds you could eat, slums,TB,rickets, the hungry thirties. Stout English yeomen doffing their caps to the Queen Mum. Where I live mate not a black face within a radius of ten miles,poor and ill educated. You know what broke our socio economic equilibrium not Johnny Foreigner, but little England's pin up girl Mrs T.

As usual for the New Statesman magazine, a misguided article totally missing out the key arguments on why we urgently need to control immigration. Its nothing to do with the contribution of immigrants, nobody doubts that in most cases. The Labour Govt are incapable of honestly discussing the subject because they are from a class of politicians who associate race with immigration as one subject and are paralysed by political correctness. They are huge cowards and are prepared to sacrifice everybodies quality of life knowing and conveniently ommitted from your text that 80% of British people want immigration cut dramatically.

Key reasons for balanced migration-
1/ Overcrowded- 400 people per square km in England.
Where do we put another 10 million people forcasted in the next 25 years?The govt is already 2 million houses short for the people we have. Do we build on green belt, farmland or national parks? Either way we a going to dramatically reduce quality of life and radically increase congestion. If we have to build 10 cities the size of Birmingham, that would be CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT. No govt has the right to take that decision without serious debate.

2/ Carbon emmissions- We need new power stations for our existing population. Another 10 million would be unsustainable.

3/ Water shortage- Although a wet climate we cannot store enough water for parts of the country already.How do we provide for another 10 million.

4/ National Identity and culture - I know the left and liberals hate British culture and heritage and long to air brush it from these islands but not everbody feels that way. The spectre of a northern Ireland problem in every British county could materialise as White British feel alienated and undervalued as mass immigration continues to surplant them and their culture.

5/ Down ward pressure on wages. Intellectual leftists may not be aware but average pay rates for working men in building , plumbing etc have plummeted. More labour supply makes businesses richer and workers poorer.

6/ Sustainable food security- Another 10 million people in the next 25 years would be totally reliant on food imports as we build on farmland to provide housing and infastructure. Is it right to do that when we are trying to reduce carbon emmissions? What if countries stop exporting to us?

The immigration debate should be about numbers not race. GB is a a small island and can not cope with an influx of a further 10 million in 20 years. Hospitals, housing, schools and roads that are struggling now will be crippled. This lefty fluffiness on the issue is missing the point.

Come down from your ideological Ivory Towers!

The Liberal Left Bleeding Heart Do-Gooders have now had many years of playing with Britain's once stable socio-economic dynamics: wooly Liberal thinking has ruined education: the "Justice" system: and much else.

Of course mass unfettered and as we now know, cynically engineered migration has ruined Britain: at no time until now that it is far too late, have any series of checks and balances on education, apposite skills and employability been instituted.

Whole areas have been transformed into sorts of Ghettoised cultural transplants of the migrant's home states. Leeds and Bradford are amongst far too many examples.

Trotting out the old tired statistics on illusory tax benefits fails to conceal the whole story: first, if migrants stay, then they add a further drain on health and retirement resources: without having had sufficient timespan to have adequately contributed.

There aren't anough homes: there weren't even before immigration started way back in the early 1950s.

Schools have suffered: multitudinous languages are a barrier to educational success and have unfairly discriminated against those children whose natural language was English. They have been held back.

As integration - the dream of Ivory Tower dwellers such as Hattersley - failed to happen, then the inane Left Wing Liberals dreamt up a new word for their failure: Multiculturalism.

Whilst then passing statutes to favour incomers and punish extant members of this society who dared to protest about the destruction of their culture and social fabric!

Of course BNP's new success is driven by immigration and multiculturalism!

Simply examine the geographical areas in which they are enjoying success!

Field and Soames at least have their eyes on the ball.

You don't.